Sri Lanka v New Zealand, 2nd T20, Pallekele November 21, 2013

Sri Lanka cruise to series win


Sri Lanka 143 for 2 (Dilshan 59*, Kusal 57) beat New Zealand 142 for 7 (Ronchi 34*, Devcich 30) by eight wickets
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Kusal Perera and Tillakaratne Dilshan struck 96 rapid runs together, as Sri Lanka comfortably hunted down New Zealand's modest 142 for 7 to take the series 1-0. Both hit half-centuries, and while Kusal's was the more belligerent, and the more attractive, Dilshan again whet his increasing appetite to bring chases home. He was unbeaten on 59 off 49 balls - his seventh international fifty in eight innings - after Kusal had walloped 57 from 37.

Miserly debutant Ramith Rambukwella had been the only man to deliver four overs in a row for Sri Lanka, as Dinesh Chandimal made fine use of the Twenty20 bowling stocks at his disposal. All seven bowlers were called upon, injected in short spells and replaced swiftly when the batsmen showed signs of comfort. New Zealand did not suffer a collapse, but partnerships were prevented, and on a tacky surface, Sri Lanka's controlled showing prevented even the in-form Nathan McCullum from doing unmanageable damage at the death.

Though Kusal's innings was emphatic, it had its share of good fortune. He lofted his second ball high over the long-on boundary, but two deliveries later, should have been trudging back to the dugout, when he pulled Mitchell McClenaghan to Andrew Ellis, at backward square-leg. Ellis shelled that chance, perhaps because the ball was hit so hard, but Colin Munro did not have that excuse on the long leg boundary, when he too spilt one, with Kusal on 39.

In between the drops, Kusal's strokes veered from excellent to extraordinary. A swinging length ball from Kyle Mills was launched into the sightscreen before he leant back to the next delivery and eased it between point and cover. A good eye and lightning bat speed are the pillars of his batting, and though there were plays and misses as well, the balls he hit almost invariably sped off the bat.

Even in his short international career, though, he has tended to perish attacking, and despite two let offs, he did so again. Having crossed 50 off 31 balls - his second Twenty20 half-century - he came down the pitch to send Rob Nicol high into the air, off his top edge. Nicol moved a few meters to his left to complete the catch.

In what is developing into a trend, for Dilshan, he was the slower of the two batsmen, whose partnership propelled Sri Lanka well beyond the asking rate and to eventual victory. There were no flashy strokes in his fifty, only measured attacks on poor bowling. Showing respect to New Zealand bowlers he did not fancy, he made sure he would be around to soak up the large crowd's applause at the end.

Hamish Rutherford had waited all tour for a match, but lasted only four balls, nicking Nuwan Kulasekara's first ball - an away-swinger - to the keeper. Charging down the pitch to miscue an Angelo Mathews' short ball, Neil Broom failed to impress in his first match for New Zealand in three-and-a-half years.

The early strikes forced caution into New Zealand's batting, and perhaps they reasoned they would make amends with violence later on, as they had in the ODIs. Only, no pair truly established rhythm at the crease, and the bowling changes brought wickets as well as a subdued run rate. Until the 16th over, New Zealand did not score at much more than a run-a-ball.

McCullum had been a high-impact batsman during the ODIs, and though flashes of that form bore two fours in the penultimate over, the tackiness of the surface and a controlled death-overs showing from Sri Lanka prevented him from truly freeing his arms. He was run out going for an ambitious second in the final over, before a hitherto expensive Lasith Malinga trapped Nicol in front.

Rambukwella produced exactly the sort of spell he had been picked for, conceding less than five an over with his tight offspin. He rarely departed from the length ball, pitched outside off stump, but his skill was tweaking the manner in which the ball arrived. Some were flighted, others were slow and flat, but most were darted in - sometimes after a pause in his delivery stride.

Sri Lanka's eight-wicket win was an apt reflection of their dominance over a severely depleted New Zealand side, and the hosts protect their No. 1 ranking as well. This match was supposed to be the second in the series, but Tuesday's game was rained out, turning this into a one-off.

Andrew Fidel Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Buddhika on November 22, 2013, 18:49 GMT this is BD and SL T20 match palyed last February without 3 seniors in Palekale.this match SL team scord 198. the guy who tells Pallekalle is difficult fast track now what's ur answer? if IND,AUS played in this track they will definitely scored 200. then can u tell y 1st Rank SL team defeat in 2 T20 WC finals. one against PAK 2009, and other against WI 2012 in a flat track. is there a point Ranking as 1 without wining WC. if not Kusal played 57 of 37 can SL win d match.can't. otherwise Thisara should hammered. i think 99% of SL fans not belive reality but they have to do after 2014 T20 WC

  • Manesh on November 22, 2013, 16:16 GMT

    @Albert_cambell. If you are not believing ICC rankings, I could say Ind,WI, Eng are top T20 teams. Playing more games will not make a team

  • Manesh on November 22, 2013, 16:14 GMT

    @Albert_cambell . In T20 WCs SA and NZ were at semis once and lost all other three in super8. On the other hand India won a cup and lost other three in super8. How can you forget the last WC were SA lost all 3 matches? India won at least 2 of them. Even Australia have better results than SA in the T20 WCs.

  • Manoj on November 22, 2013, 15:02 GMT

    I don't see any logic of asking to retire big 3, especially Sanga and Dilshan. If you see their last 4-5 years performance, their performance is still increasing. Check their averages in tests and ODI. Even in Mahelas test average is increasing. But, Sachin had a declining performance for the same period. Still he managed to survive for couple of years. It is unfair and headless comments, esp from Indian fans asking the big 3 to retire.

  • yuvraj on November 22, 2013, 14:00 GMT

    @Fast_Track_Bully. We deserve to be there in the top 3. We defeated No.1 team SL and No.2 team Pak in their home grounds. SL,PAK and SA are the top teams in T20 cricket. They hold an overall winning percentage of 60% in T20s. But I dont know how a mediocre team like India got into the top 3, after beating low ranked team like Aus. They even lost to NZ at home. They failed qualify to the Semi finals in the 3 last 3 T20 world cups.

  • Dummy4 on November 22, 2013, 10:55 GMT

    I don't know why this people blaming mahela and saying that chandimal can win games for sl.chandimal's strike rate is less than 100 and average is wellshort of 20.but when you look at mahela his average is well over 30 and strike rate is almost 140.and he has most no. of 70+ scores in the world.And he was ranked no.1 and currently 5.he is the top ranked t20 player for sl as well.

  • Manesh on November 22, 2013, 9:54 GMT

    Face saving win for SL considering the fact that they were unable to win ODI series. Just wonder how a mediocre SA team listed as no:3 in T20 even if they lost to NZ, Pak and SL recently.

  • john on November 22, 2013, 9:22 GMT

    I wish hesson would explain the point of the tour from an nz perspective. .every other team in the world has a unchanged consistent team , with winning habits a target...nzc is a unexplained mess..why would we watch nz cricket when the ashes is on?

  • Nilantha on November 22, 2013, 9:15 GMT

    Cant believe that there are so many Sri Lankans having a go at Mahela, didnt they see the ridiculous umpiring decision he got today? For all the haters moaning about our "ageing" team => well sone to Kusal on his batting ( aged 23 ) and well bowled to rambukwella ( aged 22) , theres also Chandimal ( aged 24) , Thisara (aged24 ) and Angelo (aged 26) and also thirrimanne ( aged 24) who didnt get a game today..yes we have three over 35's but we also have the youngsters and even though its only T20, still the #1 ranking...

  • dhanuja on November 22, 2013, 9:11 GMT

    Selectors should give more chances to Kusal bcz he will be our next batting sensation. Amazing thing is we can forget his failiers easily

  • No featured comments at the moment.