South Africa v India, 2nd Test, Durban

Conditions key as India seek Durban resurgence

The Preview by Sriram Veera

December 25, 2010

Comments: 76 | Text size: A | A

Match Facts

December 26-30, Durban
Start time 10:00 (08:00 GMT, 13:30 IST)


Rahul Dravid overtook Don Bradman to reach his 30th Test century, India v New Zealand, 1st Test, Ahmedabad, 1st day, November 4, 2010
Rahul Dravid averages just 33 in Tests in South Africa and has only one hundred from 18 innings. Can he turn things around in Durban? © Associated Press
Enlarge

Pitch and conditions

This is perhaps the greenest track this Indian team might have ever played on. MS Dhoni reckons that Vadodara's IPCL track in his first year of first-class cricket was greener. It is thick grass with deep roots, but it's not just the greenness. Under the grass there is a crack around the good length area, just outside the off stump for a right-hand batsman batting from the dressing-room end. Moreover, the overhead conditions are a legend of mythical stature here. If the breeze blows from the north-east, from the sea towards land, it means clear weather and a good time for batting. If it blows towards the sea, it brings clouds, and hell for batsmen. The forecast is for overcast conditions, and it drizzled steadily for a half-hour today. You can't really say, as you could in Centurion, that the toss is a crucial thing.

The Big Picture

Strike one in Centurion. Strike two in Durban? South Africa would like to think so. They will hope that the sun doesn't come out and make the pitch unfriendly to seamers. Hashim Amla, the local lad, believes that the pitch will have bounce, but will be great for batting if the sun is out. "I'm not sure how the Test wicket is going to play, but on a good day, when the wicket's flat, it's a fantastic place to play."

Durban's pace and bounce shouldn't worry the Indians as much as when it gets combined with the seam movement. When the ball moves around at pace, their techniques gets exposed. In Morne Morkel, South Africa have a bowler who can test the Indians with bounce - it was in Durban that Mitchell Johnson broke Graeme Smith's fingers with a snorter - and in Dale Steyn, they have the man who can harass them with pace and movement. So much will come down to how the surface plays. The selection headache revolves around the third seamer: Lonwabo Tsotsobe or Wayne Parnell? In his brief career, Tsotsobe has proven to be a steady operator while Parnell has shown, on occasions, the prowess to bowl fiery spells. Indians, traditionally, have struggled against such left-arm seamers. Will South Africa bite the bullet?

For India, it's another acid test. The batsmen's approach in the second innings of the first Test was successful but by then the pitch had lost its sting. Can they do it when the pitch has some spice in it? So much, yet again, depends on Virender Sehwag if India are to do well in the first innings. He has the skill and the mental tenacity to deal with pace and bounce. Though VVS Laxman didn't sparkle in the first Test, he was at relative ease till his dismissals, but the same can't be said of Suresh Raina. Will the Indians give him one more chance "to surprise himself" or will they draft in Cheteshwar Pujara? Zaheer Khan returns to alleviate their bowling woes and India will hope that Ishant Sharma and Sreesanth have learnt from the mistakes of the first Test.

Form guide

(most recent first)
South Africa: WDDWD
India: LWDDW

Watch out for...

Zaheer Khan v Graeme Smith: In 20 innings, Zaheer has taken out Smith nine times (four each in Tests and ODIs and once in T20s). Zaheer has been always good against left-hand batsmen with his ability to punctuate his incoming deliveries with the one that holds the line or even moves away, and he has been exceptionally good against Smith. Often, Smith has been caught at the crease, either pushing outside the line or stabbing inside it.

Dale Steyn v Rahul Dravid: Dravid's judgement of his off stump's location is no longer what it used to be. Often, he has been pushing at deliveries that he would have not touched in the past. It's not an aggressive move to score runs either: his back leg stays rooted to the leg stump line and the front leg keeps dragging him well outside off. Steyn's pacy away-seamers will tempt Dravid to waft outside off, but will he overcome the instinct to feel for them?

Team news

South Africa have no fitness issues and only have to decide between Tsotsobe and Parnell, with the former likely to retain his spot.

South Africa: (probable) 1 Graeme Smith (capt), 2 Alviro Petersen, 3 Hashim Amla, 4 Jacques Kallis, 5 AB de Villiers, 6 Ashwell Prince, 7 Mark Boucher (wk), 8 Paul Harris, 9 Morne Morkel, 10 Dale Steyn, 11 Lonwabo Tsotsobe / Wayne Parnell

Zaheer is set to replace Jaidev Unadkat for India. It is to be seen whether they retain Raina or bring in Pujara. India will sweat over the fitness of Gautam Gambhir as well, who was hit on the left hand in the first Test and the injury seems to have gotten worse.

India (probable): 1 Gautam Gambhir, 2 Virender Sehwag, 3 Rahul Dravid, 4 Sachin Tendulkar, 5 VVS Laxman, 6 Cheteshwar Pujara / Suresh Raina, 7 MS Dhoni (capt & wk), 8 Harbhajan Singh, 9 Zaheer Khan, 10 Ishant Sharma, 11 Sreesanth

Stats and trivia

  • Rahul Dravid averages just 33 in Tests in South Africa and has just one hundred from 18 innings. Click here for a comprehensive stats analysis on the teams' performances in Durban.
  • Since Smith took over as captain, South Africa have won only three of the seven Tests played at Kingsmead, two of them against the lowly-ranked West Indies. The third was in 2006 against India and was ten minutes away from being drawn.

Quotes

"We don't consider one Test match more important than the others. By doing that, you can put additional pressure on yourself. We believe in taking care of small things so we respect every Test, and not in taking any extra pressure."
The series may be on the line, but MS Dhoni is taking it as just another game

"There's a lot of talk about momentum, and it's important, but it's just there until the next game. We are approaching this game as starting fresh again, having the confidence of the previous win."
South Africa may have dominated the first Test, but Corrie van Zyl believes it going to be a fresh start in Durban

Sriram Veera is a staff writer at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sriram Veera

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (December 29, 2010, 12:22 GMT)

m an indian cricket fan from nepal? thiz is the gift of new year of all indian supporter?nd lots of wising to ms dhoni nd his team for next match starting from sunday ?

Posted by A.Afker on (December 26, 2010, 14:09 GMT)

@Sampath Reddy. U said Toss will decide the result isn't it?....If so why they are playing for somany days and why are they wasting of others time,money etc.They do not need to play, toss onwards referee can stop the match and can give (win) that to SA.Further if so then what happen to IND in Ahamedabad,Nagpur etc resently against with same SA.What will be the results then?...Don't talk like a kid,Accept the fact that SA is superior team than IND and appereciate their ability and skills.Instead of giving excuses like No Zaheer,No Gambir,No toss,Wet outfield,Overcast condition etc,etc.However end results will be 2-0 or 3-0 SA's favour.

Posted by thecheechman on (December 26, 2010, 13:03 GMT)

You just have to look at India's record against SA since readmission. It is not a nice sight. The simple fact is that SA has been able to win in Australia, India and England in the last few years. India is a great side but I do sometimes feel it's supporters make too many excuses about the toss or the conditions when they play away from home. India to really be considered the number 1 team in the world like Australia was for so many years, they need to fight through when they lose the toss in conditions that are not going their way. This is the quality that a number 1 side has? The fact is that SA played BETTER cricket than India in the last test. India might have made a good score in the second innings but they still got out before SA had to bat again. So in good batting conditions, SA was still able to get 10 wickets. India managed to only get half the wickets of SA. Why can't India supporters just admit when their team plays badly?

Posted by   on (December 26, 2010, 10:44 GMT)

@Kashi... India didnt get the #1 coz of sachin records. Its the hard work of total team. Compare the winning ratio of india in last two years and two years before that. If south africa lost the toss then things would be different. Why didnt they bowled out in second innings of first test under 200 or 250 if they are too good than India and their bowling is the best. You cant blame small things for the loss. Australia whitewashed in last series in india. Being top team and highly ranked bowlers they didnt even managed to draw a single test.

Posted by willmot on (December 26, 2010, 10:21 GMT)

@sweetspot: Yes true, you do have the IPL to look forward to were you can watch Indian teams thrash other Indian teams in the stage managed mickey mouse cricket shows put on by the BCCI to raise revenue.... Hilarious indian excuses,keep them coming please!!!

Posted by mahjut on (December 26, 2010, 8:51 GMT)

yes, catch2020, you are certainly right about SA batsmens' ability -they've done well everywhere recently. you are right too about the pertinence of past and present though it's fun to use the near past to predict the near future ... and you are mostly right about the lateral movement (in which every team struggles to varying degrees) - i was primarily pointing out the contradiction - but i did watch, listen and read the day 1 coverage and there was more talk of 'spitting off a length' than 'prodigious movement' but i do not reject your point - it is valid, the SA bowlers were still getting some bounce out of the pitch on the final day...

Posted by KiwiSri on (December 26, 2010, 8:06 GMT)

If India loss the toss SA will be looking farward to repeat of trend from Centurion test and send in India to bat, to take advantage of similar pitch conditons. And if Gambhir is playing today, my first innings (only) strategy will be Dravid should open the inning with Sewag, that will serve the purpose threefold, while Gambhir should be pushed down the order: 1) The "wall" capable of playing defensively can endure and remain for long time to remove the shine of the ball from the venomous bouncy pitch, as he is also more capable of dealing with shortpitched bouncers than Gambhir. 2) Gambhir can be saved from the hardship of strugging to survive from the shortpitched deliveries of new ball. 3) Dravids defensive play on one end will provide right balance to Sewag's offensive risky shots on the other end.

Posted by sony_sr on (December 26, 2010, 7:49 GMT)

Am an Indian fan. but unfortunately I cannot see anything other than 2 batting collapses from Indian batting order. Its a fact and I accept it.

Posted by   on (December 26, 2010, 7:27 GMT)

India should not bother on loosing or wining the toss, all they need to bother is to avoid loosing by an innings.

Posted by Kashi0127 on (December 26, 2010, 7:03 GMT)

India and Indian Supporters at large are always worried about records. Being #1 (thats a laugh!) scoring 50 centuries, personal glories. For gods sake concentrate on winning a game outside your backyard.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sriram VeeraClose
Tour Results
South Africa v India at Centurion - Jan 23, 2011
South Africa won by 33 runs (D/L method)
South Africa v India at Port Elizabeth - Jan 21, 2011
South Africa won by 48 runs (D/L method)
South Africa v India at Cape Town - Jan 18, 2011
India won by 2 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
South Africa v India at Johannesburg - Jan 15, 2011
India won by 1 run
South Africa v India at Durban - Jan 12, 2011
South Africa won by 135 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days