The Surfer
In the Indian Express , Harsha Bhogle is largely satisfied with India's 1-0 series win over New Zealand but wonders why MS Dhoni was uncharacteristically conservative in timing the declaration in the final Test
... surely it should have been 2-0. Dhoni, often ready to go into battle with a shotgun, suddenly felt the need for greater caution. And so while bunkers were being built, anti-aircraft guns brought out, the enemy slipped away. 500 has never been threatened, 530 would have made India impregnable; it was the last 80 that saved New Zealand. Dhoni thought he needed another ten overs, he could have chosen to have had another fifteen
The decision to exclude Strauss from England's World Twenty20 squad, perhaps to keep him fresh for the Ashes, subconsciously says that England don't think they have a realistic chance of winning the World Twenty20, writes Simon Wilde in the Times
Strauss is never going to be a natural Twenty20 cricketer, but then if that argument was applied strictly to everyone under consideration England would struggle to put out any sort of XI. The fact is Strauss surprised most observers with his improvisation during the 50-overs matches in the West Indies, in which he finished man of the series - his first one-day series for two years because the selectors thought his game wasn't suited. If they can be wrong about his ability to play 50-overs, surely they can be wrong on 20-overs too?
In the Kolkata-based Telegraph , Ashok Mitra calls for more transparency in the financial transactions of the IPL, which he argues must be registered as a corporate entity
The IPL is, to all intents and purposes, an out-and-out business enterprise, in effect a transnational set-up. It nonetheless keeps flaunting itself as a sports body. Since it is not registered as a corporate outfit, the corporate laws are apparently not applicable to it, and this in spite of its making mountains of money that is the envy of many business houses.
The Guardian's Andy Bull finds that this year's Wisden Almanack makes for compelling reading, and applauds it for its "refreshingly open-minded and enthusiastic" tone
One of the real gems this year is a piece by Dean Wilson, freed from the Daily Mirror style, on the decline of cricket among Britain's Afro-Caribbean community. Nasser Hussain provides an appreciation of the careers of his contemporaries Mark Ramprakash and Graeme Hick. He is as insightful on the enigma of the former as anybody I've read. Tanya Aldred's diaries of a year in the life of three county cricketers – Darren Maddy, Claude Henderson and Chris Jordan – is an example of ghost writing at its finest, making the day-to-day lives of professional sportsmen seem fascinating and sympathetic
An ongoing debate among former international cricketers and connoisseurs of the game in Mumbai is about the difference in Sunil Gavaskar's and Sachin Tendulkar's style of play
If Gavaskar was a run machine, Tendulkar used the bat like an AK-47. When former Mumbai Test players saw Tendulkar play a Test at 15, they were all convinced that because of his peculiar bottom hand grip he would be sorted out by professional international bowlers. However, Tendulkar was not prepared to be a slave of any technique.
In the end, a series victory in New Zealand will deflect the questions that need to be asked of the Indian captain. The fact that it has come after four decades will mean that Mahendra Singh Dhoni's curiously defensive captaincy won't come under scrutiny. It was the Indian captain's inexplicable defensiveness that decided the Test in Hamilton, and not the rain.
The single most remarkable feature of India's series win is that this was a series with no transformative moment, no miracle rescue, no return from the edge of the abyss
Oddly enough, the first sign of genuine vulnerability from MS Dhoni's men in New Zealand came when they were at their most dominant, right at the end, with the delayed declaration in Wellington. It was almost as if India did not trust their own (proven) superiority over the world's No. 8 Test team enough ... The team dreams of being No. 1 and so they must; but to get there they would need to sharpen their fielding as well as their risk-assessment skills. India are not roadkill anymore and this habit of looking anxiously over their shoulders in anticipation of calamity must be kicked.
Former England batsman and administrator Doug Insole once defined a cricket captain's duties as those of a "public relations officer, agricultural consultant, psychiatrist, accountant, nursemaid and diplomat". Among a raft of boxes to be ticked during Australia's two-week limited overs joust with Pakistan in the Middle East, the most important is whether or not captain-elect Clarke can perform those duties.
The re-building process the South African one-day side are undergoing has one major bolt loose at the top of the batting, but how to tighten it is proving to be a test of patience for the coaching staff and selectors.
The 64 he made in the third ODI against Australia in Sydney contained some breathtaking strokeplay...but innings' like those have been few and far between, though.
And there's a sense that Gibbs is living off past deeds and not playing with the requisite form needed to hold on to a national spot.
Though Michael Vaughan's recent record does not merit him a place in the England team, Australia would rather see a struggling Ian Bell or Owais Shah at No.3 instead of him in the upcoming Ashes, writes Lawrence Booth in his blog in the Guardian .
England tend not to beat Australia by playing it safe. They do it by going for broke, essentially by being un-English, by making the selections the opposition would least like to see. Four years ago this column was banging the drum for Pietersen for this very reason. Now it would like to get behind Vaughan. Because Australia would love it, just love it, if England's No3 this summer is either Ian Bell (who will surely come again in Test cricket) or Owais Shah (who may well not).