July 26, 2013

What's in it for India?

Their squad to Zimbabwe is young and inexperienced; time to experiment and hand out opportunities

How much does the prospect of watching an India v Zimbabwe game excite you? India are ranked No. 1 in ODIs and are the holders of the World Cup and the Champions Trophy, while Zimbabwe are No. 10 in the ODI rankings.

Such contests often end up being lopsided, with the better team playing to boost their stats. But if the underdog puts up a fight, you can get a real cracker of a game. However, it's likely that this series will remain a mismatched one.

But for fans of Indian cricket there are still plenty of reasons to watch, the foremost being the inclusion of new faces in the side. In a wise move, which also gives the contest some life, the Indian selectors have given their key players a well-deserved break. Close to half the squad that left India comprised players who were yet to win national caps and those yet to cement their place in the side.

While there was a strong case to rest Virat Kohli too, for he has played as much as anyone else, the selectors handed him the reins of the team for a full series for the first time, which should keep him going. This series isn't a high-pressure one. Playing in Zimbabwe will help him learn a few lessons before he faces bigger challenges.

Although fiddling with the line-up and team combinations can at times backfire, that shouldn't discourage you from experimenting. The selectors must be lauded for taking risks and bringing in Ambati Rayudu, Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane, Mohit Sharma, Jaidev Unadkat and Parvez Rasool. These men are talented but will now also be brimming with confidence that stems from the selectors' faith in them.

In the first game, in Harare, the difference between the two sides was clear. While some might argue that India winning the toss was crucial to the outcome, I believe the toss didn't create the gap, only widened it.

What should be India's objective in this series? A 5-0 win? Or to give all the newcomers a fair run in the middle, and, if possible, the chance to volunteer for tougher challenges?

If the team management decides to play the best XI in every game, and the best players in their favoured positions, it's unlikely that all the newbies will get a fair chance to perform. But the selectors haven't picked these players to not play them, and hopefully the management thinks that way too. If Fletcher and Co were to choose the new recruits over the senior men, India might lose a game or two, but the series will not be lost.

The easiest thing for the team management to do is to just play one inexperienced player in the spot vacated by MS Dhoni in the batting order. That's what they did in the first game. But the tougher, and perhaps more pragmatic, thing would be to find ways to give Pujara, Rahane and Rayudu maximum opportunities in this series.

We have seen a lot of Kohli, Suresh Raina, Rohit Sharma and, to an extent, Shikhar Dhawan in the recent past. Their ability to score runs against Zimbabwe isn't going to tell us anything about them that we don't already know. So it might not be a bad idea to play Pujara, Rahane and Rayudu in all the games and rotate the more experienced players around them. For example, open with either Dhawan or Rohit (ideally, give them three games apiece) and have Pujara or Rahane partner them. While the combination of Rohit and Dhawan is doing wonders, such a move will help India find out who is the next best for the job.

To really see someone's batting prowess in a 50-over game, you have to give him as many overs to bat in as possible. Which is why Rayudu, Rahane and Pujara must bat in the top four, and be followed by Kohli, Raina and Dinesh Karthik. This batting order obviously isn't written in stone. It can and must change if the situation demands, but the intention must not.

India must look to bat first in every game, because that's the toughest time to bat in these conditions. Since the bowling isn't challenging enough, India will have to find ways to challenge themselves. If Rohit and Dhawan are to open in the remaining matches, they might as well deal with the moving ball.

While the team management can fiddle around with the batting order, they haven't been afforded the same luxury by the selectors in the bowling department, since they have in their hands an all-new attack. Still, since Vinay Kumar and Amit Mishra have been around for a while, this series must be seen as a litmus test for them. Their performances must not go unnoticed; they must be given the responsibility of bowling in tough situations.

If the opposition isn't likely to test you, you must find ways to make a series useful for yourself.

Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Out of the Blue, an account of Rajasthan's 2010-11 Ranji Trophy victory. His website is here and his Twitter feed here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on July 27, 2013, 4:15 GMT

    I think when it comes to test bench strength India needs to think about 3 or 4 departments seriously. First of all is replacement for Dhoni which needs one wicket keeper-batsman and a captain who is a batsman. Other two departments includes bowling (2 pace bowlers and one spinner) and one lower middle order batsman.

  • Ashok on July 26, 2013, 17:50 GMT

    @srini701: Id the WK of this Indian team is Karthik, who is the Back up WK? I cannot see any other guy who keeps wkts. So it has to be Rayudu. I also have a feeling that Rayudu got in the squad as a back up WK cum batsman. If karthik gets injured, Rayudu will be called upon to do the Wicket Keeping. So please do not blame the guys who are commenting that Rayudu is a WK. Personally, I had seen him doing the WK for Mumbai in IPL 2 years back. He was poor to adequate. I am sure he has improved a lot in 2 years.

  • Ashok on July 26, 2013, 14:31 GMT

    It is a battle between #1 & #10 ranked teams. Hence you are "right on" when you say the series will be mismatched. I expect India to win 5-0. The Six players you quoted who deserve a chance to show their ability are as good as the regular players. Only sad part is they could not get chance to show their abilities playing for India. Rayudu & Pujara were both captains of India U-19 before Kohli, Raina & Karthik played U-19. However some players are lucky to be fast tracked whilst others have to "wait". Rayudu has captained Hyderabad & Baroda & scored a ton of runs. Pujara is the leader of Indian Test batting averages + has a batting average of 57 playing in ODI international matches. How "risky" is it to include both in all 5 matches against "Minnows"? These 2 are better batsmen than Raina & karthik - Rayudu is also a WK. Yes, we have seen a lot of Vinay, Rohit & Raina whilst the contenders are kept waiting for EVER. Let 6 named by you get a well deserved chance in XI- Not on Bench!.

  • srinivas on July 26, 2013, 9:20 GMT

    Why do everybody who post here forget the simple fact that Ambati Rayudu is NOT a wicket keeper but is a specialist batsman? He only keeps wickets in the IPL for Mumbai Indians and has never kept wickets for any of his other first-class teams.

    The team management should also consider giving enough chances to both Mohit Sharma and Unadkat. India will need as many world-class fast bowlers as they can afford, given the injury rate and the amount of cricket the team plays.

  • Pravin on July 26, 2013, 9:05 GMT

    I take my words back on Raina :) ...he too needs to spend some time on bench

  • Pravin on July 26, 2013, 8:24 GMT

    I do agree with Akash on this, everyone is reacting as if giving few players a chance will weaken the team a lot...Do you think they are so useless? They have been selected for the Indian team for some reason. Some of them might turn out to be future stars. If we wouldn't test our bench strength against Zimbwabwe then who will we test it against? when will we test new blood?

    Rohit Sharma has played 100 ODI and its his 7th year in ODIs, some players have their whole careers spanning 7-8 years, when will he come good? As for Raina, agreed that he's having a poor run...but there was a time when he combined with Dhoni down the order to win India so many matches, their partnership record with an average of 60 and 7 century stands down the order is unparalleled in history. What about Rohit, how many partnerships did he have when he played down the order?

    With 2015 in mind, its better to try some players who might become reliable openers later on like Pujara & Rahane than force fit Rohit

  • Naresh on July 26, 2013, 6:46 GMT

    @anand jakhotia - Agree with you. Raina, Jadeja and Kholi all need rest. They have been playing non-stop for quite a while. India definitely need to test the bench players by giving them ample opportunities. I dont think the squad will be weaker. The team management needs to mirror the selectors line of thought. It helps with decisions when we plan the 2015 WC squad and gives an idea of who is who when others are injured.

  • Dummy4 on July 26, 2013, 6:45 GMT

    This is what I've been saying for years...why deprive new guys a chance of playing when a match is low profile and inconsequential. Indian team management has a very regressive thought process as does the selectorial panel

  • Kishor on July 26, 2013, 6:39 GMT

    This would be my team: Dhawan, Rohith, Pujara, Rayudu (wk), Kohli, Karthik/Jadeja, Rasol, Mishra, Mohith, Shami, Unadkat. Its time to try Rayudu as future Wicket keeping option in ODI, as well