Rewind to Rewind toRSS FeedFeeds

1974

India's all-time low

At Lord's in 1974, India were bowled out in a little over an hour for 42, in a series which started full of promise but soon fell apart

Martin Williamson

July 16, 2011

Comments: 15 | Text size: A | A

The scoreboard tells the sorry tale after India's lowest Test score, England v India, 2nd Test, Lord's, June 24, 1974
The scoreboard tells the sorry tale after India's lowest Test score © PA Photos
Enlarge

When England and India start their four-match series next week, the clash between two of the leading sides in Test cricket is eagerly anticipated. A genuinely appealing contest is ahead of us, and not one artificially pumped up by media hype, which surrounds even the most mundane of tours there days.

Back in 1974, the English media adopted a low-key, almost comatose, approach to anything other than Ashes summers, but despite that India were an intriguing proposition and many predicted a close series.

India arrived in a bitterly cold England in April as the leading side in the world. In the previous three years they had won series in the Caribbean and England, and then defeated England at home. Their superb quartet of spinners (Bishan Bedi, Chandrasekhar, Prasanna and Venkat) backed by some top batsmen (Sunil Gavaskar, Ajit Wadekar, Gundappa Viswanath) made them a formidable team, albeit one lacking any real seam prowess. West Indies and Australia were rebuilding, while England, on the back of a drawn series in the West Indies the previous winter, were considered by many to be running India a close second.

Ten of India's 12 three-day warm-up matches were drawn, largely because of what Wisden described as "outrageously unkind" cold, wet weather, which was a hallmark of the summer. Only in the last two games, against Essex and Surrey, did the tourists win, and unexpectedly it was seam bowler Abid Ali who did much of the damage on both occasions.

In the first Test, at a damp and chilly Old Trafford, India lost by 113 runs. The total attendance of 19,700 over the five days was the lowest recorded in England for a five-day Test. India's performance was lacklustre, and their spinners failed to cope with alien conditions.

They won the two tour matches ahead of the second Test at Lord's, although Imran Khan caused them more than a few problems by making 160 for Cambridge and Oxford Universities.


Geoff Arnold and Chris Old celebrate India's rout, England v India, 2nd Test, Lord's, June 24, 1974
Geoff Arnold and Chris Old celebrate India's rout © Getty Images
Enlarge

All the talk in the build-up to the game centred on the England selectors' decision to drop an out-of-form Geoff Boycott in favour of David Lloyd. It was the start of three years of largely self-imposed international exile for Boycott.

At Lord's, finally the sun came out, but on the plumbest of pitches England made hay after winning the toss and piled up 629 with hundreds from Dennis Amiss, Tony Greig and captain Mike Denness. It could have been worse for India - at one stage on the second afternoon England had been 571 for 4.

India's three-pronged spin attack - Venkat was the one to miss out - was mauled. Bedi became only the third bowler to concede 200 runs in an innings in a Test in England, finishing with 6 for 226, while the overall figures for the trio were 8 for 425. Bhagwat Chandrasekhar only bowled 10 overs after damaging a finger. Wadekar was questioned in the press for his reluctance to use Abid Ali, and for almost blanking Eknath Solkar, who bowled six overs with the new ball on the first morning and was not called upon again.

When India replied, they cruised to 131 for 0 - Gavaskar and Farokh Engineer batting without a care in the world in front of a sun-drenched crowd on the Saturday morning. The small Ladbrokes tent at the Nursery End offered 6-4 for the draw, and few believed there would be any other result.

Although Gavaskar fell shortly before lunch, there was no cause for alarm in the Indian camp. And yet, from then on wickets fell regularly, largely because of poor shot selection and a strategy of playing shots rather than settling down to play for the draw. "There was something reckless about the way several got out," wrote John Woodcock in the Cricketer. "I am all for adventure by that has to be tempered by judgement." India were bowled out minutes before the close for 302 - a deficit of 327 - and asked to follow on, ended on 2 for 0.

With the pitch remaining true, the fourth day, which was after a rest day on Sunday, was expected to be another one that favoured the batsmen. However, the Monday morning was overcast and humid, offering markedly different conditions to those on the first three days, and in front of a small crowd England's seam pairing of Chris Old and Geoff Arnold wreaked havoc, skittling India for 42.


Indian fans take over the temporarily roofless Mound Stand, England v India, 2nd Test, Lord's, June 22, 1974
Indian fans take over the temporarily roofless Mound Stand on the hot Saturday afternoon of the Lord's Test © PA Photos
Enlarge

"The ball didn't do as much in the air as everybody thought, but it certainly went off the pitch," said Arnold, who started the rout with 4 for 8 in his first four overs. "Obviously what happened was that it had sweated under the covers overnight and greened up just enough to give the ball the sort of purchase I needed. It was amazing really. Just one of those days." He was not even in the original starting XI, only coming in when Bob Willis pulled out on the eve of the game with a strained back.

In the second over Engineer, who had top-scored with 86 in the first innings, perished leg-before to a straight one from Arnold, who had put doubt in his mind with an awayswinger followed by an inswinger before the ball that held its line.

An over later India were 5 for 2 when Wadekar was completely cleaned up by Old, and soon after, Arnold dismissed Viswanath courtesy of a low catch in front of first slip by Alan Knott.

While several batsmen perished to poor strokes, Brijesh Patel, in superb form in the county matches but cruelly exposed against the moving ball in the Tests, was undone by a snorter from Arnold that moved away and lifted; Knott took his second catch to leave India 14 for 4.

While Gavaskar remained, the previously noisy Indian contingent in the Mound Stand had hope, but he was trapped back in his crease by an Arnold inswinger to leave India 25 for 5, and after that it was a procession.

Old, operating from the Nursery End with a slight breeze behind him, polished off the innings by bowling Prasanna and Bedi with successive deliveries, but was deprived of a hat-trick opportunity when Chandrasekhar, still nursing an injured thumb, opted not to bat. In 65 minutes and 15 overs, India had lost nine wickets for 40. Old, who finished with a Test-best 5 for 21, ended with a burst of 4 for 6 in 17 balls.

Solkar was left marooned on 18 not out, his innings including a bouncer on the head from Old and then a hooked six the next delivery, when the bowler dug in another one.

As Arnold and Old posed on the pavilion balcony for press photos, Wadekar did not even allow his players time to sit down and change, forcing them back to the Nursery End for a long net session. When he finally faced the journalists, he admitted, "we have fallen a long way today before some fine seam bowling".

"On Sunday I thought we were only halfway through this fight," admitted Denness. "I certainly never expected anything like this."


Brijesh Patel is caught by Alan Knott off Geoff Arnold for 1, England v India, 2nd Test, Lord's, June 24, 1974
Brijesh Patel is caught by Alan Knott off Arnold for 1 as India's innings falls apart © PA Photos
Enlarge

Gavaskar said it was simply that "Arnold and Old bowled five good balls which got our five top batsman out... after that there was no resistance from the tailenders."

Jack Bailey, the MCC secretary, was left facing angry spectators, who had paid for a full day. "We are always sorry when a match finishes early," he told the Daily Express, but he dismissed suggestions the teams should have played a beer match. "We tried it some years ago and it was found the cricket was so anti-climactic that neither the crowd or spectators found it entertaining."

"To Indians in India this might seem like the end of the golden age," Woodcock wrote in the Times. "Having become accustomed to success, they will not have cared to hear India had been bowled out for the lowest score they had ever made and the lowest ever to be made in a Lord's Test."

In the Cricketer, former England captain Tony Lewis said India's problems "might have been technical in conditions which favoured movement off the pitch, but the psychological test of replying to a total of 629 surely underlay their difficulties. In that case everything must go right. All the clichés of a dressing room must be realised - or else the trough is deep and pitch dark. India fell headlong down the familiar slope of despondency."

But Wisden pulled few punches. "Basically, [India's] batting was not much weaker than in 1971… but collectively [it] was too weak and brittle to be able to hold its own at international level. As captain, Wadekar had obviously used up all his luck in building up his hitherto unbeaten record."

What happened next?

  • England routed India in the final Test, at Edgbaston, scoring 459 for 2 and bowling India for 165 and 216 to win the match by an innings and 67 runs, and in so doing completing a 3-0 series whitewash
  • England, buoyed by this and a hard-fought drawn series against Pakistan, headed to Australia with media expectations they would be able to defend the Ashes. They were crushed 4-1 and blown away by the pace of Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thomson
  • Wadekar was sacked as captain and retired soon after, while Denness was fired after losing the first Test of the following summer to Australia

Is there an incident from the past you would like to know more about? Email us with your comments and suggestions.

Martin Williamson is executive editor of ESPNcricinfo and managing editor of ESPN Digital Media in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

RSS Feeds: Martin Williamson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by ArijitC on (July 18, 2011, 21:14 GMT)

Do you remember the 2nd test they played in SA? :)

Posted by karthikfromchennai on (July 18, 2011, 14:41 GMT)

@Umar-Amir-Junaid, no problem if india loses 4-0. Remember last time pak toured england and the result was 10, 7 and 5...you know what i mean? lol...at least we can be sure that no such results this summer.

Posted by   on (July 17, 2011, 23:23 GMT)

I was cycling from IIT to home. It was about an hours ride.Radio commentary was what we had. When I started the score was 5 for 2 wickets. I reached home and switched on the radio there was no cricket commentary. I thought there was some technical transmission problem, which was very common those days. After trying for sometime I gave up. Only in the next day papers I realised the match had got over during my ride. Unbelievable. And what I vauguely remember is that the top scorer in that 42 all out was dropped for the next test.

Posted by   on (July 17, 2011, 7:28 GMT)

@Umar-Amir-Junaid, lets see what happens in this season. At least some true competition and sporting actions will be seen. Not like last summer when spot fixing scandle ruined the cricket. Place and value of India in cricket at the moment is at highest level as world can not survive without their money ;).

Posted by krish_2011 on (July 17, 2011, 7:16 GMT)

India became No. 1 today by sheer hard work and not by fluke. Why doesn't it count if India wins at home, and for England/Australia/South Africa it is an achievement if they win at home? Those who dismiss India's performances at home are crying because they cannot win against a strong Indian team at home. Isn't it common to have home advantage? Since 2003 which team won against India by a margin bigger than one test in their country, and other than Australia in 2004 who could beat India in India? Pakistan, England, West Indies, South Africa, New Zealand, Sri lanka, and recently Australia have all lost series at home. India won due to world class players like Sachin, Dravid, Laxman, Sehwag, Gambhir, Yuvraj, Zaheer, Dhoni and Bhajji. It is stupid to run down India's achievements. Whatever be the outcome of this series, it cannot undermine India's recent excellent test record. If England win, it is due to roaring form of their bowlers just like Indian batting in the last two years.

Posted by   on (July 17, 2011, 6:40 GMT)

India still havent uncovered bowlers with excellent pace, bounce and swing and the spin talent is fading too.

Posted by allblue on (July 16, 2011, 21:31 GMT)

@serious-am-i I respect your honest comment, but as an England fan I have to disagree with you! I think India are the best Test side at the moment, but the gap between them, South Africa and England and is a narrow one. We've become accustomed to one side being way better than the rest - first the Windies then Australia, but it's far more competitive now, and that has to be a good thing. One thing's for sure - I don't think England will bowl India out for 42 this time round!

Posted by serious-am-i on (July 16, 2011, 19:13 GMT)

I am an Indian and an proud Indian fan and I am yet to see or believe India is the best side in the world yet though. People would argue about that, but that's the hard reality. Though, I would def. confirm India is far better than the other sub-continental teams both on paper and on pitch - may not be the supreme with the fast bowling unit but has the batting unit to balance it up. I will not be surprised if either India lose the test series or drew it with England, for sure it will not be a white-wash that I can guarantee & will be hard fought series beginning from second test, as India has a problem of slow start always - I expect no change in that. @Umar: learn to value other teams as well, pakistan isn't the only cricketing country in the world.

Posted by Champagne_Cricket on (July 16, 2011, 17:33 GMT)

Reminds me on how the SL team folded not so long ago against England..

Posted by   on (July 16, 2011, 17:26 GMT)

They are the tigers just at home, and at sub continent.....I bet they cant win the series against the best test playing nation at this moment!

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Martin WilliamsonClose
Martin Williamson Executive editor Martin Williamson joined the Wisden website in its planning stages in 2001 after failing to make his millions in the internet boom when managing editor of Sportal. Before that he was in charge of Sky Sports Online and helped launch and run Sky News Online. With a preference for all things old (except his wife and children), he has recently confounded colleagues by displaying an uncharacteristic fondness for Twenty20 cricket. His enthusiasm for the game is sadly not matched by his ability, but he remains convinced that he might be a late developer and perseveres in the hope of an England call-up with his middle-order batting and non-spinning offbreaks. He is now managing editor of ESPN EMEA Digital Group as well as his Cricinfo responsibilities.

    Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?

    85 Tests, 70 defeats

Numbers Game: Bangladesh's stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests

Zulu finds fulfilment in coaching

After limping out of international cricket, Lance Klusener slipped off the radar, but his coaching stint with Dolphins has given them a higher profile and self-belief

Chanderpaul, the coach's nightmare

Modern Masters: He developed a rhythm that worked for him and gave him better balance at the crease

Johnson v McLaren: a tale of two blows

Russell Jackson: The South African allrounder had the misfortune of being in the line of fire twice this year

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

From Constantine to Chanderpaul

As West Indies play their 500th Test, here's an interactive journey through their Test history

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

The umpire's bowling change

Plays of the day from the CLT20 game between Kolkata Knight Riders and Chennai Super Kings

News | Features Last 7 days