West Indies v Zimbabwe, 2nd ODI, Grenada

Sarwan hundred gives West Indies series

The Report by Abhishek Purohit

February 24, 2013

Comments: 36 | Text size: A | A

West Indies 274 for 3 (Sarwan 120*, Powell 57) beat Zimbabwe 273 for 8 (Ervine 80, Masakadza 60, Sibanda 51, Dwayne Bravo 6-43) by seven wickets
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Ramnaresh Sarwan guides one towards third man, West Indies v Zimbabwe, 2nd ODI, Grenada, February 24, 2013
Ramnaresh Sarwan guided West Indies' chase with an unbeaten century © WICB Media/Randy Brooks Photo
Enlarge
Related Links

Don't go by the seven-wicket victory margin. Don't go by the one over left unneeded in West Indies' innings. This was a chase in which the pressure built, and was allowed to be built, gradually during a century opening partnership. Then came two wickets in three deliveries. More pressure. Then came the batting Powerplay. And Ramnaresh Sarwan bolted away finally, to his fifth ODI century, his highest ODI score and his first substantial knock after his comeback. Any remaining pressure was blasted away by Kieron Pollard. West Indies had the series, but Zimbabwe were worthy competitors following their surrender in the opening game.

They made their highest away total against West Indies and created chances in the field but lacked penetration in their attack. They were also robbed of Sarwan's wicket when he was on 53. He was caught several inches short by a direct hit but umpire Peter Nero, instead of referring it to the third umpire, immediately shook his head when Zimbabwe appealed. West Indies needed 151 from 20 overs at that stage, and who knows what the wicket of a well-set Sarwan could have led to.

It was the lone, albeit significant, blemish for Sarwan in an innings where he exploited the batting Powerplay to race from a slow half-century to a breezy hundred. Sarwan and Kieran Powell had put on 111 at the top, but hadn't attempted to dominate Zimbabwe, who squandered an early opportunity. In the fourth over, the debutant medium-pacer Tendai Chatara had Powell pushing uppishly for Vusi Sibanda to pull off a one-handed stunner at short extra cover. Replays, however, showed Chatara had overstepped.

Sarwan began in a blaze of boundaries, cutting, driving and pulling for fours but started finding the field far too often. Powell was a touch more aggressive but wasn't far behind in hitting seemingly innocuous deliveries to the infield. However, there was hardly any bite in the Zimbabwe attack to tie them down for a prolonged stretch.

It was Powell who threw away another promising start, heaving at a Hamilton Masakadza delivery and edging it behind to depart for 57 off 81. Two balls later, Masakadza moved one away slightly to take Darren Bravo's outside edge into the wicketkeeper's gloves. The asking-rate was now approaching seven, and West Indies' at times diffident start could have cost them.

Sarwan and Narsingh Deonarine managed just a boundary each till the onset of the batting Powerplay, by when the asking-rate was within touching distance of eight. Sarwan was on 68 off 103, having gone 80 deliveries without hitting a boundary during the middle overs.

In the 37th over, he slammed Kyle Jarvis through cover and point for fours. In the 38th, he lifted Chatara down the ground and over extra cover for successive boundaries. In the 40th, he hit Jarvis for a one-handed straight six, and off the next ball, reached his century. He had taken 32 off his last 15 deliveries, and West Indies had taken 46 off the batting Powerplay. Zimbabwe, tied down by Sunil Narine, had managed 22 off theirs.

Deonarine played an important knock of 42 off 49, turning the strike over repeatedly, but when he was run out by a direct hit, West Indies still needed 55 off 40. Enter Pollard. Exit Zimbabwe. Pollard rained fours and sixes, his power punishing anything too full or too short. He needed just 20 deliveries to race to 41, with Sarwan fittingly hitting the winning single.

Zimbabwe will no doubt be gutted with the Sarwan run-out that wasn't given, especially after their batting effort. They had conceded 337 and were reduced to 34 for 4 on Friday in their first international game in five months, but two days later, three of the top five made fifties.

Like in the first match, Craig Ervine was at the forefront of a recovery and, unlike in the first match, he ensured he carried on long enough to make a significant difference. Had Dwayne Bravo not struck at crucial moments on his way to a career-best 6 for 43, his side would have had a chase much closer to 300 on their hands.

In his first over, he removed the in-form Vusi Sibanda and the captain Brendan Taylor in the space of three deliveries to convert a solid 76 for 1 into a shaky 76 for 3. Sibanda had vindicated his captain's decision to bat and had looked in little trouble as he drove, cut, pulled and swept his way to a breezy fifty.

Ervine and Masakadza responded with a 110-run fourth-wicket partnership. Ervine paddled Dwayne Bravo and swept Narine for fours. Masakadza, nowhere close to Ervine in fluency, soldiered on at the other end, heaving Pollard and Andre Russell for a six each.

Following an unproductive batting Powerplay, Masakadza had another heave and the top-edge landed in the hands of a running Narine at third man. Zimbabwe were 194 for 4 after 42 overs, and needed someone to kickstart the final charge.

Malcolm Waller provided that boost in a cameo that altered the momentum of the innings. In an eventful 43rd over from Kemar Roach, Waller pulled and drove for a six and a four before being yorked. Roach was dumbfounded when no-ball was signalled, and it turned out that Tino Best's carelessness had made it one man too many outside the inner circle. Roach went harder for another yorker next ball, and Waller flicked the resultant full toss off his pads over short fine leg for six more. Zimbabwe managed 79 off the final eight overs, but West Indies won both the batting Powerplays, and they had Pollard for later.

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by tappee74 on (February 27, 2013, 12:04 GMT)

A hundred is a hundred,I looked at the match on television and my thoughts are,he has batted a bit too slow, he probably was being over cautious because of a string of failures from genunine bowling,and finally he could have been the cause of loosing the game had other batsmen not taken evasive actions.It needs to be seen what his performances will be in the course of the series.I personally think he is not the player he used to be and it's time he give way for someone else.This guy has been too complacent in his career and those who appreciate cricket as a competitive sport will not see him as a great contributor. WI cricket is at an all time low,and with a visionless administration, the future doesn't look good.Why play Sarwan infront of Chanderpaul?

Posted by   on (February 26, 2013, 23:50 GMT)

How ICC allows the current state cricket to continue baffles me. How do u allow a team to go for 5 months without a match. A vote for a mandatory league and then optionalmpre arranged series. Very funny how they speak about spreading and promoting the game globally.

Posted by delboy on (February 26, 2013, 12:19 GMT)

If Sammy is given a team a shade in comparison to those of Clive Lloyd will his leadership and occasional cameos be seen in the same context? WI need a strong team lead by a COMPETENT leader. At the moment unfortunately for some. Sammy BEST fits the role of leader. Everyone needs to step up and consistency in performances is needed.

Posted by LabMan on (February 26, 2013, 2:48 GMT)

@Ambrose Alexander:- I totally agree with you. I think he was tryingto be more aggresive earlier than he usually is. Heres hoping that Charles gets better for final ODI. I like the combinatiom.

Posted by   on (February 26, 2013, 1:18 GMT)

Too many umpire errors (all over the world) seem to be spoiling the game. DRS is also not an answer, since too many jokers, sitting upstairs looking up at the replays , using the prohibitively expensive technology,are also giving the craziest of decisions. Just, the general quality of umpires need to improve. Till then, like the old Roman empire, Neros will be fiddling, when Rome is burning!

Posted by   on (February 26, 2013, 1:10 GMT)

Nice to see Sarwan back, And in form. Welcome to international cricket!

Posted by Randy_Wilson on (February 26, 2013, 0:13 GMT)

@ Abdullah Al Mamun Sammy a Non performer? it's a laugh. yes Sammy isnt a great plaer, but non performer. Sammy also played a Part in WI T20 World cup Win. and many other Victory WI had. People need to look at WI before Sammy came into the Pic and see Sammy isnt doing anything worst than What WI got in the last Few year. just because DJ Bravo win two matches against Zim, i dont get why people making this a Big Deal. a few year ago. Bravo Cap WI and then was White wash the series after. it's sad to see people washin off Sammy, after he actrully started WI turn around from disbelive to believer, When he had the Worst 11 with out all WI better player, That team was progress, unfortunely people dont see it.

Posted by grahaam on (February 25, 2013, 17:55 GMT)

I often come on here criticising ZC, However thats the Board and not the players..Well done to those guys, I still beleive the second seamer should be Meht out of that squad , and Chatara looked very raw indeed, Batiing was good with recoveries from wicket losses well controlled whilst maintaining an acceptable scoring rate. Fielding was a down side again...they need another local guy Trevor Penney to return home and sort this. !!! Let hope the Board can react positively to these guys, and make some decisions moving forward , Insisting selection is performance based and retaining the best players locally ..

Posted by   on (February 25, 2013, 16:29 GMT)

I saw the match on tv and I was happy for Sarwan getting his hundred but was it me or does anyone think that RS batted too slowly? I could have easily seen another scenario with Zimbabwe ending up winners. The other batters who got in seem to be able to rotate the strike a lot better than him and especially if he had been given out run out, or as TC said in Zimbabwe had referred the run out, who knows? The KP dismissal I think was due to the pressure build up. Anyway a win in a win and hopefully we can see a more efficient performance.

Posted by MrHillz on (February 25, 2013, 15:06 GMT)

for a team that has been so much out of practice, congrats for the improved batting performance

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abhishek PurohitClose
Tour Results
West Indies v Zimbabwe at Roseau - Mar 20-22, 2013
West Indies won by an innings and 65 runs
West Indies v Zimbabwe at Bridgetown - Mar 12-14, 2013
West Indies won by 9 wickets
Sagicor v Zimbabweans at Black Rock - Mar 7-9, 2013
Match drawn
West Indies v Zimbabwe at North Sound - Mar 3, 2013
West Indies won by 41 runs
West Indies v Zimbabwe at North Sound - Mar 2, 2013
West Indies won by 8 wickets (with 23 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!