| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is he trying to score too quickly, especially in bowler-friendly conditions? A look at how his stats have changed over the last four and a half years
September 7, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: Hits and misses among the ICC's nominees
Players/Officials:
Virender Sehwag
Teams:
India
|
|||
If Virender Sehwag stays fit through the next couple of months, the second Test of the series against England, in Mumbai, will be his 100th. It'll be a fine landmark for a batsman who has thrilled the senses more than most players in world cricket over the last decade with his aggressive brand of batting at the top of the order. He will become the ninth Indian player to reach the mark, and it'll be a well-deserved reward for his longevity.
Over the last few years, though, whispers have gradually been growing louder about Sehwag's skewed record - superb in subcontinental conditions, where fast bowlers don't get too much assistance, but not so flash in other countries, where fast bowlers get more help from the conditions. He has himself expressed the desire to bat in the middle order, but so far there seems to be nothing to suggest that his wish will be granted.
However, over the first six and a half years of his international career, Sehwag constantly defied the odds, and critics who gave his technique no chance in seamer-friendly conditions: he scored Test hundreds in South Africa, England and Australia. Till the 2007-08 tour of Australia, there was very little to choose between his home and away averages. He consistently scored hundreds away from home as well, even in conditions that were supposedly not suited to his style of batting: he averaged 59.50 in seven Tests in Australia, and 39.50 in four Tests in England. He was less successful in South Africa, averaging 26.44 in nine innings, but his overall average in Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa was a respectable 40.84 in 18 Tests, with four hundreds.
His last successful tour to one of these countries was in Australia in 2007-08, when he scored 286 runs in four innings at 71.50. Since February 2008, though, Sehwag's consistency, and his reputation of being able to score runs in all sorts of conditions has taken a beating, which is reflected in his numbers. There is nothing to choose between his overall averages during these two periods - 50.46 in 54 Tests till January 2008, and 50.85 in 44 Tests since then. However, delve deeper and the differences are significant: in the latter period, Sehwag has depended on home Tests to rack up the runs - he averages more than 62 at home and 38 away. Then there's the small matter of Tests outside the subcontinent: in 12 Tests in Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa, his average has dropped to 22.73, with only three fifties - and a highest of 67 - in 23 innings.
There are a couple of differences apart from that in his averages outside the subcontinent. In the first period he converted half of his 50-plus scores into hundreds - he had 13 hundreds and as many fifties. Since then, though, his conversion rate has dropped - only nine hundreds out of 28 scores of 50-plus. Since he scored his last century, 173 against New Zealand in November 2010, he has scored nine fifties in 30 innings without converting a single one into a hundred.
And then's the matter of his strike rates. Sehwag has always been an aggressive batsman, regardless of the bowlers, the match situation or the conditions, but over the last four years and a bit, his strike rate has increased to 92.50, from 75 in the first part of his career. Despite struggling for runs outside the subcontinent, he has still scored at a rate that's 11% faster than it used to be when he was more successful in seamer-friendly conditions.
| Tests | Runs | Average | Strike rate | 100s/ 50s | |
| Home | 46 | 4376 | 57.57 | 83.38 | 12/ 19 |
| Away | 52 | 3930 | 44.65 | 80.86 | 10/ 13 |
| Overall | 98 | 8306 | 50.64 | 82.17 | 22/ 32 |
| Tests | Runs | Average | Strike rate | 100/ 50s | |
| Home | 22 | 1879 | 52.19 | 71.47 | 6/ 7 |
| Away | 32 | 2562 | 49.26 | 77.61 | 7/ 6 |
| In Aus, Eng, NZ, SA | 18 | 1348 | 40.84 | 70.98 | 4/ 4 |
| Overall | 54 | 4441 | 50.46 | 74.89 | 13/ 13 |
| Tests | Runs | Average | Strike rate | 100s/ 50s | |
| Home | 24 | 2497 | 62.42 | 95.34 | 6/ 12 |
| Away | 20 | 1368 | 38.00 | 87.74 | 3/ 7 |
| In Aus, Eng, NZ, SA | 12 | 523 | 22.73 | 79.00 | 0/ 3 |
| Overall | 44 | 3865 | 50.85 | 92.50 | 9/ 19 |
Let's further drill down his numbers in Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa, and check how he has fared against pace and spin over these two periods. Before February 2008, Sehwag's average against pace in these countries was marginally over 46. He had notable successes against fast bowling during this period: against Brett Lee he scored 190 runs and was dismissed twice; against Jason Gillespie he scored 70 for one dismissal; against Andrew Flintoff he scored 54 runs without being dismissed; Makhaya Ntini dismissed him just once, conceding 62. The quick bowlers who did well against him were Shaun Pollock (3 for 43 in 81 balls) and Shane Bond (3 for 16 in 28 balls).
Against spin, though, his average was much lower, generally paying the price for his urge to dominate slow bowlers from the start. Stuart MacGill, for example, conceded 73 off 81 balls to Sehwag but dismissed him three times.
Since February 2008, though, Sehwag's numbers against both pace and spin have plunged. Ben Hilfenhaus (3 for 64 in 117 balls) and Dale Steyn (3 for 49 in 91) have dismissed him most often, while James Anderson, James Pattinson and Peter Siddle have dismissed him twice each in these four countries.
Against spin, though, his stats are even more shocking, especially given that the matches in question have mostly been played in conditions that don't assist spinners. In 47 balls he has been dismissed five times by spinners, even though he has scored at more than seven an over against them. Here are his stats against some spinners: 1 for 13 off 19 balls against Graeme Swann; 1 for 30 off 16 balls against Nathan Lyon; I for 7 off three balls against Daniel Vettori; 1 for 4 from two balls off Jeetan Patel. (That tendency to dominate from the first ball was again on display against Patel in the recently concluded Bangalore Test, when he hit a six and a four, and was then bowled.)
It's also noticeable that his scoring rates against both spin and pace have gone up, even though his averages have dropped.
| Bowling type | Runs | Balls | Dismissals | Average | Run rate |
| Pace | 1106 | 1640 | 24 | 46.08 | 4.04 |
| Spin | 189 | 182 | 7 | 27.00 | 6.23 |
| Bowling type | Runs | Balls | Dismissals | Average | Run rate |
| Pace | 466 | 615 | 17 | 27.41 | 4.54 |
| Spin | 57 | 47 | 5 | 11.40 | 7.27 |
A common criticism of the latter-day Sehwag is to do with his tendency to attempt extravagant strokes early in his innings, especially in conditions that are favourable for seam bowling. Here's a look at his stats in the first 15 overs of an innings over those two time periods, in Tests in Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa.
His average in the first 15 has dropped to 28.81 in these countries since February 2008; in the earlier period it was 35.67. His rate of scoring boundaries is a good indicator of his aggressive intent: though he has scored almost the same number of fours and sixes in the two periods, he faced 232 more deliveries in the first period. Thus, his frequency of scoring a boundary - a four or a six - has increased from one every 9.5 balls to one every 6.8. That has led to him taking more chances, and increased his frequency of dismissals as well.
| Period | Runs | Balls | Dismissals | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s |
| Till Jan 31, 2008 | 535 | 784 | 15 | 35.67 | 4.09 | 79/ 3 |
| Since Feb 1, 2008 | 461 | 552 | 16 | 28.81 | 5.01 | 78/ 3 |
While none of this may be a factor over the home season - though both England and Australia have fast bowlers who could trouble him if the pitches have some pace and movement - it will again be one when India begin their next sequence of overseas tours in 2013-14.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

Wisden Almanack: From Grace to the IPL: in its 150th edition, Wisden looks at the most seminal events in cricket
'You can't taint the whole IPL'
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on spot-fixing, Adil Rashid's future, and yorkers in Test matches
Harsha Bhogle: The spot-fixing controversy teaches us about the pitfalls of insecurity and of the desire to keep up with the Joneses
The new Harmison? Or is it the new Caddick?
Numbers Game: Stuart Broad is destructive at his best, but at other times his bowling average is unusually high
Less cricket on TV? Hallelujah
Matt Cleary: Why Channel Nine should be applauded for not broadcasting domestic cricket in Australia
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Vijay slips, Ashwin does a Sahara
Plays of the day from the IPL qualifier between Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in Delhi
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Another season in the bottom half
With some of their big names stumbling this season, Kings XI Punjab were rarely serious contenders for a playoff place
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (86)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (42)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
@maddison Did the MCG pitch suddenly turned into a batsman's graveyard when he got out for 195 @Kiwirocker Multan was the same ground where Pakistan was dismissed for 200 odd following on & The innings that spell doom for the Pakistani spin great Saqlain Mushtaq.
Posted by trueanalyst on (September 10, 2012, 3:13 GMT)@SCC08 His average of 11.4 against the spinners in foreign conditions shows who is the destroyer. Sehwag is self destructing himself .He is averaging a reasonable 27 even in this lean period against the pacers.If you remove his performance against Newzealand his average improves.Pl don't comment for the sake of commenting
Posted by trueanalyst on (September 10, 2012, 3:05 GMT)@hotwife Sehwag scored his first century on debut against SouthAfrica. These are his centuries:105 against SA,106 against England in Nottingham,180 against Westindies and 2 centuries against Australia
Posted by g.narsimha on (September 9, 2012, 8:51 GMT)KIWIROCKER - when did JAVED MIANDAD played a memorable inning out side sub continent he was pathetic in AUS - AVE 38, IN WI-33 , ENG -46 , i have checked the atats in stat guru but nothing of substance out side, yaa if u r referering his last ball six off an unknown inexpereanced, rooky bowler off a rank full toss ball in u r fotress than ok ,
Posted by Bilal_Choudry on (September 9, 2012, 7:00 GMT)Sehwag like all players who rely on hand eye coordination more than technique will have more problems than the classical tendulkar/dravid batsmen when out of form ... but the only way he will get into form is to do what he does best which is to swat anything within his range ... y would anyone want him to change who he is .. i wouldnt
Posted by just_chill_chill on (September 8, 2012, 23:03 GMT)@Praveen Shavindra Muthuthanthri - You seem to have forgotten the beating you received when he toured SL last time around. Beat up your fast bowlers, spinners, and everyone else on all kinds of pitches.
Posted by Anand1268 on (September 8, 2012, 22:13 GMT)Sehwag is doing a big damage for the opponent in the frontline and the opposite team feels that. He is a great striker of the ball and coming in the middle we will too dangerous as well for the opposite side
Posted by Al_Bundy1 on (September 8, 2012, 18:53 GMT)Completely agree with @satchander - Drop Sehwag and blood a new opener....Time we had openers who can play the new ball out and put century stands consistently....am really sick of Seeing Sehwag get out in one day fashion all the time...he was awesome to watch until few years back from when he has just not scored consistently enough to deserve a place in the Test side..
Posted bycm'n guyz dont be so critical abt sehwag... remember players like him come only once in a while.... his almst 3 triple hundreds cannt be fluke.....'
blooding a new youngster is okay bt i guess we would be sacrificing all those test wins which we get thanx to a viru blast....
he prbly needs to pick n choose deliveries which i am sure he would do....
i dnt remember too many batsmen with 3 triple hundreds(almst) n making a side win the match with ease....
thatz spcl quality of this man.... players like these have their days n can score big runs bt look pathetic on odrs....
jst enjoy his class n i am sure he will find his form back....
Posted by DaGameChanger on (September 8, 2012, 16:03 GMT)@KiwiRocker..I agree Sehwag is non-performer but million times better than Afridi and Umark Akmal combined. . Rajesh should analysis about them..oh I forgot.its not even worth mentioning it. Compare to NFL, his role is of Gunner. Fast and Furious and do all the psyche damage you can. Looks like you forgot what he did to Umar Gul in Semi-Final 2011.