South Africa v England, 2nd Test, Durban, 2nd day

Ordinary Ntini falls into the spotlight

The pressure will be squarely on Makhaya Ntini during the third day in Durban with questions growing about his future

Andrew McGlashan in Durban

December 27, 2009

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

Dale Steyn and Makhaya Ntini rush to don their bowling boots, after adding 58 for South Africa's tenth wicket, South Africa v England, 2nd Test, Durban, December 27, 2009
Makhaya Ntini played an important role with the bat, but his bowling was badly off the pace in England's first innings © Getty Images
Enlarge

The pressure will be squarely on Makhaya Ntini during the third day in Durban with questions growing about his future following another below-par display with the ball. His opening three-over spell was dispatched for 25 runs, largely by a rampant Andrew Strauss, and he wasn't called on again by Graeme Smith before bad light and rain ended play.

The debut performance of Friedel de Wet in the first Test, when he took 4 for 55 in the second innings to bowl South Africa to the brink of victory on the final day, has added to the increasing talk about Ntini's place in the line-up. De Wet was dropped for this match with a fit-again Dale Steyn back in the fold, but his full-length approach would have been ideal in the swinging and seaming conditions on offer, instead of Ntini's hit-the-deck style.

Given his tremendous Test record of 390 wickets at 28.53, Ntini understandably has the backing of Smith and coach Mickey Arthur, but at some stage in the very near future he is going to have to reward that faith with performance. Of course, there is also the blurred line between cricketing and political reasoning which comes with Ntini's position, and that has the potential to cloud the issue.

Ntini managed just two wickets in the opening Test, which marked his 100th appearance amid an emotional atmosphere, and he was unable to claim the final wicket when entrusted with the last over of the match, ahead of de Wet. During his short opening spell on the second afternoon in Durban he was taken for three boundaries in four balls by Strauss, a pull, a drive and a cut, as he struggled to find the correct line. Bowling to left-handers has historically been Ntini's strength, but the concerns are growing that he has lost the edge needed for Test cricket, although his team-mates don't believe that.

"He wasn't in the best form of his life today but that's part of being a sportsman, you don't always play very well," said AB de Villiers. "He'll definitely be back tomorrow the way I know him, hitting the good areas and hopefully picking up some wickets. He's still fine, he's a strong individual."

Ntini's role in this match has taken on increasing importance because Steyn is returning from nearly a month without bowling following his hamstring injury. Jacques Kallis is also still only operating off a shortened run-up following his rib problem, and was comfortably dealt with during a two-over spell. Morne Morkel is currently South Africa's most dangerous option, closely followed by the unlikely threat of Paul Harris's left-arm spin.

However, none of the home attack escaped the wrath of Arthur after a slipshod opening effort allowed England to race out of the blocks in their first innings. South Africa had wrestled the advantage after Steyn's 47 from No. 10, which formed a final-wicket stand of 58 with Ntini, but a succession of loose deliveries allowed Strauss to launch England's reply at five-an-over.

"Mickey did come pretty hard and said we aren't really executing the basics very well," said de Villiers. "We were a little too short and will certainly try to go fuller tomorrow. I won't go into details but there were a few harsh words in that short [rain] break.

"Our bowlers were very slow to adapt. We bowled a lot better in the final half-an-hour, Morkel is in good form and it's good to have Dale back, but we were definitely slow to adapt. We were very poor in the first ten overs and the plan tomorrow will be to get the run-rate down."

South Africa's batsmen haven't been shy of criticising their bowlers when they feel they have let the side down, with Jacques Kallis offering a similarly stinging view after the second day at Centurion when England eased to 88 for 1. The home side's response was impressive on that occasion as they secured a useful first-innings lead. Right now, they are expected to produce a similar turnaround.

Andrew McGlashan is assistant editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by dananiki on (January 1, 2010, 20:37 GMT)

Ntini has been a wonderful servant for South African cricket.However, when your time is up it is time to go. I hope South Africa do not make the mistake Aistralia did with JasonGillespie in 2005.

Posted by NBZ1 on (January 1, 2010, 18:09 GMT)

Much of the Ntini debate seems to implicitly assume that dropping Ntini would automatically mean the end of his career. He is still 32, and one of the fittest players around! Dropping him for a couple of matches now, when he is clearly ineffective, would give him time to work on his problems and perhaps return with a few more weapons in his armoury to make up for the loss of pace. Keeping him in the Newlands squad now would send all the wrong signals and perhaps even prompt Ntini to retire prematurely in the face of all the media pressure.

Posted by cricman007 on (December 29, 2009, 16:47 GMT)

Form is temporary, class is permanent. Ntini has been written off so many times and yet he has bounced back. How did De wet supersede the left-armer Lonwabo Tsotsobe who averages 19.0 in one day internationals including 4 for 50 against Australia? What is South Africa's selection policy? Sentiment will always cloud Ntini's selection if other deserving players of colour like Tsotsobe are not given a fair run. Morkel was not very penetrative in the first test and Steyn was a huge disappointment in this test. Yet all the calls are for the head of a man who has taken 390 wickets at 28.53. If their failure in this test is solely his fault then what are the younger bowlers being paid for? South Africa must practise inclusiveness and avoid going back to the type of teams that do not reflect the environment in which they live. If Ntini has to go Tsotsobe must replace him. He has a better first class average than De wet and an impressive ODI average.

Posted by Tomek on (December 28, 2009, 9:07 GMT)

Although I would agree that a more ruthless approach is necessary in these things there are also mistakes made there. Shaun Pollock I believe was shifted too soon, on the basis that there was all this pace coming on up, Andre Nel I believe was an example at that time and how long did he last. Ntini is and has always been a very fit individual and I believe has earned the right to have a few games to get 'it' back.

Just a side note, uknsaunders mentioned Australia's recent ruthlessness. I believe that may be a little incorrect. I would suggest that most Australian (non-one-eyed) cricket fans would tell you that if they'd been allowed to pick the side, Australia would have the Ashes in hand right now. The only ruthlessness I've seen displayed by the Aussie selectors recently is a ruthless desire to hold onto their very well paid part-time jobs. And considering some of their appalling decision making I have no idea how they succeeded.

Posted by rony1008 on (December 28, 2009, 6:31 GMT)

SA dropping Parnell from the squad is puzzling. The fact that Ntini is playing ahead of de Wet in such a vital test is the kind of mindset SA have and the only reason why SA won't rule world cricket despite having all the ingredients to do so.

Posted by uknsaunders on (December 27, 2009, 19:42 GMT)

Ntini is living on borrowed time. South Africa tend to have a very conservative approach to selection and I certainly think it was a mistake to retain Ntini - not that England will mind. Australia and even England have been far more ruthless in recent years. Take Hoggards dropping in NZ, it was rumoured he had lost his "nip" for a while but England didn't muck around and went on to win the series. SA need to take the hard decisions soon otherwise they could lose the series.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
South Africa v England at Johannesburg - Jan 14-17, 2010
South Africa won by an innings and 74 runs
South Africa v England at Cape Town - Jan 3-7, 2010
Match drawn
South Africa v England at Durban - Dec 26-30, 2009
England won by an innings and 98 runs
South Africa v England at Centurion - Dec 16-20, 2009
Match drawn
SAf Invit XI v England XI at East London - Dec 11-12, 2009
Match drawn
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days