Harsha Bhogle
Harsha Bhogle Harsha BhogleRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Commentator, television presenter and writer

The problem with Indian cricket academies

Increasingly young players (and their parents) look at them as ways to generate returns on investment

Harsha Bhogle

April 5, 2013

Comments: 25 | Text size: A | A

Sachin Tendulkar drives down the ground, India v Australia, 1st Test, Chennai, 2nd day, February 23, 2013
Can a modern academy allow the talent of a Tendulkar to flourish? Unlikely © BCCI
Related Links
Teams: India

A few years ago my son was protesting about the way he had to prepare for his ICSE exams. "I won't be tested on my knowledge anyway…" he started. "They only want to check if I can reproduce the answers that someone has already written." He was right, our education system seeks to produce homogeneous masses, production lines of identical students. This reduces us to excellent followers of a particular system.

I was reminded of that when I read Greg Chappell's thought-provoking article in the Hindu about how modern batsmen are struggling to "survive, let alone make runs, when the pitch is other than a flat road where the odds are overwhelmingly in the batsman's favour". He thinks it could be a result of academies that "do not produce the creative thinkers that become the next champions", and whose "highly intrusive coaching methods… have replaced those creative learning environments".

Even as academies mushroom everywhere, there is little proof that they are enriching Indian cricket and not merely providing another source of income to retired cricketers. It is a good exercise at social events to say, "You know, my son goes to such and such academy run by so and so former cricketer", but it does little else. My fear is that it thrusts eager children into another school of regimented learning; instead of the unfettered joy of hitting and chasing and bowling a cricket ball, they are checking out their stance, their foot movement and the alignment of the shoulder. That is like answering a question on five aspects of the architectural layouts of 16th century temples, instead of learning history. Sport can run the risk, as my friend Shyam Balasubramaniam says, of "becoming an industrial time and motion study".

You can see why academies flower in urban jungles like Mumbai, where playgrounds are cruelly encroached upon. With no place of your own, you get pushed into camps; cramped, crowded factories where you pay to become nobody. When you pay a stiff fee, you very quickly start looking for returns on it. Playing cricket becomes an exercise where returns are sought on monetary investment. Mumbai understands that language well, and so, caught between no space, long journeys and expensive gear, potential cricketers become insecure and feel the need to produce results quickly. The fun goes out of it, and fun is such a vital ingredient in producing a champion. When you are growing up, when you are learning, you have to play for no reward, and it is my thesis that that is where a financially driven city like Mumbai loses talent early.

And so as playgrounds vanished, as time began commanding a premium, as academies flourished and as experiential learning diminished, Mumbai started going downhill. They still win the Ranji Trophy but the only genuine international Mumbai have produced since Sachin Tendulkar is Ajit Agarkar in one-day cricket. One in 24 years is poor.

Chappell also talks about MS Dhoni, and of how he evolved his own style, unfettered by a curriculum. That is how it should be, with a player free to play in the way that comes naturally to him. Academies can then become finishing schools where you nudge a player a bit here, prod him a bit there but largely let him remain the natural player he is. I think that is best done when a player is around 16. I know that is the age when Tendulkar played international cricket but he was a freak; you cannot hold him up as a product of a system. Critically, Tendulkar was not over-coached; his heavy-bat, bottom-handed style would never have survived otherwise. What Ramakant Achrekar did was make him play matches, face different bowlers, different situations, and though his arm was on his ward's shoulder, though they talked cricket, Tendulkar learnt to play it by himself.

And so, accepting that Tendulkar is an aberration, and almost from another era, I am convinced that the best talent will come out of the small towns, where time and space are not rapidly perishable commodities; where a young Harbhajan Singh wants to bowl late into the evening with a revved-up scooter providing light. There are academies there too, but players who emerge from those places seem to talk fondly about their coaches, amateur sports lovers who give freely of their time.

If academies can retain joy, and provide time, they will give themselves a chance of producing unique cricketers. But if coaches and parents are looking at academies for a quick return on investment, they will continue to gobble up talent.

Harsha Bhogle is a television presenter and writer, and a commentator on IPL 2013. His Twitter feed is here

RSS Feeds: Harsha Bhogle

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (April 7, 2013, 4:08 GMT)

Having lived in two metros of India for over the past three years and twenty two years before that in a very nondescript sleepy town, I have observed an important difference between 'life in a metro' and 'life in a small town', and it quite aligns with Harsha's tenor here: youth from the smaller towns of India are a more positive bunch.They are not overly cynical and more important they are willing to give their time and stay patient.Maybe that comes naturally to them because life in small towns does tend to move rather slowly,and time does not just fleet by with a million things vying for your attention.They are more likely to take disappointments in their stride,to learn from it,and to get back at it, than the kids in urban centers who have a million avenues to try and have attention spans of three year olds.Cricket emulates many virtues of life;it's one of the most important charms of the sport.At the moment those virtues are more in vogue in the smaller towns of the country.

Posted by   on (April 6, 2013, 6:47 GMT)

Cheers for your son Harsha for the revolutionary thought. However, one's greatest coach is one himself and his ability to learn. No matter how you are taught, the thing which matters is how you perform. In Cricket, you can have coaches to guide/teach you skills but at the end you have to deliver. There comes your ability and will power which is vital. With regards to Sachin, even Achrekar can now not help him from his current poor run...it is Sachin who has to learn from his mistakes.It's not only reflexes but shot selection. With Cricket growing and new bowlers coming in with great/innovative skills...Sachin and others will always be tested. Cricket is not about Mumbai/Delhi/Bangalore......it's everywhere in India.....it was just not explored. Now with players coming in from all regions, competition has grown.....which is EXCELLENT for the growth of INDIAN CRICKET.

Posted by ThatsJustCricket on (April 5, 2013, 20:07 GMT)

Wonderful article and absolutely to the point.

Posted by sundaram530 on (April 5, 2013, 17:50 GMT)

The fact that Mumbai does not produce that many international cricketers anymore may have nothing to do with the increase in number of cricket coaching academies. It probably has to do with better talent scouting in far flung areas of India, less prejudice from BCCI towards non-metro areas, more available money hence more overall participation, etc. After all, Kohli, the new kid on the block, is from Delhi. I don't know if he attended any academy or not, but certainly Delhi has no fewer academies than Mumbai? My point is that true talent will come out - academies or no academies.

Posted by   on (April 5, 2013, 16:48 GMT)

Its same everywhere.... whether its cricket or education or music !!!! Its same .... you want to learn cricket come to us.. you want 99%,... home tutor ... you want to be singer come to us ....its everywhere...if a person is really good at something he should be encouraged to do that ...that is not happening ... we are forced to do everything so that once we pass out we at least get a job!!!! I remember i had a friend once who was really good in maths but very poor in all other subjects...I wonder if people like him who are really good in something are allowed to pursue that than mindlessly following a curriculum we might see more of Tendulkas, Rehmans, Einsteins and S.Jobs... Who knows ..but its all fantasy..:):):P:P

Posted by itsthewayuplay on (April 5, 2013, 16:02 GMT)

The sub-title of this article and the bragging rights that going to the right academy gives to the parents are right are spot on. A redistribution of the money generated by the IPL into test cricket and an uneven balance of reward in favour of test players would soon sort the wheat from the chaff.

Posted by Rahulbose on (April 5, 2013, 15:59 GMT)

The notion of "fun", in most professional sports the fun part comes from personal ambition and career goals, the idea of professional athletes/ trainees playing with the glee of a teenager on a holiday is not realistic. As for natural style vs technique, I think it depends on the individual player. The very best in any sport are always gifted people who play their natural way. But there are also those who hone skills through years of training. So what style of coaching works for a player depends on where he/she is on the bell curve.

Posted by cricket-india on (April 5, 2013, 15:05 GMT)

i wonder what the batting coaches of today would have said of lara's high backlift...:-)

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Harsha BhogleClose
Harsha Bhogle Harsha Bhogle is one of the world's leading cricket commentators. Starting off as a chemical engineer and going on to work in advertising before moving into television, he is also a writer, quiz host, television presenter and talk-show host, and a corporate motivational speaker. He was voted Cricinfo readers' "favourite cricket commentator" in a poll in 2008, and one of his proudest possessions is a photograph of a group of spectators in Pakistan holding a banner that said "Harsha Bhogle Fan Club". He has commentated on nearly 100 Tests and more than 400 ODIs.

    'We did not drop a single catch in 1971'

Couch Talk: Former India captain Ajit Wadekar recalls the dream tours of West Indies and England, and coaching India

Sachin to bat for life, Lara for the joy of batting

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss the impact of Lara's batting

    Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Ricky Ponting: Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane

    Why punish the WI players when the administration is to blame?

Michael Holding: As ever, the WICB has refused to recognise its own incompetence

What cricket can take from darts

Jon Hotten: It's simple, it's TV-friendly and it has a promoter who can tailor the product for its audience

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

India's attack: rare intensity before regular inanity

For the first hour on day three, despite the heat and the largely unhelpful pitch, India's fast bowlers showed a level of intensity and penetration rarely seen from them; in the second hour, things mostly reverted to type

News | Features Last 7 days