Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Pietersen issue resolved but what about the schedule?

England's administrators got their star batsman to agree to play all three formats again, but the problem of the overloaded itinerary still remains

Ian Chappell

August 12, 2012

Comments: 19 | Text size: A | A

Kevin Pietersen made 12 from eight balls, England v South Africa, 2nd Investec Test, Headingley, 5th day, August 6, 2012
Kevin Pietersen has a history of falling out with his team administrations © AFP
Enlarge

Kevin Pietersen's latest battle of wills with the English administrators is certainly not his first joust with officialdom, and players and administrators all over the world have been on opposite sides of the fence over many decades.

The reasons for these battles have varied over the years but mostly the results have been in the administrators' favour. Since the advent of the IPL, though, the odds have swung wildly in favour of the player. At least now when a player loses a battle with his local administration, he has the consolation of knowing he can still ply his trade - at a lucrative rate - in the IPL.

Unfortunately this solution often requires the player to retire from all other forms of the game and stick strictly to a diet of T20 tournaments. This was the situation Chris Gayle found himself in, but fortunately Pietersen's standoff with the ECB has now been resolved and his considerable talent and drawing power haven't been lost to the longer versions of the game.

It took a rare show of common sense to find a suitable solution for Gayle to resume playing for West Indies. Appropriately, it was the former West Indies physiotherapist Dennis Waight who first told me: "The problem with common sense is it's not all that common." In Pietersen's case it was more a case of a common cause rather than common sense that saw the player and the ECB work out a solution to their impasse.

Though it was the player who made the move towards reconciliation, it was hard to imagine England allowing Pietersen to walk away from Test cricket when there are two Ashes series looming in the space of 18 months. It has taken England too long to establish their superiority over Australia - after nearly two decades in the doldrums - to willingly sacrifice that position of strength over a principle.

Pietersen has a history of falling out with clubs he has played for: Natal, Nottinghamshire and Hampshire. He also has a tendency to speak first and think afterwards. Anyone in his position who publicly utters the words "It's not easy being me" needs a hastily arranged visit to an African refugee camp to regain perspective. On this occasion, though, Pietersen has come to his senses and agreed to a compromise.

For its part, the English hierarchy can be pretty inflexible both on and off the field. In the last couple of years that tendency has served the officials well and their side has won plenty of silverware to back their theories. Having now resolved the Pietersen issue, it might be a good time to adopt a slightly more flexible approach with the players.

The early examples of players and administrators locking horns were generally over money. From "the big six" in Australia in 1912, to World Series Cricket and then a series of rebel tours, the players' main complaint was over the size of the wage packet. The cricketers had little choice and the administrators could afford to say: "If you don't play for us then who are you going to play for?"

The former Australian captain Warwick "Big Ship" Armstrong was one of the few early revolutionaries who survived to fight another battle. He was the only one of the big six who pulled out of the England tour of 1912 in protest to later resume playing for Australia. Not only did Armstrong play again, he was also appointed captain, but neither of those achievements was his biggest victory.

The Victorian administrator and teetotaller Ernie Bean was Armstrong's chief antagonist. When Armstrong, suffering from a malaria attack, dropped himself down the batting order and prescribed himself a couple of stiff gins to hasten the recovery process, Bean counted on the England bowlers' resolve to spoil the plan. And after they quickly claimed five wickets, Bean was seen rubbing his hands in glee when Armstrong was forced to bat. However, there were reported sightings of Bean drunk, slumped in a corner of the bar, when a couple of hours later the unconquered skipper left the field to a standing ovation.

In the end, Pietersen didn't drive the administrators to drink. If there has been some form of compromise by the ECB as part of the resolution, I hope it includes an offer to try to reach a sensible solution to what is currently a chaotic international schedule.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator and columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Dude.Cricket on (August 14, 2012, 13:54 GMT)

@scritty: Atleast IPL is a domestic competition and invites overseas players for a fee and the Indian team is made of Indians. But most of the English team is made of foreigners who rescue them more often than not. If the boards wish not to allow their players, so be it. IPL will still be played in India with all success. English players are not even attracting bids in such a "mediocre" tournament. This shows the skill levels of the English players.

Posted by   on (August 13, 2012, 11:57 GMT)

Fascinated to hear about the big 6. Warwick Armstrong was the only player to play for Australia again, but would be interested to know to what extent the Great War prevented the other 5 playing rather than politics.

Posted by Jack_Tka on (August 13, 2012, 9:43 GMT)

As Ian pointed out: the issue resolved between one board and player, but the main issue has been ignored. The big picture needs to be taken care of. IPL cannot be banned: FACT. The point is what will happen in the Ashes. Somebody needs to be groomed in really quickly for the English side. We'll see where the ENG is headed post KP saga in the third test against SA.

Posted by pgkamath on (August 13, 2012, 6:09 GMT)

Ian - you are right. Also, you have felt the pain during your cricketing days. Why dont you push for reforms? There are several former cricketers in Aussie board. If they had felt the pain as players, why dont they understand cricketers' plight? If I recall right, all-time great Allan Border is on some committee. Why cant he fight for the players? After all, the players do all the plumbing work.

Posted by   on (August 13, 2012, 0:21 GMT)

Anyone in his position who publicly utters the words "It's not easy being me" needs a hastily arranged visit to an African refugee camp to regain perspective. _Well wrtten!

Posted by Meety on (August 12, 2012, 23:30 GMT)

@landl47 - the better idea would be for England to utilise their key pleyers better. They rested Anderson from the 3rd Test against the WIndies, but played Swann, & played both of them in the Oz ODI series. Swann has injury concerns. If I was in charge of the ECB, I'd of played Anderson in the 3rd Test unless there was something significantly wrong. I would of rested both for the ODI series v Oz. IF Broad is considered integral to England's Test team,& they wish to groom him for captaincy thru the T20 side, I'd rest him from ODI's. The other thing to consider is, there be at least 1 month per year, set aside for the players where there be no tours.

Posted by hhillbumper on (August 12, 2012, 20:15 GMT)

it will be good to see what happens in the ashes series.Guess some of the younger batsmen will grow up quickly.We do have some young talent and glory be some was even born here. Buttler looks good as does Hales.Taylor has all the shots and seemingly avery good temperament

Posted by laxmanrules on (August 12, 2012, 16:19 GMT)

"Though it was the player who made the move towards reconciliation, it was hard to imagine England allowing Pietersen to walk away from Test cricket when there are two Ashes series looming in the space of 18 months"

Early christmas present to all Australians and South Africans. Utter foolishness what has happened.

Posted by   on (August 12, 2012, 15:54 GMT)

I think icc should banned all private lucrative leagues or international players shouldn't be permitted from participating these private leagues. I know it is hard to do for icc but this is the only way to resolve this issue.

Posted by scritty on (August 12, 2012, 15:00 GMT)

IPL should be banned by all international cricket boards. ICC should forbid a DOMESTIC competition from taking prescidence over international cricket. The standard in IPL outside the star players is very poor inded. 4 or 5 players who take the field for every team would struggle to play league cricket in most of the world. Why is the ICC bending over backwards to accomadate a substandard DOMESTIC competition. Call it the "International Cricket League" - remove all caps on foreign player numbers, have a couple of franchises in say Aus, England and SA involved and THEN we can talk about it.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

    An all-round ODI giant

Numbers Game: Few players can boast the sort of numbers that Jacques Kallis achieved in ODIs

    Is being bowled out by Moeen embarrassing?

Polite Enquiries: Is Rahane India's Misbah? Should Rohit be dropped? Jarrod Kimber and George Dobell discuss

    'We were determined to prove we were not an average team'

Former South Africa wicketkeeper Dave Richardson remembers his favourite moment from the Lord's win in 1994

    'A test of Kohli's mental strength'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoffrey Boycott on Kohli's recent form, and Cook's captaincy

How does one 'lead by example'?

Alex Bowden: A captain needs to do enough as an individual to retain respect and control, but exceptional performances may not result in even greater influence

News | Features Last 7 days

The woeful world of Pankaj Singh

Pankaj Singh greeted his most expensive analysis in Test history with the words 'That is cricket'. It was admirable acceptance from an impressive man of a record he did not deserve

Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th

Ugly runs but still they swoon

Alastair Cook did not bat like a leading man but the crowd applauded him for simply not failing

Boycott floored by an Indian trundler

When Eknath Solkar got under the skin of Geoff Boycott, leading to a three-year self-imposed exile from Test cricket

Worst keepers, and honours at Lord's

Also, most keeping dismissals on debut, seven-for at HQ, and youngest ODI centurions

News | Features Last 7 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!