Kumar Sangakkara 10,000 ODI runs February 17, 2012

Durability Sangakkara's forte

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan
Kumar Sangakkara, the tenth batsman to reach 10,000 runs, stands out among Sri Lankan batsmen because of his strong performances in foreign conditions
36

Until November 2011, Sanath Jayasuriya was the only Sri Lanka batsman in the elite 10,000-ODI-runs club. Just 11 matches after Mahela Jayawardene reached the mark against Pakistan, Kumar Sangakkara also achieved the feat, during his breezy knock of 30 against Australia in Sydney. Sri Lanka are thus the only team to have two current players with 10,000-plus ODI aggregates, and also the second team after India to have three players who have surpassed the landmark. Sangakkara, who has been the mainstay of Sri Lanka's batting in Tests and ODIs along with the classy Jayawardene, reached the 10,000-run mark in his 315th ODI. He is the fastest to the mark among Sri Lanka batsmen, both in terms of matches and innings. While most Sri Lanka batsmen have struggled overseas over the years, the compact Sangakkara has dealt with foreign conditions a lot better, and averages close to 40 outside Sri Lanka.

Overall, Sangakkara has a highly respectable record in ODIs, averaging 37.80 with 12 centuries and 67 fifties. However, what is surprising is that his away record is much better than his home one. In 106 home ODIs, Sangakkara averages slightly below 35 with just one century. In away matches, not only is his average much higher (39.29) but also his century tally (11). His away stats, however, are slightly skewed towards performances in the subcontinent. In the subcontinent, he averages 38.80 while scoring ten of his 12 centuries. Outside the subcontinent, he has done fairly well (average of 36.52) but has a poorer ratio of centuries to fifties (2:31) as compared to the corresponding number in the subcontinent (10:36). As is the case with most top ODI batsmen, Sangakkara has lifted his game in World Cups. Among Sri Lankan batsmen who have played at least 25 World Cup matches, his average of 45.04 is the second-highest behind Arjuna Ranatunga's, and his aggregate of 991 runs is behind only those of Jayasuriya and Aravinda de Silva. He has no century in tournament finals but his average of 38.18 is marginally better than his overall ODI average.

Batting stats of Sangakkara in ODIs
  Matches Runs Average SR 100/50
Overall 315 10019 37.80 75.33 12/67
Home 106 3025 34.77 72.47 1/21
Away/neutral 209 6994 39.29 73.42 11/46
In subcontinent 179 5782 38.80 75.76 10/36
Outside subcontinent 136 4237 36.52 74.75 2/31
In World Cup 30 991 45.04 78.71 1/7
Tournament finals 22 840 38.18 72.28 0/9

Sangakkara endured a fairly ordinary start to his career before cementing his place as one of Sri Lanka's best ODI batsmen. In his first four years (2000-2003), he had an average of just 28.55 and a strike-rate of 69.39 in 96 matches, while scoring only two centuries. Things turned around after that though; in the next five years (2004-2008), his average went up to almost 41 as he scored eight centuries in 139 ODIs. His best year in the period was 2004, when he scored over 1000 runs at an average of 53.15 with one century and ten fifties. In 2008, he averaged 39.25 but scored four centuries in 27 ODIs. In the last three years (2009 onwards), his average and strike-rate have gone up to 42.50 and 78.48, but he has struggled to convert the starts into centuries (two hundreds in 80 matches). Between 2009 and 2011, when Sangakkara was the ODI captain, he scored 1756 runs at a high average of 47.45.

Various phases of Sangakkara's career
Phase Matches Runs Average SR 100/50
2000-2003 96 2170 28.55 69.39 2/9
2004-2008 139 4789 40.93 76.34 8/34
2009-present 80 3060 42.50 78.48 2/24
Overall 315 10019 37.80 75.33 12/67

Sangakkara and Jayawardene's stats are, in many ways, strikingly similar. Both batsmen have close to 7000 runs in away matches and over 3000 runs in home ODIs. In away matches, both batsmen have the same number of centuries (11) but while Sangakkara has just one century in home ODIs, Jayawardene has four. Sangakkara has been the more successful player in Australia, averaging 38.72 to Jayawardene's 32.94. Jayawardene has three hundreds in England but his average of 43.80 is lower than that of Sangakkara, who is yet to score a century there. In ODIs in South Africa and New Zealand, Sangakkara is comfortably ahead of Jayawardene, who averages just 17.45 and 20.42 respectively in each country. However, in the West Indies, Jayawardene has done much better, averaging 47.21 with a century and five fifties, while Sangakkara has struggled, scoring four fifties in 17 games and averaging 28.68.

Sangakkara and Jayawardene outside the subcontinent (excl Zimbabwe)
Country Matches/Runs (Sangakkara) Average, 100/50 (Sangakkara) Matches/Runs (Jayawardene) Average, 100/50 (Jayawardene)
Australia 38/1394 38.72, 1/9 43/1285 32.94, 1/11
England 16/579 48.25, 0/6 23/920 43.80, 3/3
New Zealand 15/425 32.69, 0/4 15/192 17.45, 0/0
South Africa 31/785 31.40, 1/4 30/531 20.42, 0/4
West Indies 17/459 28.68, 0/4 17/661 47.21, 1/5

Sangakkara, who has batted at No. 3 for the majority of his career, has been immensely successful in that position. He is one of only four players to score over 5000 runs at No. 3. Ricky Ponting leads the fray in terms of runs but Jacques Kallis' average of 46.94 is the highest among batsmen with 4000-plus runs at No.3, and is followed by Brian Lara's 45.84. Sangakkara averages a relatively lower 38.53 but has a strike-rate of 75.57, which is bettered only by Lara and Ponting, who have corresponding numbers of 85.98 and 80.82 respectively. However, Sangakkara's century tally at No. 3 (5) is the second-lowest in the group and is better only when compared to Marvan Atapattu, who managed to score just four centuries batting at that position.

Top run-getters at No. 3 in ODIs
Batsman Matches Runs Average SR 100/50
Ricky Ponting 334 12655 42.60 80.82 29/74
Jacques Kallis 199 7746 46.94 73.82 13/57
Kumar Sangakkara 160 5626 38.53 75.67 5/41
Dean Jones 132 5100 43.58 72.07 7/39
Brian Lara 109 4447 45.84 85.98 12/26
Marvan Atapattu 122 4142 38.35 66.33 4/33
Rahul Dravid 112 4000 38.83 69.60 7/27

Sangakkara's feat is all the more remarkable considering that for the majority of his career he has also kept wickets. In Tests, his average in matches when he has played as a wicketkeeper is much lower than in those where he has played purely as a batsman. However, in ODIs, the numbers are reversed. Sangakkara has relished the dual role and his run-tally as a wicketkeeper-batsman is second only to Adam Gilchrist's. Among batsman-wicketkeepers with 4000-plus ODI runs, Sangakkara has an average of 39.50 which is bettered only by MS Dhoni, who has a stunning average of 51.41. By virtue of batting higher in the order, Sangakkara has scored ten centuries, which is behind only Gilchrist's tally of 16, but his strike rate of 76.72 is well behind those of Gilchrist and Dhoni, who have corresponding numbers of 96.94 and 88.32.

Top batsmen-wicketkeepers in ODIs
Player Matches Runs Average SR 100/50 Catches/stumpings
Adam Gilchrist 282 9410 35.64 96.94 16/53 417/55
Kumar Sangakkara 271 9126 39.50 76.72 10/65 289/79
MS Dhoni 200 6632 51.41 88.32 7/44 190/63
Andy Flower 186 5845 34.58 73.71 4/46 133/32
Mark Boucher 294 4680 28.71 84.93 1/26 402/22

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Isu00 on February 20, 2012, 4:13 GMT

    This is a silly comparison.The only base that you can compare these players is their wicket keeping ability.For that gilly is the no 1.then sanga.Then dhoni.Batting wise these three players do different job.Gilly is an explosive opener.dhoni a brilliant finishe.Sanga is a player who anchors the innings.others bat around him.gilly and sanath are both explosive openers.they have SR of 96.94 & 91.21.Thats what you expect from them.When you compare best no 3 batsmen like punter,kallis & dravid they have SR of 80.39,72.96 & 71.24.So you can see that sanga is well placed there with SR of 75.33.Then the great finishers like M.hussey,L.klusener has SR of 88.01 & 89.91.dhoni is also there with 88.32.So this is the correct comparison and it shows that these 3 world class players do their respective jobs brilliantly.So please dont do blind comparisons

  • Isu00 on February 20, 2012, 2:16 GMT

    First of all congratulations for sanga for his great achievement.It is great to see that a player is playing for the team's course not for his own records.As a batsmen who need 6 runs for his 10000 runs it is pleasure to see sanga coming down the track to dan christian to finish the game quickly because sri lanka need the bonus point.Even when he got 10000 he did not know it.He is asking mahela what's up mate.Brilliant sportsmanship sanga.Truly brilliant.Proud to be a sri lankan

  • on February 19, 2012, 14:58 GMT

    Dhoni's average is better he doesn't get out most of the time. Sangakkara is the most reliable player in SL team, he always scores 40 runs in any given match. Dhoni's lucky he's batting 5th because above him there's a strong indian batting line up. But in SL stability of an innings starts with sanga. Therefore he does an important job than dhoni.

  • yasask on February 19, 2012, 7:15 GMT

    @Spelele if sanga is such a poor ODI batsman, how come he was the 2011 ODI Player of the year mate?

  • on February 19, 2012, 5:17 GMT

    by the 20th century WI was flourishing thanks to lara,ponting was loving his role with AUS,ENG had discovered pietersen and of course IND had Tendulkar................and then came Sanga,better than most , almost equal 2 SRT and SLs best ever,taking the world by storm and he will continue to do so.Long live Kumar Sangakkara ,may the force of SL and all cricket fans be with you.

  • on February 19, 2012, 1:03 GMT

    Sanga is a terrific player and he is the best...thats all i have to say

  • Spelele on February 18, 2012, 18:14 GMT

    The stats prove why Sanga is a poor ODI batsman. Poor average, poor strike rate, poor everything! This is why he can never be compared to the likes of Gilly and Dhoni who both scored at a better pace (better strike rates) and with more consistency (better averages), thereby single-handedly winning matches for their countries. Like the overrated Tendulkar, Sanga never won any significant matches for Srilanka. Mahela is the ONLY classy batsman in Srilanka. He has single-handedly won WC semi-final matches for Srilanka before and has scored memorable centuries in WC knockout matches (more significant than school-boy hundreds scored in flat and meaningless dustbowls in Srilanka). Sanga is still not too bad in the Tests though :)

  • NALINWIJ on February 18, 2012, 15:13 GMT

    Well done Sanga. I was there at the ground and cheered when you got the 10,000 and when this was shown in the scoreboard more cheers went up and Sanga himself realised his achievement. Comparing Gilly, Sanga and Dhoni is simple. They are all decent wicket keepers. As batsmen Gilly gives explosive starts, Sanga builds the innings and Dhoni finishes it. Only Sanga is a great test batsman, captain, Lawyer an orator and a statesman!!!

  • on February 18, 2012, 13:55 GMT

    I dont think a slogger like Dhoni should be compared with the likes of Sanga & Gilly..In ODIs he is decent but Doni is a terrible test batsman..Sanga on the other hand averages 56 in Tests with 10,000 runs & as a pure batter he averages 70 +..Also the ODI pitches in Sri Lanka are very difficult to bat and rarely a batsman can score a century in those pitches..

  • KingOwl on February 18, 2012, 13:53 GMT

    I think putting Dhoni together with Sanga and Gilly is not appropriate. Dhoni is certainly a very good one day batsman. But he is no where in the class of Sanga. Dhoni is more of a flat track bully - takes good advantage of coming down the order. Gilly is of course great in all conditions and Sanga is great, period.

  • Isu00 on February 20, 2012, 4:13 GMT

    This is a silly comparison.The only base that you can compare these players is their wicket keeping ability.For that gilly is the no 1.then sanga.Then dhoni.Batting wise these three players do different job.Gilly is an explosive opener.dhoni a brilliant finishe.Sanga is a player who anchors the innings.others bat around him.gilly and sanath are both explosive openers.they have SR of 96.94 & 91.21.Thats what you expect from them.When you compare best no 3 batsmen like punter,kallis & dravid they have SR of 80.39,72.96 & 71.24.So you can see that sanga is well placed there with SR of 75.33.Then the great finishers like M.hussey,L.klusener has SR of 88.01 & 89.91.dhoni is also there with 88.32.So this is the correct comparison and it shows that these 3 world class players do their respective jobs brilliantly.So please dont do blind comparisons

  • Isu00 on February 20, 2012, 2:16 GMT

    First of all congratulations for sanga for his great achievement.It is great to see that a player is playing for the team's course not for his own records.As a batsmen who need 6 runs for his 10000 runs it is pleasure to see sanga coming down the track to dan christian to finish the game quickly because sri lanka need the bonus point.Even when he got 10000 he did not know it.He is asking mahela what's up mate.Brilliant sportsmanship sanga.Truly brilliant.Proud to be a sri lankan

  • on February 19, 2012, 14:58 GMT

    Dhoni's average is better he doesn't get out most of the time. Sangakkara is the most reliable player in SL team, he always scores 40 runs in any given match. Dhoni's lucky he's batting 5th because above him there's a strong indian batting line up. But in SL stability of an innings starts with sanga. Therefore he does an important job than dhoni.

  • yasask on February 19, 2012, 7:15 GMT

    @Spelele if sanga is such a poor ODI batsman, how come he was the 2011 ODI Player of the year mate?

  • on February 19, 2012, 5:17 GMT

    by the 20th century WI was flourishing thanks to lara,ponting was loving his role with AUS,ENG had discovered pietersen and of course IND had Tendulkar................and then came Sanga,better than most , almost equal 2 SRT and SLs best ever,taking the world by storm and he will continue to do so.Long live Kumar Sangakkara ,may the force of SL and all cricket fans be with you.

  • on February 19, 2012, 1:03 GMT

    Sanga is a terrific player and he is the best...thats all i have to say

  • Spelele on February 18, 2012, 18:14 GMT

    The stats prove why Sanga is a poor ODI batsman. Poor average, poor strike rate, poor everything! This is why he can never be compared to the likes of Gilly and Dhoni who both scored at a better pace (better strike rates) and with more consistency (better averages), thereby single-handedly winning matches for their countries. Like the overrated Tendulkar, Sanga never won any significant matches for Srilanka. Mahela is the ONLY classy batsman in Srilanka. He has single-handedly won WC semi-final matches for Srilanka before and has scored memorable centuries in WC knockout matches (more significant than school-boy hundreds scored in flat and meaningless dustbowls in Srilanka). Sanga is still not too bad in the Tests though :)

  • NALINWIJ on February 18, 2012, 15:13 GMT

    Well done Sanga. I was there at the ground and cheered when you got the 10,000 and when this was shown in the scoreboard more cheers went up and Sanga himself realised his achievement. Comparing Gilly, Sanga and Dhoni is simple. They are all decent wicket keepers. As batsmen Gilly gives explosive starts, Sanga builds the innings and Dhoni finishes it. Only Sanga is a great test batsman, captain, Lawyer an orator and a statesman!!!

  • on February 18, 2012, 13:55 GMT

    I dont think a slogger like Dhoni should be compared with the likes of Sanga & Gilly..In ODIs he is decent but Doni is a terrible test batsman..Sanga on the other hand averages 56 in Tests with 10,000 runs & as a pure batter he averages 70 +..Also the ODI pitches in Sri Lanka are very difficult to bat and rarely a batsman can score a century in those pitches..

  • KingOwl on February 18, 2012, 13:53 GMT

    I think putting Dhoni together with Sanga and Gilly is not appropriate. Dhoni is certainly a very good one day batsman. But he is no where in the class of Sanga. Dhoni is more of a flat track bully - takes good advantage of coming down the order. Gilly is of course great in all conditions and Sanga is great, period.

  • on February 18, 2012, 12:57 GMT

    my favorite srilankan player

  • Meety on February 18, 2012, 11:58 GMT

    Kumar is my favourite non-ozzy cricketer!

  • on February 18, 2012, 11:47 GMT

    Congrats Sanga.You are a true inspiration to upcoming youngsters.You have a long way to go....

  • on February 18, 2012, 9:44 GMT

    hats of to snga,u r best best classic player@ no 3 ever and u r the best partner with mahele for all three formates.congratulations

  • NaveedAfzal on February 18, 2012, 9:06 GMT

    Well Done Sanga............ As an outsider, I would say that SriLanka should feel proud to be a player like you and as a cricket viewer we are thankful to you for playing such an exciting cricket. Hope you will entertain us more and more in Future. Best wishes for your future.................

  • Don_Simon on February 18, 2012, 8:55 GMT

    @Bala Ashwin: I believe that Sangas' record is reasonably good for a mere mortal ...LOL HATS OFF TO SANGA !!

  • on February 18, 2012, 5:00 GMT

    Well done Sanga. We are all proud of You.

  • Sinhaya on February 18, 2012, 4:44 GMT

    Sangakkara is a very consistent batsman and he can certainly play the 2015 world cup. His style is simple amazing.

  • Balumekka on February 18, 2012, 4:22 GMT

    @Murugan Vallinayagam Veerabahu: You are spot on mate!

  • on February 18, 2012, 3:53 GMT

    Great player...hats off to Sanga..a true legend of the game...stats are no correct when you take the average odi score in India and Australia during the past decade is way higher than in Sri Lanka.(Author please look into those stats). Therefore Gilly and Dhoni obviously should have higher averages and strike rates. although gilly's average is lower than Sanga. So i think he's the best Wicket keeper batsman ever produced.

  • on February 18, 2012, 3:43 GMT

    The stats prove why Sri Lankan batsman have lower batting averages, its mainly because in Sri Lanka the par scores of an odi is much lower than in India,Aus,SA and England. mainly because of slow and low pitches. so that's why its always not fair to compare statistics without looking into the facts. Its the same reason why SL bowlers have good stats compared to bowlers in India who have poor stats

  • world.cricketer on February 18, 2012, 3:42 GMT

    After Gilly Sangakkara is best Batsman.

  • Just_Do_It_Now on February 18, 2012, 3:06 GMT

    All 3 are All Time Greats....Gilly...Sanga...n Dhoni !! Each has a unique style of their own & each of them highly spirited sportsman...Hats of to all 3 Legends ! The only unique thing Dhoni did...as a wicketkeeper-batsman & Captain....he WON the World Cup for his country..!

  • on February 18, 2012, 3:01 GMT

    Congratulations Sanga,You are the best Batsman in SL team,Really nice to watching when you are playing on the ground at any situation, that means you are one of the best cricketer

  • on February 18, 2012, 2:18 GMT

    Interesting Fact:

    Though Kumar Sangakara is 10th Batsmen to score 10000 runs

    IT IS TO BE NOTED THAT THE GOD OF CRICKET - SACHIN is the only batsmen to get man of the match award in the match the player crosses 10000runs landmark.

    HATS OFF TO SACHIN

  • on February 18, 2012, 2:09 GMT

    Guyz, i'm a sri lankan and i even belive that sanga is not the best wk battter all time.Bt dnt compare to sanga and gilly,gilly always batted as an opener in most of his matches he was a devastating one,but sanga on the other hand needed to bat at no.3 and he has the responsibility of guiding his team to a better total along with jayawardena in most of his carrer esp. after 2003 or so. But on the other hand Gilly didn't had any problems bcz he was an opener and he played most of his career with classy batsmen like ponting,hayden,martyn,bevan,clarke,steve and mark waugh's,symonds etc. and he didn't have that huge responsibilty of guiding the team to the victory but on the other hand sanga was batting at no.3 which is the most important place to bat at.So guyz i think dnt compare sanga and gilly.If we compare sanath and gilly that is okay bt not sanga and gilly sanga was always a responsible player keeping for his side for 50ovs and batting at no.3.sanga was alwayz bettr than gilly.

  • johnathonjosephs on February 18, 2012, 1:21 GMT

    @murugan. Can't of said it better myself mate. Gilchrist was better at the top of the order, Sanga is a better middle order batsman, and Dhoni is one of the best finishers. Can't really see each of those batsman outdoing another in a different position (imagine Dhoni opening or Sanga finishing things off, or Gilly a middle order batsman... just preposterous)

  • johnathonjosephs on February 18, 2012, 1:19 GMT

    Ahhh.... legend of the game. Doesn't really have that much of an impact in the shorter format, but was still a huge asset to the team. When it comes to Sri Lanka and New Zealand, batting averages are usually lower than what they should be. That's because in the limited over version of the game, they do NOT play for statistics (well up until Matthews and Chandimal arrived at least....). Look at the example today. Sanga just kept trying to hit all balls for 4/6 and got out at 30. He didn't really care about his stats, because thats what Test Cricket is for. If Sanga wanted a couple not outs and played accordingly, his average should have been around 40. Likewise, Dhoni and Gilchrist had inflated averages because of their not outs by playing at number 5/6. You can not use averages to judge a good limited overs player. Look at Jayasuriya, one of the legends and all time best opener of all time, but his average is only a measly 33.

  • on February 18, 2012, 0:48 GMT

    Congrats Sanga. We salute you for your contribution to Cricket and particularly to Sri Lankan Cricket. You are one of the true gentlemen among the present and past cricketers. Keep going and achive many more milestones. God bless.

  • on February 18, 2012, 0:39 GMT

    Its pointless arguing who is the better wicket keeper batsman Gilchrist,Dhoni or Sangakkara. All three of them play a different brand of cricket, Gilchrist is a devastating opener, Sangakkara an elegant middle order run machine and Dhoni is one of the games best finishers.They have all been major assets to their respective teams and are great in their own way.

  • Sinhabahu on February 17, 2012, 22:46 GMT

    Great stuff, Sanga! Pride of the nation! I laugh at those who think Gilchrist was a better batsman, though full respect to Gilly too.

  • cricketisagame on February 17, 2012, 22:45 GMT

    @ Perera, With all respect to Sanga, the above statistics proves what Gilly was. He had impact beyond those statistics. You might argue Sanga's average is slightly higher than Gilly's. Then, what are you going to call Dhoni? Dhoni and Gilly's strike rate is much higher than Sanga's. It is Gilly who changed the way we look at the wicket-keeper/batsman today.

  • NikhilNair on February 17, 2012, 20:45 GMT

    Sanga is definitely one of the best players around... and a true gentlemen. Congrats on his achievement :)

    @Ramesh... greatest wk keeper of all time? No mate, not arguments there... Gilchrist is the best of this generation [don't know about all time... ]

  • nlambda on February 17, 2012, 20:33 GMT

    @Ramesh Perera: Sangakkara the greatest WK-batsman? Please. Look in the list above for a guy whose initials are A.G. Even statistically he is superior to Sanga and we know Gilly's impact went beyond the stats. In all 3 WC finals he produced bludgeoning knocks, one which Sanga himself was at the receiving end of.

  • nicolinde on February 17, 2012, 20:31 GMT

    Sure if it wasn't for Gilchrist

  • on February 17, 2012, 19:50 GMT

    arguably the greatest wk keeper batsman of all times

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on February 17, 2012, 19:50 GMT

    arguably the greatest wk keeper batsman of all times

  • nicolinde on February 17, 2012, 20:31 GMT

    Sure if it wasn't for Gilchrist

  • nlambda on February 17, 2012, 20:33 GMT

    @Ramesh Perera: Sangakkara the greatest WK-batsman? Please. Look in the list above for a guy whose initials are A.G. Even statistically he is superior to Sanga and we know Gilly's impact went beyond the stats. In all 3 WC finals he produced bludgeoning knocks, one which Sanga himself was at the receiving end of.

  • NikhilNair on February 17, 2012, 20:45 GMT

    Sanga is definitely one of the best players around... and a true gentlemen. Congrats on his achievement :)

    @Ramesh... greatest wk keeper of all time? No mate, not arguments there... Gilchrist is the best of this generation [don't know about all time... ]

  • cricketisagame on February 17, 2012, 22:45 GMT

    @ Perera, With all respect to Sanga, the above statistics proves what Gilly was. He had impact beyond those statistics. You might argue Sanga's average is slightly higher than Gilly's. Then, what are you going to call Dhoni? Dhoni and Gilly's strike rate is much higher than Sanga's. It is Gilly who changed the way we look at the wicket-keeper/batsman today.

  • Sinhabahu on February 17, 2012, 22:46 GMT

    Great stuff, Sanga! Pride of the nation! I laugh at those who think Gilchrist was a better batsman, though full respect to Gilly too.

  • on February 18, 2012, 0:39 GMT

    Its pointless arguing who is the better wicket keeper batsman Gilchrist,Dhoni or Sangakkara. All three of them play a different brand of cricket, Gilchrist is a devastating opener, Sangakkara an elegant middle order run machine and Dhoni is one of the games best finishers.They have all been major assets to their respective teams and are great in their own way.

  • on February 18, 2012, 0:48 GMT

    Congrats Sanga. We salute you for your contribution to Cricket and particularly to Sri Lankan Cricket. You are one of the true gentlemen among the present and past cricketers. Keep going and achive many more milestones. God bless.

  • johnathonjosephs on February 18, 2012, 1:19 GMT

    Ahhh.... legend of the game. Doesn't really have that much of an impact in the shorter format, but was still a huge asset to the team. When it comes to Sri Lanka and New Zealand, batting averages are usually lower than what they should be. That's because in the limited over version of the game, they do NOT play for statistics (well up until Matthews and Chandimal arrived at least....). Look at the example today. Sanga just kept trying to hit all balls for 4/6 and got out at 30. He didn't really care about his stats, because thats what Test Cricket is for. If Sanga wanted a couple not outs and played accordingly, his average should have been around 40. Likewise, Dhoni and Gilchrist had inflated averages because of their not outs by playing at number 5/6. You can not use averages to judge a good limited overs player. Look at Jayasuriya, one of the legends and all time best opener of all time, but his average is only a measly 33.

  • johnathonjosephs on February 18, 2012, 1:21 GMT

    @murugan. Can't of said it better myself mate. Gilchrist was better at the top of the order, Sanga is a better middle order batsman, and Dhoni is one of the best finishers. Can't really see each of those batsman outdoing another in a different position (imagine Dhoni opening or Sanga finishing things off, or Gilly a middle order batsman... just preposterous)