Australia v England, 4th Test, Melbourne, 2nd day

Trott's hunger hurts Australia

After the bowlers did their job yesterday, England's No.3 ensured there was no let-up with another impressive display

Andrew Miller at the MCG

December 27, 2010

Comments: 19 | Text size: A | A

Some batsmen specialise in the counterattack, others major in attrition. Jonathan Trott, however, nestles into another comfortable and entirely enclosed genre, that of the specialist bloodletter. Like a medieval physician faced with a case of apoplexy, Trott draws his scalpel across the artery, and drains all tension from the situation until the patient is totally becalmed.

And so it was, on one of the most volatile days of the summer, with Ricky Ponting inviting ICC censure for his run-in with Aleem Dar and Peter Siddle pounding in on a still-lively track to give Australia the outside chance of a sub-200 deficit, Trott bedded in, zoned out, and finished the day on 141 not out. It was his third hundred in his first five Tests against Australia, the first England batsman since Michael Vaughan in 2002-03 to achieve such a feat, and for the second time in as many games, it moved England into a position from which an Ashes-sealing victory appears little more than a formality.

"I don't think it's anything about batting against Australia in particular," said Trott. "I've played five games against Mike Hussey and he's also scored three hundreds, so you might also have to ask him why he likes batting against England. It's just one of those things. I'm very fortunate. I work really hard on my game, along with everyone else in the team, and I'm just happy to be able to contribute to getting us into a good position."

A total of 67,149 spectators turned up to the second day at the MCG - some 20,000 fewer than attended on the first, but still the largest crowd that he had ever before encountered. Trott, however, anesthetised the lot of them as he treated the occasion with his habitual equanimity. "Each hundred you get is in different circumstances," he said. "This is definitely an important Test match and one I'll definitely savour. They're all pretty special but Boxing Day, [with] the hype around it and the support from the English fans, it would definitely be right up there."

Like South Africa's Jacques Kallis, a fellow Capetonian, Trott is not exactly a man to set the pulses racing, but it's hard not to admire the unfussy manner with which he goes about his work. All of the fuss, in fact, is fast-tracked into his ritual between balls, which involves constant guard-taking and crease-scratching, and enables him to expend any excess nervous energy and leave the business of seeing and hitting cricket balls to a combination of a sound instinct and a water-tight technique.

"Any batter that's out there in the middle, in the zone, is tough to bowl to - especially him," said Siddle, whose adrenalin-fuelled method has been thwarted by Trott in each of those three centuries. "It is tough work. The wicket is not offering a lot of bounce, which keeps it in his favour a little bit - knowing it's going to be pretty much up there for him on the front foot."

Trott's current average against Australia is a Bradman-esque 96.33, while his career average - at his overnight score - of 62.92 puts him second behind the Don in the all-time averages for batsmen who have made more than 1500 Test runs - a figure he ghosted past during the afternoon accumulation with Matt Prior.

As with the best of Trott's performances, notably his 184 in partnership with Stuart Broad at Lord's last summer, the latter stages were fuelled by an absolute certainty of outcome. The morning drizzle and early life had made survival tough for all the batsmen, and both overnight incumbents, Alastair Cook and Andrew Strauss, fell without significant addition.

But as the evening drew in and the crowds dissipated in droves for the second day in a row, Trott's love of crease occupation and eye for the loose delivery allowed him to ease to within nine runs of his third 150-plus score in seven months. To put that in context, Pietersen (on six occasions) is the only English batsman to manage more so-called "daddies" in the whole of the past five years.

"I think it's important I don't over-rev when I'm batting and try and over-hit the ball," said Trott. "Sometimes I find I'm a bit tense, it's too much. I try and be nice and patient and play my natural game, which is to accumulate here and there and let the other guys hit boundaries and sixes."

In fact, Trott was so under-revved, he claimed he did not notice or take an interest in any of the controversy that took place early in the second session, when Kevin Pietersen survived a caught-behind appeal off Ryan Harris that led Ricky Ponting into an angry discussion with umpire Aleem Dar. The only moment he was truly unsettled came when he inside-edged Ben Hilfenhaus onto the side of his kneecap.

"It was one of the most painful things I've felt in my life," said Trott, who required lengthy treatment after falling to the crease in a heap. "I asked for the runner to put the pads on and see how it went. I gave it 20 minutes to see if it stiffened up. It did a little bit ... but that'll teach for me inside-edging it."

That incident aside, Trott's resolve was scarcely tested, as he re-entered the zone that he and Alastair Cook had occupied on the final day at Brisbane, when England served notice of their series intentions with that formidable second-innings scoreline of 1 for 517. "Obviously the cloud cover was there and a bit of drizzle early on," he said, "but fortunately the sun came out this afternoon and the wind sort of dried the pitch out."

But despite the looming prospect of a very handsome victory, Trott was not ready to take anything for granted just yet, the very same trait that has served his batting so well throughout a memorable 2010. "We all know that the Australian team - like we saw in the last Test match - has got some good players," he said. "We're going to have to be at the top of our game to make sure we keep the pressure on them the whole time.

"I wouldn't say that they were demoralised," he added. "I thought they bowled pretty well today ... [but] things went our way. It was a good day for us but it's important to remember they'll come at us tomorrow morning and try and get themselves right back and get as many wickets as soon as possible. It's important I'm on my game from the start tomorrow. There's plenty of work for us left to be done in this Test match."

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo.

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (December 28, 2010, 11:02 GMT)

@all: I want to make it clear that trott is a very good batsman... I am only saying he struggled in the greener pitches in SA and against left arm inswing bowling early on in his innings.... However his temperament cannot be doubted and his innings yeterday spoke heaps about his temperament.... And of course he is good enough to be playing test cricket ... So I am not suggesting for a momen that he isn't...and lastly like everyone else I am enjoying eng giving aus a thrashing in aus and pontings face when things don't go his way....:) peace

Posted by   on (December 28, 2010, 8:09 GMT)

@jupiterlaw: No,I am not speaking from gut feeling. the stats tell one story , but scoring runs in England/SA in swinging and seaming pitches is much different to scoring a century in, say, Gabba or MCG where the pitch completely flattens out after day 1....Look, he failed in Gabba in the 1st innings and he failed twice in Perth [all when the pitches had some grass on them] and he was trapped LBW by Mitchell Johnson in Perth and Mohammad Amir back in England. This can't really be a coincidence. He was found out in SA by Steyn and Co and will sooner or later be found out by good left arm swing bowlers and on grassy pitches. Amla,on the other hand has a much better technique _currently_. He played Zaheer magnificently at Durban, I thought. On the other hand, _everyone_ seems to be struggling on grassy pitches these days lol , so no point in blaming Trott really. Even the greatest of them, i.e Tendulkar and Ponting are coming a cropper on greener pitches.

Posted by landl47 on (December 27, 2010, 20:18 GMT)

Trott took time to mature- he was at the end of his 8th season in England before he made the test team. Since then, like Hussey for Australia, he has shown he learned from his time as a county cricketer. The player he reminds me of is Glen Turner of New Zealand, who just loved occupying the crease. Trott's not a fast scorer, but he holds an innings together. Once he gets to 100, he doesn't change the way he bats at all, he just keeps going for as long as he can. I don't agree at all with those who say he should drop down the order; the primary objective for batsmen at the top of the order is to put together a solid foundation so that the strokeplayers (in England's case, Pietersen, Bell and Prior) can bat freely later. Whenever England have done that, they've been successful. The only thing about Trott is- his fidgeting between balls drives me crazy!

Posted by masterblaster1971 on (December 27, 2010, 20:04 GMT)

There are only two options left for Punter in this series. They are- 1. Fall on your sword and retire now'

2. Go fishing and wait for the axe to fall on your puny head

Aussie going down!

Posted by jupiterlaw on (December 27, 2010, 18:51 GMT)

@PARAMJIT: Neither the strike rates nor the averages of the two men offers your argument any support. Are you then speaking from gut feeling or what?

Posted by East_West on (December 27, 2010, 18:01 GMT)

Have you ever thought..in wildest of your dreams that Australia score board is flooded with single digit scores?? Nope! Not me!! When was the last time England scored 300+ runs comfortable [at least against Aussies..let alone 500+]..but hmm! things have changed for good! Although I am NOT AN AUSTRALIA fan, i feel pity to see Ricky's tantrums [esp when it is not working and the whole world is watching]...and what a shame!! Well, Ricky should give up captaincy and may be they should bring other Hussey into the test team as well! Clark??? what are you doing as a vice-captain??? ENgland resurgence is a blessing for all the cricket lovers!! nope I am not English but good to see they are contenders!! Is this their COACH that made a huge difference???

Posted by 5wombats on (December 27, 2010, 17:47 GMT)

@Sam Kapila - Smith said that about Trott ! ! Ha ha, what a complete and utter numpty. @jupiterlaw - dead right about Australia. They are a shambles - but you can only beat the team in front of you. Englands strength in this series is that, unlike Aus, they have not relied on one batsman and one bowler, everyone (mainly everyone) in the England side has made a contribution. Even 21 year old novices like Finn look better than any of the Aus bowlers on display. Trott is a relative test novice - and he too is better than any Aus batsman on display. Smith would have it that Trott would never play Test cricket. His mistake has allowed the world to enjoy a great batsmans skills. Thanks Graham!

Posted by kayjas2000 on (December 27, 2010, 17:43 GMT)

Jonathan Trott was at best an average First Class cricketer in SA and Smith was correct in stating he would not have made the SA side, ever. He has scored his runs this year against woeful opposition, Australia included. He is a decent cricketer but no more than that and certainly would not pose a threat to the SA (Prince excluded) or Indian batting line-ups. Where SA missed out big time was with KP but unfortunately in SA we have other factors at work that make picking the best team not always an option.

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 17:31 GMT)

Trott is not only prolific but level headed enough to know the job is still to be finished. I hope he stays that way and makes england a fighting team in the years to come.

Posted by Abhijeth_Manohar on (December 27, 2010, 17:24 GMT)

No doubt Grame Smith is eating his words right now. However I doubt he would still consider Trott in his line-up. With Kallis, Amla, AB & Prince he has excellent test players.

@Jupiterlaw - Totally agree. England look great, probably right up there. In my 20 years of watching cricket, I've never seen a team come to Australia and do what they're doing. I have a feeling the next 5 - 10 years will be exciting times for the English

Australia desperately need players in the likes of Amla, Trott, Dravid, Kallis, Samaraveera - Test run machines who will grind and grind the opposition bowlers.

Posted by cricketeria on (December 27, 2010, 16:46 GMT)

Agree totally with RashadBanna. Although it seems like SA specialize in turning out such batsmen...Kallis and then Amla. Surprised that they collapsed today against India.

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 16:43 GMT)

Would like Graeme Smith to reassess his potential again! Like somebody pointed out already he made that ridiculous statement a few years ago. Trott is a very attacking batsman that any side would like to have in their ranks, and England did!

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 16:11 GMT)

ricky may cry in jealous seeing trott play marathon innings,eng will surely pile a lot of pressure on punter after the rsult of the match!!!!! the result wil definitely show the way 2 punters career for SURE!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 15:54 GMT)

@rashadbanna: I don't think they missed him too badly though...quite frankly Amla is much better than him and is a better no 3... He could take the position of prince tho but then sa's ridiculous quota policies means he couldn't fit in there either...oh well sa's loss is England 's gain....however, trott needs to improve against the left arm inswing bowlers like zaheer, Johnson ( when he is on song), Amir(if he comes back), etc.... He seems to have a habit of falling over in his innings early on... Excellent innings by him today tho

Posted by   on (December 27, 2010, 13:57 GMT)

Graeme Smith said that Trott wouldn't make it into the South African side... Didn't know Smith had a sense of humour.

Posted by jupiterlaw on (December 27, 2010, 13:01 GMT)

I don't want to detract from England's performance but it is clear that Australia are no good. They are actually comical; so it's still difficult to say how good England really are. I still want to see them against other teams.

Posted by 5wombats on (December 27, 2010, 12:31 GMT)

Before this series I thought Trott would do well in Australia - so it has proved. It's hard to believe he only started in test cricket 16 months ago! He came into a real hotbed of a test match at the Oval in 2009 and played superbly. A real "in the zone" player, Boycott will love this innings at the MCG today! I just hope England can go on to win this match now. They have been the better team throughout and deserve to win.

Posted by anver777 on (December 27, 2010, 11:36 GMT)

Very stubborn character while he's batting & mostly converts his starts to marathon innings & the style of his batting which is ideal for Test cricket is always irritates the opponents................ A PERFECT TEST PLAYER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by RashadBanna on (December 27, 2010, 11:13 GMT)

South Africa missed out big time on Jonathan Trott.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
Tour Results
Australia v England at Perth - Feb 6, 2011
Australia won by 57 runs
Australia v England at Sydney - Feb 2, 2011
Australia won by 2 wickets (with 4 balls remaining)
Australia v England at Brisbane - Jan 30, 2011
Australia won by 51 runs
Australia v England at Adelaide - Jan 26, 2011
England won by 21 runs
Australia v England at Sydney - Jan 23, 2011
Australia won by 4 wickets (with 24 balls remaining)
More results »
Ashes Videos
Tremlett not blaming fatigue

Tremlett not blaming fatigue
(01:24) | Jan 28, 2011
Andrew Strauss: 'Fatigue no excuse'

Andrew Strauss: 'Fatigue no excuse'
(00:39) | Jan 23, 2011
Ashes post mortem

Ashes post mortem
(04:13) | Jan 18, 2011
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days