November 25, 2009

The vincible and the untouchable

Records that are vulnerable to the passage of time, and those that are safe forever

The gods of sport always did have a way reaching out to us from beyond the grave. Last Thursday, on the very day he was formally, albeit posthumously, inducted into the ICC Hall of Fame, one of Sir Donald Bradman's most durable peaks finally fell, when Mahela and Prasanna Jayawardene overhauled the 73-year-old Test record sixth-wicket partnership The Don set in consort with Jack Fingleton in the third 1936-37 Ashes Test against England at the MCG. Thus, almost without a murmur, was the international game's most venerable record alliance toppled.

Personally speaking, beyond the requisite sense of awe, the impact of the Jayawardenes' liaison was immediate and practical. For the past five years, my first-year sports journalism students at the University of Brighton have been force-fed everything there was to know about that Bradman-Fingleton stand, presaged as that particular feat of derring-do was by one of the rare instances of a Test captain reversing his batting order (the West Indies' Jackie Grant pulled a similar stroke in Bridgetown in 1935). Thus did the students discover that the term "sticky wicket" actually carries a literal as well as a metaphorical meaning - Bradman's enterprising decision, after all, was prompted by the treacherous vagaries of that Melbourne pitch. A correction was winging its way into the students' inboxes before noon.

That same day, stunningly enough, brought news of another fresh peak, this time from New Zealand, where Peter McGlashan, the Northern Districts wicketkeeper, beat the record for most catches in a first-class fixture with 12, usurping the mark set by Surrey's Arnold Long 45 years ago and subsequently equalled no fewer than a dozen times.

Not unnaturally, the expiration of these records set me thinking. Which long-lived landmarks are the least vulnerable to the passing of time? And which are the most susceptible? Let's begin with the latter:

1) Arthur Fagg's twin double-centuries (71 years)
At Colchester in 1938, the Kent opener, who would umpire more than three times as many Tests as he would bat in (18 to five), dominated the visitors' first innings to such a voracious extent that he accounted for 244 of their 429 runs. Having ensured a lead of 79, he then went out and piled on a further 202 not out in just 170 minutes, becoming the only man in first-class annals ever to rack up a double ton in each innings. Given that first-class fixtures, for all their increasing scarcity, now tend to encompass four days, and such is the helter-skelter rate of modern scoring, it is far from inconceivable that Phil Hughes, to cite but the most obvious candidate, will match Fagg before he is done.

2) Oscar Scott: most runs conceded in a Test (79 years)
In Kingston in 1930, England ransacked the hapless West Indies wrist-spinner for 374 runs - 266 in the first innings, 108 in the second. Against India last winter, however, Jason Krejza, took 12 wickets on debut but came within 17 runs of annexing arguably the least desirable Test bowling record of all. Given that there have been five other instances of a bowler yielding 268-plus over the past 15 years (Anil Kumble did so twice), who can say how much longer Scott's nadir will stand?

3) Jack Gregory: most catches by an outfielder in a Test series (88 years)
Gregory's mark of 15 has stood since the 1920-21 Ashes encounter, since when Greg Chappell (14 in the 1974-75 Ashes) has come closest, with Bobby Simpson (twice), Brian Lara (twice) and Rahul Dravid all managing 13. You might have thought, with the gradual erosion of the five-Test series, that Gregory was pretty safe. Since the start of 1997, nevertheless, there have been 19 instances of a fielder taking 10 catches or more, including seven in a four-match series, two in three-Test rubbers, and one, by Stephen Fleming, in a two-matcher. Do hold your breath.

Over the past dozen years no fewer than 18 first-up totals of 400-plus have led to defeat, and nine in excess of 440, headed by Australia's 556 against India at Adelaide in 2003-04. Yesterday's surefire insurance is today's opening gambit

4) Bill Ponsford: first-class centuries in most consecutive matches (83 years)
Bradman's erstwhile sparring partner notched a hundred in 10 successive first-class matches in 1926-27, three more than Bradman himself managed in 1931-32 and Ernest Tyldesley did in 1926. The best such streak since has been six, by David Boon (on the 1993 Ashes tour), Lara (1993-94) and Jacques Kallis (2003-04), but with time running out on the most prolific first-class career of the modern era, who would bet against Mark Ramprakash trumping Ponny? Given that he set the extant record for most consecutive first-class scores of 150-plus, with five in 2006, certainly not me.

5) Australia: highest first-innings Test total in a losing cause (115 years)
The only significant record to survive an entire century - Australia totted up 586 but still fell prey to the first of only three instances of a side enforcing the follow-on and losing. Over the past dozen years, however, no fewer than 18 first-up totals of 400-plus have led to defeat, and nine in excess of 440, headed by Australia's 556 against India at Adelaide in 2003-04. Yesterday's surefire insurance is today's opening gambit.

NOW FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES. Yes, there are some venerable invulnerable ancients, such as the lowest first-class total, 6 (by The Bs - yes, every member of the side's surname began with the second letter of the alphabet - against All England at Lord's in 1810), a shameful milestone rendered all the more astonishing when one considers that the only sub-16 score since 1922 remains Surrey's pathetic 14 against Essex in a mad final hour at Chelmsford in 1983. Furthermore, the odds against a 30-year career are now so prohibitive that Wilfred Rhodes' 4204 first-class wickets (the next-best by anybody who has played since the start of the 1960s is Derek Shackleton's 2857) and Jack Hobbs' 199 first-class centuries (Ramprakash is the leading active player, with 108, and it is quite likely nobody will ever broach three figures again) and 61,760 first-class runs (nobody since Walter Hammond has aggregated 50,000) are all assault-proof. Opportunity, crucially, no longer knocks with quite the same insistence.

One-offs, conversely, may be more trumpable than suspected. Take Hedley Verity's freakish 10 for 10 for Yorkshire against Nottinghamshire in 1932. It may have endured for 77 summers, yet as recently as 1995-96, Naeem Akhtar took 10 for 28 for Rawalpindi B against Peshawar.

The following, nevertheless, are the five landmarks - in no specific order - that seem set to defy all challenges:

1) Donald Bradman: highest Test average (61 years)
Sport's most famous four-figure number - 99.94 - remains more than half as impressive again as the next best. Not even Usain Bolt can claim to be that superior. Every bit as staggeringly breathtaking today as it was in 1948. That first-class average of 95.14 (nobody else has contrived a mean of 72) isn't too shabby either.

2) Jim Laker: most wickets in a match (53 years)
Nineteen wickets. In a Test to boot. Nobody else in first-class history has ever taken 18 - unless, that is, one counts Henry Arkwright, who recorded 18-96 for Gentlemen of MCC v Gentlemen of Kent in a 12-a-side match in 1861, and Frederick Lilywhite, about whose feat for the Players against the 16-man Gents at Lord's in 1837 not even the number of runs conceded is known. Since that magical week at Old Trafford in 1956, moreover, only John Davison, for Canada against the USA in 2004, has reaped 17. It's a toss-up as to whether 99.94 or 19 for 90 is the most fabulous figure in cricket annals - what is it about the number nine? Maybe The Beatles had something?

3) Arthur Sims and Victor Trumper: highest eighth-wicket stand (95 years)
At Lancaster Park, Christchurch, on the last day of February, 1914, Victor Trumper, batting at a lowly No. 9 in the Australians' order, came in to join Arthur Sims with the tourists having struggled to 209 for 7 in response to Canterbury's 92 all out. By the time Trumper was caught for 293, the eighth-wicket pair had added 433 in a shade over three hours of controlled mayhem. Only one partnership for the eighth wicket has ever come within 140 runs of that seemingly impregnable zenith: 313 by Wasim Akram and Saqlain Mushtaq for Pakistan against Zimbabwe in 1996-97.

4) Don Bradman: most first-class double-centuries (61 years)
Again, scoring rates may possibly render this vincible, but concentration spans will probably ensure it isn't. Consider this: behind Bradman's 37 stands Hammond, with 36, but Patsy Hendren (22) is the only other batsman to have managed more than 17. Of the moderns, Graeme Hick (16) and Ramprakash (15) stand tallest.

5) SF Barnes: most wickets in a Test series (96 years)
Opportunity has something to do with it, yes. Of the eight instances of a bowler taking 40 or more wickets in a single rubber, all bar one have required at least five Tests, and four needed six. The remarkable exception, though, is Barnes, whose 49 South African scalps at 10.93 apiece in 1913-14 encompassed just four matches. The tragedy with Barnes is that there is no footage of him at his awesome, unprecedented peak. For once, we simply have to take genius on trust.

As an addendum, it is also worth noting that we will soon have a new trio of records to gawp at. Ricky Ponting and/or Sachin Tendulkar will hoist the bar for Test centuries and runs to unthinkable heights; Muttiah Muralitharan will do likewise for the number of Test wickets. These will be the new Untouchables. Given that Test matches appear destined to become a dying breed, their reign may last for centuries.

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • TMS8137 on December 23, 2009, 15:19 GMT

    I have a question if batsman of the modern day are so good, what with modern equipment, protection and smaller boundaries, shouldnt grest modern bowlers be the best of all time so that they are able to tackle batsmen with all these advantages. going by this dale steyn with an average of 22 or so and a strike rate in the 40's and muttiah muralitharan should be the greatest bowlers of all time.

  • santhoshkudva on December 14, 2009, 16:58 GMT

    how about the records held by warne, ponting and mcgrath? featuring in 90+ test victories?

  • santhoshkudva on December 14, 2009, 16:54 GMT

    i think some records have stood unbroken only BY CHANCE. for example laker's 19, verity's 10-10, reggie foster debut knock, and surrey's collapse. they could be broken any day. however, records held by the great hobbs, bradman, barnes etc will take some beating, since it demands consistency over a length of time. A sehwag in good form can break lara's 501 playing for delhi against tripura, but i doubt if he can ever surpass the don's tally of 37 double hundreds. considering the fact that a batsman in the form of his lifetime can manage to score at best 2000 runs in a season, i shudder to think how long would it take him to emulate jack hobbs' 61,000 runs. also, i wont be surprised if the indian team makes up its mind and goes on to break victoria's 1107 given another brabourne wicket and a bangladesh attack. wilfred rhodes, so you think he is known for his first class wickets alone? have a look at the runs he scored as well!

  • Willowman on December 12, 2009, 6:23 GMT

    All the Test highest partnership per wicket records have gone (or been equalled) in the last 15 years, except those for the 5th (405, SG Barnes & DG Bradman, Australia, v England,Sydney, 13 Dec 1946) and 7th (347, DS Atkinson & CC Depeiaza, West Indies v Australia,Bridgetown,14 May 1955) wickets. Only 1 partnership has got within 100 of the latter in the last 50 years, and that only just, so logically you'd think the 5th-wicket record would be the next of these two to go. With one-off records, though, you can never be sure.

  • Vishrant on December 11, 2009, 2:31 GMT

    @amigobyc if you really are comparing how Don Bradman would have fared with all the padding and the helmets and the bats, then take into consideration the quality of bowlers in those times compared to now. Don Bradman remains to this day, and will forever remain a legend in the history of Cricket, but it is not fair to compare the two eras. Tendulkar, Ponting, Lara are the batting legends in this era, and no one can deny that, but with the padding, the helmets and the bats they have, its to face bowlers like wasim akram, glen mcgrath, walsh, ambrose.... these bowlers along with Murali and Shane Warne were not around in the Bradman days.....

  • Maroof23 on December 6, 2009, 12:00 GMT

    What about Brian Lara's record of being the only batsman to score a century, a double, triple, quadruple and a quintuple hundreds? I don't see anyone matching that record anytime soon. Even the 400 in itself is very invincible!

  • amigobyc on December 3, 2009, 21:38 GMT

    In trying to define/explain records, many vital factors are missed. For example, if Sir Don Bradman had these modern bats, imagine how much more he would have accomplished. To me - he is the really "UNTOUCHABLE" one of all. And what about no helmet and no modern padding and all the gear the guys have today. I doubt we will ever see another Sir Don. Thank you Australia. Webby.

  • digital_storm on December 2, 2009, 10:40 GMT

    Talking of records difficult to break, try this: fastest triple century in test cricket by Sehwag in 278 balls.

    A hundred at more than run a ball is not easy in test cricket. A double century more so. But a triple? Triple centuries are not scored that often in the first place. Its happened 23 times and only once at more than run a ball.

    History has thrown up limited overs batsmen who have made runs at an amazing rate but these are not as rare a breed as Sehwag, the man whose test strike rate is 80 to go along with the average of 50. And I am sure if one were to look at his test strike rate since the last couple of years, it would be close to 100. And the fact that he does this as an opener, in India or overseas, makes him a once in history test cricketer.

  • beverage on November 29, 2009, 19:41 GMT

    Highest first class team score, victoria vs 1,107 in the '26/27 season, it's been there a long time and hasn't really been troubled.

  • Pelham_Barton on November 29, 2009, 14:07 GMT

    @waspsting: Mark Taylor scored 839 runs in the 6 Test series in England in 1989, but this was not his debut series: he scored 67 runs in 2 Tests against the West Indies in the previous Australian season.

  • No featured comments at the moment.