Feature

Dangerous pitches, and a first-ball six

Before Tendulkar shot to fame at the first-class and international levels, he set the Mumbai club circuit on fire
Devashish Fuloria November 2, 2013

related links

They say if you were good enough to survive in the top division of Mumbai's Kanga Memorial Cricket League, the Ranji Trophy would turn out to be a piece of cake.

The Kanga League, a club tournament, has a storied history. Wet, uncovered pitches, matches in the rain, tall grass in the outfield, and no helmets meant the conditions favour bowlers as heavily as they do batsmen in the modern international game.

Sachin Tendulkar circa 1988
Tendulkar in 1988: a run-ogre © Unknown

Sachin Tendulkar made his Kanga League debut at age 11 in the G division, in 1984, for the John Bright Cricket Club. Ramakant Achrekar, Tendulkar's coach, was so confident of his abilities that he told John Bright's owners that Tendulkar would only be available for a year.

"He will be playing higher-level cricket next year," Achrekar told Sharad Kotnis and Prakash Kelkar, who had asked the coach to allow the young batsman, who was attending summer-camp nets, to play for their club.

John Bright was originally a recreational cricket club owned by a Parsi family from Dahanu, 140km north of Bombay. The family travelled on weekends to play Kanga League matches, stopping in the suburb of Borivali on their way in for an update on the status of weather in South Bombay. It was on one of these stopovers in 1983 that Kotnis and Kelkar bought the club from the Parsi family with the idea of promoting young cricketers who could then progress to play for Kotnis' other club, Shivaji Park Youngsters, which played in the higher division. The new John Bright was restructured to feature six to seven senior cricketers and four or five young players, who the seniors could mentor.

"The Kanga League was dangerous, but that was a test for these boys," says Kelkar, an administrator with the Mumbai Cricket Association for more than 30 years. "Not everyone was selected to play, these were special boys. These guys played with tennis or cork balls, so their movement of feet was so good, they become strong to play [with the] season ball."

The 11-year-old Tendulkar showed remarkable ability to defend on those treacherous pitches, according to Nadeem Memon, one of the senior players in the side.

For the next three years, Tendulkar batted and batted and batted. There were no rest days. He rode pillion on Achrekar's scooter from ground to ground, and team to team. From John Bright CC, he graduated to Sassanian CC, then to Shivaji Park Youngsters, changing schools to concentrate on cricket, giving bowlers false hope with his small frame, but then flattening them with powerful assaults. Whether it was the Kanga League, Police Shield, Purshottam Shield, Times Shield, age-group cricket or school tournaments, Tendulkar collected runs like a well-oiled machine.

In a Purshottam Shield match in 1987, he scored an outstanding 70-odd against a Cricket Club of India side that featured Madhav Apte, the former India batsman who was the president of the CCI at the time. The CCI was already following Tendulkar's rise, especially after he hit five consecutive hundreds in the Giles Shield. His inclusion in the premier club was discussed by the club's cricket committee.

"In the case of Tendulkar, it was very clear that he would play for a club Ramakant Achrekar wanted him to play for," says Hemant Kenkre, Tendulkar's first captain at CCI. "If he should play or not play for CCI was eventually Achrekar's decision."

Tendulkar had a lot to gain at the club. Firstly, CCI was an A-division club with direct entry to the top divisions of all the Mumbai tournaments. Secondly, inclusion by the CCI would have allowed Tendulkar to develop his game further in international-class facilities at the Brabourne Stadium. The pitches at Brabourne were carefully curated, unlike the up-and-down ones in the maidans, which, although they tested the batsmen, were also thought to be the source of faulty techniques among players. Thirdly, the club would allow Tendulkar access to mentors such as Dilip Sardesai, Hanumant Singh and Milind Rege.

But Tendulkar needed to overcome a technicality to play for the club. Minors - under the age of 18 - were not allowed into the main clubhouse at CCI that housed the player dressing rooms in the '80s. Tendulkar was 15 and thanks to Apte, an exception was made to allow him into the clubhouse. The ruling is still in place and Tendulkar is the only cricketer for whom an exception was made.

"He turned the Bombay style of batting on its head"
One of Tendulkar's first captains, Hemant Kenkre

In July 1988, Tendulkar was included in the squad for a match against Karnatak Sports Association for CCI's Kanga League match at Cross maidan. He walked in at No. 4, as Achrekar had insisted. At the other end was Kenkre, CCI's captain for the match, and he knew that in the Kanga League "the mud hits your face before the ball does".

The bowler, Sharad Rao, was known to be a difficult medium pacer, who played first-class cricket for Karnataka. Kenkre remembers how that first delivery was lofted straight over Rao's head for a six with so much ease it was hard to believe it came off a 15-year-old's bat. It was as straight as it could have been, "in the line of the stumps".

In another match later that season, Kenkre remembers the team was struggling and messages were sent out to Tendulkar to not do anything stupid. Tendulkar defended till lunch but asked permission to play naturally in the afternoon session as he was uncomfortable playing the waiting game. In the three overs after lunch, he changed the complexion of the match with a calculated attack on the bowlers. His aggression rubbed off on the batsmen who followed.

"He turned the Bombay style of batting on its head," says Kenkre. "Before that, if you lofted the ball as a batsman, the coaches used to get upset about why you want to take the risk. But that is the beauty of Achrekar. He allowed Tendulkar to play that way."

As early as his first season with CCI, there were many across Bombay who believed Tendulkar would play for India. As Kenkre puts it, "Tendulkar could have played for any unknown club and still made it big, he was so good. From the first day, it was very clear that this guy was destined for greatness. Unless he messed it up himself."

Posted by   on (November 15, 2013, 4:28 GMT)

Tendulkar was born to rule n teach.....

Posted by   on (November 3, 2013, 5:16 GMT)

@Mcgorium - Good comment. But until the rise of Ganguly and Dravid, Tendulkar was fighting lone battles. There are numerous occasions where Sachin hits a 100 and the remaining 10 batsmen score atleast half of that score.The more memorable and classic example is "that" test against Pakistan, where Sachin scored a hundred and India lost the test by 15 runs. What makes Sachin is his presence and the authority that lets the batsmen like Dravid, VVS and Sourav feel comfortable.My order will be Gavaskar, Sachin and Dravid - with all the due respect to the greatest Indian opener who stood strong against the 4 horsemen of apocalypse :)

Posted by EverybodylovesSachin on (November 3, 2013, 3:12 GMT)

April 24 should be a cricket day in India and should declare holiday in India..

Posted by McGorium on (November 2, 2013, 22:08 GMT)

@Arrow011: Hayden was being hyperbolic ;) As far as test cricket is concerned, can one really say that SRT is India's greatest batsman? (ODIs yes, ODI and tests, yes. Test only)? I believe India's greatest test batsmen were SM Gavaskar, RS Dravid, and then SR Tendulkar, in that order. Gavaskar because of his record against the Windies and others at a time when conditions and rules were not batting friendly as they are today (helmets, pitches, 2 bouncers/over, etc), and he managed an avg of 51 back then. RS Dravid because nearly every overseas victory has his name in the centuries column (Adelaide,Headingley,Trent Bridge,Rawalpindi, Perth (93) etc). And then,Eden Gardens. The same cannot be said of Tendulkar, esp overseas. Dravid and SRT have comparable averages (52/54). Neither compare to Kallis's average of 57,but that's another matter.SRT's ODI success makes him a more marketable commodity than RSD,JK,or SMG, and perhaps the reason for all the fanfare vs. RSD or VVS.

Posted by   on (November 2, 2013, 18:47 GMT)

Another one: There are 2 classes of batsmen, one is Sachin and then the rest!

Posted by   on (November 2, 2013, 18:34 GMT)

@Arrow011 - you are right on the mark. Sach is the god of cricket.

Posted by vish2020 on (November 2, 2013, 18:34 GMT)

Tendulkar was born to bat. And bat he did. The greatest!!!

Posted by Arrow011 on (November 2, 2013, 12:31 GMT)

I have seen God, he plays for India in tests at number 4 - Matthew Hayden said this while commentating after his retirement, this sums up all about the greatest ever cricketer.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Features

The man whom cricket loved back

Sambit Bal: Tendulkar was the biggest worshipper the game could ever find, and in that lay the foundation of his greatness

Tendulkar's perfect balance

Sharda Ugra: While the team, the country and the sport changed around him, Tendulkar remained constant

Why do we insist on seeing the 'real' Sachin?

Rahul Bose: You can ask as much as you want for a more "human", more "feelable, touchable" Sachin, but he'll probably not change - and that's a good thing

Zaltz Stats

550,000,000
The approximate number of people in India today who had not been born when Sachin Tendulkar made his Test debut in 1989 (calculated from these figures). His batting has been so erotically outstanding that the global population has increased by almost 2 billion during his career, with the biggest increase, understandably, in India itself.

I have played cricket for 24 years, it has been only 24 hours since retirement, and I think I should get at least 24 days to relax before deciding these things.

Sachin Tendulkar doesn't want to think of what lies ahead just yet