Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Why Cook and Dhoni will struggle against Clarke

England's captain is too conservative and India's can't seem to bring his limited-overs aggression into the Test arena, so they are unlikely to beat Australia

Ian Chappell

June 1, 2014

Comments: 173 | Text size: A | A

MS Dhoni and Alastair Cook walk out for the toss, India v England, 3rd Test, Kolkata, 1st day, December 5, 2012
Dhoni and Cook: no match for the ultra-aggressive Michael Clarke © BCCI
Related Links
Players/Officials: MS Dhoni | Alastair Cook | Michael Clarke
Teams: Australia | England | India

In reality, the degree of difficulty involved in captaincy lies somewhere between those who believe it's a mystery Sherlock Holmes couldn't unravel and the camp of great Australian legspinner Bill "Tiger" O'Reilly, who concluded: "My collie dog could captain a cricket team."

However two international captains, MS Dhoni and Alastair Cook - provided they retain their jobs - will soon face a task closer to the Holmes degree of difficulty. Both Dhoni and Cook will have a return bout with an opposing captain who handed them a drubbing, a whitewash, a hiding - take your pick which terminology you use - but whichever way you perceive the situation, it's the toughest task any captain faces.

The difficulty is created by the style of the opposing captain. As long as Michael Clarke's dodgy back holds out, Australia will commence both those Test series with a huge advantage.

Clarke's style is ultra-aggressive, with an attack to match, so he'll be prodding the opposition from the opening delivery of the series. In contrast Dhoni, at least in Tests away from home, is a captain who tends to be reactive rather than proactive. Clarke's style wins that contest every time.

Cook is ultra-conservative, and during the 5-0 drubbing in Australia, even when he had the opposition teetering on the edge of the cliff, he couldn't initiate the final shove. As much as anything, that's what frustrated Kevin Pietersen. He's an aggressive cricketer who likes to win and he could see England, unconvincingly led by Cook, had little chance of beating Australia.

It may well be that Pietersen had worn out his credits as a match-winner but it still makes little sense to cast aside your best batsman to bolster a captain who is out of his depth. At least out of his depth in a head-to-head battle with a captain like Clarke.

Supporters of Cook will say he can improve. While an important part of captaincy is learning on the job from your mistakes, there are certain critical things about the task that can't be learned. Aggressive intent and a positive approach can't be taught and Cook will be hard-pressed to acquire those innate qualities. He's unlikely to match Clarke in a contest where those attributes tilt the scales.

Dhoni is a slightly different case. He does have an aggressive streak as captain and it stands him in good stead in the shorter forms of the game. However, that trait seems to desert him in a Test series played away from his beloved home turf.

Dhoni's failings could be caused by a combination of things. Firstly, the short forms of the game virtually dictate how you should play, whereas in Test cricket, the captain has to establish a pattern and then attempt to impose his will on the opposition. Secondly, a captain can stay in the job too long. This leads to him becoming stale and adopting a more conservative approach.

It's going to be hard for India to beat Australia away from home. They don't possess the fast bowlers who are crucial to winning on bouncy pitches and there's a question mark over their batting under those conditions.

India may not win under another captain - most likely Virat Kohli - but they have no chance under Dhoni. On the last tour of Australia, India went downhill fast under his leadership and unless the injection of youth has an inspirational effect, I don't see Dhoni reversing that trend.

In Cook's case he has one advantage. His next meeting with Clarke will be on English soil. Nevertheless, it won't help Cook much as his team is short on match-winners with Pietersen's dismissal, and Australia's strong pace attack should be suited to English conditions.

The real problem for England is they have virtually no alternative choice for captain. Neither situation bodes well for India or England in a series where captaincy could make all the difference.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator for Channel 9, and a columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Batmanian on (June 6, 2014, 15:58 GMT)

To paraphrase Leonard Cohen on Phil Spector: Captain Dhoni may be a mad genius. But he is a genius.

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (June 5, 2014, 21:34 GMT)

Spot on as usual Chappelli although you are probably going to cop a bit for this! Cook is a poor excuse for a captain, and without KP England will be in danger of getting decimated each time they walk out onto a cricket ground, at least in the short term. Dhoni is a good player but only a fair captain, both will struggle against pup, especially at home.

Posted by jay57870 on (June 4, 2014, 3:24 GMT)

Miss #3) the unknown unknowns, things we don't know we don't know. It's presumptuous of Ian to say "Cook & Dhoni will struggle against Clarke". As if the rest of the world stagnates, while OZ rides the wave. Even experts are failing to see the looming signs: It's T20 that's become the platform for Test cricket. Many OZ stars play in IPL: Warner, Watson, Smith, Haddin, Johnson, Bailey & Co. So did Clarke & Harris last year. Not to mention emerging stars: Maxwell, Starc, Cummins, Faulkner. In fact, Brett Lee credits Johnson's resurgence to his IPL stint. Improved Warner is back in Tests. This year's IPL was very competitive. In the exciting finals on Sunday, it's the unfancied, unknown players who stole the show: M Pandey, M Vohra, A Patel & an older W Saha. India's not sitting still. Yes, it has a wealth of hidden talent. Selectors are watching IPL closely to find the next Sehwag. Remember he was your "next Bradman", Ian? The opposition can ambush too. Elementary, my dear Chappelli!!

Posted by jay57870 on (June 4, 2014, 3:05 GMT)

Ian - Spot on about Sherlock Holmes: he's clueless, he misses! Miss #1) the known knowns, things we know that we know. Coaching matters. Darren Lehmann's arrival turned OZ around. Look at the dismal situation when Arthur & Clarke suffered the "Homework" saga & a 0-4 whitewash in India. Arthur was axed. The affable Lehmann was inserted to remedy the toxic team culture. It worked. Though OZ lost 0-3 in Eng, they rebounded later at home with a 5-0 Ashes drubbing. The momentum carried over to SA: OZ won 2-1. Cooke could not have succeeded without Lehmann. Miss #2) the known unknowns, things we know we don't know. Cricket's vagaries - injury, form loss, fatigue, burnout, personal issues - can quickly render a team vulnerable to defeat. Also longevity. Many key players are over 30 - Haddin (36), Rogers (36), Harris (34), Watson (33), Johnson (32). Clarke too (33). Surely these "ageing masters" are limited by their "use-by-dates", especially Clarke with his "dodgy back". Time to exit, Ian?

Posted by indianzen on (June 3, 2014, 22:16 GMT)

Ian, if Clarke is too good as you exaggerate, why did he loose 4-0 to India in India ? Every team will struggle in another country and at times luck decides who will win, just like SL winning in England at the moment...

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (June 3, 2014, 17:32 GMT)

@Jamie: Fast bowlers will win you matches outside subcontinent.. Its as simple as that.. Australia is winning because clarke has bowlers like johnson, siddle, pattinson who bowl close to 150kmph.. Im sure dhoni would be a great captain if he has bowlers like that.. If you are true follower of cricket you will know that india were the true winners of 2007 test series if not for steve bucknor in the sydney test.. We won the one day series following that..

Posted by Nampally on (June 3, 2014, 13:08 GMT)

Dhoni is a proven failure as a Captain to lead India overseas. It is so obvious that it does not need a Rocket Scientist to prove it. Why is he still the Captain of the Indian Team touring England? The Indian Selectors have some serious Soul searching to do as regards their tactics or reasoning behind Dhoni continuing to lead India overseas in Tests. Rohit Sharma is the best alternate choice. He is better tactician & leader than Dhoni. He also has the personality. That is the first change India needs if it needs to perform better. Secondly, India needs to focus on opening batsmen & opening bowlers seriously. Dropping an in-form pace bowler like Umesh Yadev or opening batsman Uthappa shows serious deficiencies in the selectors. Form, Record & Fitness should be the only basis for selection. Last but not the least at least one batsman & bowler should be selected with an eye on the future- e.g., Nair & Sandeep Sharma. India has the best talent & if used correctly will perform at high level

Posted by   on (June 3, 2014, 13:07 GMT)

I tend to agree with Ian's views on Clarke, undoubtedly aggressive. However as it was shown in the series in India an aggressive captain without the correct team (more so bowlers bit batsmen too) will have his tactics backfire. Aus has only done well in seamer friendly conditions remember!!! India's recent tours of south Africa and new Zealand clearly have shown lack of penetrative fast bowling is the clear cause of unflattering results. Batting has performed satisfactorily but loosing matches or drawing matches when you have the runs to back you up is just not done. Before passing dhoni for being reactive abroad I wish we could see him with a pace battery of two 135-140 and one quality 145-150 km bowling attack. Unfortunately this might just be a dream.

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (June 3, 2014, 12:37 GMT)

All the folk on here defending Dhoni are completely missing the point! Chappell is purely stating that Dhoni will struggle outside of a India against Clarke as if you haven't noticed India are touring Australia later in the year. So all these folk going on about being whitewashed 4-0 in India are obviously a bit wet between the ears , as actually read the article properly. Australia will hammer India 4-0 again this summer as we did it last time with a weaker Aussie team than this one , and exactly as Chappell put it , Dhoni is totally rubbish outside of his custom made dust bowls. And again before all you Indians start moaning again yes Australia and most other teams will still struggle in India , but Australia won there in 2004 so when was the last time India won in Australia? Yes thought so!

Posted by latecut_04 on (June 3, 2014, 9:09 GMT)

Everyone seems to attribute Clarke's aggression to the presence of Mitchell Johnson and Ryan Harris. Yes,he has the most feared fast bowler in his repository. But that is not the only cause for his aggression. Remember his first series in SA after the Ashes debacle in 2011 and his declarations. They were always sportive and result oriented.(like they are right now).Also Clarke is a very shrewd tactician unlike Dhoni and Cook.(look at his use of Lyon and how he has been molded into Aus attack, spin was a major headache since the days of Shane Warne and although we cant say Aus spin problems have been addressed they are currently at a much better position than they were during the days of Doherty,Beer,Krajza etc ).Even if Dhoni has a 150 k bowler he wont know how to use him(see how he has left Umesh Yadav at home for the series against Eng.)not saying Yadav is anyway similar to Mitch. point is Dhoni being a poor test player will always be a poor captain .Period.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Hangovers and headaches

2014 in review: Embarrassing defeats, a beleaguered captain, a bitter former star, alienating administrators - England's year was gloomy. By George Dobell

Ten years later

Gallery: Efforts by Surrey have helped transform a coastal village in Sri Lanka devastated by the December 26 tsunami

Going for glory and falling just short

Anantha Narayanan: An anecdotal account of close finishes similar to the recent Adelaide Test

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Gilchrist's conscientious moment

In the semi-final against Sri Lanka in 2003, Adam Gilchrist walked back to the pavilion despite being given not out by the on-field umpire

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days