SL v WI, World T20, semi-finals April 2, 2014

High-risk and handsome

West Indies' inability to rotate the strike has landed them in a few sticky situations, but their six-hitting prowess has usually come to their rescue. Can this approach take them to a second straight final?
  shares 25

"Stop us from hitting sixes," was Darren Sammy's challenge before West Indies began their World T20 campaign. It came in reply to Suresh Raina's statement that West Indies relied too much on sixes and did not rotate the strike much. While West Indies' self-confessed preference for the big shots did not help them against the Indians, it bailed them out in two must-win matches against Australia and Pakistan.

Both times, the sixes came out when nothing else would have worked. West Indies needed 31 off the last two overs against Australia. The sixes arrived. They were 84 for 5 in 15 overs against Pakistan. The sixes arrived in such a flood that West Indies nearly doubled that score in the last five overs for the loss of just one more wicket.

Everyone knows, including West Indies themselves, that it is not an ideal way to operate. It can take them down, and often necessitates one or two batsmen playing a blinder. As the tournament has gone along, Sammy has spoken about the need to take more singles and twos, especially against the spinners.

It is difficult to change what comes naturally to you, though. And when it comes to the crunch, you will subconsciously rely on what comes naturally to you. Somehow, by a mix of habit and good bowling by the opposition, West Indies have found themselves in situations where that instinct to deliver sixes has had to kick in.

Hitting sixes is a high-risk business, more so when you rely so much on them. There are plenty of ways in which you can make yourself look foolish. But when they come off, they make you look grand. And West Indies' late sixes against Australia and Pakistan were anything but mishits. They were mighty, chunky blows that soared far beyond the boundary. They were the sort of blows that demoralise the opposition, particularly in a format where margins can be so thin and that one over that goes for 20 can be the difference. West Indies had two such overs against Pakistan, which earned 24 and 21, against two of the most experienced T20 bowlers in Saeed Ajmal and Umar Gul.

How much those strikes deflated Pakistan was clear in their chase, which blew whatever steam it had too soon and then stalled. It is not only the six runs that a six earns. It is also the psychological impact on the bowling side. There is something awe-inspiring about the way players such as Sammy and Dwayne Bravo hit sixes: unrestrained, intimidating backswings, big heaves, clean connections and unfettered follow-throughs.

Such hits reduce cricket to its most basic element. "See the ball, hit the ball," Sammy says. It is often a cliché these days in cricket, but Sammy means it in the original sense of the term. Pure, instinctive reaction to an object hurled at you. It is coming to get me, I'll whack it out of sight.

That six-hitting prowess came to West Indies' rescue in the 2012 World T20 final, after they had made 38 in 11 overs. Out of nowhere, Marlon Samuels smashed three sixes in one Lasith Malinga over, and the first 11 overs became immaterial after that.

Each time you watch them, you feel this is the one time they will have to pay for this one-track approach. But so frequently, they find a Samuels or a Bravo or a Sammy who ensures it works one more time. They are such different personalities, but that ability to produce the big stroke when needed unites them.

The first semi-final of the 2014 edition brings together the teams that lined up for the World T20 final two years ago. Will it again come down to a shower of sixes from a West Indian batsman, as it did on that Colombo night?

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 3, 2014, 13:08 GMT

    well too be honest as far as T20's are concerned West Indies is the better side but it's cricket and you can never rule anyone out. If the windies get through malinga and herath sensibly then they can always hit out the rest of the bowlers. Won't be surprised to see Gayle getting some runs today as he always rises to the big match occasion. Go Windies get your title back

  • POSTED BY Saadi69 on | April 3, 2014, 12:40 GMT

    Well what ever the approach I surely know which team I will be supporting in today semi final. Go Gangnam style.

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 3, 2014, 4:47 GMT

    west indies will defend their title

  • POSTED BY VinothSam on | April 3, 2014, 3:11 GMT

    Six hitting power helps WI for sure but forget about Samuels innings at previous T20 WC. It was history. Sounds like Indians sing about their 2011 WC forever. Even if we get around average score we can still control WI by our bowling attack. SL rocks forever!!!

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 3, 2014, 3:02 GMT

    revange of 2012 t20 final.. we wanted wi for the semi now we have them so dont keep many hopes cz lankans ready to face anything... we are the finalist with india...

  • POSTED BY raveekoomar on | April 3, 2014, 1:28 GMT

    I feel Sunrisers Hyderabad should have made Sammy their captain instead of Shikar Dhawan. Cause Sammy is specifically a T20 specialist captain and he accesses the disadvantages of his team quickly and makes sure the positives are more capitalised on and thats his bete noire. Such an astute T20 captain, if am not wrong, he brought WI out of the senior players rebellion, during a transition phase some years ago when seniors like Gayle Chanderpaul and Sarwan did not join national duties due to payment disagreements or something like that. Thats when he took advantage of their disadvantage and made the inexperience line up into a more special unit where they can give more teeth and fight altogether and now the results shows it all. Go Sammy. Way to go maaaan!!!!!

  • POSTED BY Siva_Bala75 on | April 3, 2014, 1:04 GMT

    You don't even have Pollard here. When you have practically all batsmen being six hitters- and then you count the all rounders also- practically No1 to No 9 can hit sixes. All WI need is 2 or max 3 batsmen to click. So this can not be called 'high risk'.

  • POSTED BY on | April 3, 2014, 0:47 GMT

    Bearing in mind that Gayle, Samuels and Smith owe us some runs,,, Id love to see Gayle bat out around 15 overs.... that would mean that we'd get some serious runs on the board.

  • POSTED BY on | April 3, 2014, 0:41 GMT

    Srilanka is better team whats so ever windies does in previous two match .iy was coz of bad bowling from bowler.they cant aspect same on from triky lankan Good look asian lyons.

  • POSTED BY on | April 3, 2014, 0:38 GMT

    I can see something cracking !! Srilanka habbut of reaching final will once more repeat. West indies can't relays on samey n bravo always.

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 3, 2014, 13:08 GMT

    well too be honest as far as T20's are concerned West Indies is the better side but it's cricket and you can never rule anyone out. If the windies get through malinga and herath sensibly then they can always hit out the rest of the bowlers. Won't be surprised to see Gayle getting some runs today as he always rises to the big match occasion. Go Windies get your title back

  • POSTED BY Saadi69 on | April 3, 2014, 12:40 GMT

    Well what ever the approach I surely know which team I will be supporting in today semi final. Go Gangnam style.

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 3, 2014, 4:47 GMT

    west indies will defend their title

  • POSTED BY VinothSam on | April 3, 2014, 3:11 GMT

    Six hitting power helps WI for sure but forget about Samuels innings at previous T20 WC. It was history. Sounds like Indians sing about their 2011 WC forever. Even if we get around average score we can still control WI by our bowling attack. SL rocks forever!!!

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 3, 2014, 3:02 GMT

    revange of 2012 t20 final.. we wanted wi for the semi now we have them so dont keep many hopes cz lankans ready to face anything... we are the finalist with india...

  • POSTED BY raveekoomar on | April 3, 2014, 1:28 GMT

    I feel Sunrisers Hyderabad should have made Sammy their captain instead of Shikar Dhawan. Cause Sammy is specifically a T20 specialist captain and he accesses the disadvantages of his team quickly and makes sure the positives are more capitalised on and thats his bete noire. Such an astute T20 captain, if am not wrong, he brought WI out of the senior players rebellion, during a transition phase some years ago when seniors like Gayle Chanderpaul and Sarwan did not join national duties due to payment disagreements or something like that. Thats when he took advantage of their disadvantage and made the inexperience line up into a more special unit where they can give more teeth and fight altogether and now the results shows it all. Go Sammy. Way to go maaaan!!!!!

  • POSTED BY Siva_Bala75 on | April 3, 2014, 1:04 GMT

    You don't even have Pollard here. When you have practically all batsmen being six hitters- and then you count the all rounders also- practically No1 to No 9 can hit sixes. All WI need is 2 or max 3 batsmen to click. So this can not be called 'high risk'.

  • POSTED BY on | April 3, 2014, 0:47 GMT

    Bearing in mind that Gayle, Samuels and Smith owe us some runs,,, Id love to see Gayle bat out around 15 overs.... that would mean that we'd get some serious runs on the board.

  • POSTED BY on | April 3, 2014, 0:41 GMT

    Srilanka is better team whats so ever windies does in previous two match .iy was coz of bad bowling from bowler.they cant aspect same on from triky lankan Good look asian lyons.

  • POSTED BY on | April 3, 2014, 0:38 GMT

    I can see something cracking !! Srilanka habbut of reaching final will once more repeat. West indies can't relays on samey n bravo always.

  • POSTED BY Cpt.Meanster on | April 3, 2014, 0:20 GMT

    WI are a very good team and ANY team who face them have to play well to beat them. India did a very good job against them in the group stage. The same performance needs to be replicated by SL if they are to have any chance. Both teams have good bowling attacks with a variety of skills. That's what makes this contest so endearing.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 23:40 GMT

    Wasn't it Malinga who got pummelled by Samuels at the last final.? No bowler holda a terror for this Windies Team, the die is cast.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 23:01 GMT

    WI have to send Russell to pinch hit up the order, drop Samuels down to number seven. Wi have to look at getting eighty runs in the first ten overs. The top order have to be aggressive and if four early wickets fall then Ramdin and Samuels can steady the ship lower down. That is a winning strategy for WI

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 2, 2014, 22:05 GMT

    malinga vl take revenge on westindies he vl break wi batsman's ankles with his yorkers

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 2, 2014, 20:37 GMT

    I can't see any team beating west Indies for the rest of the tourney

  • POSTED BY Sevarino on | April 2, 2014, 20:23 GMT

    So far I've heard and read about WI on both sides of the runs scoring spectrum as for scoring singles and boundary hitting. SL has a very good T20 squad the captaincy issue is both a good and bad, for if this doesn't work against the WI who is going to put up their hand to say it was my call. Mahaela Jayawardene is a great tactician, no doubt about it, but when it comes to that moment where the captain has a difference in opinion to him what will be the situation there. As for the WI all I hope they remember that what happened in the 2012 WT20 final is a different ball game to present. So many cricket fans are complaining that WI are getting full of themselves just because they are winning again, but when they were performing poorly I am sure some of these same fans were chastising them.

  • POSTED BY SevereCritic on | April 2, 2014, 19:57 GMT

    And Chris Gayle hasn't arrived to the party yet. One wonders if the semis will be the place where he explodes......

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 2, 2014, 19:26 GMT

    west indies all the way

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 2, 2014, 19:03 GMT

    Sri Lanka have touch players only perera and Mathews can hit big blows and they are out of form with the bat just like Pakistan batting line up sri Lankan batting line up is flexible and due to panic so if Sri Lanka dont turn up with the ball it's game over west indies batting too powerful and their bowling not to be UN estimated this should be a cracka wanna see Samuels vs malinga

  • POSTED BY sugars on | April 2, 2014, 18:22 GMT

    in 2012 SL had malinga and kulasekara who marlon samuels pomelled around the park. it dosn't matter what bowling attack a side has once west indies show up they are unstoppable..the game will only be decided on the field. theres nothing special about the SL bowling attack.. pak had a way better bowling unit

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 17:45 GMT

    Gayle , smith, samuels, bravo, sammy...its bad luck there's no Pollard...whattaa team...simply magnificent when they hit those towering sixes...waiting to watch them hit those sixes in the semis....

  • POSTED BY BigINDFan on | April 2, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    Windies bat deep as Sammy says but SL has better bowlers than Aus or Pak. Kulasekara and Malinga are tougher than Gul and Herath is a different bowler compared to Ajmal. Windies have to do better in their first 10 overs than they have in the past. For that Gayle or Samuels needs to get going while the others rotate the strike around them. Bravo and Sammy can go for it in the last 5 overs as they often do. Remember Mahela alone can destroy any sub-par score that Windies come up with but a big score will put pressure on him and others. If Windies are chasing then it really comes down to Narine and Badree. They should go with Rampaul instead of Russell but Russell is a better batsman.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 17:02 GMT

    Yeah but for the first time Windies also have perhaps the most potent T20 attack. Numbers one and two spinners in the world in this format and Santokie creating incessant problems. And there are Bravo, Samuels and Sammy who can go for broke in four overs. As one commentator said, the bowling seems able to defend almost any total.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 16:57 GMT

    Like I said early it was not Pakistan bowling that cost the match, it was their batting. Even Malinga is a threat in death overs against any opposition still lankans batting will save them, mathew and especially Peresa is a shameful bowler, pakistan has world class bowlers but simply their batting let them down, but experience of Sanga and Mahela will save the defeat against WI.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 16:33 GMT

    Thing is they have so many batsmen that can play blinders that their strategy actually works. Gayle and Smith failed against Pakistan but they still had the depth to recover. If Gayle or Samuels fires, it's game over. So I rate their chances very highly.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 16:33 GMT

    Thing is they have so many batsmen that can play blinders that their strategy actually works. Gayle and Smith failed against Pakistan but they still had the depth to recover. If Gayle or Samuels fires, it's game over. So I rate their chances very highly.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 16:57 GMT

    Like I said early it was not Pakistan bowling that cost the match, it was their batting. Even Malinga is a threat in death overs against any opposition still lankans batting will save them, mathew and especially Peresa is a shameful bowler, pakistan has world class bowlers but simply their batting let them down, but experience of Sanga and Mahela will save the defeat against WI.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 17:02 GMT

    Yeah but for the first time Windies also have perhaps the most potent T20 attack. Numbers one and two spinners in the world in this format and Santokie creating incessant problems. And there are Bravo, Samuels and Sammy who can go for broke in four overs. As one commentator said, the bowling seems able to defend almost any total.

  • POSTED BY BigINDFan on | April 2, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    Windies bat deep as Sammy says but SL has better bowlers than Aus or Pak. Kulasekara and Malinga are tougher than Gul and Herath is a different bowler compared to Ajmal. Windies have to do better in their first 10 overs than they have in the past. For that Gayle or Samuels needs to get going while the others rotate the strike around them. Bravo and Sammy can go for it in the last 5 overs as they often do. Remember Mahela alone can destroy any sub-par score that Windies come up with but a big score will put pressure on him and others. If Windies are chasing then it really comes down to Narine and Badree. They should go with Rampaul instead of Russell but Russell is a better batsman.

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2014, 17:45 GMT

    Gayle , smith, samuels, bravo, sammy...its bad luck there's no Pollard...whattaa team...simply magnificent when they hit those towering sixes...waiting to watch them hit those sixes in the semis....

  • POSTED BY sugars on | April 2, 2014, 18:22 GMT

    in 2012 SL had malinga and kulasekara who marlon samuels pomelled around the park. it dosn't matter what bowling attack a side has once west indies show up they are unstoppable..the game will only be decided on the field. theres nothing special about the SL bowling attack.. pak had a way better bowling unit

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 2, 2014, 19:03 GMT

    Sri Lanka have touch players only perera and Mathews can hit big blows and they are out of form with the bat just like Pakistan batting line up sri Lankan batting line up is flexible and due to panic so if Sri Lanka dont turn up with the ball it's game over west indies batting too powerful and their bowling not to be UN estimated this should be a cracka wanna see Samuels vs malinga

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 2, 2014, 19:26 GMT

    west indies all the way

  • POSTED BY SevereCritic on | April 2, 2014, 19:57 GMT

    And Chris Gayle hasn't arrived to the party yet. One wonders if the semis will be the place where he explodes......

  • POSTED BY Sevarino on | April 2, 2014, 20:23 GMT

    So far I've heard and read about WI on both sides of the runs scoring spectrum as for scoring singles and boundary hitting. SL has a very good T20 squad the captaincy issue is both a good and bad, for if this doesn't work against the WI who is going to put up their hand to say it was my call. Mahaela Jayawardene is a great tactician, no doubt about it, but when it comes to that moment where the captain has a difference in opinion to him what will be the situation there. As for the WI all I hope they remember that what happened in the 2012 WT20 final is a different ball game to present. So many cricket fans are complaining that WI are getting full of themselves just because they are winning again, but when they were performing poorly I am sure some of these same fans were chastising them.