|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
How England's tendency to bowl short on the fourth day nearly cost them the match
August 7, 2005
Throughout the first three days of the Edgbaston Test, Steve Harmison and Andrew Flintoff bowled with impeccable control on a slow pitch: they realised the futility of bowling short, and instead kept the ball up to the bat. With victory only sniffing distance away, though, they lost the plot completely, reverting to short-pitched bowling. It looked good on television, and occasionally caused the batsmen - particularly Brett Lee - physical discomfort, but it did little for England's cause. As the graphic shows, the short ball is a great option when used as a surprise weapon, but when overdone, it becomes an excellent run-scoring opportunity for the batsmen - even Australia's tailenders managed to get those 28 deliveries away for 30 runs, whereas on the third day their top order only eked out five from 15.
Meanwhile, England's win at Edgbaston means that the venue continues to be a lucky one for them - they've won 21 Tests and lost just seven here, while Australia's win-loss record has gone down to 3-5.
What's wrong with their cricket? Well, what isn't?