Australia in India 2012-13

'I missed bowling in Chennai' - Watson

As India's batsmen piled on runs in Chennai, Watson was itching to take the ball confirming in his mind that giving up bowling wouldn't be a permanent move

Brydon Coverdale

February 28, 2013

Comments: 47 | Text size: A | A


Shane Watson bears a frustrated look as Sri Lanka batsmen continue to thwart the attack, Australia v Sri Lanka, 1st Test, Hobart, 5th day, December 18, 2012
Shane Watson: "The decision I made is more a longer-term decision to get some running and conditioning into my legs, so when I start bowling again, my body has more chance of handling it" © Getty Images
Enlarge

If Shane Watson's commitment to playing as a batsman only on this tour was ever going to be tested, standing in the field for 154.3 overs during India's the first innings in Chennai was the time. As the runs piled up for India and Australia's attack struggled for impact they missed Watson's bowling, and Watson missed being part of it. But he said while the possibility of bowling later on the tour had crossed his mind, he knew that for the sake of his fitness and form, he had to stick to his plan.

Over the past few years in Test cricket, Watson has had a happy knack of breaking partnerships and an unhappy habit of breaking down. His most recent injury, the problem with his left calf that ruled him out of the third Test against Sri Lanka in January and the one-day series that followed, prompted him to declare that he would give up bowling for the Test tour of India to concentrate on his batting, and on stringing together as much cricket as he could.

Having missed the whole of the previous Australian Test summer due to calf and hamstring injuries, and then the Brisbane and Adelaide Tests against South Africa, Watson decided his best option was to temporarily give up bowling. As India's batsmen put on a series of frustrating partnerships in Chennai, Watson was itching to take the ball and he said the experience had confirmed in his mind that giving up bowling would not be a permanent move.

"That was a time that reaffirmed to me that I do want to bowl," Watson said. "That was a time where if I hadn't have made the decision not to bowl for this tour that I could have had some input on the game at a crucial time in the match. That to me was the first time over the last month since I came back that I missed bowling.

"The decision I made is more a longer-term decision to get some running and conditioning into my legs, so when I start bowling again, my body has more chance of handling it. I do appreciate the decision but it certainly reaffirmed to me that I'm never going to give up bowling. It excites me having some input on the game, especially when what I do could have an influence on a certain part of the game."

For the time being, Watson's plan is to resume bowling during the second half of the IPL with the ultimate goal of being able to contribute with the ball during Australia's Ashes tour of England in July and August. He said while the thought of bowling at some point on the Indian tour was tempting - he has taken 12 wickets at 33.41 in his past six Tests in the country - he was resigned to the fact that his existing plan was a better long-term idea.

"That thought has gone through my mind a few times but I suppose we do have to stay on course," Watson said. "There were reasons why I made that decision - to try and get my body conditioned enough to get back into my bowling.

"I know I've needed two or three months just to be able to get some conditioning into my body, to then hopefully hold together for the next period of time once I get back bowling again. There is a big reason why I'm not bowling at the moment - in between the Test matches to get some running into my legs to continue to build that resilience, so I can hopefully just stay together."

In committing to his long-term plan to stay on the field, Watson took advice from Cricket Australia's medical staff as well as his personal physio, Viktor Popov, and it was made after discussing the idea with the captain Michael Clarke. The bowling issue came to a head after the Hobart Test against Sri Lanka, when Watson bowled 47.4 overs, easily the most he had ever sent down in a game, and he struggled with his calf in the next Test.

"I took a lot of information in at the time, especially through the summer having the same calf injury again and also the amount I bowled in Hobart, that was the most I've ever bowled in my career in four or five-day cricket," Watson said. "I knew my body could handle it, it was more so backing up to handle it again. I had to get the right conditioning in my legs, things like running technique, doing all those things to give myself a better chance to hold together my body when I'm bowling.

"But I also need to be more careful in the future about the overs I do bowl. One, I have the chance to do it more consistently and have less chance of injury but also there were times when it affected my batting, more so in Test cricket over the last 12 to 18 months, especially when I was opening. There were a number of reasons why I made that decision, most importantly is trying to score some runs in Test cricket as well."

To that end, Watson has been working in the nets on his footwork, with the intention of being able to come down the pitch to India's spinners rather than simply playing back as he has on previous tours of India. He made 84 and 60 during the warm-up match against India A and showed encouraging glimpses in the first Test but was unable to build a big score, falling for 28 in the first innings and 17 in the second.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by line.and.length on (March 1, 2013, 14:31 GMT)

This so-called "long-term plan" has been going on ever since Watson first got his baggy green... there is no doubt that on talent and ability alone Watson deserves a place in the test playing XI, however, apart from his occasional "handy" quick runs and wickets, the role he has played most consistently is as the one player who has made sure that Australia has not been able to have a settled side... he's in the side, may or may not perform, then he's then injured and out again, then automatically walks/limps back into the side again. I'm not saying it's anything it's his or anyone else's fault, but it is what it is. ... even if he played over 3-4 more years, how many of those tests would he be able to play? I remember Callum Ferguson was beginning to cement his place in the odi side and even on the verge of a test call-up not that long ago, gets injured and has to prove himself again.... the NSP have to plan for the future Oz cricket, not Watson's future

Posted by ScottStevo on (March 1, 2013, 13:32 GMT)

@MadHamish, I was going to make the same point re Watson at opener! Really, we need to drop Cowan and push Watson back to the top. It's obvious he feels comforatble/confident there. Bring in Khawaja in the middle order, say 6 or 4. Please, no more talk of moving Clarke in the order - so sick of it. The guy is scoring bucket loads at 5 - why move him? Just find someone to fill the spots around him. Also, there's a lot being made of Henriques after one good test match. I'm glad he played well, but you have to understand the guys 1st class batting average is only 30, so it'll be very interesting to see how he goes from here. His excellent debut warrants his spot in the next, but please don't be fooled into thinking this guy is a worthy number 6. Yes, I know he's batting at 7, but it's disgraceful to see Wade at 6, not even Gilly batted at 6 and Wade is no Gilly. In fact, I'd be quite happy to see the back of Wade - too immature for test cricket, I'd rather see Paine. Also, Maxwell is a no

Posted by   on (March 1, 2013, 12:34 GMT)

watto should practice alot to be bowling with out getting injured

Posted by rohanbala on (March 1, 2013, 9:13 GMT)

It looks as though Watson is trying to justify his place in the playing XI after having failed miserably in the first test at Chennai. What is the use of calling himself as an all rounder when he cant bowl and scores only 20s and 30s with the bat?

Posted by   on (March 1, 2013, 9:09 GMT)

Watto - Follow the work ethics of Mr. Kallis.

Posted by DINESHCC on (March 1, 2013, 8:06 GMT)

MEETY: "definitely NEEDS to bowl to be WORTH his spot in the team". You forgot his 18 ball five wickets burst against SA in SA during 2011-12.

Posted by whofriggincares on (March 1, 2013, 5:11 GMT)

@ Rednwhitearmy, now that is rich taking potshots at the Aussies for imported players. Henriques moved to Australia at the age of 1 and Ahmed hasnt even played a test yet ,although I think he will. The only way the english have become competitive has been to stock the side with players that have not only been born in another country but learned to play cricket away as well. 10 Aussies 11 South Africans , 11 West Indians (including Cowans,Small,Defreitas,Malcolm, and Lewis has their ever been a quality quick born in england?) Throw in a Zimbabwean, (Hick) a kenyan (pringle). Gee a lot of your quality players have been born elsewhere.61 imported players in your test history ,now that is a huge percentage. perhaps you should call yourself rednwhitengreennbluenblacknorangenyellownbrownnmarroonngreynArmy .Why not cover all the flags of your reps.And dont forget the Saffers without them you would still be trying to win back the Ashes LOL. Dont ignore your heritage!

Posted by   on (March 1, 2013, 4:23 GMT)

Overrated all rounder who gets lucky with the ball.

Posted by Meety on (March 1, 2013, 4:19 GMT)

Watson is on the verge of another flip flop. Definately an opener, definately a #3, definately a #4, definately an allrounder, definately a specialist batsmen, definately NEEDS to bowl to be WORTH his spot in the team (based on his Test batting stats of late).

Posted by jmcilhinney on (March 1, 2013, 2:47 GMT)

Watson says that he missed bowling but, if he had had a bowl on that pitch in Chennai then maybe he would have felt differently. Obviously CA have a plan for Watson but it's hard to see how anything will change regarding his fitness. He's almost 32 so if he hasn't been able to bat and bowl without injury so far then I don't see that changing. If Watson can't bowl or Henriques proves a success as an all-rounder then I feel that Watson's only chance of staying in the team is if he opens the batting and is more successful there than his overall record. He'd need to average at least mid forties going forward to warrant a place as a batsman alone you'd think.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.
Tour Results
India v Australia at Delhi - Mar 22-24, 2013
India won by 6 wickets
India v Australia at Mohali - Mar 14-18, 2013
India won by 6 wickets
India v Australia at Hyderabad (Deccan) - Mar 2-5, 2013
India won by an innings and 135 runs
India v Australia at Chennai - Feb 22-26, 2013
India won by 8 wickets
India A v Australians at Chennai - Feb 16-18, 2013
Match drawn
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days