Peter Roebuck
Peter Roebuck Peter RoebuckRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former captain of Somerset; author of It Never Rains, Sometimes I Forgot to Laugh and other books

Is Clarke up for the captaincy?

He fits the type and is the right age but is yet to show that he can confront his weaknesses and toughen up like Ponting did

Peter Roebuck

October 20, 2010

Comments: 115 | Text size: A | A

Michael Clarke smiles after he was given a reprieve when he was caught off a no-ball from Ishant Sharma, India v Australia, 1st Test, Mohali, 4th day, October 4, 2010
Unconvincing: there was a lightweight air to Clarke's batting in the Tests against India © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Michael Clarke | Ricky Ponting
Teams: Australia

Michael Clarke is an established Test batsman with an impressive record, a successful leader of his country's Twenty20 team and the vice-captain of a Test side led by a man already in his mid-thirties and with seven years of service to furrow his brows. Long ago identified as the next captain of his country, a position altogether more prestigious and secure than in other nations, the jaunty right-hander has the cricketing world at his feet. And yet… Always with this youthful batsman there is a reservation.

Much to his frustration, Clarke is struggling to convince the hard heads of Australian cricket that he is the right man to follow Ricky Ponting. Certainly he has not been able to persuade them that he is ready to take charge in a few months should Ponting withdraw in the event of the Ashes and World Cup campaigns going awry.

Ordinarily Clarke's ascendancy would be straightforward. Not that Australian vice-captains can take anything for granted. Of late, few of them have taken over, except temporarily. Geoff Marsh, Ian Healy, Shane Warne and Adam Gilchrist never were promoted. But then, as a rule, they have belonged to the same generation as the captain and were regarded as replacements rather than successors. Clarke is six years younger than Ponting and so is exactly the right age. And yet…

Already the search for alternatives is underway. During the week, the name of Callum Ferguson was suddenly thrown into the pot, and never mind that he is not in the team and has not played a Shield match for a year. Previously on the same list was Cameron White, a highly regarded leader at Victoria but probably not quite good enough as a batsman. And Australian captains need to be worth their place. Behind the suggestions lie a sense that Clarke has not yet overcome the boyishness that is part of his charm but also a limitation. As one elder of the game growled recently, "Mate, is he tough enough?"

Moreover the decision will not be lightly or hurriedly made. The captaincy is not passed around but handed down, usually to a man able to lead the team for the next seven or eight years. Australia have only appointed four captains since 1984. Not a bad record for any sporting team. Age was an important factor in Ponting's appointment. Otherwise, short-term contenders might have been promoted. Once nominated, the leader is given strong backing. Australians know that captains run cricket teams and that security of tenure is important. They also understand that captains can learn whilst in office and need not be the finished product at the outset.

As it turned out, Ponting was the right choice. His main problem has been that his mistakes were small in number but large in scale and therefore have not slipped silently to the back of the mind. Ponting grew into the job. Actually he had already started maturing before his appointment. He has always been a man of his capability. Interviewing him in his teenage years, and assuming that he was a rough, tough kid from the backwaters of Launceston, as advertised, I was taken aback to hear him talk about the treatment of black people in South Africa (he had just returned from the country). "Not very good, is it?" opined the 16-year-old. In that moment the caricature was shattered. Subsequently he had a few ups and downs caused by the hot spirit long associated with youth. Eventually he called a press conference, admitted he had a drinking problem and promised to sort it out. And did.

 
 
Over the next few months Clarke needs to shed all lingering brittleness and show that he is a worthy inheritor of a great tradition
 

Thereafter the incumbent impressed as a man of intent. As captain he has won two World Cups, recaptured the Ashes and held a slowly declining side together. Australia's disciplinary record and reputation have improved in the last few seasons, too, and in these last stages of his career he is emerging as an elder statesman of the game.

These comments may seem odd from a journalist who once called for his head. As JM Keynes once asked, "My opinion changes as the facts change. Does yours?" As is well known, I loathed the nationalistic hysteria on display in the infamous SCG Test - nationalism is despicable as patriotism is honourable - and thought that the captain erred grievously in not calming things down and in refusing to talk to Anil Kumble, a man of the highest integrity. Ponting's next error occurred in Nagpur, where at the critical moment he suddenly started worrying about over rates and bowling part-timers. It was a staggering way to concede the series. His other obvious howler was the omission of Nathan Hauritz at The Oval, but as it turns out the spinner himself was partly to blame.

Regardless, these episodes do not define Ponting's leadership. In terms of tactical acumen he has sometimes frustrated observers, but as a responsible leader of the national cricket team he has surpassed expectations. Bear in mind that he was not dealt as good a hand as his two immediate predecessors were. It has been his task first to keep an ageing outfit going as long as possible, and then, following its inevitable break-up, to form a new team with its own ambition. By and large he has succeeded. Australia may have slipped to fifth in the rankings - and ought not to bleat about it - but they still hold the World Cup and have never been swept aside.

Clearly Ponting completed the journey from headstrong youth with hidden depths to respected senior capable of commanding a group of peers for a long period. He was in command of them because he was in command of himself. The main question mark against his mooted successor does not concern his tactical sharpness or his batting ability. Clarke needs to convince observers that he has put aside fancies and taken charge of his life. The criticisms are not personal. Rather they stem from concern about Australian cricket. Australia are lucky that way. Past players are committed to the cause, not to themselves. In that regard England are latterly gaining ground.

Clarke's dismissals in India were held against him. In the second innings in Mohali he clipped his first ball airily to short midwicket, only to be spared as the umpire asked for a review of the bowler's front foot. Already he had been careless. Now he compounded the error, or anyhow reinforced the perception, by chatting cheerfully to India's keeper and slip as the review was undertaken. Accordingly it did not come as an entire surprise to see him take his eye off a bumper a few balls later and lift a simple catch. He departed without waiting for the decision. Doubtless it all sounds sporting. It felt lightweight. After all it was a critical moment in the match. Ponting had just departed and Ishant Sharma was in the middle or a fiery spell. Clarke's job was to resist and rebuild.

His second-innings dismissal in Bangalore seemed equally aberrant. Clarke stretched forwards and was beaten by a turning delivery. He held his position, whereupon MS Dhoni whipped off the bails and celebrated. The batsman looked back and realised he had not so much left his crease as never claimed it. It was a schoolboy error from an important batsman, one of the top 15 players around, according to the rankings.

Any player can have a bad series, particularly at the start of the season. Clarke's problem was not so much the scores as the lack of rage in his batting. His wicket was too easily taken. From batsmen of his calibre, it was barely tolerable; from a future captain it was unacceptable. He lacked conviction. Meanwhile Ponting did his utmost to hold the innings together. He was crying out for support but his deputy did not respond.


Ricky Ponting and Michael Clarke tied for the Allan Border Medal, Melbourne, February 3, 2009
There is much that Clarke can learn from his seniors and predecessors © Getty Images
Enlarge

At times Clarke may be bemused that his wider life attracts so much comment, but he does not exactly hide his light under a bushel. Contrastingly Ryan Giggs flies so far below the radar that even keen followers of the game only recently discovered that his father is black. It can be done. Clarke chooses to live in the public eye and the rest follows. Partly, though, it is due to his position as the anointed captain of his country's cricket team.

Ponting had the guts to confront his weak points. Clarke needs to do the same. He needs to make himself into an Australian captain by building around his numerous strengths and correcting the flaws. He could consult past leaders like Mark Taylor, Allan Border and Steve Waugh. The captaincy is not handed over on a platter. Candidates need to fight for it, need to prove that they are the right men for the job, that it can confidently be put in their hands.

Clarke has many fine qualities. The younger players look up to him because he talks their language (about clothes, anyhow; he avoids poker). He is loyal: he rejected overtures to join the IPL because he wanted to focus all his energy on representing his country. He has a lot of sparkle and a lot of ideas as well, more than his current captain. But that is not quite enough. To my mind he is the man for the job, but a lot of respected thinkers are wary. Over the next few months Clarke needs to shed all lingering brittleness and show that he is a heavyweight and so a worthy inheritor of a great tradition.

Peter Roebuck is a former captain of Somerset and the author, most recently, of In It to Win It

RSS Feeds: Peter Roebuck

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Statsmatter on (October 22, 2010, 22:00 GMT)

Hey @dotdalton careful not to upset the long suffering Victorians that think they are continually denied Test players. We all know you get an Aus cap when you get a NSW cap and Vic get shafted.

Posted by SnowSnake on (October 22, 2010, 20:20 GMT)

@Wolver: I gave you more credit that I should have. You seem to be in a habit of looking backward. Two decades in case of SA. If India was average and still kept in top 3 ranks for last 3 years then Australia is doing really bad for average running weighted rank of Australia, India and SA for last 3 year span would almost come about the same. If you do trend analysis then India and SA would have upward trend and Aus. would have a lower trend with large negative gradient in ranking trend. Once again, over the ranking period, India's record is better than Australia both in home and away. Australia has gotton into habit of losing in away series. With a differential of 11 points over 2nd ranking team, all India has to do is to draw next few series and it may still end up #1 by the end of 2011. That would be #1 for two years. These debates of deserving #1 do not really matter to me. The fact is #1 ranking is very coveted, and once a team gets it, it should hold on to it.

Posted by Proteas123 on (October 22, 2010, 14:01 GMT)

@SnowSnake - What does Aus ranking have to do with India's ranking. India has before now always been an average team, only good at home, and one of the weakist touring teams, even dominated by SA, who were out of international cricket for over two decades. Aus will bounce back, but international cricket is not just about Aus and India. And to be clear I meant series wins. India lossing 2-1 to Aus and SA do not make a number one team. @Jim1207 - I was saying that the ranking is disputable not that I don't accept it. You can laugh all you want, lets see how India does in Sa. @anoopshameed - Ponting did pretty ok on the last tour and even Sachin is not brilliant everywhere, his record in SA is very average for him.

Posted by dotdalton on (October 22, 2010, 1:27 GMT)

We should groom Tim Paine for the captaincy because:

1. He's shown he has a cool head under pressure; 2. He's young and looks like a long term test cricketer; 3. He can play as a specialist batsman if the keeper's job is not available.

In addition, he's Tasmanian, so there's an obvious succession route to follow.

Posted by knowledge_eater on (October 22, 2010, 0:39 GMT)

How about Australia find an Autralian Dhoni and make him a Captain ? And let Clarke be the one of the top Australian batsman ?

Posted by knowledge_eater on (October 22, 2010, 0:22 GMT)

Is Ponting up for retirement yet ? I doubt it. We should remember that after India Next world cup is in Aus/Nz. You never know. It might be too early to make any predictions. "The captaincy is not handed over on a platter. Candidates need to fight for it, need to prove that they are the right men for the job, that it can confidently be put in their hands." If Ponting scores well in Ashes, he will play one more Ashes in England again. If Clarke play match winning knocks in Ashes, there is no competitor for Clarke. Australian tradition for making Captains, we all know how it goes. Play strong Cricket for long time. Score lots of runs Rub shoulder with current Captain. Become a Captain. We, Indians being emotional we tend to choose who can manage emotions of not only players, media, past cricketers, selectors, fans +personal performance. Captaincy is important for bowlers and fielding positions. If Clarke can manage his bowlers and pump them up with confidence then...

Posted by devalyagnik2003 on (October 21, 2010, 21:42 GMT)

@ masterblaster74: let me clear how wrong it is to say England gave more fight to Aus than India did for not just recent time lets say since last 30 years!!! India won 15 matches and lost only 13 against Australia during this THIRTY years while England won 20 matches against 40 loses!! they won half matches then they lost is this what you called a fight!! Thanks to your comment I got chance to present this fact!! Let me repeat I am agreed over all for this all years australia is best team but TODAY, according to RECENT form, India is NO 1. ACCEPT it or not... And don't keep saying India is not playing well away because it was past, since last couple of years, India beat England in England, NZ in NZ, WI in WI, Pak in Pak, and they atleast played better in Aus then what aus did in India so far in recent time.. !!

Posted by shovwar on (October 21, 2010, 21:41 GMT)

@MR. SPOONER ...ARE U BRAGGING ABOUT INDIA DRAWING IN SL??????......LMAO ..WE ARE DEBATING WHOSE THE BEST TEAM IN THE WORLD AND YOU ARE POINTING OUT A DRAWN SERIES...THIS TELLS A LOT ABOUT INDIA'S POTENTIAL!!!! WOLVER WAS TALKING ABOUT A SERIES VICTORY NOT A DRAW!!!! LOL

Posted by shovwar on (October 21, 2010, 21:36 GMT)

@WOLVER....I TOTALLY AGREE WIT U!! WHEN OZ'S WHERE THE NO1 TEAM THE WHOLE WORLD ACCEPTED IT CUZ THEY WHERE A DOMINANT TEAM...EVEN WHEN SA TOOK OVER THE NO1 SPOT, NO ONE DISAGREED COS THEY WON SERIES IN ALMOST EVERY COUNTRIES....BUT NOW WHEN INDIA IS NO1 THERE'S A LOTTA QUESTION..EXCEPT THE INDIANS THERE ARE FEW PPL OUT THERE WOULD SAY INDIA IS THE BEST AROUND THE WORLD. THERE ARE DOUBTS BECAUSE IF YOU SEE IT FROM AN UNBIASED WAY THEN INDIA IS NOT THAT THREATENING, OFCOURSE THEY ARE GOOD AND REALLY GOOD AT HOME BUT IN OVERALL CRICKET NOT TOO IMPOSING. IN THE NUMBER GAME INDIA ARE AHEAD IN THE RANKINGS DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE THE BEST. OZ'S WER NOT ONLY AHEAD, THEY WERE THE BEST. INDIA DOES NOT HAVE TO PROVE ANYONE BY BEATING SA IN SA COS IF THEY LOSE; SA WUD AUTOMATICALLY BCOM NO1. THERE IS NOTHING TO PROVE BUT THEY HAVE TO SURVIVE SA TO KEEP NO1 STATUS. ITS SIMPLE AND CLEAR...LET THE WORLD TELL YOU THAT YOU ARE THE BEST NOT YOURSELF...THE RANKINGS ARE JUST NUMBERS AND NOT STABLE.

Posted by devalyagnik2003 on (October 21, 2010, 21:30 GMT)

@masterblaster74 : you said India is not winning away since long time like australia did for 21 years, let me tell you again rakings shows current form, if they were at no 1 for 5-10 years that wont make them the best team all the time, current form shows who is playing better, India won more away matches in recent times, India lost VERY few matches compare to Aus in recent times, and if you are saying aus won more away matches why they are not able to fight against India in India. If matches are boring high scoring as you said how come India won 4 out of 5 last matches! and for last 10-12 years over all record shows India won more matches then australia did against each other, that is the best record for ANY country, just because of ONE series you cant say England give more fight to Aus, dont forget they lost so many matches during this period, including 4-0 lose as well!! CONCLUSIVELY as per CURRENT form India is NO 1, and if they perform well in SA no one can ever argue!

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Peter RoebuckClose
Peter Roebuck He may not have played Test cricket for England, but Peter Roebuck represented Somerset with distinction, making over 1000 runs nine times in 12 seasons, and captaining the county during a tempestuous period in the 1980s. Roebuck acquired recognition all over the cricket world for his distinctive, perceptive, independent writing. Widely travelled, he divided his time between Australia and South Africa. He died in November 2011

    'The key to Ishant's success will be length'

Ajit Agarkar and Aakash Chopra assess: Ishant Sharma and
Peter Siddle

The best commentator on TV

The Cricket Monthly: Cricket brings the drama through its narrators' tones. Our panelists pick five of their favourites
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

    Love before first sight

My Favourite Cricketer: First-class batsman Yere Goud caught a 13-year-old's attention with his unusual name and news-making runs. By Karthik Krishnaswamy

    Every innings is an act of courage

Simon Barnes: Phillip Hughes' death was desperately unlucky, and it came in the courageous pursuit of sporting excellence

Why cricket needs women's Tests

Raf Nicholson: Apart from the fact that they are exciting, intense encounters, getting rid of them will only spell doom for the format itself

News | Features Last 7 days

Phillip Hughes: Gone too soon

The cricket world reacts to the passing away of Phillip Hughes

Phillip Hughes: Country kid who moved a nation

Likeable, hard-working and skilful, it was a matter of time before Phillip Hughes cemented his spot in the Australian Test team. Then, improbably and inconsolably, his time ran out

Hope for Hughes, feel for Abbott

It is impossible to imagine how Sean Abbott must feel after sending down that bouncer to Phillip Hughes. While the cricket world hopes for Hughes' recovery, it should also ensure Abbott is supported

November games need November prices

An early start to the international season, coupled with costly tickets, have kept the Australian public away from the cricket

#putoutyourbats

People across the world paid tribute to Australian cricketer Phillip Hughes, who died on November 27, by putting out their bats

News | Features Last 7 days