England v Australia, 2nd Investec Test, Lord's, 2nd day July 19, 2013

Swann admits to outrageous fortune

Graeme Swann claimed his best Ashes figures of 5 for 44 on the second day and felt his dismissal of Chris Rogers constituted one of the worst pieces of cricket in Test history
28

When a bowler takes a wicket with a full toss as ugly as the one Graeme Swann delivered to Chris Rogers, he can be fairly confident it is going to be his day.

Certainly Swann admitted to some "outrageous fortune" on his way to claiming his best Ashes figures of 5 for 44. He was even happy to float the suggestion that the dismissal of Rogers constituted the "worst piece of cricket in Test history."

It all helped to underline that Swann and his England colleagues were the beneficiaries of as inept a performance of Test batting as Australia has displayed on this famous old ground since the Second World War.

On the ground where Don Bradman and Greg Chappell made Test centuries, where Steve Waugh lifted a World Cup, and where Keith Miller and Glenn McGrath ripped through England's batting, Australia produced a performance unworthy of their proud heritage. England weren't required to operate in anything above third gear.

That is not to say that Swann and co bowled poorly. Far from it. But, on a pitch on which Swann England rated a par score at around 400-450, to dismiss Australia for just 128 was reflective not just of a solid bowling performance but of something rotten within the Australian batting.

It sounds harsh, but the standard of cricket in this series has been oddly mediocre. While there have been outstanding individual performances - the batting of Ian Bell and the bowling of James Anderson stand out - the batting of both top-orders to date has been some way below that expected at this level. And on the second day of this game, England's bowlers did not need to be anywhere near their best to dismantle an Australian batting line-up who are in danger of being remembered as the weakest to have represented their nation.

At times, England were not even forced to earn wickets. Phil Hughes fell to a wild swing, Ashton Agar was run out in a style that might have been considered too slapstick for inclusion in a Laurel and Hardy film and Rogers should have hit the delivery that dismissed him into St John's Wood High Street.

Even Shane Watson, the man promoted to open the batting due to his superior technique, fell after attempting to play across a straight ball in the over before lunch. Rarely in Test cricket are wickets sold so cheaply.

For that reason it is necessary to maintain some perspective while judging this England performance. Their top-order batting continues to under-perform, they missed two relatively straightforward chances in the field and they were obliged to use a succession of substitute fielders as several members of the team left the field to gain treatment for various aches and pains. On a flat pitch and under a hot sun, they should have faced a draining day.

Instead they found life easy. Australia, showing the fight of a pacifist kitten, produced a display of batting so lacking in backbone or intelligence that it reduced a full house crowd to something approaching bewilderment.

The issue of DRS typifies the contrast in professionalism between these two sides. While England have devised a largely successful formula that involves calm decision making, Australia continue to treat DRS as if it is a form of barely intelligible black magic.

Brad Haddin's pre-match comments that Australia "go on feel" and that the DRS "is not actually a big thing" sounded strangely fatalistic, even amateurish, in the modern game where analysis plays such a huge role. Leaving such an important area to chance is a dereliction of duty and is costing Australia dear.

Swann is a fine cricketer and arguably England's best spinner since Jim Laker. But he will never take a softer five-wicket haul in Test cricket than this. Although the pitch is dry and a few balls turned alarmingly from a largely unthreatening line outside the right-handers' leg stump, Swann benefited most from some reckless batting.

He claimed two wickets as first Usman Khawaja and then Ryan Harris tried to drive him over the top and skied catches. He gained another when Brad Haddin attempted to slog-sweep a delivery from outside off stump. The Rogers dismissal, described as "embarrassing" to batsman and bowler by Swann, will win mentions for years to come as a contender for 'the worst delivery to take a Test wicket.'

Only Steve Smith, brilliantly caught by Ian Bell at short leg off a delivery that spat off the pitch and took the batsman's glove, could claim innocence for his downfall.

"It was a mixture of good bowling and a bit of outrageous fortune," Swann admitted afterwards. "The Rogers dismissal was very strange. I can't put my finger on why it happened. I'm not sure there's been a worse piece of cricket in Test history. I'm sure he's as embarrassed about it as I was. It was one of those freaky things. It completely slipped out of my hand."

Swann certainly bowled better than he had at Trent Bridge. While he is yet to regain the remarkable accuracy that has typified his bowling in the past, he was noticeably tighter than he had been in the previous Test and, against such fragile opposition, it proved enough to make them buckle. He is the first England spinner to claim a five-wicket haul in an Ashes Test at Lord's since Hedley Verity in 1934.

Describing the performance as a "boyhood dream", Swann said that his previous mention on the Lord's honours board had been tarnished when the game became the focus of allegations about spot-fixing.

"I'm on the honours board once before from a game against Pakistan," Swann said, "But that was tainted. So to get it up there in an Ashes game is a boyhood dream. For a while I was thinking I might get on the batting board this morning, but agonisingly I fell 72 runs short."

England maintained the pressure well in the field. Stuart Broad, again bowling better than his figures suggest, executed England's plan to dismiss Michael Clarke perfectly - a succession of bouncers left him reluctant to get forward and pinned on the foot by the full delivery that followed . Tim Bresnan, recalled in place of the enigmatic Steven Finn, justified the decision by providing few soft runs, James Anderson delivered eight maidens in his 14 overs and the ground fielding showed impressive commitment and athleticism. It was typified by Jonny Bairstow who, with England leading by almost 250 with Australia nine down, turned a four into a three following a long chase and diving stop on the long off boundary.

England's fortune extended into their second innings. Had Joe Root been caught on eight, a simple chance that passed between first slip and keeper, the scrutiny on his new role of opener would have increased and Australia might have scented an opportunity to clamber their way back into this game. Instead an opportunity to lift the mood was transformed into another dispiriting setback and Root went unpunished for his lapse.

For those England supporters who grew up familiar with the ritual humiliation that characterised Ashes encounters in the 1990s, there will be some grim satisfaction in days like this. But for those who relish combative, good quality cricket, this was a bitterly disappointing experience.

In years to come, this period may be remembered as the lowest ebbs in the history of Australian Test cricket. It would be unwise to read too much into England's current ascendancy.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Stevros3 on July 20, 2013, 9:35 GMT

    @VivGilchrist It was a full toss above the eyeline and is very hard to pick the line when it's dropping at an angle, watch it in slow-mo and it looks like it's going down, live at full speed it looked plum. Problem with either watching the ball or watching the stumps is because it was so high until very lat.e you have very short space of distance and time where your able to see both at the same time making it hard to judge the line

  • landl47 on July 20, 2013, 4:28 GMT

    Yes, the Australian batsmen were bad, but don't undersell England's bowlers. Swann got wickets by putting pressure on the batsmen until they made mistakes (excluding Rogers' of course, which was a joke). Khawaja in particular had no idea how to play Swann and finally got out trying to hit his way out of his bewilderment. Broad bowled very well again, good length and direction with just a hint of movement. He bowled how Pattinson ought to have bowled, but Pattinson made us all forget that he is rated as Australia's best young seamer. Bresnan got one good and one lucky wicket- Hughes did indeed hit it, as Snicko made clear, but it was a bad ball and a worse shot. Anderson bowled economically, but without the threat of Trent Bridge. England proved they can skittle Australia without a major contribution from him, which was very satisfactory.

    A good performance from England's bowlers, which is all that is needed against this Australian side.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on July 22, 2013, 10:46 GMT

    Swann bowled fantastically well this test, spinning the ball square and his skills were breathtaking to witness. The 2nd innings Rogers dismissal was an example of this: 3 sharply spinning balls, followed by the 'zooter' which bowled him. Classic bowling from the best in the game.

  • Blokker on July 20, 2013, 14:52 GMT

    The worst thing for Australia is that this is at best a fair to good English side which has also been underperforming of late. Which makes our effort in this Test spectacularly bad.

  • EnglishCricket on July 20, 2013, 10:24 GMT

    Its easy to blame it on T20s for the downfall of Australian batting but what we could say is that because of the rise of T20 especially in Australia with their Big Bash, more Aussie batsman these days tend to focus on the shorter form compared to the long form especially if you can make a lot of money of it compared to first class Cricket.

  • Mervo on July 20, 2013, 9:43 GMT

    Australia are embarrassing. Too many with T20 techniques and no real experience in the Shield arena. The experienced players such as Rogers and Haddin have added a lot but the loss of Hussey and Ponting, and so many all time greats before them over the last few years have taken their toll.

    Poor technique with low intelligence is a bad combination and Smith and Hughes are typical of the quality we have to draw on. Like England we should really start to recruit players from South Africa and other nations until we develop a stronger home competition.

  • mani1951 on July 20, 2013, 9:40 GMT

    Let us not forget that Australia could have as well won the first test .Too early to write them off in this test .I am looking forward to the possibility of England getting bowled out within 150 and a great battle in the fourth innings of this test .Cricket at the end of the day is a great leveller -let us see what happens by the end of this day.English batting has been broadly resting only on Bell and Broad only

  • sarangsrk on July 20, 2013, 9:05 GMT

    Mr Dobell, could not have agreed with you more. This Australian batting has lacked will to fight and also, common sense. There was not one wicket taking ball out of the 9 Aussie wickets yes'day (Agar being run out). Aussie bowlers are bowling their hearts out only to see the top and middle order leaving it to them to bat as well. Maybe its too early to comment but Darren Lehmann as the coach needs to instill some pride and hunger in the team batsmen. For now, Australia seems to have blown the best chance to win this test. George, 100% right about the England team as well. They are not bowling as well as they can. In many ways, this series is more about who makes more mistakes rather than punching-counter punching 2005 Ashes. Disappointing to say the least.

  • 64blip on July 20, 2013, 8:43 GMT

    Lehmann starting to show the strain. Publicly blaming Rogers over DRS mistakes is not the way to go. Neither is declaring mediocrity will not be tolerated amongst the batsmen when all he has is mediocrity. Best to (and this goes to a few Aussie supporters as well) accept what you have, make a call on who you believe has the best prospects and then stick with them. In the same place in the batting order too! As an England supporter I remember the revolving door policies which got us nowhere slowly. Show some belief, work hard and take your lumps.

  • Crimsonbat on July 20, 2013, 8:19 GMT

    The Australian performance in the first innings was shoddy. I loved it. I root for teams that play against the Aussies. Also this innings vindicates India's whitewash of Aus in India earlier this year.

  • Stevros3 on July 20, 2013, 9:35 GMT

    @VivGilchrist It was a full toss above the eyeline and is very hard to pick the line when it's dropping at an angle, watch it in slow-mo and it looks like it's going down, live at full speed it looked plum. Problem with either watching the ball or watching the stumps is because it was so high until very lat.e you have very short space of distance and time where your able to see both at the same time making it hard to judge the line

  • landl47 on July 20, 2013, 4:28 GMT

    Yes, the Australian batsmen were bad, but don't undersell England's bowlers. Swann got wickets by putting pressure on the batsmen until they made mistakes (excluding Rogers' of course, which was a joke). Khawaja in particular had no idea how to play Swann and finally got out trying to hit his way out of his bewilderment. Broad bowled very well again, good length and direction with just a hint of movement. He bowled how Pattinson ought to have bowled, but Pattinson made us all forget that he is rated as Australia's best young seamer. Bresnan got one good and one lucky wicket- Hughes did indeed hit it, as Snicko made clear, but it was a bad ball and a worse shot. Anderson bowled economically, but without the threat of Trent Bridge. England proved they can skittle Australia without a major contribution from him, which was very satisfactory.

    A good performance from England's bowlers, which is all that is needed against this Australian side.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on July 22, 2013, 10:46 GMT

    Swann bowled fantastically well this test, spinning the ball square and his skills were breathtaking to witness. The 2nd innings Rogers dismissal was an example of this: 3 sharply spinning balls, followed by the 'zooter' which bowled him. Classic bowling from the best in the game.

  • Blokker on July 20, 2013, 14:52 GMT

    The worst thing for Australia is that this is at best a fair to good English side which has also been underperforming of late. Which makes our effort in this Test spectacularly bad.

  • EnglishCricket on July 20, 2013, 10:24 GMT

    Its easy to blame it on T20s for the downfall of Australian batting but what we could say is that because of the rise of T20 especially in Australia with their Big Bash, more Aussie batsman these days tend to focus on the shorter form compared to the long form especially if you can make a lot of money of it compared to first class Cricket.

  • Mervo on July 20, 2013, 9:43 GMT

    Australia are embarrassing. Too many with T20 techniques and no real experience in the Shield arena. The experienced players such as Rogers and Haddin have added a lot but the loss of Hussey and Ponting, and so many all time greats before them over the last few years have taken their toll.

    Poor technique with low intelligence is a bad combination and Smith and Hughes are typical of the quality we have to draw on. Like England we should really start to recruit players from South Africa and other nations until we develop a stronger home competition.

  • mani1951 on July 20, 2013, 9:40 GMT

    Let us not forget that Australia could have as well won the first test .Too early to write them off in this test .I am looking forward to the possibility of England getting bowled out within 150 and a great battle in the fourth innings of this test .Cricket at the end of the day is a great leveller -let us see what happens by the end of this day.English batting has been broadly resting only on Bell and Broad only

  • sarangsrk on July 20, 2013, 9:05 GMT

    Mr Dobell, could not have agreed with you more. This Australian batting has lacked will to fight and also, common sense. There was not one wicket taking ball out of the 9 Aussie wickets yes'day (Agar being run out). Aussie bowlers are bowling their hearts out only to see the top and middle order leaving it to them to bat as well. Maybe its too early to comment but Darren Lehmann as the coach needs to instill some pride and hunger in the team batsmen. For now, Australia seems to have blown the best chance to win this test. George, 100% right about the England team as well. They are not bowling as well as they can. In many ways, this series is more about who makes more mistakes rather than punching-counter punching 2005 Ashes. Disappointing to say the least.

  • 64blip on July 20, 2013, 8:43 GMT

    Lehmann starting to show the strain. Publicly blaming Rogers over DRS mistakes is not the way to go. Neither is declaring mediocrity will not be tolerated amongst the batsmen when all he has is mediocrity. Best to (and this goes to a few Aussie supporters as well) accept what you have, make a call on who you believe has the best prospects and then stick with them. In the same place in the batting order too! As an England supporter I remember the revolving door policies which got us nowhere slowly. Show some belief, work hard and take your lumps.

  • Crimsonbat on July 20, 2013, 8:19 GMT

    The Australian performance in the first innings was shoddy. I loved it. I root for teams that play against the Aussies. Also this innings vindicates India's whitewash of Aus in India earlier this year.

  • ynotlleb on July 20, 2013, 7:39 GMT

    Bring back Ponting and make it a contest

  • CapitalMarkets on July 20, 2013, 7:39 GMT

    It's unwise to focus too much on the Australians when only two of the seven English batsmen look in good nick at the moment. Cook and Prior both looks as if they are going through a lean spell and Root looks short of time against quality pacemen. Pietersen and Bairstow have both played one useful innings. Bairstow looks the part in a way that Root does not. Pietersen seems to have caught the T20 malaise which riddled the Australian (under)performance yesterday; his footwork was non-existent and he played as if it didn't matter if he failed or not. Trott has been a little unlucky to play on yesterday and to be on the wrong end of a howler from Erasmus which has balanced the same umpire's ineptitude re Rogers. Bell has been magnificent but the rest have fired spasmodically at best. Statistics don't lie and they show that Harris is the only player from Australia performing to his potential. He has a strike rate similar to the great Malcolm Marshall, so should be treated with respect.

  • bjg62 on July 20, 2013, 7:21 GMT

    This should be mandatory reading for the entire Australian team. But wait, that might just constitute homework!

  • sifter132 on July 20, 2013, 7:20 GMT

    "It sounds harsh, but the standard of cricket in this series has been oddly mediocre." I disagree. The BATTING has generally been mediocre, but I think the bowling has been quite good quality, and it was only when Pattinson couldn't get it right on day 1 that you realised how stifling the bowling has been in the series. Generally you know cricket has been high standard when the bowling is tight, and that is one thing that both sides have done well.

  • VivGilchrist on July 20, 2013, 6:56 GMT

    In a due respect... and I know Australia should have reviewed it but, HOW ON EARTH DID ERASMUS THINK THAT WAS GOING TO HIT THE STUMPS?!

  • MonotremeInEurope on July 20, 2013, 5:56 GMT

    Don't the umpires need to take some blame. They have given Australia some really bad decisions in the first place. England have been very lucky in this regard.

  • Niketh2000 on July 20, 2013, 4:50 GMT

    CA,Bring back Simon Katich!

  • sportofpain on July 20, 2013, 3:40 GMT

    Swanny the way these Aussies are playing with your next fifer you will say you really had to earn this one. These guys can't play spin. Bring Monty into the side and they won't cross 100 in the rest of the series.

  • ollie99 on July 20, 2013, 2:46 GMT

    As an Australian, it's going to be a looong 10 tests... Reminiscent of the "official" test team during WSC, only that back then it was the 2nd XI and this is meant to be the 1st XI.

  • Barnesy4444 on July 20, 2013, 2:17 GMT

    Australia being dismissed for 98 on boxing day at the MCG was a pretty low ebb, but this was arguably worse.

  • baskar_guha on July 20, 2013, 2:12 GMT

    It is just the first innings -- wait for the match to complete before referring to history

  • satyam.sharma on July 20, 2013, 1:41 GMT

    You know Aussie cricket is in trouble when Shane Watson gets promoted to open the batting for his "superior technique" ... :-)))

  • Haleos on July 20, 2013, 1:08 GMT

    God help the aussies if guys like khwaja are punters replacement. Punters can still bat better than all of these guys.

  • Twinkie on July 20, 2013, 0:30 GMT

    Well put! No better than West Indies/Pakistan at the moment. Still. I am enjoying Australia's mediocre performances. It's not only the mighty Windies who have fallen. We in Barbados have a saying. 'Wuh en catch yuh ain't pass yuh'! That means, don't laugh too much at people who are down because you don't know what is going to happen to you. They greatly disrespected us years ago by saying there should be a two tier system and we should be in the second tier so that they would not have to bother with us Which tier are they headed for now? Not much to shout about for England either. Just Ian Bell and Jimmy Anderson looking like winners.

  • Shan156 on July 20, 2013, 0:04 GMT

    "For those England supporters who grew up familiar with the ritual humiliation that characterised Ashes encounters in the 1990s, there will be some grim satisfaction in days like this." I am one of them and am thoroughly enjoying England taking full advantage of a very poor Aussie batting line-up. While I do like combative, good quality cricket, I would rather we humiliate the Aussies like they regularly did in their pomp.

    "It would be unwise to read too much into England's current ascendancy. " agreed, it looks like a battle between two inept batting line-ups. While the Aussies could cite inexperience as an excuse, we have none. I am thoroughly disappointed with the efforts of our batsmen (except Bell, Bairstow, and, to a small extent, Trott). If we play like this against SA or India, we will be trounced. It is our good fortune that we are playing a team whose batting, except Clarke, is probably among the worst of all top test playing nations.

  • Chris_P on July 19, 2013, 23:38 GMT

    Watson's "superior" technique means nothing with his T20 concentration levels. He was, without doubt in my mind, the spur that started this abysmal team effort. The only question left to be answered is can we sink any lower? I really do feel for our bowlers, big time.

  • 2.14istherunrate on July 19, 2013, 23:23 GMT

    I remember in 1968 Australia were rolled for 78 in the first innings of a rain ruined game, a mere 50 runs lower than today's meagre effort. I doubt rain will ruin this one though even if England's batting has done its best to throw the game away. The late Olly Milburn played in '68.

  • on July 19, 2013, 22:08 GMT

    "It would be unwise to read too much into England's current ascendancy. " I absolutely agree.

  • on July 19, 2013, 22:08 GMT

    "It would be unwise to read too much into England's current ascendancy. " I absolutely agree.

  • 2.14istherunrate on July 19, 2013, 23:23 GMT

    I remember in 1968 Australia were rolled for 78 in the first innings of a rain ruined game, a mere 50 runs lower than today's meagre effort. I doubt rain will ruin this one though even if England's batting has done its best to throw the game away. The late Olly Milburn played in '68.

  • Chris_P on July 19, 2013, 23:38 GMT

    Watson's "superior" technique means nothing with his T20 concentration levels. He was, without doubt in my mind, the spur that started this abysmal team effort. The only question left to be answered is can we sink any lower? I really do feel for our bowlers, big time.

  • Shan156 on July 20, 2013, 0:04 GMT

    "For those England supporters who grew up familiar with the ritual humiliation that characterised Ashes encounters in the 1990s, there will be some grim satisfaction in days like this." I am one of them and am thoroughly enjoying England taking full advantage of a very poor Aussie batting line-up. While I do like combative, good quality cricket, I would rather we humiliate the Aussies like they regularly did in their pomp.

    "It would be unwise to read too much into England's current ascendancy. " agreed, it looks like a battle between two inept batting line-ups. While the Aussies could cite inexperience as an excuse, we have none. I am thoroughly disappointed with the efforts of our batsmen (except Bell, Bairstow, and, to a small extent, Trott). If we play like this against SA or India, we will be trounced. It is our good fortune that we are playing a team whose batting, except Clarke, is probably among the worst of all top test playing nations.

  • Twinkie on July 20, 2013, 0:30 GMT

    Well put! No better than West Indies/Pakistan at the moment. Still. I am enjoying Australia's mediocre performances. It's not only the mighty Windies who have fallen. We in Barbados have a saying. 'Wuh en catch yuh ain't pass yuh'! That means, don't laugh too much at people who are down because you don't know what is going to happen to you. They greatly disrespected us years ago by saying there should be a two tier system and we should be in the second tier so that they would not have to bother with us Which tier are they headed for now? Not much to shout about for England either. Just Ian Bell and Jimmy Anderson looking like winners.

  • Haleos on July 20, 2013, 1:08 GMT

    God help the aussies if guys like khwaja are punters replacement. Punters can still bat better than all of these guys.

  • satyam.sharma on July 20, 2013, 1:41 GMT

    You know Aussie cricket is in trouble when Shane Watson gets promoted to open the batting for his "superior technique" ... :-)))

  • baskar_guha on July 20, 2013, 2:12 GMT

    It is just the first innings -- wait for the match to complete before referring to history

  • Barnesy4444 on July 20, 2013, 2:17 GMT

    Australia being dismissed for 98 on boxing day at the MCG was a pretty low ebb, but this was arguably worse.

  • ollie99 on July 20, 2013, 2:46 GMT

    As an Australian, it's going to be a looong 10 tests... Reminiscent of the "official" test team during WSC, only that back then it was the 2nd XI and this is meant to be the 1st XI.