March 5, 2012

Double impact

Virender Sehwag's 219 took the number of double-centuries in men's List A cricket to a neat 11. Here they are in detail
28

Alistair Brown, 268
Easily the highest score in senior limited-overs cricket remains Brown's astonishing 268 for Surrey against Glamorgan in a C&G Trophy match at The Oval in 2002. The free-hitting Brown - the only man with two entries on this list - hit 30 fours and 12 sixes from 160 balls: he shared an opening stand of 286 with Ian Ward (97). Glamorgan seamer Darren Thomas was left nursing figures of 3 for 108 from nine overs. "I'm probably in the best form of my life," said Brown, although he was forced to admit: "Mind you, it's 268 more than I got against Scotland a couple of weeks ago!" Even though Brown hauled Surrey to a total of 438, they came remarkably close to losing: with The Oval sporting an uncharacteristically short leg-side boundary of about 55 yards, Glamorgan's spirited reply ended up only nine short.

Graeme Pollock, 222*
The first man to reach 200 was one of the all-time greats: Pollock, the powerful South African left-hander, lashed 222 not out for Eastern Province against Border in a Gillette Cup match in East London in October 1974. Pollock admitted to a spot of good fortune: "The other captain mucked up his maths and bowled his best bowlers out early. He had to put on the part-timers at the end, so I got lucky and was able to score 78 off the last four overs." It didn't matter much: Border made no attempt at EP's 60-over total of 372 for 5, finishing with 166 for 2.

Virender Sehwag, 219
For years people had been wondering just how many Sehwag might score if he batted through the innings in a one-day international. And in Indore last December they found out (well, almost: actually he was out in the 47th over). Sehwag blasted the hapless West Indian bowlers for 25 fours and seven sixes as he joined his illustrious team-mate Sachin Tendulkar in the 200 club. Tendulkar wasn't there to see his record being broken, though - he was rested from that series and was flying to Australia at the time. Sehwag's game plan was simple: "Whenever I hit the ball into the gaps, it would go for four. Whenever I decided to hit a six, I would hit with a straight bat and it would go for six." Even he had to admit it wasn't always that easy: "This opportunity will come only once in a lifetime, and I am happy I have taken it."

Mohammad Ali, 207
Mohammad Ali (no, not that one!) is one of the lesser lights on this list. He's never yet made a hundred in a ten-year first-class career, while 31 senior one-day games have brought him just 854 runs. But nearly a quarter of those came in one innings - 207, with 24 fours and six sixes, for Pakistan Customs against the Defence Housing Authority in a Patron's Cup one-day game in Sialkot in April 2005.

Alvin Kallicharran, 206
One of the big days for a Minor County player a few years ago was the annual match against first-class opposition in the NatWest Trophy. Occasionally it produced an upset: more often a thrashing was the order of the day. One of the biggest of those came at Edgbaston in 1984, when the West Indian Test batsman Kallicharran caned Oxfordshire's part-timers for 206, as Warwickshire hurtled to 392 for 5. Just to make sure there was no argument about the Man-of-the-Match award, Kalli then dusted off his little-used offspinners and took 6 for 32.

Khalid Latif, 204*
Karachi Dolphins' captain Latif smashed 204 not out against Quetta in an RBS Cup match in Karachi in March 2009. He hit 19 fours and seven sixes, and piled on 239 for the second wicket with Asad Shafiq (105). Shafiq has since become a Test regular, while Latif has had to content himself with a handful of one-day and Twenty 20 international appearances. But he is still only 26.

Alistair Brown, 203
Brown's second entry on this list came in an AXA League match in Guildford in 1997, when he sprinted to what remains the only double-century in a senior 40-over match. Playing for Surrey against Hampshire, Brown peppered the modest boundaries - and endangered traffic in the adjacent Woodbridge Road - with 11 sixes to go with 19 fours.

Alan Barrow, 202*
Natal supporters in Durban in October 1975 groaned when the home captain, the great Barry Richards, was out for 12 in a Gillette Cup match against an South Africa African XI. But Richards' opening partner, playing his first senior one-day game, took his chance: 20-year-old Barrow, who never scored another one-day hundred, pummelled 202 not out and shared an unbeaten stand of 303 with Henry Fotheringham before Natal declared (allowed in one-day games then) at 361 for 2. Their No. 5, Bob Woolmer, never got to the crease. The overmatched African XI was then blown away for 78, and lost by 283 runs.

Ravi Bopara, 201*
Dropped by England after a disappointing 2007-08 winter, Bopara had something to prove when he returned to Essex. And several fine performances were crowned in June 2008, when in the Friends Provident Trophy quarter-final in Leicester, Bopara cracked ten sixes and 18 fours in an unbeaten 201, as his side ran up an impregnable 350 for 5 (they had been in some trouble at 37 for 3 not long after he came in at No. 4). Bopara's innings eclipsed Graham Gooch's highest score for Essex of 198, and made Grace Road the only ground to have witnessed two double-centuries in one-day cricket.

Vince Wells, 201
A dozen years after Alvin Kallicharran plundered a Minor County, Wells did likewise against Berkshire in a NatWest Trophy first-round match in Grace Road in June 1996, hitting 201 as Leicestershire galloped to 406 for 5 in their 60 overs. Berkshire made a spirited reply, reaching 300: Simon Myles and Harry Hall put on 152, with Hall making a fine century of his own.

Sachin Tendulkar, 200*
It was fitting that it was Tendulkar - the leading scorer in one-day internationals by a country mile - who collected the first double-century in the format, against South Africa in Gwalior in February 2010. It was a perfectly paced innings: he reached the landmark from the 147th and last ball he faced, in the final over of the innings, after hitting 25 fours and three sixes. MS Dhoni celebrated by clouting a couple of fours to take India past 400, and they ended up winning by 153 runs.

And... Belinda Clark, 229*
Just to stop everyone writing in, we haven't forgotten that Australia's Clark made the first double-century in official one-day internationals, male or female, with an unbeaten 229 against Denmark in Mumbai during the 1997 women's World Cup. England's Charlotte Edwards, 18 at the time, also broke the previous record (156) the same day, with 173 not out against Ireland in Pune.

Steven Lynch is the editor of the Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2012.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on March 6, 2012, 12:32 GMT

    Well with All Due Respect to all in d List and Anwar, I believe Sanath J's 189 is d Best. Mind You He Scored It While 5 down for 116 in a Final

  • Duke-Count on March 6, 2012, 11:30 GMT

    Lotz of ppl writing in tht Anwar's amazing knock of 194 came at Bangalore... well, ppl, it was not B'lore but CHENNAI's MAC STADUIM, where he made tht memorable innings. Am proud to say tht as a CHENNAIITE, I got to watch tht historic innings live.

    Let me share an interesting anecdote with u all..

    Legend has it tht the day b4 the match, Shoiab Akthar broke his bat and had gone shopping, in one of the many sports shops that dot the Chepauk area (where the stadium is located). It so happened tht Anwar tried out one of the bat during nets b4 the match and took a fancy for it and requested Akthar to part with it for the match. The rest, as they say, is history. The humble Anwar then visited the shop,the day after the match, and gave a cash reward to the shop-keeper as a token of his appreciation for such a fine piece of willow. As regards the bat, Akthar gifted the same to Anwar, and it was retired after the match and now, duly, holds a pride of place in Anwar's burgeoned trophy cabinet

  • skepticaloptimist on March 6, 2012, 3:10 GMT

    It's a pointless debate this--Anwar's 194 vs Tendulkar's 200. Both are great batsmen, undoubtedly. The significance of Anwar's gem was, it created a record that stood for something like 12 years, if I'm right. Tendulkar's on the other hand, breached a mark untouched for 40 years. While Anwar's knock came in an India-Pak game, which, we all know are the most high-pressure cricket games, Tendulkar's came in a relatively relaxed game. That said, Tendulkar's came against a far superior bowling attack, and was much quicker, plus he didn't use a runner. In addition, people forget two things: 1) After getting a ton from 93, he raced to 189 from 135; and 2) Tendulkar just gave the strike to Dhoni, who was connecting well, delaying his 200 by at least six overs. Between these two great innings, I don't think Sehwag's fits anywhere, which came against a weak bowling attack, and a fielding side that dropped him so many times. Anwar's is far better than Sehwag's on any day.

  • on March 6, 2012, 2:19 GMT

    Ali ,i am a big admirer of anwar and especially that 194 of his,but with due regards to that innings it is slightly lesser then that of sachins 200 only one point of ur 3 are fair (the ground).because at that time we had that 15 over stuff if u remember.the pressure on Tendulkar throughout his 22 year career is immense specially during the 90 s.the ground on which he made was a bit tougher to bat on but then again the bowling attack which Sachin faced was much more deadlier

  • Harry_Kool on March 6, 2012, 1:34 GMT

    You have to look at these in the proper perspective. First of all, reviewing most of the grounds, all except for East London, are on the smaller scale or bottom half of ground sizes about. (Even East London is not that big). 170 at the MCG, for example would be worth any amount far in excess of 200 on most of these little grounds. However that said, the batsman still has to bat out a large proportion of the overs to get anywhere near 200 and acknowledgement should always be there. But really, I saw Gilchrist hammer 154 at the MCG in 45 overs against a very good Sri Lankan attack (in 1999 I think) that would have been over 200 on most other grounds as so many boundaries just fell short of the line as well running numerous 1"s & 2's that would have been 4's elsewhere. Probably the same as other high impact players but this is the first one that comes to mind as I watched it live.

  • on March 6, 2012, 1:17 GMT

    There would be lot of debates about who did better - first of the format remains a treasured spot - Tendulkar, fittingly scaled the peak. Sehwag's boundary hitting talent duly found it's own moment. The pitch was flat, bowling was better than it looked, but honestly so were many other times. Then there was Anwar's 194, which was a brilliant innings in a Bangalore cauldron defeating the home team's crowd and a must-win scenario, not to mention a certain Anil Kumble who rarely before or since went for more than 4 RPO. For big ODI innings close to 200 - both Viv's 180s stand out, purely for the era in which they were scored, and especially one was scored with last two men partnering him. Ditto for Kapil's 175 which turned the match on it's head from a precarious 17/5. The best however IMHO is Belinda Clark's 229 - the first int'l ODI double century, for the record, more special since the chances are fewer for women, unbeaten to boot and a remarkable physical feat in hot and humid Mumbai.

  • AlanHarrison on March 5, 2012, 21:16 GMT

    Without getting into the Tendulkar-Sehwag-Saeed Anwar debate, it's worth mentioning that before the first ODI double hundred there was lots of speculation that it would happen when someone like Sehwag, Gilchrist, or Gayle (e.g.) got in against a minnow side in the world cup or elsewhere. Yet in fact we've now had two ODI double-hundreds, and while people say they were made against poor attacks, neither of these double-hundred came against a "minnow" team. Indeed, the minnows actually have a bigger score made for them than against them, if you consider Charles Coventry's innings for Zimbabwe against Bangladesh at a time when Zimbabwe were not playing test cricket

  • rk_ks on March 5, 2012, 21:11 GMT

    Sachin and Anwar are very good players. But it is pointless to compare his 194 with Sachins 200. This article is about people who made 200. Also the quality of attack, that Sachin ihas faced is not comparable to the bowling what India had during the time Anwar scored 194. Sachin faced the best bowling attack in the world.

  • on March 5, 2012, 20:23 GMT

    all my indian friends,there are some facts which i like to mention about how anwar inning was better.... 1.that was india pakistan match(u better know the emotions of both nations).that was a pressure game 2.now a days,run scoring is very fast and powerplays in operation. 3.banglore ground was much bigger than gwaliar 4.anwar inning was in a very crucial match for both tems.both teams needed to win it to reach final of pepsi independence cup. so my friends,these are facts.i know facts are difficult to digest but i think u should.

  • on March 5, 2012, 20:07 GMT

    @vimalan and cricfan06. No one could dream of scoring 194 in them days in international cricket against india. in them days 194 would have been a decent total for the whole team. and he also held the record for 13 years which speaks volume for the greatness of the man . his innings will will be way superior than tendulkars and sehwags.

  • on March 6, 2012, 12:32 GMT

    Well with All Due Respect to all in d List and Anwar, I believe Sanath J's 189 is d Best. Mind You He Scored It While 5 down for 116 in a Final

  • Duke-Count on March 6, 2012, 11:30 GMT

    Lotz of ppl writing in tht Anwar's amazing knock of 194 came at Bangalore... well, ppl, it was not B'lore but CHENNAI's MAC STADUIM, where he made tht memorable innings. Am proud to say tht as a CHENNAIITE, I got to watch tht historic innings live.

    Let me share an interesting anecdote with u all..

    Legend has it tht the day b4 the match, Shoiab Akthar broke his bat and had gone shopping, in one of the many sports shops that dot the Chepauk area (where the stadium is located). It so happened tht Anwar tried out one of the bat during nets b4 the match and took a fancy for it and requested Akthar to part with it for the match. The rest, as they say, is history. The humble Anwar then visited the shop,the day after the match, and gave a cash reward to the shop-keeper as a token of his appreciation for such a fine piece of willow. As regards the bat, Akthar gifted the same to Anwar, and it was retired after the match and now, duly, holds a pride of place in Anwar's burgeoned trophy cabinet

  • skepticaloptimist on March 6, 2012, 3:10 GMT

    It's a pointless debate this--Anwar's 194 vs Tendulkar's 200. Both are great batsmen, undoubtedly. The significance of Anwar's gem was, it created a record that stood for something like 12 years, if I'm right. Tendulkar's on the other hand, breached a mark untouched for 40 years. While Anwar's knock came in an India-Pak game, which, we all know are the most high-pressure cricket games, Tendulkar's came in a relatively relaxed game. That said, Tendulkar's came against a far superior bowling attack, and was much quicker, plus he didn't use a runner. In addition, people forget two things: 1) After getting a ton from 93, he raced to 189 from 135; and 2) Tendulkar just gave the strike to Dhoni, who was connecting well, delaying his 200 by at least six overs. Between these two great innings, I don't think Sehwag's fits anywhere, which came against a weak bowling attack, and a fielding side that dropped him so many times. Anwar's is far better than Sehwag's on any day.

  • on March 6, 2012, 2:19 GMT

    Ali ,i am a big admirer of anwar and especially that 194 of his,but with due regards to that innings it is slightly lesser then that of sachins 200 only one point of ur 3 are fair (the ground).because at that time we had that 15 over stuff if u remember.the pressure on Tendulkar throughout his 22 year career is immense specially during the 90 s.the ground on which he made was a bit tougher to bat on but then again the bowling attack which Sachin faced was much more deadlier

  • Harry_Kool on March 6, 2012, 1:34 GMT

    You have to look at these in the proper perspective. First of all, reviewing most of the grounds, all except for East London, are on the smaller scale or bottom half of ground sizes about. (Even East London is not that big). 170 at the MCG, for example would be worth any amount far in excess of 200 on most of these little grounds. However that said, the batsman still has to bat out a large proportion of the overs to get anywhere near 200 and acknowledgement should always be there. But really, I saw Gilchrist hammer 154 at the MCG in 45 overs against a very good Sri Lankan attack (in 1999 I think) that would have been over 200 on most other grounds as so many boundaries just fell short of the line as well running numerous 1"s & 2's that would have been 4's elsewhere. Probably the same as other high impact players but this is the first one that comes to mind as I watched it live.

  • on March 6, 2012, 1:17 GMT

    There would be lot of debates about who did better - first of the format remains a treasured spot - Tendulkar, fittingly scaled the peak. Sehwag's boundary hitting talent duly found it's own moment. The pitch was flat, bowling was better than it looked, but honestly so were many other times. Then there was Anwar's 194, which was a brilliant innings in a Bangalore cauldron defeating the home team's crowd and a must-win scenario, not to mention a certain Anil Kumble who rarely before or since went for more than 4 RPO. For big ODI innings close to 200 - both Viv's 180s stand out, purely for the era in which they were scored, and especially one was scored with last two men partnering him. Ditto for Kapil's 175 which turned the match on it's head from a precarious 17/5. The best however IMHO is Belinda Clark's 229 - the first int'l ODI double century, for the record, more special since the chances are fewer for women, unbeaten to boot and a remarkable physical feat in hot and humid Mumbai.

  • AlanHarrison on March 5, 2012, 21:16 GMT

    Without getting into the Tendulkar-Sehwag-Saeed Anwar debate, it's worth mentioning that before the first ODI double hundred there was lots of speculation that it would happen when someone like Sehwag, Gilchrist, or Gayle (e.g.) got in against a minnow side in the world cup or elsewhere. Yet in fact we've now had two ODI double-hundreds, and while people say they were made against poor attacks, neither of these double-hundred came against a "minnow" team. Indeed, the minnows actually have a bigger score made for them than against them, if you consider Charles Coventry's innings for Zimbabwe against Bangladesh at a time when Zimbabwe were not playing test cricket

  • rk_ks on March 5, 2012, 21:11 GMT

    Sachin and Anwar are very good players. But it is pointless to compare his 194 with Sachins 200. This article is about people who made 200. Also the quality of attack, that Sachin ihas faced is not comparable to the bowling what India had during the time Anwar scored 194. Sachin faced the best bowling attack in the world.

  • on March 5, 2012, 20:23 GMT

    all my indian friends,there are some facts which i like to mention about how anwar inning was better.... 1.that was india pakistan match(u better know the emotions of both nations).that was a pressure game 2.now a days,run scoring is very fast and powerplays in operation. 3.banglore ground was much bigger than gwaliar 4.anwar inning was in a very crucial match for both tems.both teams needed to win it to reach final of pepsi independence cup. so my friends,these are facts.i know facts are difficult to digest but i think u should.

  • on March 5, 2012, 20:07 GMT

    @vimalan and cricfan06. No one could dream of scoring 194 in them days in international cricket against india. in them days 194 would have been a decent total for the whole team. and he also held the record for 13 years which speaks volume for the greatness of the man . his innings will will be way superior than tendulkars and sehwags.

  • HawksEyeFocused on March 5, 2012, 19:24 GMT

    Though I'm Indian but the fact is Sachin and Sehwag's 200s were nothing compared to Saeed Anwar's 194 VS India in India. He was a great Pakistani legend. We, all Indians salute to greater Pakistani talent!!!

  • Erebus26 on March 5, 2012, 19:12 GMT

    Graeme Pollock and Alvin Kallicharan - better batsmen than flat track bullies such as Tendulkar and Sehwag.

  • on March 5, 2012, 17:53 GMT

    @Peter While not taking any credit away from Shane Watson, it is easy to go all guns blazing when you know the target is small and your team is much stronger than the opposition. Batting first, he would probably not be so "reckless", and would have played in a more "organized" way. Besides, he has got several other opportunities to bat first.

  • asmohankumar on March 5, 2012, 16:57 GMT

    Guys.. first thing we must keep in mind that we are talking about 200's. And apart from Sachin no one has done so against a quality attack, Sachin have done it against an attack which had the best fast bowler in the world (contemporary), Morkel and one of the best death bowler in the world in Lagveldt.

  • on March 5, 2012, 14:59 GMT

    Saeed Anwar was a genious, his and tendulkar's innings was the best. Sehwag's was just against a bad bowling attack.

  • cricfan06 on March 5, 2012, 14:34 GMT

    @Matt, of course it was the best. @Hammad.. Saeed Anwar? Seriously dude?

  • on March 5, 2012, 14:34 GMT

    @Hammand

    I am struggling to understand how Anwar's innings is better than Sachin's ? Anwar played more than half of his innings with a runner and that too against an India attack whereas Sachin played against one of the best attacks and best fielding teams, SA. He also ran all his runs on his own. Now tell me how is Anwar's innings better ? BTW Anwar didn't reach 200 that we are discussing now, did he ?

  • Pavan_15 on March 5, 2012, 12:20 GMT

    I appreciate the collection of these records.....and i bet most of us aren't even aware of these!! So get to know these things rather arguing or making a meaningless discussion!!

  • Pavan_15 on March 5, 2012, 12:15 GMT

    aahh!! Come on people now cut this out!! Stop saying that " Just think what shane watson would have done.....wat saeed anwar have done..."...they might had the chance to do it but they DID NOT do it!! And that stays like that in the Statistics!! So stop imagining and view the records which were actually broken..rather imagining whether it might have been broken in this way or by this cricketer!!

    What a meaning less discussion it is!!

  • AlanHarrison on March 5, 2012, 10:23 GMT

    @Nutcutlet: while I agree that about a decade ago Engannd tended to chop and change their ODI line up too much, they seem to have gone too far the other way these days, specifically with the batting line-up in test matches, and seem to go about three years between considering dropping any player. Also, while I think Ali Brown was a bit hard done by, he was not alone in this; there were at least two equally talented opening batsmen of his era who were as shabbily treated by the selectors, namely Mal Loye and Vikram Solanki (OK, Solanki did get to play a few more ODIs, but merited a chance in tests as well, and Loye must have only got a cahcne in about 12 ODIs).

  • Nutcutlet on March 5, 2012, 9:56 GMT

    The handling of Ali Brown by the England selectors of the day will remain forever as a blot on their record. He was picked and dropped, picked and dropped - and when he had played 16 ODIs, that was it. True, he didn't play to his potential, but is that any surprise when a freescoring batsman is given no confidence by being regarded as the plaything of selectorial whim? In the current era he would have been handled very differently and given every chance to establish himself in the team. He was an outstanding fielder too. Thank heavens that those days are past, but there were several casualties of that shambolic system - and Ali Brown heads that list.

  • on March 5, 2012, 9:37 GMT

    Although Saeed Anwar has't made 200, but still surely his innings is much better than Tendulkar and Sehwag that played in front of opposite crowd and ground.

  • on March 5, 2012, 8:57 GMT

    Oh of course Sachin's was the best as everything he does is the best, no? What a shame India can't clone him, then they might stand a chance. Mind you, he seems over the hill to me now and this quest for 100th century will hurt India through poor selection.

  • CapeTownSummer on March 5, 2012, 8:02 GMT

    the argument will always be that most of these scores was the result of bullying inferior opposition, but that being said- plenty of other worthy batsmen have had similar oppourtunities, and as sehwag was quoted to have said- that it's a once in a lifetime opportunity that needs to be cashed in :) as i observed sach's innings on the telly (in obvious awe), i kept reminding myself that we've overcome something similar in the greatest ODI not too long ago (but clearly lightning doesn't strike twice lol). my money's on the little master hanging up his gloves on THAT illusive 100!

  • on March 5, 2012, 7:25 GMT

    Makes you wonder what Shane Watson would have scored if Australia batted first, when he made 185* off 90-odd deliveries vs Bangladesh.

  • on March 5, 2012, 5:41 GMT

    Pretty cool list. Thanks for pointing out some of the more obscure double-centurions.

  • johnathonjosephs on March 5, 2012, 5:09 GMT

    3 of the people on this list did it in 60 overs...... That Alistair Brown guy has some real aggressive batting though... One of his double century came in a 40 over match!

  • on March 5, 2012, 3:16 GMT

    Sachin's 200 was best of them all. It was against best bawling attack and best fielding side of world. Truly Immortal Innings.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on March 5, 2012, 3:16 GMT

    Sachin's 200 was best of them all. It was against best bawling attack and best fielding side of world. Truly Immortal Innings.

  • johnathonjosephs on March 5, 2012, 5:09 GMT

    3 of the people on this list did it in 60 overs...... That Alistair Brown guy has some real aggressive batting though... One of his double century came in a 40 over match!

  • on March 5, 2012, 5:41 GMT

    Pretty cool list. Thanks for pointing out some of the more obscure double-centurions.

  • on March 5, 2012, 7:25 GMT

    Makes you wonder what Shane Watson would have scored if Australia batted first, when he made 185* off 90-odd deliveries vs Bangladesh.

  • CapeTownSummer on March 5, 2012, 8:02 GMT

    the argument will always be that most of these scores was the result of bullying inferior opposition, but that being said- plenty of other worthy batsmen have had similar oppourtunities, and as sehwag was quoted to have said- that it's a once in a lifetime opportunity that needs to be cashed in :) as i observed sach's innings on the telly (in obvious awe), i kept reminding myself that we've overcome something similar in the greatest ODI not too long ago (but clearly lightning doesn't strike twice lol). my money's on the little master hanging up his gloves on THAT illusive 100!

  • on March 5, 2012, 8:57 GMT

    Oh of course Sachin's was the best as everything he does is the best, no? What a shame India can't clone him, then they might stand a chance. Mind you, he seems over the hill to me now and this quest for 100th century will hurt India through poor selection.

  • on March 5, 2012, 9:37 GMT

    Although Saeed Anwar has't made 200, but still surely his innings is much better than Tendulkar and Sehwag that played in front of opposite crowd and ground.

  • Nutcutlet on March 5, 2012, 9:56 GMT

    The handling of Ali Brown by the England selectors of the day will remain forever as a blot on their record. He was picked and dropped, picked and dropped - and when he had played 16 ODIs, that was it. True, he didn't play to his potential, but is that any surprise when a freescoring batsman is given no confidence by being regarded as the plaything of selectorial whim? In the current era he would have been handled very differently and given every chance to establish himself in the team. He was an outstanding fielder too. Thank heavens that those days are past, but there were several casualties of that shambolic system - and Ali Brown heads that list.

  • AlanHarrison on March 5, 2012, 10:23 GMT

    @Nutcutlet: while I agree that about a decade ago Engannd tended to chop and change their ODI line up too much, they seem to have gone too far the other way these days, specifically with the batting line-up in test matches, and seem to go about three years between considering dropping any player. Also, while I think Ali Brown was a bit hard done by, he was not alone in this; there were at least two equally talented opening batsmen of his era who were as shabbily treated by the selectors, namely Mal Loye and Vikram Solanki (OK, Solanki did get to play a few more ODIs, but merited a chance in tests as well, and Loye must have only got a cahcne in about 12 ODIs).

  • Pavan_15 on March 5, 2012, 12:15 GMT

    aahh!! Come on people now cut this out!! Stop saying that " Just think what shane watson would have done.....wat saeed anwar have done..."...they might had the chance to do it but they DID NOT do it!! And that stays like that in the Statistics!! So stop imagining and view the records which were actually broken..rather imagining whether it might have been broken in this way or by this cricketer!!

    What a meaning less discussion it is!!