| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A look at the major numbers from 2012
January 4, 2013
Among the major statistical achievements of 2012 were Michael Clarke's record-breaking spree with the bat, the resurgence of left-arm spin, and South Africa's confident march to the top of the Test rankings by winning series in England and Australia. Here are the highlights of the year, in numbers:
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
|
|||
The overall numbers
Thirty-two out of 42 Tests in 2012 produced decisive results, which, in percentage terms, was higher than in 2011 (76.19 to 69.23). And while 2011 had been an outstanding year for bowlers, batsmen made some sort of a comeback in 2012, though the overall runs per wicket for the year remained lower than the corresponding number for each year between 2006 and 2010. In 2011, the hundreds per Test figure dropped to 1.85, the first time since 2002 that it dipped below 2, but in 2012 it went back up to 2.12.
There were plenty of one-sided results too: out of the 32 outright wins in 2012, 14 were either by an innings, or by ten wickets, or by more than 200 runs; the corresponding stat in 2011 was 11 out of 27. The batting stat that improved dramatically in Tests in 2012 was the conversion rate of fifties into hundreds: there were 89 hundreds and 177 fifties (ratio 1.98) in 2012, compared to 72 centuries and 200 fifties the previous year (ratio 2.78). In fact this was the first year since 2004 that the ratio fell below 2.
In ODIs, the number that stood out more than any other was the total matches played: only 90 internationals were played in 2012, 56 fewer than the previous year (a drop of 38%). The last time fewer than 100 ODIs were played in a year was way back in 1995, when 60 matches were played. The next year 127 matches were played, which wasn't surprising given that it was a World Cup year, and since then the annual tally has always remained above 100. (Click here for the full year-wise list since 1990.) India hosted only one ODI, against Pakistan on December 30. Since they began hosting ODIs, in 1981, only once before have they hosted one ODI in an entire year - in 2004.
On the other hand, there were 82 Twenty20 internationals played in 2012, almost four times the 2011 stat. Given that the World Twenty20 was held this year, there were obviously going to be more Twenty20 internationals than last year, but the previous highest in any year was 68, in 2010.
| Year | Tests | Results/ draws | Result % | Average | Run rate | 100s/ 50s |
| 2012 | 42 | 32/ 10 | 76.19 | 34.00 | 3.12 | 89/ 177 |
| 2011 | 39 | 27/ 12 | 69.23 | 32.47 | 3.14 | 72/ 200 |
| 2010 | 43 | 32/ 11 | 74.42 | 36.48 | 3.34 | 98/ 214 |
| 2009 | 41 | 26/ 15 | 63.41 | 37.84 | 3.37 | 97/ 217 |
| 2008 | 47 | 36/ 11 | 76.60 | 34.12 | 3.23 | 96/ 221 |
| 2007 | 31 | 22/ 9 | 70.97 | 35.28 | 3.35 | 65/ 142 |
| 2006 | 46 | 34/ 12 | 73.91 | 34.60 | 3.34 | 95/ 208 |
| 2005 | 49 | 37/ 12 | 75.51 | 33.53 | 3.38 | 100/ 201 |
| Year | Matches | Average | Run-rate | 100s/ 50s |
| 2012 | 90 | 31.09 | 5.05 | 43/ 205 |
| 2011 | 146 | 29.97 | 5.04 | 63/ 337 |
| 2010 | 142 | 30.11 | 4.98 | 65/ 303 |
| 2009 | 150 | 30.92 | 5.12 | 68/ 325 |
| 2008 | 126 | 29.00 | 4.93 | 51/ 259 |
| 2007 | 191 | 30.39 | 5.04 | 75/ 428 |
| 2006 | 160 | 28.97 | 4.82 | 60/ 331 |
| 2005 | 107 | 31.38 | 5.10 | 50/ 239 |
The top teams
South Africa took over as the top-ranked Test team, a position they thoroughly deserved, given that they won overseas series in Australia and England, and were the only side to remain unbeaten through the year in Tests. The last time they didn't lose a single Test in a year was in 1999, when they won six and drew four. Australia were very good too, but they lost the series that really mattered, at home against South Africa. That Perth defeat was their only loss, which means they still had an excellent win-loss ratio of 7. England, the previous No.1 side, had a tough year, though they salvaged something significant from 2012 at the end with a series win in India. They finished with a 5-7 win-loss record, with comprehensive series defeats against Pakistan and South Africa. West Indies, meanwhile, won four Tests in 2012, as many as they had won in the four previous years from 2008 to 2011. The last time they won more than four Tests in a year was in 1988. (Click here for West Indies' year-wise Test results since 1985.)
![]()
|
|||
In ODIs, though, England were unquestionably the form team with 12 wins and two defeats - a win-loss ratio of 6 when no other team managed more than 2. England had three series in which they blanked the opposition - Pakistan, West Indies and Australia - without losing a single game. Their only losses were to South Africa in a 2-2 drawn series at home. It's easily England's best ODI win-loss ratio in a year, and an almost nine-fild improvement over their previous year's ratio of 0.68 (11 wins, 16 defeats). New Zealand's ratio of 0.40, on the other hand, was their worst since 1994 (0.33, 6 wins, 18 defeats).
Clarke and other batting stars
In terms of individual performers, the stand-out player of 2012 was easily Michael Clarke, whose Test numbers were easily among the greatest that any player has achieved in a calendar year. His 1595 Test runs is the fourth-highest in a calendar year, and among batsmen with at least 1000 Test runs in a year, only Garry Sobers and Don Bradman - two of the greatest names in the game - have higher averages. Among captains, only Graeme Smith scored more in a calendar year (he scored 1656 in 2008), while among captains who scored 1000, only the Don had a higher average. And then, of course, there were the four double-centuries he scored, a feat which even the Don didn't manage. His 1407 Test runs in Australia is easily a record for a year in home Tests - the next-best is Mohammad Yousuf's 1126 runs in 2006.
Obviously, he racked up some huge partnerships along the way as well: with Michael Hussey he put together three 200-plus stands, including an unbeaten one of 334 against India in Sydney. Together, the pair racked up 1249 runs in 14 innings at an average of 104.08. Among non-opening pairs, only Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan have added more partnership runs in a calendar year.
| Batsman | Year | Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Don Bradman | 1948 | 8 | 1025 | 113.88 | 5/ 2 |
| Michael Clarke | 2012 | 11 | 1595 | 106.33 | 5/ 3 |
| Ricky Ponting | 2006 | 10 | 1333 | 88.86 | 7/ 4 |
| Graham Gooch | 1990 | 9 | 1264 | 79.00 | 4/ 5 |
| Brian Lara | 2003 | 10 | 1344 | 74.66 | 5/ 5 |
| Graeme Smith | 2008 | 15 | 1656 | 72.00 | 6/ 6 |
In ODIs, Kumar Sangakkara and Tillakaratne Dilshan were the top run-getters, but a few others displayed even greater consistency. Virat Kohli scored 1026 runs at 68.40 and a strike rate of almost 94; only five times have more ODI centuries been scored in a calendar year.
For South Africa there were the ever-reliable Hashim Amla and AB de Villiers, who had smashing ODI stats again. In nine innings, Amla went past 40 eight times, and beyond 50 six times. He averaged 84.75 at a strike rate of more than 90. De Villiers scored two unbeaten hundreds and a 96, and, quite incredibly, had an average and strike rate of more than 100.
| Batsman | ODIs | Runs | Average | Strike rate | 100s/ 50s |
| AB de Villiers | 13 | 645 | 107.50 | 108.58 | 2/ 3 |
| Hashim Amla | 10 | 678 | 84.75 | 90.76 | 2/ 4 |
| Virat Kohli | 17 | 1026 | 68.40 | 93.78 | 5/ 3 |
| MS Dhoni | 16 | 524 | 65.50 | 87.62 | 1/ 3 |
| Ian Bell | 11 | 549 | 54.90 | 82.68 | 1/ 4 |
The year of left-arm spin
For the third year in a row, a spinner topped the charts for most Test wickets in 2012, with Rangana Herath taking 60. (Saeed Ajmal had been the highest wicket-taker in 2011, and Graeme Swann in 2010.) The difference this time, though, was in the type of spinner who took centrestage: though Swann finished second-highest in the wickets chart with 59, this was clearly the year of left-arm spin. Apart from Herath, there were three other left-arm spinners who took 25 or more wickets - Pragyan Ojha, Monty Panesar and Abdur Rehman - and all of them did so at averages of less than 27. Not surprisingly, the overall Test stats for left-arm spin was much better in 2012 than it's been for several years.
The haul of 192 wickets is the third-highest for left-arm spinners in a calendar year - they had 210 in 2004 and 197 in 2008. But even more impressive than the wickets was their average in 2012: left-arm spinners averaged 29.14, with 17 five-fors and three ten-fors. That's as many ten-fors in one year as they had in the previous 7 (between 2005 and 2011), and more five-fors than the last two years put together. And the last time they took 100-plus wickets at a better average was in 1977, during the days of Bishan Singh Bedi and Derek Underwood.
Also, left-arm spinners took 15.18% of the total wickets that bowlers took in Tests in 2012. The last time they managed over 15% was in 1987, and before that in 1976; in the last 40 years this has only happened thrice.
| Year | LAS wkts | Average (1) | Overall wkts | Average (2) | % wkts | 1/ 2 |
| 2012 | 192 | 29.14 | 1265 | 34.02 | 15.18 | 1.17 |
| 2011 | 167 | 29.42 | 1233 | 32.31 | 13.54 | 1.10 |
| 2010 | 159 | 43.07 | 1252 | 36.60 | 12.70 | 0.85 |
| 2009 | 172 | 37.81 | 1214 | 37.70 | 14.17 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 197 | 37.50 | 1445 | 33.68 | 13.63 | 0.90 |
| 2007 | 102 | 37.50 | 920 | 34.83 | 11.09 | 0.93 |
| 2006 | 112 | 43.75 | 1400 | 34.53 | 8.00 | 0.79 |
| 2005 | 106 | 44.94 | 1508 | 33.40 | 7.03 | 0.74 |
| 2004 | 210 | 36.07 | 1555 | 35.31 | 13.50 | 0.98 |
| 2003 | 167 | 36.20 | 1305 | 36.12 | 12.80 | 1.00 |
The stats for left-arm spin also look very good in 2012 when compared to other types of bowlers: right-arm spinners averaged 36.17 with 12 five-fors; right-arm fast bowlers averaged 34.27, and left-arm fast bowlers 34.42. The overall average for all bowlers was 34.02.
| Bowling type | Wickets | Average | Strike rate | Econ rate | 5WI/ 10WM |
| Right-arm pace | 653 | 34.27 | 66.1 | 3.10 | 24/ 3 |
| Left-arm pace | 97 | 34.42 | 61.9 | 3.33 | 4/ 0 |
| Right-arm spin | 323 | 36.17 | 71.5 | 3.03 | 12/ 4 |
| Left-arm spin | 192 | 29.14 | 67.1 | 2.60 | 17/ 3 |
More stats
Click here for Anantha Narayanan's stats review of 2012.
Graphics created by Sajan Nair, head of scoring, ESPNcricinfo
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
@ Happy_AusBang & Great_Nate. In 2012 tests, Amla scored 4 tons - 311* and 121 vs Eng, & 104 and 196 vs Aus - and 2 50s. Total 1130 runs, batting ave - 70.62. He certainly did not out perform Clarke's 5 tons, 1674 runs, ave 98.47, but these are still great test stats, Great-Nate!
In ODIs Amla scored 2 tons 150, 112, (& 2 "almost" tons, 97*, 92,) scoring 678 at ave 84.75. Clarke scored 1 ton and 656 runs at ave 46.85.
Clarke is the no.1 ranked test player with 887 rating points, & Amla no.3 with 878 points. Amla is ODI no.1 with 901 points, and Clake no.7 with 718 points. 9 points separate them at the test level, but Amla is well ahead by 183 points in ODIs. ICC ratings show Amla is currently the leading batsman across formats, with Clarke in 2nd place.
As usual, RandyOz is dead wrong, re: Clarke and Eng's bowlers, who across formats rank better than Aus bowlers! Not unexpectedly, Saffers dominate the test & ODI rankings - not even including the Saffers who play for England :)
Posted by gibboj on (January 7, 2013, 22:48 GMT)@deckchairand6pack ODI have the best parts of test cricket and T20, It has tactics and big hitting. The problem with it is they keep trying to change the rules to make it suit T20 fans, which ruins it for everyone (one ball from each end).
I personally don't understand T20, a game where a dot ball is worth as much as a wicket and where the outcome of most games can be worked out 5 to 10 overs into the 2nd innings
Posted by THE_MIZ on (January 5, 2013, 13:00 GMT)@Great_Nate, wait, you kidding right? One other century? Forgot that he scored two hundreds in Austrailia, two in England?
Posted by Great_Nate on (January 5, 2013, 8:11 GMT)Take out Amla's 311 not out against England and his stats for the year weren't really great in test cricket. He only scored 4 half centuries and 1 hundred. He is a great batsman, but I can't say he is the best in the world at the moment. That result doesn't really compare to clarke with two half centuries, one century, three doubles and a triple.
Posted by Happy_AusBang on (January 5, 2013, 7:12 GMT)Hashim Amla is undeniably the best at the moment. He has scored runs all over, not just in South Africa. Let us see how Clarke fares in India and England.
Posted by Someguy on (January 4, 2013, 22:45 GMT)@Afreen Akthar - Clarke didn't play any tests in the sub-continent last year, but did play ODI's vs Afghanistan and Pakistan in UAE.
Not sure about South Africa and can't be bothered looking it up.
Posted byHas Clarke been in subcontinent this year or has south Africa, I mean 2012? But they rightly are the best player and team currently!
Posted by RandyOZ on (January 4, 2013, 17:09 GMT)Well clearly Clarke is the best batsman on the planet right now, not that we needed reminding. The English would also do well to be reminded on the thumping that their bowlers have taken this year.
Posted by DeckChairand6pack on (January 4, 2013, 13:40 GMT)I'm sure it has been said before, but I just don't see the point of ODI's. You have a powerplay in the beginning and end, and then a load of dross in between when the batsment sedately take singles and the crowd falls asleep. T20 has all the best bits of ODI with the boring parts removed. It has a serious identity crisis. IMHO of course. Hats off to Michael Clarke, talk about a run machine. This Aussie team is ordinary and he has pulled them up by their bootlaces on several occasions. Inspired captaincy when we declared against WI with a first innings deficit, tremendous player and leader. Last but not least, all hail the Proteas, it's been a long time coming. I've been waiting since readmission to know we're number one but we've never quite been good enough. The 20 year odd wait makes it all the sweeter and is richly deserved!
Posted by@warrenwhite: The term used is "decisive result" and not decisive victory. Read carefully before pointing mistakes. Yours sincerely, a Copy Editor