Brydon Coverdale
Assistant editor, ESPNcricinfo

England v Australia, 5th Investec Test, The Oval

Lehmann fires, but misses the point

Instead of trying to rattle the England players, Australia's coach should focus on the issues in his own team

Brydon Coverdale

August 21, 2013

Comments: 73 | Text size: A | A

Tough job: Darren Lehmann watches Australia's performance, England v Australia, 2nd Investec Ashes Test, Lord's, 2nd day, July 19, 2013
Cheat a bit more convincingly and that's acceptable in Darren Lehmann's world © Getty Images
Enlarge

Cheating is okay, just not if it's too blatant. That, essentially, is the crux of Darren Lehmann's argument. Actually, calling it an argument is too generous, for it implies a measure of reason. Posturing, that's what it was. Using a blokey interview on a blokey Australian radio station to appeal to Aussie blokes. Let's all have a laugh and call them cheating Poms. Let's get stuck into Stuart Broad when England come to Australia. Sledge him from the stands, fellas.

It is hard to imagine that Lehmann would have called Broad a cheat had he been in a press conference full of English reporters. But Triple M is a radio station that has a way of making sportsmen feel they're among mates. It was on Triple M that Matthew Hayden called Harbhajan Singh a "little obnoxious weed" in 2008, and it was on Triple M that Andrew Symonds referred to Brendon McCullum as "a lump of shit" in 2009.

Both men faced Cricket Australia disciplinary action for "detrimental public comment"; Hayden was reprimanded, Symonds fined $4000. Cricket Australia has no choice but to report Lehmann for a Code of Conduct breach, for calling an opponent a cheat is nothing if not detrimental. It is also ridiculous. "That was just blatant cheating," Lehmann said of Broad's failure to walk at Trent Bridge. "I don't advocate walking but when you hit it to first slip it's pretty hard."

So on the one hand, Lehmann doesn't generally believe players should walk. But on the other, he calls Broad a cheat for... not walking? Broad knew he edged that delivery off Ashton Agar. But Brad Haddin knew he tickled behind off James Anderson later in the same match. It took an England review to have that match-winning decision given. David Warner knew he edged when he hooked at Broad in Manchester and England's review failed as Hot Spot did not show evidence.

Ah, but Broad's cheating was blatant. Cheat a bit more convincingly and that's acceptable in Lehmann's world. Of course, none of these men are cheats, for players are under no obligation to walk. Not to mention that Broad's edge, while thick, was not to slip - it deflected there off Haddin's gloves. Double standards aside, perhaps Lehmann thought that it would be good to get inside the heads of the England players. Shake things up a bit.

"Certainly our players haven't forgotten, they're calling him everything under the sun as they go past," Lehmann said. And how has that worked out, Boof? A match-winning 11-wicket haul at Chester-le-Street? A better series batting average after the fourth Test than Shane Watson, Phillip Hughes, Usman Khawaja, Steven Smith, Haddin or Ed Cowan? Yes, Broad is clearly shaken by all those stinging remarks.

Perhaps instead of trying to rattle the England players, Lehmann should ensure his own players don't feel flustered. At 0-3 down in an Ashes series, with another one on the horizon, that has to be his focus. How, exactly, are young batsmen like Hughes and Khawaja supposed to feel comfortable at the crease when they fear for their place? Lehmann is one of the selectors responsible for changing the batting order in every Test on this tour.

What must Hughes, Khawaja and Cowan think now that a bowling allrounder has been picked at No. 7? How must the players have felt when the coach said after the loss in Chester-le-Street - where Australia had been very competitive, mind you - that careers would be on the line at The Oval? Can you imagine a respected mentor like Andy Flower or Gary Kirsten making such statements? Can you imagine them calling an opponent a cheat for not walking?

From the surprise selection of Ashton Agar from outside the official squad in the first Test to the constant shuffling of the batting order to the inclusion of James Faulkner at The Oval to the comments on Broad, Lehmann has tried to keep England on the hop throughout this series, tried to keep them guessing. He needs to forget that and worry about his own men, give them some self-belief instead of misguidedly attempting to shake the confidence of the England players.

"If they don't learn we will find blokes that will," Lehmann said of his players after the fourth Test. It is to be hoped Lehmann, on his first tour as an international coach, learns from his mistakes as well.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Reggaecricket on (August 23, 2013, 12:01 GMT)

So far all Lehmann has done is say the wrong things! First, he comes under fire from no less than Steve Waugh, for threatening to end player's careers if they don;t perform, now this. Remembering the incidents that got him reprimanded during his playing days, don't make it surprising that he would say stuff unbecoming of a coach of a touring side.

Posted by   on (August 23, 2013, 5:43 GMT)

Agreed 100% Brydon. Mickey Arthur, whatever faults he might have had, instilled confidence in the players I felt. Ever since Lehmann has been installed as a selector, we have been continually frustrated by the pernicious chopping and changing of the batting order. I hope Hughes and Khawaja are given another chance soon.

Posted by Nerk on (August 22, 2013, 22:10 GMT)

Australia are poor losers, as shown by Lehmann's comments here. England are poor winners, as shown by their slowing of the over rate and defensive tactics.

Posted by   on (August 22, 2013, 14:52 GMT)

Stuart Broad does himself no favours. He is petulant, appeals his batting decisions almost without fail and doesn't walk when he should. Having said all that, he is still more hones than most Aussie batsmen.

Posted by   on (August 22, 2013, 12:47 GMT)

If England were down 3-0 and lets say it had been Smith who was in Broad's position we know for sure that the English fans , press and members of the team ( possibly including both captain and coach ) would have been carrying on in the same vein as Lehmann is now. You know that it would happen.. after all its human nature. My concern as an educator is the impact that Broad's "confession" has on those youngsters e.g. schoolboy cricketers for example who admire him as hero and role model.

Posted by pbehr on (August 22, 2013, 12:13 GMT)

Broad's comments gave Lehman the perfect excuse to fuel the fire, and now the media attention is further fanning those flames. The point Darren was (poorly) trying to make, is that after a long time to reflect, Stuart commented publicly, with pride, about his decision not to walk. That gets any opposition's back up. Pressure and intimidation are vital factors in The Ashes, and the crowds play a huge role. England crowds win hands down since the Barmy Army, but now the wounded, large Aussie crowd have their own pantomime villain, gifted courtesy of Stuart's comments. As Ponting faced in England and Warner faces for the rest of his career. Be unsportsmanlike and you suffer the consequences. And now the added attention will make it a memorable career highlight, like Trevor Chappell's underarm, and Maradona's hand of god. So unfortunately Stuart's got a tough tour ahead. It may work in his favour, who knows. But I'm certain it would have all blown over if he'd been more humble.

Posted by PutMarshyOn on (August 22, 2013, 11:36 GMT)

And I hope the ACB climb into Lehman for an irresponsible and unprofessional lack of tact. His were the comments of a man under pressure but that doesn't excuse out and out hypocrisy. Asking the crowd to get into a player is just inexcusable. John Snow 1970/71, Alderman early 80's both got injured by crowd members in Australia. Stupid, stupid, stupid. In my book he'll be lucky to survive this.

Posted by Samdanh on (August 22, 2013, 8:52 GMT)

I am waiting for India fans' reactions when India is at the receiving end of such a decision like Aleem Dar's and such a behaviour like Broad's in the near future-with a lot of overseas tours coming up. Stay tuned

Posted by Sumeet.Gupta on (August 22, 2013, 8:50 GMT)

I remember during the infamous 2008 series between India and Australia. Clarke absolutely smashed the ball to first slip off Kumble (or Bhajji?) and waited for the umpire to give him the marching orders. He later said that he was not waiting for ump's decision but was disappointed with his shot and standing there. The most laughable excuse you will hear!!

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.

Awesome in whites, awful in colour

Osman Samiuddin: Pakistan's year oscillated between superb and dreadful, with their ODI form poor ahead of the World Cup

Two triples, and a devastating loss

Gallery: 2014 was a sobering year for cricket

The most significant act of fielding

The Cricket Monthly: Gideon Haigh, Ayaz Memon, Rob Steen and Rahul Bhattacharya on fielding moments that mattered the most
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

Late highs fail to mask wretched year

Save for the rout of Zimbabwe, it was a year of suspensions and demoralising defeats for Bangladesh. By Mohammad Isam

A maverick with maturity

Janaka Malwatta: Tillakaratne Dilshan, one the few '90s era cricketers still around, is an entertainer who never backs down from a challenge

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Rudderless Shami proves too costly

Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

From waterboy to warrior

Ajinkya Rahane was part of India's bench strength for several series before he finally got his opportunity. He's made it count on the most testing tours

News | Features Last 7 days