1899 June 19, 2010

Albert Trott's mighty hit

A look back at a 111-year-old record: one of the biggest and most famous shots played at Lord's
16

Changing attitudes and constantly improving technology mean that while big hitting was once the domain of a handful of players - Gilbert Jessop, Arthur Wellard and Ian Botham for example - it is now a required element of most batsmen's arsenals. Despite that, one hitting record has eluded players for almost 111 years - clearing the Lord's pavilion.

Opened in 1890, the iconic building is permanently in the batsmen's firing line, but only one has cleared it properly - Albert Trott in the summer of 1899. Many have tried and a few came close. Earlier this month West Indian Kieron Pollard on his Somerset debut clubbed Middlesex's Shaun Udal into the top tier; in 1977 I was present at the Gillette Cup final when Glamorgan's Mike Llewellyn hit John Emburey into the guttering in front of the north turret. But Trott's place in cricket history remains.

Trott had already played for Australia when, overlooked by selectors for the 1896 tour, he travelled to England under his own steam (although on the ship carrying the Australians, who were captained by his brother) and set about qualifying for Middlesex. By 1898 he was playing county cricket and that winter played two Tests for England in South Africa.

Renowned as a big hitter, he wielded a 3lb bat in an era where the norm was around 2lb 3ozs and anything over 2lb 8ozs was deemed a club. He was also a very good bowler and in 1899 took 237 wickets and scored 1175 runs.

In May that year he had already made a mark when he struck two huge sixes into the Lord's pavilion in a Championship match against Sussex, one of them, off Fred Tate, ricocheting off the ironwork at the top of one of the turrets. It is possible that was an even bigger strike than the one the following month.

When the Australians came to Lord's on July 31, MCC put out a strong side that included WG Grace and KS Ranjitsinhji as well as Trott. A crowd of around 10,000 basked in the sunshine as MCC reached 123 for 4 shortly after lunch and Trott marched to the middle.

He took no time to play himself in and immediately set about the bowlers, adding 65 in 45 minutes with the more circumspect Ranjitsinhji. His big hit came off Monty Noble, who was bowling seamers and who had already been hammered onto the middle balcony of the pavilion. "He found the range with a couple of sighting shots," recalled Sir Pelham Warner who was in the front of the pavilion at the time. "And then came the historic hit."

The stroke was a violent drive that soared up and over the roof of the pavilion. Some reports say it landed on the far slope of the roof, struck a chimney pot and landed in the Grove End Road garden of Philip Need, the dressing-room attendant, behind the building. Onlookers said Trott stepped back, shaded his eyes with his hand and admired his handiwork as the ball disappeared.

"I was not very sure about it; and the next thing I saw was the ball looking like a pea in the air"
Trott on his shot

"Noble was bowling, and sending the balls down in pretty good style, and at last I struck at one," Trott told Boys' Own a few years later. "I was not very sure about it; and the next thing I saw was the ball looking like a pea in the air, and I learned then that it had just touched a chimney and nearly gone out of the ground."

WN Roe wrote to the Daily Telegraph in 1937 to say he was on the top tier and "the ball came right over our heads … Trott got only four for this hit as the ball hit the racquet courts behind and in those days a ball had to go out of the ground to score six."

Noble got him out almost immediately as he top edged an expansive swipe to third man, but Trott's day was not yet over. In an hour's batting during the evening the Australians slipped to 54 for 4 in reply to MCC's 258, Trott taking three wickets, including the prized one of Victor Trumper.

The following year playing for MCC against Cambridge University he again twice found the top balcony, and in 1902 he landed a ball high into the Mound Stand with a slashed drive over cover, a massive carry for that kind of shot.

It is often said Trott's big hit ruined his career as he sought to repeat the feat, but there is no evidence of that. It happened early in his county career and he continued to perform impressively.

But sadly, Trott's career as a whole was soon on the slide. He loved beer as much as cricket, gambled heavily, and as his body began to pay for the excesses, his abilities waned. At a time when many players went on into their forties, he retired and turned briefly to umpiring, but even that proved beyond him.

A day before the 15th anniversary of his momentous hit he shot himself in a one-bedroom rented flat, leaving almost nothing but memories. He was 41 but looked years older. "He had a heart of gold," wrote Warner, "and was as simple as a child. He was one of those people who compel attention."

Is there an incident from the past you would like to know more about? Email us with your comments and suggestions.

Martin Williamson is executive editor of Cricinfo and managing editor of ESPN Digital Media in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • 69denise on June 21, 2010, 9:23 GMT

    I saw Asanka Gurasinha hit either Willie Watson or Gavin Larsen out of the ground in a one dayer in Auckland in 1991 that remains the biggest hit I've ever seen. It was a big mow over cow corner that easily left the ground. The best consistent big hitter for me was Chris Cairns, he made it look so easy.

  • callington_man on June 20, 2010, 21:48 GMT

    I remember Mike Llewellyn's effort for Glamorgan - off John Emburey ? I thought Mike Gatting was the bowler for some reason.

  • waspsting on June 20, 2010, 15:03 GMT

    I've read that Keith Miller almost matched the feet - was about two feet short of clearing the pavillion. I wonder what the biggest hit ever has been? its nice to see the distances noted in 20-20 tournaments - 110 yards seems to be HUGE. Sobers mentions a shot he played - a pull over mid-on over Alan Davidson which went for six at the Adeilaide Oval (a ground with long straight boundaries). He reckons the hit must have carried 150 yards. Bradman recalls this stroke, too and described it as demonstrating "unbelievable power".

  • on June 20, 2010, 13:56 GMT

    Michael Foster of Durham hit one over the Lords pavillion, about 15 years ago in a one day match against Middlesex. I have never understood why it never gets mentioned in these discussions. I might have had a few beers, but I clearly remember it. Does anybody else?

  • on June 20, 2010, 11:09 GMT

    Peter Greenwell's comment screams ignorance! As stated previously, records were well kept in the 19th century and if anyone else had cleared the pavillion at lords surely we would have all heard about it? Believe it or not, there were plenty of talented and intelligent people playing cricket all over the world before 2010. Intellectual Darwinism has no place in cricket.

  • Yorker_ToeCrusher on June 20, 2010, 8:10 GMT

    I am thinking if he was batting at the other end,would it hit the recently made media pavallion at the Lord's.I've been to lords and the dtraight boundary isvery long.

  • Venkatb on June 20, 2010, 0:56 GMT

    Very poignant - I remember Clive Lloyd's six, possibly off Robin Jackman (at the Oval though) in mid-70s in a John Player one-day match that landed on the upper level of a bus and was deemed lost as it travelled all over London!

  • Cam_PT on June 19, 2010, 23:34 GMT

    Nice story. I was at the Gabba when Brett Lee hit a six out of the ground against the West Indies. I would think that would be further, but of course it doesn't have the elaborate old world story behind it. Good stuff.

  • on June 19, 2010, 21:18 GMT

    yes that is a good point.. thanks to wisden which has covered every county and international game in detail since times immemorial. so for me this record stands... on another note, i dont agree with suggestion of 160 yard six as i ve seen some of gayle sixes which have been bigger than that (ground to ground)

  • on June 19, 2010, 18:43 GMT

    I think Peter Greenwell is wrong. Cricket was very well documented in those days, with reports in the newspapers, Wisden, and 10,000 people at the ground for the equaivalent of a county game. If anyone else had done that, it would have been reported. Do we not believe other records from that time, for instance that Bannerman from the first test still holds the record for highest proportion of runs in a test innings. You can look in the online Times archives to find reports of matches, in great detail.

  • 69denise on June 21, 2010, 9:23 GMT

    I saw Asanka Gurasinha hit either Willie Watson or Gavin Larsen out of the ground in a one dayer in Auckland in 1991 that remains the biggest hit I've ever seen. It was a big mow over cow corner that easily left the ground. The best consistent big hitter for me was Chris Cairns, he made it look so easy.

  • callington_man on June 20, 2010, 21:48 GMT

    I remember Mike Llewellyn's effort for Glamorgan - off John Emburey ? I thought Mike Gatting was the bowler for some reason.

  • waspsting on June 20, 2010, 15:03 GMT

    I've read that Keith Miller almost matched the feet - was about two feet short of clearing the pavillion. I wonder what the biggest hit ever has been? its nice to see the distances noted in 20-20 tournaments - 110 yards seems to be HUGE. Sobers mentions a shot he played - a pull over mid-on over Alan Davidson which went for six at the Adeilaide Oval (a ground with long straight boundaries). He reckons the hit must have carried 150 yards. Bradman recalls this stroke, too and described it as demonstrating "unbelievable power".

  • on June 20, 2010, 13:56 GMT

    Michael Foster of Durham hit one over the Lords pavillion, about 15 years ago in a one day match against Middlesex. I have never understood why it never gets mentioned in these discussions. I might have had a few beers, but I clearly remember it. Does anybody else?

  • on June 20, 2010, 11:09 GMT

    Peter Greenwell's comment screams ignorance! As stated previously, records were well kept in the 19th century and if anyone else had cleared the pavillion at lords surely we would have all heard about it? Believe it or not, there were plenty of talented and intelligent people playing cricket all over the world before 2010. Intellectual Darwinism has no place in cricket.

  • Yorker_ToeCrusher on June 20, 2010, 8:10 GMT

    I am thinking if he was batting at the other end,would it hit the recently made media pavallion at the Lord's.I've been to lords and the dtraight boundary isvery long.

  • Venkatb on June 20, 2010, 0:56 GMT

    Very poignant - I remember Clive Lloyd's six, possibly off Robin Jackman (at the Oval though) in mid-70s in a John Player one-day match that landed on the upper level of a bus and was deemed lost as it travelled all over London!

  • Cam_PT on June 19, 2010, 23:34 GMT

    Nice story. I was at the Gabba when Brett Lee hit a six out of the ground against the West Indies. I would think that would be further, but of course it doesn't have the elaborate old world story behind it. Good stuff.

  • on June 19, 2010, 21:18 GMT

    yes that is a good point.. thanks to wisden which has covered every county and international game in detail since times immemorial. so for me this record stands... on another note, i dont agree with suggestion of 160 yard six as i ve seen some of gayle sixes which have been bigger than that (ground to ground)

  • on June 19, 2010, 18:43 GMT

    I think Peter Greenwell is wrong. Cricket was very well documented in those days, with reports in the newspapers, Wisden, and 10,000 people at the ground for the equaivalent of a county game. If anyone else had done that, it would have been reported. Do we not believe other records from that time, for instance that Bannerman from the first test still holds the record for highest proportion of runs in a test innings. You can look in the online Times archives to find reports of matches, in great detail.

  • mongoose47 on June 19, 2010, 14:07 GMT

    It is 114 (horizontal) yards from the Nursery end crease to the ridge of the Pavilion roof, and 46 further yards to the back gardens of the houses in Grove End Road. So that is a total of 160 yards. One would expect that the ball pitched and bounced rather than carried all the way and stopped dead. So the full "carry" of the shot if you took the buildings out of the way was probably somewhere in the 130-odd yards region. The real trick, rather than the length of the carry, was to attain and still have cleared the height of the pavilion - about 50 feet - at a distance of 114 yards.

    Which explains why nobody else has ever done it.

  • on June 19, 2010, 13:17 GMT

    And if anyone believes this is a genuine record, I have some Arizona beachfront property to sell you. I wouldn't trust any kind of "record" that was set in the 19th century.

  • arsalan1996 on June 19, 2010, 12:18 GMT

    unbelievable lord is very big ground and in 1899 without gloves and helmet he covered a long distance.i salute him.

  • on June 19, 2010, 11:08 GMT

    while the exact distance is not easy to calculate, legend has it it landed on the chimney of a roof outside the ground. So, following the trajectory, it can be considered abt 180 m hit (ground to ground).

  • praveen05 on June 19, 2010, 10:59 GMT

    hadnt heard about such a big hit at the lords. good article.

  • on June 19, 2010, 7:47 GMT

    i would like to know the distance that the ball travelled while trott hit that longest six.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on June 19, 2010, 7:47 GMT

    i would like to know the distance that the ball travelled while trott hit that longest six.

  • praveen05 on June 19, 2010, 10:59 GMT

    hadnt heard about such a big hit at the lords. good article.

  • on June 19, 2010, 11:08 GMT

    while the exact distance is not easy to calculate, legend has it it landed on the chimney of a roof outside the ground. So, following the trajectory, it can be considered abt 180 m hit (ground to ground).

  • arsalan1996 on June 19, 2010, 12:18 GMT

    unbelievable lord is very big ground and in 1899 without gloves and helmet he covered a long distance.i salute him.

  • on June 19, 2010, 13:17 GMT

    And if anyone believes this is a genuine record, I have some Arizona beachfront property to sell you. I wouldn't trust any kind of "record" that was set in the 19th century.

  • mongoose47 on June 19, 2010, 14:07 GMT

    It is 114 (horizontal) yards from the Nursery end crease to the ridge of the Pavilion roof, and 46 further yards to the back gardens of the houses in Grove End Road. So that is a total of 160 yards. One would expect that the ball pitched and bounced rather than carried all the way and stopped dead. So the full "carry" of the shot if you took the buildings out of the way was probably somewhere in the 130-odd yards region. The real trick, rather than the length of the carry, was to attain and still have cleared the height of the pavilion - about 50 feet - at a distance of 114 yards.

    Which explains why nobody else has ever done it.

  • on June 19, 2010, 18:43 GMT

    I think Peter Greenwell is wrong. Cricket was very well documented in those days, with reports in the newspapers, Wisden, and 10,000 people at the ground for the equaivalent of a county game. If anyone else had done that, it would have been reported. Do we not believe other records from that time, for instance that Bannerman from the first test still holds the record for highest proportion of runs in a test innings. You can look in the online Times archives to find reports of matches, in great detail.

  • on June 19, 2010, 21:18 GMT

    yes that is a good point.. thanks to wisden which has covered every county and international game in detail since times immemorial. so for me this record stands... on another note, i dont agree with suggestion of 160 yard six as i ve seen some of gayle sixes which have been bigger than that (ground to ground)

  • Cam_PT on June 19, 2010, 23:34 GMT

    Nice story. I was at the Gabba when Brett Lee hit a six out of the ground against the West Indies. I would think that would be further, but of course it doesn't have the elaborate old world story behind it. Good stuff.

  • Venkatb on June 20, 2010, 0:56 GMT

    Very poignant - I remember Clive Lloyd's six, possibly off Robin Jackman (at the Oval though) in mid-70s in a John Player one-day match that landed on the upper level of a bus and was deemed lost as it travelled all over London!