Mark Nicholas
Mark Nicholas Mark NicholasRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Hampshire batsman; host of Channel 9's cricket coverage

Once flawless, England now oddly insecure

How hard will it be for them to get the wheels back on, Pietersen and all?

Mark Nicholas

August 10, 2012

Comments: 69 | Text size: A | A

Kevin Pietersen fell to the second ball of day four, England v South Africa, 2nd Investec Test, Headingley, 4th day, August 5, 2012
A player who divides opinion can be part of a team that's winning; it's different in a losing side © AFP
Enlarge

Lucky to work on the Olympic Games in London, this writer missed (the first such instance at home since 1995) the recent Leeds Test match between England and South Africa. I had hoped the view from afar would be as rewarding as the one from the boundary. But no, nothing beats being there. For all the brilliance of the many modern media platforms, live sport is still the greatest thrill.

Thus, damn it, I missed KP's epic - though this disappointment was tempered by a weekend that included Jessica Ennis, Mo Farah and Usain Bolt. How spoilt us journalists are, and in the best seats too. The roar in the Olympic Stadium as Farah attacked the final 200 of his 10,000 metre triumph was off the chart, something only matched in my lifetime for its dramatic content by Ian Botham's five-wicket heist at Edgbaston in 1981, England's wins at Edgbaston and Trent Bridge in 2005, the semi-final penalty shoot-out against the Germans at Wembley in 1996, and Jonny Wilkinson's drop goal to win the World Cup in Sydney in 2003. Nick Faldo's 1995 Ryder Cup putt against Curtis Strange at Oak Hill Country Club comes close but Faldo was holing out for Europe not Great Britain, and there is a difference in the collective identity of the achievement. To emphasise this, think of MS Dhoni's jaw-dropping strike to win the World Cup in Mumbai last year and imagine the response, not just in the stadium, but India-wide.

The true appeal of sport lies in its unpredictability. Moments of perfection are mixed freely with the theatre of the absurd. For the overwhelming excitement provided by Farah - and equally by Ennis moments before him - there are myriad examples of tortured failure. Britain is waving its flag right now but the days of despair are not so distant.

This thought occurred to me watching bits and pieces of England's performance at Headingley. A year ago flawless, and now oddly insecure, the team struggled to impose itself. Selection reveals much of this insecurity - not just to those on the outside, who have time to reflect and then judge, but most relevantly to those on the inside, who feel the tension of decisions taken around them. There is no logic to playing a five-day game of cricket without a spin bowler, particularly one so good as Graeme Swann. The South Africans would have fed from it as further evidence of the panic caused by the heavy beating they inflicted on England at The Oval.

England's players would have reacted with equal fascination, but rather than feed from it, would have found themselves with gritted teeth, fearful of swallowing the facts and willing the upside - i.e. win the toss; make use of the four specialist seamers by bowling first; yikes, we had better hold on to our catches; if we don't knock 'em over today, the chance of winning the series will have gone, etc.

 
 
By Flower's admission, England went to the UAE last winter underprepared. Not by much but by enough for an eager opponent to bite their backsides off. If you ask him in a few months' time, he might admit that they got it wrong at Headingley too
 

England's selectors, completely out of character, had chosen to twist. The message was confused: "Hasn't anyone told you, the house will always win?" Then the players will have looked up to the clear sky and thought, "Whoops, shouldn't we be batting?" (There is this cricket saying at some grounds in the world, and Headingley is first amongst them: "Look up not down." Which means make your choices based on the weather, the cloud cover or otherwise, not on the pitch.) The rub is that you could not meet two more measured men than Andrew Strauss and Andy Flower. If together even they can come up with such a howler, be assured the team can follow suit.

Such are the minutiae of sport. A choice here, a decision there; an injury here, a misfire there, and suddenly the wheels are off. By Flower's admission, England went to the UAE last winter underprepared. Not by much but by enough for an eager opponent to bite their backsides off. If you ask him in a few months' time, he might admit that they got it wrong at Headingley too. Of course, the real point here is how hard it becomes to get those wheels back on. Which brings us to Kevin Pietersen.

A divisive player - if that is what he is, and it is a hard call - can be part of a winning team without much ado. But for such a player to be a part of a team that has its back to the wall is another issue altogether. This needs both parties to come together, to see the shared flaws in their approach to one another and to establish whether they want/need each other enough to make sacrifices. Good teams are built on sacrifices, which take various forms but are mainly about acceptance, integration, discipline and respect. Not quite all for one, one for all - that is a paragon born of unlikely idealism - but something that ebbs and flows out of consideration for each detail that then leads to the desired effect.

The audience takes these things for granted, often forgetting that the characters we watch, and from whom we expect so much, are brittle. For all his bravado, Pietersen is brittle. Observe his press conference on these pages and for the quote "It's not easy being me in this team" read "Help, I'm brittle, I can break, I'm lost, sometimes lonely, but I can bat like no other and that's enough, isn't it… isn't it?" Well, is it? That is the question put before those who manage the England team. Is this one player's high maintenance worth it?

From afar, from the Olympic Park, where on a small television screen Pietersen's strokeplay captured the imagination every bit as much as Bolt's sprint and Farah's chase, the answer would be an unequivocal yes. Up close, where the detail is in your face, the answer may be less certain. What a terrible waste if the answer were to become no, a waste both parties would ultimately regret.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

RSS Feeds: Mark Nicholas

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by zenboomerang on (August 13, 2012, 11:10 GMT)

@Mark Nicholas... Wow - going from "Fortess England" to "England now oddly insecure" within a few Test matches... Really know how to write (cough, choke, splutter)... The reality is that Eng haven't come up against a decent bowling attack for years, up until the Pak UAE Tests - now they have come up against a team with good allround skills in all departments.... Work it out for yourself...

Posted by foursandsixes on (August 12, 2012, 13:50 GMT)

"Flawless" is laughable indeed! Their only advantage is that visiting teams (esp. subcontinent) are not used to playing in cold, damp, and overcast conditions. Take that away and they are average.

Posted by   on (August 12, 2012, 11:06 GMT)

"How spoilt us journalists are..." That should read, "How spoilt WE journalists are...", Mark. Tut-tut-tut.

Posted by RodStark on (August 11, 2012, 16:35 GMT)

"Flawless" is a ridiculous exaggeration, but England were for a while the best of a rather mediocre bunch. Beating Australia in Australia over 5 tests is not bad, even if Australia were having their own problems at the time. And no matter how awful India were last year, England could not have beaten them much more convincingly than they did. Teams like the old WI and Australia were the exception rather than the rule. I don't know why everyone seems unwilling to accept a team as "number one" unless they achieve that level of dominance; more likely, the rankngs will see a number of teams move in and out of that position over the next few years--and to me that's a lot more interesting. Also, from what I recall, most of the nonsense about the team being "flawless" or "invincible" has come from journalists and others outside the team rather than the team itself.

Posted by applethief on (August 11, 2012, 16:32 GMT)

@ davidpk Many thanks, I was just after some examples where England were under pressure and managed to find a win, instead of either crumbling or being in situations where it was simply dominating another side. I think it's useful to know how a side performs under match pressure instead of just see-sawing

Posted by jackiethepen on (August 11, 2012, 12:42 GMT)

I'm amazed at the criticism of the England team as 6 Tavares when South Africa have barely been batting at more than 2 an over to set up their innings. That slow run rate is just the ticket if you are trying to save a game. Fair enough. But South Africa have been batting that cautiously in their first innings. Not exactly speed merchants then! As for KP, nobody is getting rid of him. He is getting rid of himself by unacceptable behaviour if the latest saga of the texts to his IPL mates is verified. During the Headingley Test he is supposed to have sent texts critical of his captain, his coach and his team mates. Which side is he on?

Posted by Soso_killer on (August 11, 2012, 10:35 GMT)

As a South African fan i must say i'm dissapointed by the logic england were lucky to be no.1 (yes their media was over the top about it, and got carried away with the comparison of Australia and West Indies of the past), they derseved to be no.1 based on their consistency in their home conditions. What about us we couldn't manage to a test series win at home, were we 'unlucky'? Please, yes we are the best travellers currently, but we should 1st build a fotress at home and then conquer the world. On paper South Africa are the best in the world, matches are not won on paper are they? If we don't win the series (i.e. Lose at lords) then we don't derseve to be no.1 period. We have outplayed England but the series aint over england could still get a draw. South Africa need to show their mettle, until they do.... well....

Posted by Soso_killer on (August 11, 2012, 10:11 GMT)

England this England that, Kevin Pietersen this Kevin Pietersen that, Graeme Swann this Graeme Swann that. When do you put your hand up an say wow the opposition have been brilliant. Without sounding arrogant 'coz we not renowned for that but i hope south africa wins at lords and take 2-0 series win (forget about the rankings they'll take of itself). Maybe then South Africa will get the recognition and accolades they deserve.

Posted by Soso_killer on (August 11, 2012, 9:56 GMT)

This article is dissapointing just like all the articles i've read post the 2nd test match. Not 1 article is dedicated to South Africa on how they have comprehensively outplayed england. And if it was not for KP we would be 2-0 up. Same thing happened in 2003 Makhaya Ntini took 10 wickets at Lords in a winning cause, Andrew Flintoff got a 100 in a losing cause. Guess who got the headlines? Thats right flintoff, Ntini's name only got mentioned in 6th paragraph. I rest my case. (CRICINFO PLZ PUBLISH!!)

Posted by Beertjie on (August 11, 2012, 9:53 GMT)

Great comments, @CduPlessis. If SA become and remain top for the next couple of years, none of their fans (of which I am not none) will speak of a dynasty or of being "flawless" because everyone else will remind them of their past. Anyway, good to see some recognition of the facts by @o-bomb - SA also unbeaten since 2009. It seems it's the media that "make" the teams. I'm just hoping Aus will be competitive against SA while they re-build, but media pressure next year may undermine the re-building, as indeed it will bring a decent England team further down the test ladder.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Mark NicholasClose
Mark Nicholas A prolific and stylish middle-order batsman for Hampshire, Mark Nicholas was unlucky never to have played for England, but after captaining his county to four major trophies he made his reputation as a presenter, commentator and columnist. Named the UK Sports Presenter of the Year in 2001 and 2005 by the Royal Television Society, he has commentated all over the world, from the World Cup in the West Indies to the Indian Premier League. He now hosts the cricket coverage for Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in England.

    'I'm 31 but I feel 51 and look like 61'

Netherlands captain Peter Borren on his fictitious nicknames, beating England twice, and how he scares his neighbours

'Hard work, not natural talent, has made me'

Rohit Sharma on his frustrating road back from injury, and the need for young cricketers to be disciplined

    Top dog of the underdogs

My Favourite Cricketer: Jack Russell brought a neatness to the keeper's art that was matched by his meticulous scruffiness in other regards. By Scott Oliver

    Rewarding times for Hashim Amla

Numbers Game: The rate at which he has accumulated ODI hundreds and MoM awards is among the fastest in history

How boring is boring cricket?

Probably not as much as boring periods in the likes of rugby, football and tennis, Russell Jackson thinks

News | Features Last 7 days

Manic one-day chases, and daddy partnerships

Also, most brothers in a Test XI, and the fastest to 20 ODI centuries

Rewarding times for Hashim Amla

The rate at which Amla has accumulated ODI hundreds and MoM awards is among the fastest in history. And his runs-per-innings figure is easily the best of the lot

Well worth the wait

Zulfiqar Babar missed five seasons between his first two first-class matches, and was 34 when he finally made his Test debut, but he is quickly making up for all the lost time with his artful left-arm spin

Has international cricket begun to break up?

The gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider, and the disenchantment is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket among weaker teams

Australia outdone in every way

Surviving into the final session of the last day cannot disguise the fact that Australia's continued inability to play spin contributed to an all-round thrashing

News | Features Last 7 days

    Has international cricket begun to break up? (83)

    The gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing wider, and the disenchantment is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket among weaker teams

    Rewarding times for Hashim Amla (55)

    The rate at which Amla has accumulated ODI hundreds and MoM awards is among the fastest in history. And his runs-per-innings figure is easily the best of the lot

    Lyon low after high of 2013 (51)

    The offspinner was Australia's highest wicket-taker in 2013, but his form has dipped sharply this year

    Australia outdone in every way (51)

    Surviving into the final session of the last day cannot disguise the fact that Australia's continued inability to play spin contributed to an all-round thrashing

    Well worth the wait (36)

    Zulfiqar Babar missed five seasons between his first two first-class matches, and was 34 when he finally made his Test debut, but he is quickly making up for all the lost time with his artful left-arm spin