December 29, 2011

Undone by overconfidence

Bangladesh's year began with the ignominy of their lowest one-day total and they hardly improved thereafter
13

After a fantastic last quarter of 2010, there was an air of promise over Bangladesh cricket. Having crushed New Zealand in their first major performance, the Tigers ended a difficult year on a winning note, cruising past Zimbabwe. The New Year was expected to take Bangladesh to the promised land: a place in the last eight of a home World Cup beckoned, under the leadership of the man considered the country's first cricket superstar.

But what ensued was a dreadful narrative of vanity, followed by poor form, discipline issues, several controversies, and a mauling. It truly wasn't Bangladesh's year.

It was a quiet start for the team. The Bangladesh Cricket Board's decision to appoint Shakib Al Hasan as captain for the year (and Tamim Iqbal as his deputy) put a bigger decision in the shade: it was decided, rather unwisely, to not play cricket in January, a month before the World Cup, when eight other countries were engaged in competitive cricket. The notion that a team that has a one-day World Cup in front of it can't play any other form is archaic. The lull would go on to breed a dangerous mix of overconfidence and bitterness - the latter owing to the exclusion of Mashrafe Mortaza from the World Cup squad due to injury.

In the tournament, after a beating at the hands of India and Virender Sehwag, Bangladesh had to beat Ireland, and they did, though it wasn't without an anxious afternoon. The swagger returned much too soon, and experienced observers heard a time bomb ticking, which went off on March 4.

West Indies were eyeing revenge for the 2009 defeats, and they struck gold when they bowled at speeds and on lengths that greatly troubled Bangladesh's trigger-happy batsmen. Bangladesh were shot out for 58, their lowest ODI score.

They then made their way to Chittagong, to face an unpredictable England. When Shafiul Islam joined Mahmudullah at the crease, Bangladesh needed 57 more to win. The unlikely pair carted boundaries, ran madly and ticked off Graeme Swann, to win with an over to spare. It sparked such delirium that the teams only made it to their hotel four hours after the game ended, as the entire port city came out to the streets. Another win, against Netherlands , followed, but that was the last good day Bangladesh saw in 2011. South Africa kicked them out of the World Cup and it was back to the drawing board all over again.

Australia's short visit was marked by a Shane Watson blitz, but it did bring an out-of-form Mushfiqur Rahim back from the brink, following which the team took off to Zimbabwe slightly uncertain of itself.

The next five months would be a nightmare. First, it was the defeat to Zimbabwe in the one-off Test. The batsmen remained in their shot-a-ball mindset as two debutants and an ageing left-arm spinner tore through the top- and middle orders. Tamim did his team few favours with his "ordinary" jibe at Kyle Jarvis and Brian Vitori before the fifth day of a Test poised for three possible results.

Three consecutive ODI losses followed; Bangladesh conceded the series in dramatic fashion in Harare, where Mushfiqur played a valiant knock only to fall at the final hurdle.

The captain and vice-captain were sacked within days of the team returning home. Mushfiqur took the helm, mostly for his form, as well as for the respect his work ethic commands in a team that has lacked intensity over an extended period. He immediately found success, hitting the match-winning six to beat West Indies in a Twenty20. But the floundering top order was showed up once again as Bangladesh conceded the ODI and Test series to a team that could have been conquered with a disciplined effort. Bangladesh did, though, bowl out Darren Sammy's men for just 61 in the third ODI - seemingly retribution for the 58 that sparked the Tigers' slide in 2011.

Pakistan's crushing visit rounded off the year, during which the promising Tamim and Shafiul never rise from the ordinary. Only in the final game of 2011, the second Test against Pakistan, did Bangladesh make an effort that could be comforting enough to carry forward. Shakib's 144 and 6 for 82 stood out like a beacon amid the wreckage of the Tigers' fourth Test defeat of the year, and he ended the year as No. 1 allrounder in Tests and ODIs.

The out-of-form players would like to believe that this is just the "second-season blues", and so will the team as a whole, but 2011 has been like other World Cup years in the past (1999, 2003 and 2007), where the team has gone into a tailspin after the tournament - a dangerous trend that has often sparked upheavals in Bangladesh cricket.

New kid on the block
He was on the periphery for the last couple of years, after strong performances in the Dhaka Premier League, so Nasir Hossain's selection for the Zimbabwe tour wasn't a surprise. He started off with a half-century on debut, followed by another quick 50 against West Indies. Apart from accurate offbreaks, Nasir brings some confidence to the fielding unit. In December he became the first Bangladesh batsman to score his maiden one-day hundred in the year of his debut, and followed it up with a Test fifty against Pakistan.

High point
It would definitely be the surprise win over England in the World Cup. It came from nowhere and it brought two introverted young men into the limelight. In Shafiul and Mahmudullah, Bangladesh have players who can take responsibility - as they did in the dying moments against England. Nobody expected the ninth-wicket pair to carry the team through, but the two players were optimistic. Shafiul, who had such an excellent debut year, tapered off and was dropped for the Pakistan Tests, but Mahmudullah's stock rose when he was made vice-captain.

Low point
Too many to name. The 58 all out would be an obvious choice, but Bangladesh's low intensity during the Test against Zimbabwe was disappointing - a real low point, as opposed to the sudden collapse that occurred in March against West Indies. Shakib couldn't rouse his men to action on any of the five days, and it was capped off by a wild swing from him that put an end to any hopes of survival on the final day.

What 2012 holds
After some domestic action, Bangladesh host the Asia Cup and then, subject to a security clearance, travel to Pakistan in April. They then play a three-Test series against Zimbabwe, their first since 2007, the World Twenty20 and a series against West Indies next winter at home.

Mohammad Isam is senior sports reporter at the Daily Star in Dhaka

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on December 31, 2011, 22:25 GMT

    its true BD needs to have an organized domestic structure... but i surely can blame it to few factors. ICC and the BCB. ICC always explains BD needs to improve, but frankly speaking I have not seen ICC helping Bangladesh cricket with coaching and management. From my travel to various developing cricketing nations, i have seen, the ICC official visits to those countries have been more then that of BD. I would appreciate if the cricketing structure could be more established with the help of ICC. on the other hand BCB is also to be blamed for wrong decision. Mustafa Kamal BCB president has mainly focused on shorter format of cricket. u can see the results, they are much competent against any team in shorter format. (untill recent bad times). this shows the potential of bd boys, if trained well enough. BCB organizing BPL is another attempt to maximize the revenue like IPL. if they invested in longer version development, bd will enjoy long term benefit. BCB is only thinking money making.

  • Tigg on December 30, 2011, 10:58 GMT

    @Tom_Bowler I disagree that Ireland would struggle. While they don't have a first class system in place currently, Bangladesh have only had one a very short while. Likewise they seem just as able to compete in the shorter forms as Bangladesh do. I think they'd be able to push some of the weaker test nations as a lot of their players play in County Cricket (Porterfield, The O'Briens, Dockrell, Rankin etc) which is rated as one of, if not the, toughest FC tournament around. Netherlands would struggle as fewer of their players play proper FC cricket but I think ireland have the drive to succeed. Something the so-called Tigers lack.

  • reyme on December 29, 2011, 20:39 GMT

    Dear Sai, for the last few years, BD had been winning consistently against the ZIM. 5 out of 6 series were won and BD is way ahead in Head to Head. In recent past BD won 2/4 against ENG, 4/4 against NZ, 1/2 against WI, 2/5 against ZIM (this year), and 4/5 (last year). BD also won against ENG, IRE and NETH in the Worldcup. As a vivid fan, you might recall, BD eliminated IND from WC 2007. BD A Team has been beating South Africa in SA (both ODI and 4 days) and WI. They will play a series against ENG A Team in a few days. Can a Ranji team do all that?

  • on December 29, 2011, 20:08 GMT

    Team Bangladesh????????????? ssssssshhhhhhhhh..... watz dat? d

  • rahul_sai on December 29, 2011, 13:15 GMT

    may be I ve a gud plan for bangladesh. bangladesh shud be given 2 innings to the opponents 1. that way, they can avoid innings defeat. lol.

  • Tom_Bowler on December 29, 2011, 13:12 GMT

    Additionally those who claim that Bangladesh's continuing incompetence is an argument for Ireland and The Netherlands to be granted full membership of the ICC really should be careful what they wish for. Neither has a domestic first class structure so granting them Test status would just add more horrific mismatches to the international calendar. The Irish and the Dutch do well in one dayers but they wouldn't in Tests, if either had an abundance of players capable of playing the longer forms of the game you would see many more of them in the County Championship where their EU passports would allow them to appear as non-overseas players. Unfortunately for the Irish and the Dutch sorting out Bangladesh should be the ICC's priority before it tries to develop the game in their countries. Of course the ICC is unlikely to ever prioritise Dutch and Irish cricket as granting them full membership could create a Euro/Anglophone block to challenge the Asian hegemony and that just wouldn't do.

  • rahul_sai on December 29, 2011, 13:11 GMT

    bangladesh isnt in the elite rank. just buzz off so the gud teams will take on gud teams, waste of time playing bangladesh, no player except shakib al hasan can even find a place in the indian ranji team (even in the west bengal or assam teams). realize the truth. its high time u play the associate teams, start winning and say we r a gud team and respectable losses will no longer be accepted. end of day, back to square one. shakib shud be playing in some english county wen his country is playing the associates and take that experience to the next generation. after a gud probably 20 years, we may ve a bangladesh team that can win zimbabwe consistently. not to mention the attitude of the players. sucks man, geez.

  • Tom_Bowler on December 29, 2011, 12:57 GMT

    The results have never improved for Bangladesh. With the presence of two players of genuine class in Tamim and Shakib and a few others of a decent standard like Mushfiqur and Mamudullah they should be getting better but they still get continually plastered by all comers. Surely it's time for the ICC to actually do something positive to help them? The ICC is only concerned with money so direct some of that cash to Bangladesh to improve their domestic infrastructure and coaching facilities. The ECB, ACB and SACB should be persuaded to grant more opportunities for Bangladesh players to play at first class or club level in their countries so they develop a more rounded game. If the players don't justify their places the ICC could pay their wages, no team will turn down a free cricketer. If the ICC needs to find the money from somewhere they can take it off Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan as they were desperate to elevate Bangladesh to full member status to bolster the Asian block vote.

  • Dr_Van_Nostrand on December 29, 2011, 12:04 GMT

    Well written, Mohammad. Bad year for the Tigers, buit good to see they have plenty of international cricket next season instead of a sparse calander they have had over the past few years. Hope they are prepared for the 3 Tests against Zimbabwe.

  • QTS_ on December 29, 2011, 11:23 GMT

    Correct - overconfidence often crossing into arrogance. Fans and cricketers seemed to believe that Bangladesh belonged at the top half of the cricketing nations. At least for the moment it is demonstrated that consistent performance is required to belong there. That is one reason that the sacking of Shakib was welcomed - he seemed to promote arrogance in the team with his stances that often conflicted wit the board and the team. Lesson to learn: to be a world-class team or world-class all-rounder, on needs to be capable of combating the concomitant, deadly disease of arrogance.

  • on December 31, 2011, 22:25 GMT

    its true BD needs to have an organized domestic structure... but i surely can blame it to few factors. ICC and the BCB. ICC always explains BD needs to improve, but frankly speaking I have not seen ICC helping Bangladesh cricket with coaching and management. From my travel to various developing cricketing nations, i have seen, the ICC official visits to those countries have been more then that of BD. I would appreciate if the cricketing structure could be more established with the help of ICC. on the other hand BCB is also to be blamed for wrong decision. Mustafa Kamal BCB president has mainly focused on shorter format of cricket. u can see the results, they are much competent against any team in shorter format. (untill recent bad times). this shows the potential of bd boys, if trained well enough. BCB organizing BPL is another attempt to maximize the revenue like IPL. if they invested in longer version development, bd will enjoy long term benefit. BCB is only thinking money making.

  • Tigg on December 30, 2011, 10:58 GMT

    @Tom_Bowler I disagree that Ireland would struggle. While they don't have a first class system in place currently, Bangladesh have only had one a very short while. Likewise they seem just as able to compete in the shorter forms as Bangladesh do. I think they'd be able to push some of the weaker test nations as a lot of their players play in County Cricket (Porterfield, The O'Briens, Dockrell, Rankin etc) which is rated as one of, if not the, toughest FC tournament around. Netherlands would struggle as fewer of their players play proper FC cricket but I think ireland have the drive to succeed. Something the so-called Tigers lack.

  • reyme on December 29, 2011, 20:39 GMT

    Dear Sai, for the last few years, BD had been winning consistently against the ZIM. 5 out of 6 series were won and BD is way ahead in Head to Head. In recent past BD won 2/4 against ENG, 4/4 against NZ, 1/2 against WI, 2/5 against ZIM (this year), and 4/5 (last year). BD also won against ENG, IRE and NETH in the Worldcup. As a vivid fan, you might recall, BD eliminated IND from WC 2007. BD A Team has been beating South Africa in SA (both ODI and 4 days) and WI. They will play a series against ENG A Team in a few days. Can a Ranji team do all that?

  • on December 29, 2011, 20:08 GMT

    Team Bangladesh????????????? ssssssshhhhhhhhh..... watz dat? d

  • rahul_sai on December 29, 2011, 13:15 GMT

    may be I ve a gud plan for bangladesh. bangladesh shud be given 2 innings to the opponents 1. that way, they can avoid innings defeat. lol.

  • Tom_Bowler on December 29, 2011, 13:12 GMT

    Additionally those who claim that Bangladesh's continuing incompetence is an argument for Ireland and The Netherlands to be granted full membership of the ICC really should be careful what they wish for. Neither has a domestic first class structure so granting them Test status would just add more horrific mismatches to the international calendar. The Irish and the Dutch do well in one dayers but they wouldn't in Tests, if either had an abundance of players capable of playing the longer forms of the game you would see many more of them in the County Championship where their EU passports would allow them to appear as non-overseas players. Unfortunately for the Irish and the Dutch sorting out Bangladesh should be the ICC's priority before it tries to develop the game in their countries. Of course the ICC is unlikely to ever prioritise Dutch and Irish cricket as granting them full membership could create a Euro/Anglophone block to challenge the Asian hegemony and that just wouldn't do.

  • rahul_sai on December 29, 2011, 13:11 GMT

    bangladesh isnt in the elite rank. just buzz off so the gud teams will take on gud teams, waste of time playing bangladesh, no player except shakib al hasan can even find a place in the indian ranji team (even in the west bengal or assam teams). realize the truth. its high time u play the associate teams, start winning and say we r a gud team and respectable losses will no longer be accepted. end of day, back to square one. shakib shud be playing in some english county wen his country is playing the associates and take that experience to the next generation. after a gud probably 20 years, we may ve a bangladesh team that can win zimbabwe consistently. not to mention the attitude of the players. sucks man, geez.

  • Tom_Bowler on December 29, 2011, 12:57 GMT

    The results have never improved for Bangladesh. With the presence of two players of genuine class in Tamim and Shakib and a few others of a decent standard like Mushfiqur and Mamudullah they should be getting better but they still get continually plastered by all comers. Surely it's time for the ICC to actually do something positive to help them? The ICC is only concerned with money so direct some of that cash to Bangladesh to improve their domestic infrastructure and coaching facilities. The ECB, ACB and SACB should be persuaded to grant more opportunities for Bangladesh players to play at first class or club level in their countries so they develop a more rounded game. If the players don't justify their places the ICC could pay their wages, no team will turn down a free cricketer. If the ICC needs to find the money from somewhere they can take it off Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan as they were desperate to elevate Bangladesh to full member status to bolster the Asian block vote.

  • Dr_Van_Nostrand on December 29, 2011, 12:04 GMT

    Well written, Mohammad. Bad year for the Tigers, buit good to see they have plenty of international cricket next season instead of a sparse calander they have had over the past few years. Hope they are prepared for the 3 Tests against Zimbabwe.

  • QTS_ on December 29, 2011, 11:23 GMT

    Correct - overconfidence often crossing into arrogance. Fans and cricketers seemed to believe that Bangladesh belonged at the top half of the cricketing nations. At least for the moment it is demonstrated that consistent performance is required to belong there. That is one reason that the sacking of Shakib was welcomed - he seemed to promote arrogance in the team with his stances that often conflicted wit the board and the team. Lesson to learn: to be a world-class team or world-class all-rounder, on needs to be capable of combating the concomitant, deadly disease of arrogance.

  • Nduru on December 29, 2011, 7:33 GMT

    I think overconfidence is a good word to describe what happened. To be honest, I was getting tired of the somewhat arrogant attitude of Bangla fans and players this time last year. But I think they were taught a few lessons this year and as long as they learn from them, there is no reason why Bangladesh cannot compete with the best (I disagree with those who say Bangla should not have test status or that Ireland is better etc). I think that Hossien is a great test prospect, and of course Shakib is world class. Tamim needs to learn from his bad attitude and live up to his billing. Rahim I think will be a good captain. I also thought that the one quick bowler who made his comback against Pakistan in the last test is impressive. Good luck in 2012 and I look forward to some good tussles with my team (fellow 'minnow' Zimbabwe). Why can't we have a three test series?

  • on December 29, 2011, 4:28 GMT

    Well I have 4 words for our team- "DOMESTIC CRICKETING INFRASTRUCTURAL BOOST"

    All in all, a very well and sensibly written article by Mohammad Isam. :)

  • rivernile on December 29, 2011, 3:46 GMT

    Sad year indeed for the Tigers. Whenever there is a light of hope, they seem to self destruct almost immediately following. However, I think that the worst thing that happened in 2011 for the Tigers was letting go of Siddons. But we should not look back. I think that we finished with a positive note (towards the end) of the Pakistan series. With Shakib not having captain responsibilities, he seems to be hitting an upward stride. Now if Tamim could remember how to bat, or wake up on the right side of the bed, we should be okay for the next Pakistan series.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • rivernile on December 29, 2011, 3:46 GMT

    Sad year indeed for the Tigers. Whenever there is a light of hope, they seem to self destruct almost immediately following. However, I think that the worst thing that happened in 2011 for the Tigers was letting go of Siddons. But we should not look back. I think that we finished with a positive note (towards the end) of the Pakistan series. With Shakib not having captain responsibilities, he seems to be hitting an upward stride. Now if Tamim could remember how to bat, or wake up on the right side of the bed, we should be okay for the next Pakistan series.

  • on December 29, 2011, 4:28 GMT

    Well I have 4 words for our team- "DOMESTIC CRICKETING INFRASTRUCTURAL BOOST"

    All in all, a very well and sensibly written article by Mohammad Isam. :)

  • Nduru on December 29, 2011, 7:33 GMT

    I think overconfidence is a good word to describe what happened. To be honest, I was getting tired of the somewhat arrogant attitude of Bangla fans and players this time last year. But I think they were taught a few lessons this year and as long as they learn from them, there is no reason why Bangladesh cannot compete with the best (I disagree with those who say Bangla should not have test status or that Ireland is better etc). I think that Hossien is a great test prospect, and of course Shakib is world class. Tamim needs to learn from his bad attitude and live up to his billing. Rahim I think will be a good captain. I also thought that the one quick bowler who made his comback against Pakistan in the last test is impressive. Good luck in 2012 and I look forward to some good tussles with my team (fellow 'minnow' Zimbabwe). Why can't we have a three test series?

  • QTS_ on December 29, 2011, 11:23 GMT

    Correct - overconfidence often crossing into arrogance. Fans and cricketers seemed to believe that Bangladesh belonged at the top half of the cricketing nations. At least for the moment it is demonstrated that consistent performance is required to belong there. That is one reason that the sacking of Shakib was welcomed - he seemed to promote arrogance in the team with his stances that often conflicted wit the board and the team. Lesson to learn: to be a world-class team or world-class all-rounder, on needs to be capable of combating the concomitant, deadly disease of arrogance.

  • Dr_Van_Nostrand on December 29, 2011, 12:04 GMT

    Well written, Mohammad. Bad year for the Tigers, buit good to see they have plenty of international cricket next season instead of a sparse calander they have had over the past few years. Hope they are prepared for the 3 Tests against Zimbabwe.

  • Tom_Bowler on December 29, 2011, 12:57 GMT

    The results have never improved for Bangladesh. With the presence of two players of genuine class in Tamim and Shakib and a few others of a decent standard like Mushfiqur and Mamudullah they should be getting better but they still get continually plastered by all comers. Surely it's time for the ICC to actually do something positive to help them? The ICC is only concerned with money so direct some of that cash to Bangladesh to improve their domestic infrastructure and coaching facilities. The ECB, ACB and SACB should be persuaded to grant more opportunities for Bangladesh players to play at first class or club level in their countries so they develop a more rounded game. If the players don't justify their places the ICC could pay their wages, no team will turn down a free cricketer. If the ICC needs to find the money from somewhere they can take it off Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan as they were desperate to elevate Bangladesh to full member status to bolster the Asian block vote.

  • rahul_sai on December 29, 2011, 13:11 GMT

    bangladesh isnt in the elite rank. just buzz off so the gud teams will take on gud teams, waste of time playing bangladesh, no player except shakib al hasan can even find a place in the indian ranji team (even in the west bengal or assam teams). realize the truth. its high time u play the associate teams, start winning and say we r a gud team and respectable losses will no longer be accepted. end of day, back to square one. shakib shud be playing in some english county wen his country is playing the associates and take that experience to the next generation. after a gud probably 20 years, we may ve a bangladesh team that can win zimbabwe consistently. not to mention the attitude of the players. sucks man, geez.

  • Tom_Bowler on December 29, 2011, 13:12 GMT

    Additionally those who claim that Bangladesh's continuing incompetence is an argument for Ireland and The Netherlands to be granted full membership of the ICC really should be careful what they wish for. Neither has a domestic first class structure so granting them Test status would just add more horrific mismatches to the international calendar. The Irish and the Dutch do well in one dayers but they wouldn't in Tests, if either had an abundance of players capable of playing the longer forms of the game you would see many more of them in the County Championship where their EU passports would allow them to appear as non-overseas players. Unfortunately for the Irish and the Dutch sorting out Bangladesh should be the ICC's priority before it tries to develop the game in their countries. Of course the ICC is unlikely to ever prioritise Dutch and Irish cricket as granting them full membership could create a Euro/Anglophone block to challenge the Asian hegemony and that just wouldn't do.

  • rahul_sai on December 29, 2011, 13:15 GMT

    may be I ve a gud plan for bangladesh. bangladesh shud be given 2 innings to the opponents 1. that way, they can avoid innings defeat. lol.

  • on December 29, 2011, 20:08 GMT

    Team Bangladesh????????????? ssssssshhhhhhhhh..... watz dat? d