From our readers

Australian cricket

August 6, 2013

The physics of fast: Why McGrath was faster than you think

Fouad Khan

Glenn McGrath imitates the pose of a wax statue of himself at Madame Tussauds, Sydney, July 31, 2013
Glenn McGrath demonstrating his high-arm action with his likeness © AFP
Related Links

I recently stumbled upon a forum where an Australian fan had asked rather wistfully if, in the beginning of Glenn McGrath's career, there was a time when he used to be fast. I think this is a false question. For all the talk of McGrath being the metronome, the impeccable line and length, and the consistency, one feature that I can't shake off is his ability to rush the batsman. Yet, for much of the last three quarters of his career, when speed guns truly became ubiquitous, McGrath seemed to be trundling in between low to mid 130s kph. What was at play here?

Turns out the answer to this question is very simple if we discuss the physics of pace in a little more depth. What I am about to describe is not cutting edge science, but the application of basic mechanics to fast bowling, especially in regards to bowling speed. I am actually surprised nobody has done this before, considering that the physics used here is elementary compared to what the University of Western Australia uses to analyse hyper flexible joints and reverse swing.

Have you ever noticed a thoroughbred fast bowler, say Brett Lee, run in and let loose a fierce bouncer that the batsman and his three immediate ancestors had no clue about, only to have the speed gun report a comparatively modest speed of 88 mph? How many times have you heard the commentator go, "Well, I'm sure it looked a lot quicker from the batsman's end?" One empirically, rather well-realised (though not statistically established) fact of fast bowling is that bouncers are slower than yorkers. The reason bouncers are slower is that the speed gun measures speed. Human perception, on the other hand, is looking at "velocity"; a slightly different thing. Speed is a scalar quantity; velocity is a vector. Speed can be fully expressed using one measurement. Velocity is meaningless without also mentioning direction.

When a fast bowler releases the ball, the ball travels in a three-dimensional space. Just as the distance covered by the ball is in three dimensions, the velocity of the ball, which is distance divided by time, is also in three dimensions. The distance covered by the ball can be said to have three components: the distance covered towards the batsman, the distance covered towards and away from the pitch surface, and the distance covered laterally due to any lateral movement, or the angle of the delivery.

Similarly, the velocity of the ball can be said to have the same three components at any given time. By defining these three "axes" we have defined a Cartesian frame of reference for analysing the movement of the ball through space. Since these three components of distance and velocity are at right angles to one another, we can find the total distance covered by the ball, as well as the total velocity, by summing the squares of each of the components, and then taking the square root of the sum.

The key thing to understand is that the velocity of the ball has three components. The speed gun only measures one of these components, which is the component of the velocity towards the batsman. The speed reported by the speed gun is only a measure of how long or short it took the ball to reach the batsman once it was released. This is not a good measure as the batsman and bowler are not in a straight line in respect to the speed gun, and doesn't account for lateral movement.

McGrath was fast because the vertical component of the velocity of his deliveries - the speed of the ball towards and away from the pitch - was very high. This vertical velocity manifests itself in "nip". Bowlers for whom this velocity is high are usually considered to have nip. Nip does not register on the speed gun. In fact, the higher the nip, the lower the other components of the velocity of the delivery will be, because there is only so much velocity a bowler can impart on a ball. This is why bouncers are usually slower on the speed gun compared to yorkers. The component of the velocity directed towards the batsman - and most accurately represented by the speed gun - can be called "skid". A skiddy bowler is someone who seems to rush on to the batsmen.

A convenient way to imagine the difference between skid and nip is to assess how much distance, in a certain axis, the ball travels. Velocity is equal to distance divided by time. The higher the distance covered, the higher the velocity. Imagine McGrath now, releasing the ball from a height of about 7.5ft. The vertical component, towards the pitch and away, of the distance covered would be 7.5ft, plus the height at which the ball passed the batsman, say 4ft. The total distance would therefore be more than 11 feet.

McGrath v Malinga © Fouad Khan

Compare that with Malinga releasing the ball at say 5.5ft, and making contact at 2ft, giving a total distance of 7ft. Since the (vertical) distance covered by McGrath's delivery was much higher, the vertical velocity or "nip" of McGrath's delivery would be higher. However, Malinga's delivery took a shorter amount of time to get to the batsman, partly because it didn't have to cover all that vertical distance, and went directly for the kill. The component of velocity towards the batsman (skid) would be higher as velocity is inversely proportional to time taken. This is why Malinga would be faster on the speed gun.

But just because the speed gun cannot measure nip does not mean humans don't perceive it. Plenty of batsmen would attest to the fact that they perceived McGrath's nip all right, even if it didn't register on the speed gun. So now we know that McGrath was indeed fast, just not in a way that could be measured by a speed gun. This also explains why bouncers are usually slower on the speed gun compared to other types of deliveries covering less ground vertically. This is why "slingers" like Malinga and Fidel Edwards tend to register higher speeds on the speed gun compared to bowlers releasing the ball from greater heights, such as Glenn McGrath or Stuart Clark.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Phillip on (August 11, 2013, 12:59 GMT)

Oh & Mr.Fouad,would it be possible to provide a larger image of M v/s M.I can barely read anything.

Posted by Dummy4 on (August 10, 2013, 10:17 GMT)

Leave the Physics jargons aside, in order to explain fast bowling with some new buzzwords you have completely forgot how cricket is played. Cricket is a game of chess where a batsman is trapped over a series of deliveries, what you are basically doing here is over analyzing a single delivery. McGath was brilliant because he would setup that batsman by bowling him some full deliveries and then suddenly when the batsman was committed on the front foot, he would send a short of length delivery which would hurry him up. Had the batsman been standing on his original position (another half a yard) then he wouldn't have been hurried. There is not a single delivery in cricket which can be deemed unplayable (we have seen Dhoni smashing Malinga inswinging yorkers for sixes while at other times losing his middle), it is the series of deliveries which make certain deliveries make it look unplayable. There is no measure for that but the speed gun does it purpose i.e. 'd' covered in 't'

Posted by Dummy4 on (August 8, 2013, 10:31 GMT)

Asfahan Ali... I keep mentioning this fact over and over again. Read my comments. It doesn't nullify any of my claims, just check the diagram I posted showing the calculation about one meter from delivery point. Instead it nullifies the claims of people saying that bouncers are slower because they have less average speed.

Posted by Dummy4 on (August 8, 2013, 10:13 GMT)

What you are not mentioning here is that speed is measured at around 1 meter distance from the Point of release almost nullifying all your velocity and speed claims.Check youtube .com and search for explanation where Jeff Thompson and other commentators explain the mechanics behind checking speed of bowler

Posted by Dummy4 on (August 8, 2013, 8:42 GMT)

bingohaley... the speedguns in cricket don't use cameras to make speed calculations. Cameras are used in traffic radar guns. In those systems, the radar gun is used only to trigger the cameras, and then the speed calculations are done using landmarks visible in the pictures taken by the camera. The speeds calculated using this approach are generally considered to be much more accurate than the speeds calculated using radar guns. It is well understood that radar guns don't report accurate speeds, and are for the most part, only a proxy. None of this is news for anyone familiar with radar gun technology. Now, there've been a couple of comments here including yours that radar guns track the ball in 3D space. For the radar to be able to do that, it would need measurements from different interconnected points, that is basic physics/geometry. I have never heard of a single such triangulating radar system, though in theory they should be relatively easy to develop. If you have any info, share

Think the world needs to read your opinions on cricket? Here's your chance to be published on ESPNcricinfo.



Why you should be disappointed with Mr Pujara

Cheteshwar Pujara faced 1258 balls. Cheteshwar Pujara scored two match-winnin...

Seagulls at cow corner, Bhogle on air, and ABC to the rescue

An India fan relives the excitement of following an Adelaide Test in the earl...

It was always about your cricket, Australia

The verbal excesses and physical posturing of Australian players have always ...