|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Vaneisa Baksh's take on the fourth day's events in St Kitts where Brian Lara chose not to enforce the follow on after West Indies had gained a first-innings lead of 219
June 25, 2006
Within half an hour of the fourth day's play, three wickets had eloped with Jerome Taylor. His first victim was Rahul Dravid, caught on 22 with the overnight score only rising by seven to 157. It changed expectations of a long day of Indian batting right up to another draw. When the next two ran off with the score unmoved on 159 - ducks to both Yuvraj Singh and Mohammed Kaif - expectations of at least a batting fiesta dimmed. All eyes had turned to Mahendra Singh Dhoni to inject some wildness into the equation, but with half an hour before lunch, he was lbw to Corey Collymore.
It was a day that surprised by how well it favoured the West Indian fast bowlers, especially given the flat nature of the pitch that demanded a workingman's application to yield anything. Three wickets went to Collymore, the hardest working man on the team, as reward for his endurance. Two went to Pedro Collins, though at the end of the day he pulled up with cramps and had to leave the field. There is hope that overnight rest will restore him. Two went to Dwayne Bravo, the slowest of the quartet of bowlers.
But they all had their pickings mainly thanks to Taylor running off with the middle order. It must have been a boost to Taylor, struggling back after going empty-handed in the previous games. With only five Tests under his belt, one would have thought it would have merited a whole heap of celebration, but at the post-match press conference, he was strangely unenthusiastic.
Asked whether he had enjoyed the pitch, "absolutely not!" came his emphatic response. It was not a helpful pitch, he complained, it forced the bowler to have to work too hard. His captain didn't mind that quality too much: "It's a pitch where you have to work hard. It's a good pitch, a bit of unevenness at times but you got to cater for that in a Test. I was quite pleased with the outcome of it. Guys have to work hard and they are putting in the hard work. With five days of cricket, any surface tends to deteriorate. We're hoping that would happen tomorrow," Lara said.
So it seemed odd to hear Taylor express such disdain to the demands of a pitch that had yielded three quickies in short time, but then he also admitted that he was happy with his captain's choice not to send the Indian team back in even when they were 219 behind in the first innings. Lara's choice to bat again had stumped most. Explaining that his bowlers were tired and Collins had seemed iffy, Lara said there was never any question in his mind about sending India back in. "Why will I enforce the follow-on with 221 runs when I have the chance to defend 400 and bowl the opposition out rather than asking them to bat and maybe having to bat again?" he asked impatiently. "It's a situation where the pitch is going to deteriorate on the last day and you want as much of advantage as possible. You want your bowlers fresh and I don't think there was any other way to look at it."
It was clear that there would not have been support from his bowlers had he chosen to do otherwise. Taylor, at 22, might have been expected to be pumped up and ready to go given his early success. Indeed, in extraordinarily hot conditions, they had actually bowled out the opposition in one day. But Taylor was not at all enthusiastic at the prospect, coldly pointing out the fact that he had bowled 25 overs in the day and would be happier to have a break before coming back to bowl another 25. Fast bowlers are not known to love long spells, except maybe Wes Hall, but Taylor will find that sometimes duty calls beyond love. If Collins were to have been more seriously injured, Taylor's 25 overs would have been just the beginning of a long spell if he, and the team, wanted an outright victory.
Lara said that he wanted to put the pressure on India and it is clear he is contemplating more than a draw. "Coming into the match we talked about doing what India had done to us in the previous games - putting runs on the board and putting pressure. That's what happened. Getting 580-odd definitely put India on the back foot. India had to fight to get into a position of safety and so far they haven't." Once again, anything is possible.
Vaneisa Baksh is a freelance journalist based in TrinidadFeeds: Vaneisa Baksh
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
2014 in review: Save for the rout of Zimbabwe, 2014 was a year of suspensions and demoralising defeats for Bangladesh
Ian Chappell: One of these days there's going to be an ugly altercation between players on the field
2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe
Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players
The Beige Brigade salivate over B Mac's incredible feats and sixes, and the deliciousness that is Hagley Park
In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?
Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one
As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence
Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket
Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things
A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers
To consider banning it in the wake of Phillip Hughes' death may be knee-jerk, but to refuse to consider the pros and cons of a ban is unwise