West Indies v Bangladesh, 1st ODI, St George's August 18, 2014

Flawed teams resume rivalry

22

Match facts

August 20, 2014
Start time 0930 local (1330 GMT)

Big Picture

The penultimate ball of the last ODI series between Bangladesh and West Indies is a mini YouTube sensation. Elias Sunny, having thought that Nasir Hossain's slice off Andre Russell had gone to the boundary, began uprooting the stumps in celebration.

"The way Nasir hit that ball and started celebrating, I thought the ball went to the boundary," Sunny said. "He thought I had completed the run so he started to celebrate. I returned from very near the popping crease. I would have completed the run if I knew it wasn't a boundary. It was due to excitement. The ball was dead when the team had entered the field. If I had walked towards the striker's end, I the ball would have been live and that could have been risky."

The West Indies players were beside themselves with laughter even as they retrieved the ball. Chris Gayle wasn't too serious with his protest, but he did speak to the umpire through the giggles. The next ball, Nasir cut a boundary, giving Bangladesh the rightful claim to beating a full-strength West Indies side at home, after nearly giving it away a few times. After Bangladesh raced to a 2-0 lead in Khulna, West Indies hit back to level the series and set up a tie-breaker in Mirpur, which Bangladesh clinched through gritty performances.

This time, the series promises similar thrills as both West Indies and Bangladesh have a lot to prove, say and play for. The home side's last assignment had them losing the three-match Test series against New Zealand and drawing the T20s. They haven't won any series or tournament this year apart from a three-match T20 series against England and a one-off ODI against Ireland.

Under Dwayne Bravo, West Indies have now won three out of seven ODIs this year, and 11 out of 25 since he took over from Darren Sammy. Bravo himself has been the team's best batsman and bowler this year, averaging 93.50 and taking 12 wickets in seven ODIs. But apart from Lendl Simmons, none of the other batsmen have even crossed 200 runs this year, while none have reached double-figures in the wickets column apart from left-arm spinner Nikita Miller, who has taken 10 wickets. They will also have the issue of going into the series right after Ottis Gibson's departure from the West Indies set-up.

Since mid-July, the West Indies players have been busy in the Caribbean Premier League. The T20 tournament ended on August 16, four days before the first ODI. Simmons was the tournament's top-scorer, with Chris Gayle in third position. Among the bowlers, Ravi Rampul was the leading wicket-taker and Sunil Narine the only other bowler in the ODI squad among the top ten.

Bangladesh, meanwhile, are not the happiest cricket team in the world at the moment. They are in their favourite destination but in 2014, they have only drawn one Test against Sri Lanka and won two T20s, against Nepal and Afghanistan. They have a losing streak to break in one-day cricket, their favourite format, and several players including Tamim Iqbal are out of form.

On top of everything for the visitors is the absence of Shakib Al Hasan due to a six-month suspension. The only solace in this case is that they beat West Indies 3-2 in 2012 without Shakib. Whether that will motivate them further is a different question, as the losses this year should be motivation enough for a turnaround.

Two flawed teams can make for compelling viewing. For Bangladesh fans, it would mean staying up till the wee hours of the morning but that is an adventure that has given them a lot of pleasure in the past.

Form guide

West Indies LLWWW (last five completed matches, most recent first)
Bangladesh LLLLL

In the spotlight

Chris Gayle hasn't played an ODI since November 21 last year when, in an effort to avoid being run-out, he fell awkwardly and pulled his hamstring. He has played T20s and the Test series against New Zealand this year, scoring just the two fifties.

Mashrafe Mortaza has continued to lead Bangladesh's pace attack, having become a sharper customer as the years have gone by. Though he has taken just four wickets in five ODIs this year, he has looked threatening with the new ball and having new balls from both ends has actually helped him maintain composure later in matches.

Team news

It would make sense for the West Indies to play the tall Jason Holder against a side not too comfortable with pace and bounce. Kirk Edwards is expected to return to the side in the absence of Kieran Powell and Dwayne Smith, the pair that opened in West Indies' last ODI. Nikita Miller might miss out if West Indies decide to play the extra seamer.

West Indies (probable): 1 Chris Gayle, 2 Kirk Edwards, 3 Darren Bravo, 4 Lendl Simmons, 5 Denesh Ramdin (wk), 6 Dwayne Bravo (capt), 7 Kieron Pollard, 8 Darren Sammy, 9 Sunil Narine, 10 Jason Holder, 11 Kemar Roach

Bangladesh may wait till the last minute to decide whether to include Sohag Gazi or Abdur Razzak in the specialist spinner's role. Imrul Kayes has been told by the coach that he will bat at No. 3, and it is likely that Mominul Haque will bat just after him.

Bangladesh (probable): 1 Tamim Iqbal, 2 Anamul Haque, 3 Imrul Kayes, 4 Mithun Ali/Mominul Haque, 5 Mushfiqur Rahim (capt & wk), 6 Nasir Hossain, 7 Mahmudullah, 8 Abdur Razzak/Sohag Gazi, 9 Mashrafe Mortaza, 10 Taskin Ahmed, 11 Al-Amin Hossain

Pitch and conditions

Last year's three-match series between West Indies and Zimbabwe was played at St George's, where the overall run-rate was a shade over five per over, and the bowler's struck after every 46 balls on an average. Suffice to say there will be decent batting conditions but since it will be a 9.30am start, the team winning the toss will have second thoughts before deciding to bat first.

Stats and trivia

  • Imrul Kayes has played just a solitary Test and ODI this year, scoring a century and a fifty respectively
  • Marlon Samuels, the highest scorer in ODIs between these two sides, has been left out

Mohammad Isam is ESPNcricinfo's Bangladesh correspondent. @isam84

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Obaidur_nawabganj on August 20, 2014, 11:46 GMT

    Shakib's absence may not hurt BD as they played last few games without him winning. Hoping to win the series.

  • on August 20, 2014, 10:42 GMT

    Why that will be difficult without Shakib,,Shakib only one you have rest of guys ,,be confident,,,,play your best nothing is impossible at begining you lost hope Man before fight your losse it mentally ,,,very bad

  • on August 20, 2014, 10:15 GMT

    i thing windies is tough team.but insallah we will win the series

  • on August 20, 2014, 10:00 GMT

    Bangladesh will win the series 2-1. surely

  • on August 20, 2014, 9:45 GMT

    no change is required ....this team is good enough.. if we talkin about russell, marlon, and charles ..den we talkin about inconsistency...

  • on August 20, 2014, 8:52 GMT

    samules is not selected for bangladesh tour. he is a Best odi Batsman

  • kkk999 on August 20, 2014, 8:42 GMT

    west indies should hv included the in form andre Russell... he s done brilliantly in all three departments in the recent cpl... he should hv been tried atleast against Bangladesh who r out of form n a good series would certainly mk him a hopefull 4 d workldcup...

  • on August 20, 2014, 8:30 GMT

    West Indies has now entered a new era. It is good to try something new, Now Gibson is gone, who was the last of the old guards. It should be the rebirth of WI cricket. Justice done

  • enigma12345 on August 20, 2014, 7:41 GMT

    My squad C.Gayle.D.Smith.M.Samuels.D.Bravo.L.Simmons.D.Sammy.K.Pollard.J.Charles.S.Naraine.J.Holder.K.Roach + A.Russel.J.Taylor.S.Badree.D.Bravo

  • Riddymon on August 20, 2014, 5:35 GMT

    Thank you JoshFromJamrock for talking with some sense....a lot of these posters have been crying for Russell to come and play as if he's been some kind of star on the international scene. Fact of the matter is that at the international level, he's done absolutely nothing as of late to really gain any attention. Yes, he's made a few scores in domestic t20 tournaments but that's about it. He tends to be expensive with the ball and very unreliable with that bat often swiping and miss or getting out cheaply. Save the ODIs for the more experienced guys. I do agree though that Badree should be the in the team. He's ranked above narine in T20s for goodness sake..might as well let him have at least 2 games at the ODI level and see how he does.

  • Obaidur_nawabganj on August 20, 2014, 11:46 GMT

    Shakib's absence may not hurt BD as they played last few games without him winning. Hoping to win the series.

  • on August 20, 2014, 10:42 GMT

    Why that will be difficult without Shakib,,Shakib only one you have rest of guys ,,be confident,,,,play your best nothing is impossible at begining you lost hope Man before fight your losse it mentally ,,,very bad

  • on August 20, 2014, 10:15 GMT

    i thing windies is tough team.but insallah we will win the series

  • on August 20, 2014, 10:00 GMT

    Bangladesh will win the series 2-1. surely

  • on August 20, 2014, 9:45 GMT

    no change is required ....this team is good enough.. if we talkin about russell, marlon, and charles ..den we talkin about inconsistency...

  • on August 20, 2014, 8:52 GMT

    samules is not selected for bangladesh tour. he is a Best odi Batsman

  • kkk999 on August 20, 2014, 8:42 GMT

    west indies should hv included the in form andre Russell... he s done brilliantly in all three departments in the recent cpl... he should hv been tried atleast against Bangladesh who r out of form n a good series would certainly mk him a hopefull 4 d workldcup...

  • on August 20, 2014, 8:30 GMT

    West Indies has now entered a new era. It is good to try something new, Now Gibson is gone, who was the last of the old guards. It should be the rebirth of WI cricket. Justice done

  • enigma12345 on August 20, 2014, 7:41 GMT

    My squad C.Gayle.D.Smith.M.Samuels.D.Bravo.L.Simmons.D.Sammy.K.Pollard.J.Charles.S.Naraine.J.Holder.K.Roach + A.Russel.J.Taylor.S.Badree.D.Bravo

  • Riddymon on August 20, 2014, 5:35 GMT

    Thank you JoshFromJamrock for talking with some sense....a lot of these posters have been crying for Russell to come and play as if he's been some kind of star on the international scene. Fact of the matter is that at the international level, he's done absolutely nothing as of late to really gain any attention. Yes, he's made a few scores in domestic t20 tournaments but that's about it. He tends to be expensive with the ball and very unreliable with that bat often swiping and miss or getting out cheaply. Save the ODIs for the more experienced guys. I do agree though that Badree should be the in the team. He's ranked above narine in T20s for goodness sake..might as well let him have at least 2 games at the ODI level and see how he does.

  • Sexysteven on August 20, 2014, 3:40 GMT

    The windies have got there team wrong for starters where's jerome Taylor n rampaul one of them should of been in for sammy and Simmons should be opening instead of Edwards and marlon Samuels to come in at three or four windies need to get there strongest team on the park to start with then work from there

  • on August 20, 2014, 1:30 GMT

    With Gibson finally out the selectors should bring back chanderpaul into the odi squad . We will need his experience in Australia

  • on August 20, 2014, 1:22 GMT

    Russell > Edwards in ODI's. Keep Edwards for tests

  • ssgdave on August 20, 2014, 1:20 GMT

    Where are Andre Russell and Samuel Badree? Russell offers better options at 6 or 7 than Sammy or Pollard and is a much better all-rounder at the moment. I don't think Ravi Rampau's physical conditioning is a point where he can be relied upon to bowl 10 overs. If the pitch is right, Badree should be in as a fourth bowler and maybe sitting down one of the two late order all-rounders. WI will need to rotate the strike and with the immovable object of Chris Gayle at the top of the order, that will not happen in the early power play. I understand why he is at the top to take advantage of the filed restrictions, but Simmons would be better opening at 1 or 2 with Dwayne Smith out. WI main weakness is the propensity to live and die by the boundary. There are too many boundary batsmen and not enough that can effectively run between the wickets to generate 2s out of singles.

  • JoshFromJamRock on August 20, 2014, 0:15 GMT

    If WI are serious about selecting a competitive XI, it must have 7 solid batsmen of which 2 or 3 can bowl well enough to support the 4 specialist bowlers. One has to be the WK.

    IMO the 7 best "batting performers" for WI have been Ramdin, Shiv (c'mon selectors!), DJ Bravo, Sammy, Edwards, Simmons and Gayle (barely). They're the best so let them be the top 7. Gayle, Bravo and Sammy can bowl. Ramdin will keep as usual.

    If Russell, Pollard and Co. want to get into the XI they'll have to perform better with the BAT than those 7 guys I mentioned. It doesn't make sense to have 8 bowling opens but only 4 dependable in-form batters.

    The remaining 4 guys for the XI have to be genuine/frontline performing bowlers. Fortunately, this is what people better understand. Narine, Roach, Rampaul, Taylor are obvious choices with Holder and Miller as reserve choices.

    My hopeful XI. Sigh

    1.Gayle 2.Chanderpaul 3.Simmons 4.Edwards 5.DJ Bravo 6.Sammy 7.Ramdin 8.Roach 9.Narine 10.Rampaul 11.Taylor

  • VivGilchrist on August 19, 2014, 21:56 GMT

    Pollard is not an allrounder. He should be batting at 5. He is a batsman that can bowl a few handy overs. The thing is, WI best attacking ODI batsmen are considered all-rounders. No point just picking someone because they are listed as a batsman, if an all-rounder is a better bat than them. A little disappointed Russell and Rampaul aren't in the team. Russell is an out and out match winner with the bat and Ramps always takes early wickets.

  • on August 19, 2014, 20:54 GMT

    Why happen to Dwayne Smith, the best ODI and T20 batsmen in the Caribbean now. We need a change up, I will like to see Blackwood and Pooran playing as well.

  • on August 19, 2014, 18:42 GMT

    N0 Russel.How frustating.After performing so well.

  • on August 19, 2014, 17:49 GMT

    Andre Russell better than Sammy , Bravo and Pollard

  • wirus on August 19, 2014, 17:21 GMT

    Agreed with above comments that all three "all-rounders" can't play for WI. Thing is that this is basically the same group of players who have kept failing. Has there been some improvement not known to us? Time will tell. Seems to me that what is needed is mental toughness and proper leadership. Bravo and Sammy both do odd things as captains. There is just something about Bravo that is not convincing in every department but maybe this will be the series when he will bring it all together. WI need to win this series 3-0 preferably to show that they have taken a step forward. Batsmen need to score serious runs and we need bowlers to take wickets not just try to keep the scoring in check. Roach and Rampaul can really worry the Bang batsmen and Holder is developing and can hopefully become a wick-taking bowler of some menace. Narine will do what he does best and Bravo, Gayle, etc can provide backup. This is an ideal chance for individuals and the team to shine. They must not miss out.

  • on August 19, 2014, 16:07 GMT

    dwayne bravo, sammy and pollard in the same team is a joke.there should be only one all rounder or the most TWO in the team. four specialists bowlers, two allrounders wicket keeoper/batsma and five specialis batsmen should comprise this team

  • Mekkayel on August 19, 2014, 15:57 GMT

    Why would West Indies play ALL THREE bravo sammy and pollard? other than bravo, sammy is a part time bowler mainly used to tie up an end and Pollard is a terrible expensive odi bowler. Bravo is the best WI bat this year, Sammy is the best finisher and pollard is out of form and his technical flaws exposed. Why not drop Pollard and play Rampaul/Miller two of the best cpl bowlers this year? what thought was put into this? The team already has a decent top order (Kirk Edwards is suspect) and if Pollard bats at 7 he will either fail or be ineffective. There are already two other batting allrounders.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Mekkayel on August 19, 2014, 15:57 GMT

    Why would West Indies play ALL THREE bravo sammy and pollard? other than bravo, sammy is a part time bowler mainly used to tie up an end and Pollard is a terrible expensive odi bowler. Bravo is the best WI bat this year, Sammy is the best finisher and pollard is out of form and his technical flaws exposed. Why not drop Pollard and play Rampaul/Miller two of the best cpl bowlers this year? what thought was put into this? The team already has a decent top order (Kirk Edwards is suspect) and if Pollard bats at 7 he will either fail or be ineffective. There are already two other batting allrounders.

  • on August 19, 2014, 16:07 GMT

    dwayne bravo, sammy and pollard in the same team is a joke.there should be only one all rounder or the most TWO in the team. four specialists bowlers, two allrounders wicket keeoper/batsma and five specialis batsmen should comprise this team

  • wirus on August 19, 2014, 17:21 GMT

    Agreed with above comments that all three "all-rounders" can't play for WI. Thing is that this is basically the same group of players who have kept failing. Has there been some improvement not known to us? Time will tell. Seems to me that what is needed is mental toughness and proper leadership. Bravo and Sammy both do odd things as captains. There is just something about Bravo that is not convincing in every department but maybe this will be the series when he will bring it all together. WI need to win this series 3-0 preferably to show that they have taken a step forward. Batsmen need to score serious runs and we need bowlers to take wickets not just try to keep the scoring in check. Roach and Rampaul can really worry the Bang batsmen and Holder is developing and can hopefully become a wick-taking bowler of some menace. Narine will do what he does best and Bravo, Gayle, etc can provide backup. This is an ideal chance for individuals and the team to shine. They must not miss out.

  • on August 19, 2014, 17:49 GMT

    Andre Russell better than Sammy , Bravo and Pollard

  • on August 19, 2014, 18:42 GMT

    N0 Russel.How frustating.After performing so well.

  • on August 19, 2014, 20:54 GMT

    Why happen to Dwayne Smith, the best ODI and T20 batsmen in the Caribbean now. We need a change up, I will like to see Blackwood and Pooran playing as well.

  • VivGilchrist on August 19, 2014, 21:56 GMT

    Pollard is not an allrounder. He should be batting at 5. He is a batsman that can bowl a few handy overs. The thing is, WI best attacking ODI batsmen are considered all-rounders. No point just picking someone because they are listed as a batsman, if an all-rounder is a better bat than them. A little disappointed Russell and Rampaul aren't in the team. Russell is an out and out match winner with the bat and Ramps always takes early wickets.

  • JoshFromJamRock on August 20, 2014, 0:15 GMT

    If WI are serious about selecting a competitive XI, it must have 7 solid batsmen of which 2 or 3 can bowl well enough to support the 4 specialist bowlers. One has to be the WK.

    IMO the 7 best "batting performers" for WI have been Ramdin, Shiv (c'mon selectors!), DJ Bravo, Sammy, Edwards, Simmons and Gayle (barely). They're the best so let them be the top 7. Gayle, Bravo and Sammy can bowl. Ramdin will keep as usual.

    If Russell, Pollard and Co. want to get into the XI they'll have to perform better with the BAT than those 7 guys I mentioned. It doesn't make sense to have 8 bowling opens but only 4 dependable in-form batters.

    The remaining 4 guys for the XI have to be genuine/frontline performing bowlers. Fortunately, this is what people better understand. Narine, Roach, Rampaul, Taylor are obvious choices with Holder and Miller as reserve choices.

    My hopeful XI. Sigh

    1.Gayle 2.Chanderpaul 3.Simmons 4.Edwards 5.DJ Bravo 6.Sammy 7.Ramdin 8.Roach 9.Narine 10.Rampaul 11.Taylor

  • ssgdave on August 20, 2014, 1:20 GMT

    Where are Andre Russell and Samuel Badree? Russell offers better options at 6 or 7 than Sammy or Pollard and is a much better all-rounder at the moment. I don't think Ravi Rampau's physical conditioning is a point where he can be relied upon to bowl 10 overs. If the pitch is right, Badree should be in as a fourth bowler and maybe sitting down one of the two late order all-rounders. WI will need to rotate the strike and with the immovable object of Chris Gayle at the top of the order, that will not happen in the early power play. I understand why he is at the top to take advantage of the filed restrictions, but Simmons would be better opening at 1 or 2 with Dwayne Smith out. WI main weakness is the propensity to live and die by the boundary. There are too many boundary batsmen and not enough that can effectively run between the wickets to generate 2s out of singles.

  • on August 20, 2014, 1:22 GMT

    Russell > Edwards in ODI's. Keep Edwards for tests