Australia v England, 5th Test, Sydney, 1st day January 3, 2014

Fearless Haddin is Ashes star turn

Australia's wicketkeeper has repeatedly been the man of the hour and arguably the man of the series
  shares 30

Mitchell Johnson has deservedly attracted accolades such as these, but Brad Haddin has made a huge contribution

"We don't want to get into a situation where we're relying on Brad Haddin to drag us out of trouble every time."

When Australia's batting coach, Michael Di Venuto, said these words in the aftermath of the Boxing Day Test, he was reflecting on an Ashes series in which his team's top order have proven consistently vulnerable in the first innings. But on the first day of Test cricket in Australia for 2014, as Haddin performed his act of dragging for the fifth time in as many matches and took Steven Smith merrily along with him, a blue-blooded SCG crowd of 45,352 had reason aplenty to ask the question: why the hell not?

More sober reflection offers plenty of reasons to worry at how Michael Clarke's team have repeatedly asked Haddin to man the pumps, not least the thought that South Africa in February and March won't be anywhere near as courteous to the tail as England have been. Nonetheless, there has been a wonderfully entertaining and carefree air about the way Australia's platforms for Test victories have been assembled, with Haddin the fearless, fighting and fluent centre of it all.

Visceral though Mitchell Johnson's contribution to the series has been, epitomised by a three-over burst this evening, he would not have been given anywhere near the sorts of totals he bowled behind in Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth or Sydney without Haddin's interventions. It has been a common and logical assumption that Johnson will be named Man of the Series. But by lodging a nomination in which he has passed 50 in every first innings while taking sundry catches besides and also serving as Michael Clarke's most trusted lieutenant, Haddin has made a case for a share of the award at the very least.

The SCG's atmosphere may have been a little more New Year's festive than Ashes tense, given the series margin, but Haddin's contribution was very much representative of all he had done in earlier, weightier matches. England's bowlers used the movement on offer decently after an indifferent start, extracting seam when many might have expected a little more swing under cloudy skies. Australia's batsmen responded with strokes either overconfident or indeterminate, conveying a porous technique that has now been evident on seaming surfaces for the best part of a decade.

David Warner's feet were nowhere to a Stuart Broad delivery that moved away enough to flick off stump, Chris Rogers let his guard down and dragged a presumptuous pull shot on to his wicket, Clarke pushed too firmly at a ball moving away from him, Shane Watson reminded anyone who had forgotten about his prominent front pad, and George Bailey fiddled and fell, again demonstrating a weakness against steady bowling in the channel outside off stump that will surely be his millstone if pitted against Dale Steyn and Vernon Philander.

So Haddin walked out with England's bowlers seemingly sure of themselves and their plans, rejoicing in a scoreline of 5 for 97 and gaining most of the help they wanted from an SCG pitch similar to that on which Mohammad Asif had filleted Australia for 127 in 2010. Having marked his guard, Haddin negotiated his first five balls from Broad studiously, gaining a rough appreciation for the way the surface was playing and the manner of the bowling, before walking down the pitch at the end of the over to discuss the match situation with his New South Wales team-mate and leadership protege Smith.

Often, Haddin's innings can begin with a starburst of strokes to announce his arrival, to his batting partner, spectators but most pointedly opponents. This time he settled in for a little over half an hour, reaching 12 from 34 balls. In that period he eluded a review for a catch by James Anderson when ball had hit front and back pad rather than bat, before narrowing his focus on Ben Stokes.

England's youngest and most promising bowler, Stokes has won deserved praise this series for showing sterner stuff than some of his more storied counterparts. But here, as in Perth, Haddin used the Durham allrounder's impatience for another wicket to his advantage, goading him - verbally or otherwise - into the short-pitched bowling that allowed runs to be added crisply and quickly, while coaxing England away from the length that reaped the earlier wickets. In all, Haddin cracked 29 from the 21 balls Stokes hurled at him.

"It was great to sit up the other end. In tough circumstances he comes in and tries to switch the momentum of the game and he's done it on numerous occasions in this series"
Steven Smith on Brad Haddin's innings

In what seemed like no time at all, Haddin's fifty arrived, inspiring a frustration among the visitors that Stokes articulated after play. "It's just the way he comes out and plays his natural game whatever the situation," he said. "Quite a lot's gone his way but fair play to him, he's played his natural game and taken every chance he's had to get runs and played really well. When he came in today and starts hitting you back over your head you're almost standing there scratching your head thinking 'This isn't meant to happen'..."

While Haddin scrambled on, taking increasingly garish liberties against Anderson among others, Smith was able to construct another innings to underline his immense potential to anchor Australia's middle order for years to come. The WACA Ground again came to mind as Smith grew in confidence as a result of the clarity with which Haddin played. This can be illustrated neatly by the two halves of what became Smith's third Test hundred. In Haddin's company, he reached 55 from 95 balls. After he was dismissed, Smith surged, ransacking 60 from his final 59 deliveries.

"The way he played his shots today was brilliant, to form a partnership with him and get into the position we're in was great," Smith said of Haddin. "We were basically just saying 'Watch the ball closely and have a clear mind', and Brad was certainly clear in what he was doing. It was great to just sit up the other end. In tough circumstances he comes in and tries to switch the momentum of the game and he's done it on numerous occasions in this series."

For numerous occasions, read every occasion that mattered. When Michael Carberry, Alastair Cook and the reluctant nightwatchman James Anderson hopped around in the SCG twilight, now confronted by a score around double the tally hoped for in the minutes after lunch, they were caught in between their two main sources of torment this summer. Ahead of them, at the top of his mark, stood Johnson. Behind them, flashing a pitiless smile while brandishing his gloves, was Haddin.

Australia would do well not to rely on him so completely in future, not least because, at 36, they do not know how far into that future he will keep playing. But for this Ashes series, there has been no reason not to. He has been the man of the hour, and arguably the summer.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • csr11 on January 3, 2014, 12:13 GMT

    I could'nt agree more with the sentiment of this article. Though Mitch was the wrecker in chief of the Aussie batting, it was Haddin who played a huge part in breaking down the English balling. Every time they sniffed an advantage, Haddin came around and snuffed out the any hope almost before it precipitated. Right from Day 1 of the Brisbane test, this has been the story. One can only wonder how that test and indeed this series would have panned out if Haddin and Mitch had put together that 7th wicket partnership. It is only fair that these two guys share the honors as for men of the series.

  • OzMongrel on January 4, 2014, 8:55 GMT

    Bailey to stay, and understand what his role means. He just needs to get his feet moving earlier, as he did this afternoon. The rest of the order is just fine, while we need to understand that not everyone will fire on the same day (It ain't the 2000's anymore, troops) and we need to believe in our bowling attack the same way that Boof does. No 19 year olds getting smashed by Test Match loads, more an awareness that at 30 a bowler really knows his game. I cannot exaggerate the power of the Boof, he really has taken things back to first principles and made players love the game again.

  • andrew-schulz on January 4, 2014, 5:21 GMT

    You are all wrong. Johnson is miles ahead as man of the series. As for the performance of the Australian top order: you state it a little strongly Dan. If the current partnership between Rogers and Watson lasts for any length of time, the top five in the order will all average above 40 for a series for the first time in a long time. Yes, big problems at 6, yes some trouble in the first innings, but indications are it hasn't been such a bad performance. Simplistic analysis too: Watson's 43 in the first innings was more valuable than any of you would realize, and the fact that it was the first time he was close to lbw in te series says a lot also.

  • Gaswell on January 4, 2014, 4:04 GMT

    Man of the Series should be shared between Haddin and Johnston as both have been equally pivotal in winning the Ashes. South Africa will provide much tougher competition and Australia`s top order will have to perform if we are to beat South Africa. And we cannot contemplate losing to South Africa. It can`t be allowed to happen. Bailey has been disappointing but no one is knocking down the door at the moment with the exception of Phil Hughes who has failed on many occasions, to grab his opportunity.

  • on January 4, 2014, 3:40 GMT

    if Doolan is the next in line then he should have been in for Bailey on Boxing Day. Haddin and the tail can't be relied on. Watson to six, Doolan to 3.

  • dinosaurus on January 4, 2014, 1:38 GMT

    @ ZkAneela,

    While you're talking stats I'd like to remind you that SA haven't won a series against Aus in SA since the 1970's. In fact, Aus have a better record in SA than SA

  • on January 3, 2014, 21:23 GMT

    The simple truth about this series is that no Englishman would get picked in Australia's team - thats why its the way it is!

  • on January 3, 2014, 19:49 GMT

    The problem is how to replace him? Still think Wade has a lot to offer and a man who has two centuries in his first few tests is a useful batsmen. Hopefully, he can tighten his glove work

  • Beertjie on January 3, 2014, 17:58 GMT

    Great run down, Dan, in the fifth paragraph of your article of how the batsmen failed to cope. This does not bode well for Centurion and a far superior four man pace attack + fine catchers. Hadds needs to remember what happened at Newlands on the last tour when his approach was roundly scapegoated in the 47 all out debacle. What gives me hope is the fact that the next two tests will be played on spin-friendly tracks, and the defensive minded Saffers will try to protect their probable lead. Anyway, even then there will be something in it for the quicks so the way to go is to replace Bailey with a technically correct in form batsman in the top 3. Hughes hardly fits the bill, but who does?

  • on January 3, 2014, 14:27 GMT

    ...England beaten by two Aussies. Haddin and Johnson.

  • csr11 on January 3, 2014, 12:13 GMT

    I could'nt agree more with the sentiment of this article. Though Mitch was the wrecker in chief of the Aussie batting, it was Haddin who played a huge part in breaking down the English balling. Every time they sniffed an advantage, Haddin came around and snuffed out the any hope almost before it precipitated. Right from Day 1 of the Brisbane test, this has been the story. One can only wonder how that test and indeed this series would have panned out if Haddin and Mitch had put together that 7th wicket partnership. It is only fair that these two guys share the honors as for men of the series.

  • OzMongrel on January 4, 2014, 8:55 GMT

    Bailey to stay, and understand what his role means. He just needs to get his feet moving earlier, as he did this afternoon. The rest of the order is just fine, while we need to understand that not everyone will fire on the same day (It ain't the 2000's anymore, troops) and we need to believe in our bowling attack the same way that Boof does. No 19 year olds getting smashed by Test Match loads, more an awareness that at 30 a bowler really knows his game. I cannot exaggerate the power of the Boof, he really has taken things back to first principles and made players love the game again.

  • andrew-schulz on January 4, 2014, 5:21 GMT

    You are all wrong. Johnson is miles ahead as man of the series. As for the performance of the Australian top order: you state it a little strongly Dan. If the current partnership between Rogers and Watson lasts for any length of time, the top five in the order will all average above 40 for a series for the first time in a long time. Yes, big problems at 6, yes some trouble in the first innings, but indications are it hasn't been such a bad performance. Simplistic analysis too: Watson's 43 in the first innings was more valuable than any of you would realize, and the fact that it was the first time he was close to lbw in te series says a lot also.

  • Gaswell on January 4, 2014, 4:04 GMT

    Man of the Series should be shared between Haddin and Johnston as both have been equally pivotal in winning the Ashes. South Africa will provide much tougher competition and Australia`s top order will have to perform if we are to beat South Africa. And we cannot contemplate losing to South Africa. It can`t be allowed to happen. Bailey has been disappointing but no one is knocking down the door at the moment with the exception of Phil Hughes who has failed on many occasions, to grab his opportunity.

  • on January 4, 2014, 3:40 GMT

    if Doolan is the next in line then he should have been in for Bailey on Boxing Day. Haddin and the tail can't be relied on. Watson to six, Doolan to 3.

  • dinosaurus on January 4, 2014, 1:38 GMT

    @ ZkAneela,

    While you're talking stats I'd like to remind you that SA haven't won a series against Aus in SA since the 1970's. In fact, Aus have a better record in SA than SA

  • on January 3, 2014, 21:23 GMT

    The simple truth about this series is that no Englishman would get picked in Australia's team - thats why its the way it is!

  • on January 3, 2014, 19:49 GMT

    The problem is how to replace him? Still think Wade has a lot to offer and a man who has two centuries in his first few tests is a useful batsmen. Hopefully, he can tighten his glove work

  • Beertjie on January 3, 2014, 17:58 GMT

    Great run down, Dan, in the fifth paragraph of your article of how the batsmen failed to cope. This does not bode well for Centurion and a far superior four man pace attack + fine catchers. Hadds needs to remember what happened at Newlands on the last tour when his approach was roundly scapegoated in the 47 all out debacle. What gives me hope is the fact that the next two tests will be played on spin-friendly tracks, and the defensive minded Saffers will try to protect their probable lead. Anyway, even then there will be something in it for the quicks so the way to go is to replace Bailey with a technically correct in form batsman in the top 3. Hughes hardly fits the bill, but who does?

  • on January 3, 2014, 14:27 GMT

    ...England beaten by two Aussies. Haddin and Johnson.

  • gandabhai on January 3, 2014, 14:12 GMT

    If they had a choice in the matter ,ask Captain Cook which one player they would omit from the Aussie team if they were to play in 5 more tests in a couple of weeks time.That would give you the answer.

  • ZkAneela on January 3, 2014, 13:52 GMT

    I am just answering to all those who thinks that this australian attack is too good against SA attack,SA have beaten AUS even in their best of attacks in 2008 in their own backyard.As for as this ashes is concerned Eng are completely on backfoot coz they are not playing positive cricket,they are sorrounded by the fear of johnson mentally and physically as well.SA dont have that fear from anyone coz they dont play negative cricket and handle pressure much better than England.

  • on January 3, 2014, 13:49 GMT

    The best moment of the day came when the commentators were discussing Haddin 's retirement rumors and Clarke 's reaction to that as he was listening on that ear piece. Beautiful, only cricket in Australia can give you that. Thank you channel 9, you are the best.

  • PrasPunter on January 3, 2014, 13:02 GMT

    @ODI_BestFormOfCricket , Hadds played only one Test against india when we were there last year. Get your facts right.

  • Chris_Howard on January 3, 2014, 12:58 GMT

    No Haddin, no Australia, no Ashes. Man of the Series. QED.

  • andrew-schulz on January 3, 2014, 12:39 GMT

    The headline does you an injustice, because that is not what you are saying- you are simply asking the question. And the answer is simple: under any system of choosing the man of the series, the one who wins 3 man of the match awards will be a mile in front. So Haddin is not the star turn, Johnson is. And if he bowls half as well as he did tonight, he will win the man of the match award in this game as well. You suggest that Johnson might not have bowled so well if Haddin hadn't given him the runs to play with. I would turn that around and suggest that Haddin and others have been able to play with a lot more freedom knowing that Johnson was certain at some point to blow the English batting away. There is a lot wrong with this article: this Test has been no less competitive than the others; the ball that got Warner swung in to him; what chance do you think Bailey has of being selected for South Africa, and others but I have run out of words

  • Shaggy076 on January 3, 2014, 12:10 GMT

    I agree that Haddon has been awesome its just Johnson has been better. Brisbane it was also Johnson with the bat helping Haddin getting us to a total that still wasnt great and not giving Johnson the freedom you mentioned but he blasted through England turning the series on its head. Adelaide was an absolute road and always going to be hard to take 20 wickets but again Johnson made it a cake walk. Perth he had a decent game, then in Melbourne England batted first and if it wasn't for Johnson our 200 would have been well short of what England made. Haddon has been in unbelievable knick, but as far as bowlers go Johnson has had a Bradman like series. Haddon has not been ay that standard.

  • on January 3, 2014, 12:10 GMT

    No argument from me - Haddin has been the stand out player of the series for me. Johnson has been good at removing England's tail, but he doesn't take enough top order wickets.

  • ODI_BestFormOfCricket on January 3, 2014, 11:58 GMT

    haddin didnot contribute a bit against india and white washed. Poor player of spin but good player agains pace.

  • ZCFOutkast on January 3, 2014, 11:52 GMT

    Australia have absolutely nothing to fear when they come down South Africa to face the Proteas. With Kallis' retirement, the attack will be much weaker. Morkel poses zero threat in my opinion, Steyn will not have the consistent displays Johnson has produced each innings here, while the immaculate Philander can be resisted long enough for the change seamers&whatever pathetic spinner, to be thumped by Smith&Haddin once again.

    I can only see Australia as favourites in this one. Pattinson will no doubt be brought in to replace Siddle - so Harris+Johnson+Pattinson firing accurately at full pace is too much for Steyn+Philander+Morkel to answer, considering Watson is still there. One of North, White, Hughes&Faulkner will prove an able replacement for passenger Bailey.

    The way Australia are playing at the moment, sides should be grateful Mike Hussey retired. If you ask me, I think for once we'll see the Proteas prepare a negative pitch, go on the defensive and focus on draws. Mark my words!

  • Bonehead_maz on January 3, 2014, 11:41 GMT

    Imagine if South Africa didn't expect AB DeVilliers to score the runs to save embarrasment.

  • Jerryraj on January 3, 2014, 11:32 GMT

    From early days Haddin being silent killer to opposition, he is turning out to be anither Healy.. people wants to Axe Haddin from the team (including Micky Arthur) http://www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2013-14/content/story/689965.html

  • markofcaloundra on January 3, 2014, 11:31 GMT

    Irrespective of whether its 4 or 5 zip or Johnson getting another 7-8 wickets.... there should be a tie for man series with the award held/awarded jointly... both deserve the award, neither deserves to miss out.

  • on January 3, 2014, 11:21 GMT

    Brad Haddin deserves the MOS as much as Johnson do... Yes, johnson has performed really really well, but most of the time whenever the english side seems to be on top, it is haddin who has resisted enough, breaking them mentally and pushing them to backfoot every time in this series. If he is not given the MOS along with Mitch,it will really be unfair on Haddin, because IMPACT wise, i don't see even a tiny difference between the two...

  • PrasPunter on January 3, 2014, 11:19 GMT

    Top order's performance doesn't bode well for the SA tour. Last year, india beat a hapless Aus side only to see SA rolling them over. So I would not pass my judgement on how well this Aus side has improved till I see them playing SA. SA has a good opening pair, a strong middle order and a fantastic pace attack. We match them only with our bowling and the other 2 areas do remain a concern.

  • xtrafalgarx on January 3, 2014, 11:15 GMT

    He has been great. But 8 wickets and 100 runs in the first game, 7fer on a flat pitch against a team expected to get 500, 6 wickets in the next, 8 wickets in the next including a runout and a catch. Not only that, the fear and the uncertainty he has caused through all if England's order, and sending Trott home. I mean, Mitchell Johnson is the man of the series hands down. Maybe if Haddin had been getting hundreds rather than 50's (Not a knock on Hadds, i love him but just saying) he would get MOTS.

  • kasifdotinfo on January 3, 2014, 11:01 GMT

    It is nice that Brad Haddin, who seemed like he would never be allowed to come entirely out of the long shadow cast by Adam Gilchrist, finally finds himself in the spotlight. It is also quite something to think of how unlikely it was that he would be playing international cricket at this point at all, given how it was, until recently, seemingly one of Cricket Australia's top priorities to replace him with any one of several young wicketkeepers at the earliest opportunity.

    He has been a solid, entertaining, and charismatic wicketkeeper, batsman, and leader - in this Ashes series and in years past. Hopefully he will be allowed to stay on until he loses his desire or ability.

  • 11_Warrior on January 3, 2014, 10:46 GMT

    Who will be MOS? MJ or BH? Tough Call.

  • Ragav999 on January 3, 2014, 10:38 GMT

    Wonderful article which does justice to Haddin's performance in this Ashes. He has been overshadowed by Johnson partly due to missing out on the celebrated batsmen's milestone, i.e. a 100 on few occasions this series but his cause of batting for the team on every occasion surely makes him an ideal choice for sharing the man of the series award with Johnson.

  • MCC_Tie on January 3, 2014, 10:33 GMT

    Now that the entrée of India and England have been polished off, it is time for the mains. SA vs Aus is going to be epic. Johnson, Harris and Siddle up against Steyn, Philander and Morkel... when was the last time we witnessed such a mouth-watering pace line-up? Cannot. Wait.

  • MCC_Tie on January 3, 2014, 10:33 GMT

    Now that the entrée of India and England have been polished off, it is time for the mains. SA vs Aus is going to be epic. Johnson, Harris and Siddle up against Steyn, Philander and Morkel... when was the last time we witnessed such a mouth-watering pace line-up? Cannot. Wait.

  • Ragav999 on January 3, 2014, 10:38 GMT

    Wonderful article which does justice to Haddin's performance in this Ashes. He has been overshadowed by Johnson partly due to missing out on the celebrated batsmen's milestone, i.e. a 100 on few occasions this series but his cause of batting for the team on every occasion surely makes him an ideal choice for sharing the man of the series award with Johnson.

  • 11_Warrior on January 3, 2014, 10:46 GMT

    Who will be MOS? MJ or BH? Tough Call.

  • kasifdotinfo on January 3, 2014, 11:01 GMT

    It is nice that Brad Haddin, who seemed like he would never be allowed to come entirely out of the long shadow cast by Adam Gilchrist, finally finds himself in the spotlight. It is also quite something to think of how unlikely it was that he would be playing international cricket at this point at all, given how it was, until recently, seemingly one of Cricket Australia's top priorities to replace him with any one of several young wicketkeepers at the earliest opportunity.

    He has been a solid, entertaining, and charismatic wicketkeeper, batsman, and leader - in this Ashes series and in years past. Hopefully he will be allowed to stay on until he loses his desire or ability.

  • xtrafalgarx on January 3, 2014, 11:15 GMT

    He has been great. But 8 wickets and 100 runs in the first game, 7fer on a flat pitch against a team expected to get 500, 6 wickets in the next, 8 wickets in the next including a runout and a catch. Not only that, the fear and the uncertainty he has caused through all if England's order, and sending Trott home. I mean, Mitchell Johnson is the man of the series hands down. Maybe if Haddin had been getting hundreds rather than 50's (Not a knock on Hadds, i love him but just saying) he would get MOTS.

  • PrasPunter on January 3, 2014, 11:19 GMT

    Top order's performance doesn't bode well for the SA tour. Last year, india beat a hapless Aus side only to see SA rolling them over. So I would not pass my judgement on how well this Aus side has improved till I see them playing SA. SA has a good opening pair, a strong middle order and a fantastic pace attack. We match them only with our bowling and the other 2 areas do remain a concern.

  • on January 3, 2014, 11:21 GMT

    Brad Haddin deserves the MOS as much as Johnson do... Yes, johnson has performed really really well, but most of the time whenever the english side seems to be on top, it is haddin who has resisted enough, breaking them mentally and pushing them to backfoot every time in this series. If he is not given the MOS along with Mitch,it will really be unfair on Haddin, because IMPACT wise, i don't see even a tiny difference between the two...

  • markofcaloundra on January 3, 2014, 11:31 GMT

    Irrespective of whether its 4 or 5 zip or Johnson getting another 7-8 wickets.... there should be a tie for man series with the award held/awarded jointly... both deserve the award, neither deserves to miss out.

  • Jerryraj on January 3, 2014, 11:32 GMT

    From early days Haddin being silent killer to opposition, he is turning out to be anither Healy.. people wants to Axe Haddin from the team (including Micky Arthur) http://www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2013-14/content/story/689965.html

  • Bonehead_maz on January 3, 2014, 11:41 GMT

    Imagine if South Africa didn't expect AB DeVilliers to score the runs to save embarrasment.