January 20, 2011

No one like Steyn

He's the only one today who matches up to Lillee, Thommo, Maco, Wasim, Waqar and the other fast-bowling greats of the past

It took India's batsmen just a couple of hours on the opening day of the Test series, in Centurion, to figure out how they would deal with Dale Steyn. They wouldn't. Four of the top six averaged over 50 in Tests, while the figure for VVS Laxman was 47. Yet, one spell was enough to figure out that taking Steyn on wasn't an option. Limiting the damage that he did would henceforth be the key to their series hopes.

It was a sensible decision that allowed MS Dhoni and his men to walk away with a share of the spoils. Yet, despite taking next to no risks against him, Steyn was still, by a distance, the bowler of the series. His 21 wickets cost just 17.47 apiece and he averaged one every spell (35.4 balls).

His domination of Virender Sehwag was as one-sided as Zaheer Khan's roughing up of Graeme Smith, and he was no less effective against India's other batting titans. When a stirring Indian fightback gave them a slim chance of a draw in the opening Test, it was Steyn who summoned up a spell of supreme menace to break the game open. The delivery that ended Dhoni's resistance late on the fourth afternoon was clocked at 144.9kph and was on him so fast that he did well to fend it through to Mark Boucher.

At Kingsmead, where he took 6 for 50 in the first innings, and Newlands (5 for 75 in the first), Steyn was again imperious, but there was far more to his bowling than the figure in the wickets column. He beat the bat too many times to count, reducing even someone of Sachin Tendulkar's calibre to wry grins and sighs of relief. At one point in Cape Town, he walked down the pitch and politely told Tendulkar that he would "knock his ****ing head off".

That spell in Cape Town - it speaks volumes of Tendulkar's genius that he made 146 against such a magnificent foe - was as good as any you'll see. It offered pretty much the complete fast bowling package. Beautifully controlled outswing, nasty bouncers at the body, the ball cutting off the seam, and stealthy increments in pace when you thought he was just about spent.

Those who grew up in fast bowling's golden era between 1974-75 - the year in which Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson terrorised England en route to a 4-1 Ashes victory - and the turn of the new millennium frequently bemoan the decline in fast-bowling stocks. They have a point. How many of today's West Indian quicks would have been good enough to carry drinks in the era of the fearsome quartet? How many of Australia's current crop are even half as good as Jason Gillespie, let alone Glenn McGrath? What's Wahab Riaz doing in a team that could once boast of Imran Khan, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis?

Only in the case of English cricket can you say that things are better than they used to be, though Darren Gough and Andrew Caddick would no doubt argue that they would have been as effective as James Anderson in key matches if they'd had a similar sort of support structure in place.

You look around now, and Steyn apart, there's not one pace bowler you'd think of as an automatic pick for the pantheon. Morne Morkel, his new-ball partner, remains erratic, while Anderson and Stuart Broad have yet to ace the fast bowler's toughest test: a tour of India. Zaheer Khan has carried India's attack for four years, bowling some inspirational spells, but given the fitness issues he has had it's hard to see him carrying on for more than a couple of seasons.

Across the border, the Mohammads, Amir and Asif, have all the tools to succeed, but not the guidance off the field to utilise them properly. Amir, whose effervescence lit up a gloomy English summer before the no-ball shame, had the potential to be as good as Steyn, combining searing pace with controlled movement.

For the moment, though, Phalaborwa's finest is out in front on his own. After 46 Tests he has 238 wickets, at a strike rate (39.9) that's superior to anyone else in the modern era. And while sheer pace has played its part, it has gone hand in hand with an incredible ability to make the ball do his bidding. At Kingsmead he was asked how much skill it took to bowl the way he did. "A lot," he said with a big grin.

In a conversation with Sanjay Manjrekar, I asked why several young batsmen who appeared at ease in the one-day arena struggled so in the five-day game. "Simple," he said. "There, you don't have to face the prospect of Dale Steyn bowling three hostile spells at you in a day"

Those who watched his debut series, when he was as scattergun as Morkel is now, will remember the delivery to England's Michael Vaughan in Port Elizabeth; the ball that marked him out as one to watch. He has come up with it time and again since, including to Vaughan again, at Lord's in 2008. Poor Cheteshwar Pujara got one in Cape Town, pitching on leg stump and poised to take out middle and off if his pads hadn't come in the way.

It's the sort of delivery that coaches usually tell bowlers not to even try. Get it wrong and the batsman will clip you for four through midwicket. Get the action even slightly wrong and four byes down the leg side are a near certainty. Yet Steyn serves it up regularly, pitching it on leg or middle and swinging it away from the right-hander. When it doesn't uproot the stumps, it usually takes the outside edge, as Rahul Dravid found out in Durban.

Unlike Morkel, who gives you plenty to leave because of his height, Steyn specialises in making batsmen play. In that, he's remarkably similar to Malcolm Marshall, another who wasn't especially tall, but whose skiddy style made him a handful on every kind of surface.

In six Tests in 1983, Marshall took 33 Indian wickets at 18.81, striking every 40 balls. Steyn's strike rate in India after five Tests is 34.5, and when he gets it right, as in Nagpur in February 2010, batsmen make a beeline for the non-striker's end.

Like Allan Donald, the other great fast bowler South Africa produced in the post-isolation era, Steyn is far more comfortable in the Test arena than in coloured clothes, where the various restrictions stifle him. In a conversation with Sanjay Manjrekar a few months ago, I asked why several young batsmen who appeared at ease in the one-day arena struggled so in the five-day game. "Simple," he said. "There, you don't have to face the prospect of Dale Steyn bowling three hostile spells at you in a day."

He didn't say "fast bowler". He said "Steyn". From the rhythmic action to the way he works a batsman over and then gets him out, Steyn is now the gold standard for pace. Since Marshall's heyday, we've seen a few. Wasim came closest in terms of hustle and variety. Waqar shone in patches but was never the same once he hurt his back. Curtly Ambrose was impossible to face on his day, but took longer to line up his victims.

Some credit goes too to the South African selectors and their management of his precious talent. In six years, he's played just 44 one-day games. Contrast that with someone like Ishant Sharma if you want to know why each Indian pace-bowling hope ends up a flash in the pan.

Ian Chappell talks of how Lillee used to go into a funk if you tried to take the ball off him. Steyn is the same, and at one press conference during the India Tests, he spoke of begging Smith to give him "one more". It's that durability and hunger, as much as the skill, that makes him the perfect role model for any aspiring quick bowler. Watch him while you can. There's no one like him.

Dileep Premachandran is an associate editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Billy on January 23, 2011, 19:37 GMT

    ARad, I take your point and a lot of other people will also state that criteria as an important one for judging greatness. It is that reason alone which holds guys like Lillee, Marshall, Garner on a higher standing than McGrath, Walsh, Hadlee etc. Whether it's a right criteria to use is debatable, but that's probably not for this forum. The point is, Steyn has a long way to go to generate the same level of fear and stress that the other guys mentioned above do. The reason is, because when he's not taking wickets, he giving away plenty of runs which releases the fear and stress. The other guys were able to stifle the runs and build the pressure, allowing not only themselves but their partners to get the wickets.

  • K. on January 23, 2011, 18:38 GMT

    @mahjut.Well, It is not just Kallis. Ponting,Dravid and a whole host of batsmen had their best years in the mid 2000s. In the '90s not too many batsmen did too well.Infact if you consider batsmen who played for the whole of the '90s just 3 average more than 50.And that is just one of numerous variables I am referring to.Kallis is an alltime great, but unfortunately he misses out on the very top rung of batsmen.As with all top sport the margins between the GOAT (or the very,very great) is normally miniscule.(It is perhaps only in cricket where you have a Bradman with a freakish average).. But that doesn't mean that it is not there. A Carl Lewis may win by 2/100ths of a second .But he will win most times. And the fans and others "Know" this...Kallis is Great , but not "That" great a batsman as the South African fans here are attempting to pump him up to be.l

  • Sam on January 23, 2011, 17:44 GMT

    One thing that determines the greatness of a bowler is the excitement he generates when he comes in for a spell. Since Murali's retirement, there is only one bowler in the international arena who generates such excitement for me. Even if he doesn't take wickets, Steyn truly tests the opposing batsmen - Test cricket at its best! Thank you Steyn and keep yourself injury free...

  • mahjut on January 23, 2011, 13:01 GMT

    I have noticed this trend of assuming one can only be judicious in criticism - it can be done in praise to. Kallis's average as a bolwer is very good (I never suggested it was great - but his average is better than a LOT of test bowlers around today). Stating facts is not evidence of being judicious and stating an opinion as a fact is evidence to the contrary...It is not a fact that he will always be second rung to Tendulkar and Lara (I happen to think that he probably is not as good as Tendulkar - but even still, i think I could conjure an arguement...one eg: ST played with 3/4 other VERY talented batsmen and Kallis is only 'enduring' that luxury now .. and is flourishing in every sense - battingwise) - it's an opinion. If one fails to notice that kallis' cumulative average rises then i think the judiciousness can be questioned - in fact it took almost 4 years for Kallis to hit a 40 test average - imagine what he's been doing since. Vs Aus - well I explained in my last post...rising!!

  • K. on January 23, 2011, 9:21 GMT

    @mahjut: I am an absolute Kallis fan. But we must be judicious in our appraisals. Even at "home" in SA ,Kallis averages some 35 vs Aus...I am not for a moment saying that Kallis is not a fantastic cricketer and the best allrounder since Sobers...(at least in terms of being a "batting allrounder"..He is a good though certainly not "Great" bowler)...my point is that to me the modern day batsman rankings are 1)Tendulkar 2)Lara....Ponting,Kallis,Dravid and the Rest....Vague comments from Xolile such as we should pump up Kallis's average up to 62.5 because he played on "green tops" etc are blatantly false because they simply don't take into account numerous variables....Kallis is the modern day allround day Collosus- but the fact is he will always be in the 2nd rung as a pure batsman to Tendulkar/lara.

  • Umair on January 23, 2011, 4:43 GMT

    It is really harsh to call Morkel scattergun and erratic. He concedes fewer runs per over than Steyn in Tests, ODIs, and T20s. This is the 3rd time I posting this comment. Hopefully it will be approved for stating the same thing.

  • mahjut on January 23, 2011, 0:08 GMT

    I watched the tests in UAE and, being a zim fan, thought that is where Zim should play our first 10 tests on return to the International Test fold, because I reckon we'd get a draw against any team on those tracks :)) ... fact is, it is testament to the SA attack that there was even vague talk of SA winning either game. A Pakistan win was never, EVER on the cards...

    back to kallis briefly - i had a little look at other modern 'greats' ... they all have an achillies. Kallis' being England and SL. Lara and Ponting also 'fail' in certain places (in India maybe? and elsewhere) and Tendulkar, who fares best of the 4, still falls well below his own high standards in SA and PK. I am not comparing, but if I were, I'd pick Sachin as my top bat ... BUT, Kallis would be first on my world team sheet every time and of the current players, Steyn would be second...

  • Dummy4 on January 22, 2011, 22:16 GMT

    Steyn is the Great White Shark and other fast bowlers of this era are mere porpoises compared to him. He really makes the batsmen HOWEVER TALENTED quake in their boots with his raw pace, guile and accuracy. They have no choice but to play almost every ball he bowls - he gives them plenty with their name written on it. Any batsman who has faced him and scalped by him will wake up with a nightmare in the middle of the night with a racing heart wetting the bed.

  • Dummy4 on January 22, 2011, 19:10 GMT

    Steyn is a fantastic bowler. But please note as good as he is now I does expect that he will be even better in about 2 years when he reaches his peak.

  • mahjut on January 22, 2011, 18:00 GMT

    CricFan24. I am sure you are NOT a Kallis fan - LOL. "some people are born great, some have greatness thrust upon them, and some achieve greatness"; Kallis is the last!! I realise for many people the fact that he was not great from the get-go is a black mark but for me it means he has had to perform even better since hitting his stride, to achieve the same as those other modern 'greats'. You mention Oz as a glitch!? take out the first series when he was still a test-pup (as I said, he was a slow starter) and his average in aus is 50. take out his last three as well (partly because it suits me, but also to quell any questions about the quality of his opposition) and his average goes up to 57. that means 57 IN OZ during Kallis's form-time against the GREAT aussies - not bad! England IS a black mark but Kallis' figures EVERYWHERE else (though SL and BD were not great) hold up extremely well. maybe perspective with analysis.... Funny to think this article is about Steyn - he IS GOOOOD!!!

  • No featured comments at the moment.