Sri Lanka v Bangladesh, 2nd Test, Colombo, 2nd day

Bangladesh pacers shine on barren day

The first and third sessions of the day, which brought Bangladesh five wickets with two new balls, brought the spotlight on to the pace bowlers, of whom very little was expected even from the chief selector a month ago

Mohammad Isam in Colombo

March 17, 2013

Comments: 11 | Text size: A | A

Abul Hasan celebrates the wicket of Dimuth Karunaratne, Sri Lanka v Bangladesh, 2nd Test, Colombo, 2nd day, March 17, 2013
Abul Hasan bowled a decent spell in his fledgling Test career, drawing shots from the batsmen, and with pace he beat them often © Associated Press
Enlarge

Bangladesh's most promising period in this Test match so far has been bowling with the new ball. They had Sri Lanka on the ropes in the first session of the second day with three wickets and later when they took the second new ball, two more wickets kept them in the game. The two periods brought the spotlight on to the pace bowlers, of whom very little was expected even from the chief selector a month ago.

Robiul Islam and Abul Hasan led the way in the morning, keeping the scoring rate below three runs per over, and taking a wicket each. Robiul bowled eight overs on the trot and, though slightly expensive, his fuller length drew the batsmen into plenty of shots. Lahiru Thirimanne was his scalp, brought out to defend a length ball but he gave an edge to the wicketkeeper. Abul probably bowled his second decent spell in his fledgling Test career, also drawing shots from the batsmen and with more pace he beat them often.

It was because of the pressure they had created that Mushfiqur Rahim could bring Sohag Gazi into the attack quite late, and it was the control of the pace bowlers that gave the offspinner the wicket of Angelo Mathews just before lunch.

The opening burst should have brought Bangladesh more success, but Robiul's four overs in the middle session were just used to contain the batsmen and he only returned to field for a few overs in the final session after he had suffered severe cramps on his lower limbs. Abul too tapered off, bowling three more spells throughout the day without picking a wicket. He had a little more zing with the second new ball, but it was Rubel Hossain who took the two late wickets of Dinesh Chandimal and Kithuruwan Vithanage.

Fitness of the pace bowlers has been called into question, publicly, by the selectors. Chief selector Akram Khan called the department a "blind spot" last month when asked whether he had a combination in mind for the Sri Lanka tour.

It was a question posed to him during the BPL, a tournament in which none of the pace bowlers playing in this Test match fared well. Robiul didn't get himself a contract while Abul was hardly ever used by Duronto Rajshahi. Rubel took 14 wickets, but it was never going to be enough bowling ahead of a two-match Test series.

During the BPL, Robiul trained at the BCB's National Cricket Academy for four weeks but the last time he bowled in a competitive game, before this series, was on January 8. It has taken him more than two months to return to the cricket field and he will not bowl in another competitive game until the first Test in Zimbabwe, if he is selected.

What brought him into the national side in this series are the 29 wickets he took in seven first-class matches this season. Robiul survives on his years of gathering skill and the knowledge of bowling long spells. Having fought for a place in the Khulna Division team in the country's domestic competition, he has enough first-class experience to understand the needs of a fast bowler in the middle of a game or at the end. The same, at least this season, cannot be said of the other two bowlers.

Rubel had recovered from a shoulder injury at the start of the season, and played only three first-class matches other than the two Tests against West Indies. He raised his pace from time to time, but he is still not the bowler who could bowl at 140 kmph at the fag end of the day. It requires bowling volume, so if he stays fit, the next season could be a crucial one.

Abul meanwhile is playing in his 12th first-class match, which is staggering considering the number of matches bowlers go through in countries like England and Australia before being considered Test quality. Those who rush these fast bowlers on to the big stage would say that Bangladesh can't afford to wait for a fast bowler to grow any older.  Abul is a product of the Dhaka Premier League, which is a one-day tournament. Though there is pressure in the club scene, it cannot be intense enough for a fast bowler playing in a Test match.

One wouldn't expect any of these pace bowlers to give more than what he did on the second day though. They have the third day to bowl on and if the batsmen can give them a target to defend, perhaps more bowling is in the offing on the fifth day too. Bowling plenty of overs in domestic cricket has taught someone like Robiul the methods to put in use. Rubel and Abul have to pick up nuances, teach themselves and then implement it all in their bowling. All in a Test match.

Mohammad Isam is ESPNcricinfo's Bangladesh correspondent

RSS Feeds: Mohammad Isam

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by AnanthX on (March 19, 2013, 4:22 GMT)

I'm not showing any sort of "agressiveness", I'm stating what I think! Bangladesh have played 77 test matches till date. When Sri Lanka was on 79, they had lost 34, drawn 36, and won 9 (including a match against England). Right now, Bangladesh have won 3, drawn 8 and lost 65. They've managed to draw once against India, New Zealand and Sri Lanka; two draws against the Windies, and two of their wins came against a second string West Indies side (there was some contract issue). The numbers just don't compare. And Sri Lanka played their first 79 tests over a span of 16 years, whereas Bangladesh have played theirs over 13 years, so saying that Bangladesh hasn't gotten enough test opportunities isn't valid either. If someone says that it's a matter of time, and not of the number of matches played, then the numbers still do not compare. After playing for 13 years, Sri Lanka had won 4, lost 27, and drawn 27; as many draws as losses. So Bangladesh to Sri Lanka isn't going to work.

Posted by Bang_La on (March 18, 2013, 5:42 GMT)

@ AnanthX, it was only yesteryear that England refused to recognise and play against SL. So, don't show that sort of aggressiveness. First test in the Galle was not a fluke. Nor the second one either even though you cleared ways for Sanga's batting by mowing under Boon's "supervision" who is infamous for accepting six packs for helping :) That's why he never stood as an umpire on field. Check records.

Posted by   on (March 18, 2013, 3:32 GMT)

@ ananthx : do you have any idea how cricket is played.... or even which teams plays cricket...??? if you knew....you would not even dare to say those words... the words are dis-respectful and arrogant.. such arrogance is not welcomed..... i recommend you to choose your words more carefully from here on... thank you...

Posted by   on (March 18, 2013, 2:32 GMT)

Bangladesh can still win this! All four wickets in the first session followed up by a great second innings total will surely help :D

Posted by   on (March 17, 2013, 23:00 GMT)

Why was it allowed to cut the grass before today's play in the morning? It made the outfield fast and Srilanka took full advantage of it. If it was needed, they could do it before the match or after SL first innings. ICC should define "fair judgement" instead of relying on members with muscles.

Posted by AnanthX on (March 17, 2013, 20:02 GMT)

No, I disagree with Jahangir Alam. I still think that Bangladesh are not a test side. A draw, once in a blue moon, does not mean that they have risen to the level of the other test playing nations. Ireland are a much better team, and deserve test status over Bangladesh.

Posted by   on (March 17, 2013, 17:59 GMT)

Bangladesh loose or win does not matter.... they have already win over those minds who always think that Bangladesh short of playing test cricket..

Those days are history now...

Welldone

Posted by AnanthX on (March 17, 2013, 16:36 GMT)

That's not putting it objectively! Bangladesh are going to lose the match; quite badly as well. Saying that their pacers "shone" is stretching the truth, at best.

Posted by Bang_La on (March 17, 2013, 15:39 GMT)

What Bangladesh needs in cricket is planning, planning and planning. And cricket planning is only possible when the cricket authority has the right background, knowledge and cricketing mind. In the past, none of the above was seen only because our cricket authority aka, cricket board bosses were planted as decision makers based on political reward and allowing them making money. This time things seem different and we strongly demand that Bangladesh pacers are groomed properly in the country and abroad. Any cricket lover in Bangladesh are aware that there is a long queue of promising fast bowlers (e.g; Taskin). It makes us proud that we have potential to deliver genuine fast bowlers and again makes us sad that only the political no-brain hoodlums ,known as cricket authority, never knew what really had to be done for cricket.

Thank you very much Isam for timely and well written piece. Please keep writing on such issue for betterment of our cricket. Bangladesh shall rule cricket world.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Mohammad IsamClose
Tour Results
Sri Lanka v Bangladesh at Pallekele - Mar 31, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 17 runs
Sri Lanka v Bangladesh at Pallekele - Mar 28, 2013
Bangladesh won by 3 wickets (with 6 balls remaining) (D/L method)
Sri Lanka v Bangladesh at Hambantota - Mar 25, 2013
No result
Sri Lanka v Bangladesh at Hambantota - Mar 23, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 8 wickets (with 32 balls remaining) (D/L method)
Sri Lanka v Bangladesh at Colombo (RPS) - Mar 16-19, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 7 wickets
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!