Matches (21)
PAK v WI [W] (1)
IPL (3)
County DIV1 (4)
County DIV2 (3)
Pakistan vs New Zealand (1)
WT20 Qualifier (4)
RHF Trophy (4)
NEP vs WI [A-Team] (1)
Numbers Game

India's ODI record, and West Indies' ODI rut

India have played more ODIs than any other team, but West Indies have been struggling in this format even at home

S Rajesh
S Rajesh
04-Jun-2010
Relentless action: The Indians have gone past Australia in terms of number of ODIs played  •  Getty Images

Relentless action: The Indians have gone past Australia in terms of number of ODIs played  •  Getty Images

The Indian cricketers have hardly covered themselves with glory during the ongoing tri-series in Zimbabwe, losing to the home team twice in a row for the first time. What they have been doing, though, is keeping the counter going on the number of ODI matches played. When they took on Sri Lanka earlier in the week, it was their 742nd one-day international, which might not mean much to most, except that it put them above Australia as the team to have played the most ODIs. It's a record that sits rather well on them, considering the popularity of the format in the country and the BCCI's proclivity for the format.
Much of India's catching up has happened in the last 10 years, and especially in the period between 2000 and 2002, when they played 20 more matches than Australia: till 1999, Australia and Pakistan had played 443 matches each, the most by any team. Between 2000 and 2002, too, Pakistan stayed on top, playing 100 games, while South Africa joined them on the same number. Pakistan's decline started from 2005: in five-and-a-half years since then, they've only played 112 games, which is more than 50 fewer than the number played by Australia and India.
The table below lists the ODIs played by each team and their win-loss ratios across various periods.
ODIs and win-loss ratios for each team in different periods
Team Before 2000 - ODIs W/L ratio 2000-2002 - ODIs W/L ratio since 2005 - ODIs W/L ratio Overall - ODIs W/L ratio
India 425 0.91 93 1.04 165 1.40 743 1.04
Australia 443 1.35 73 3.05 164 2.75 741 1.84
Pakistan 443 1.17 100 1.35 112 1.13 715 1.22
West Indies 388 1.66 72 0.81 131 0.61 636 1.22
Sri Lanka 317 0.64 87 1.65 142 1.21 600 0.93
New Zealand 337 0.76 79 0.65 114 1.18 584 0.86
England 301 1.07 59 0.90 122 0.82 528 1.01
South Africa 177 1.80 100 1.93 120 2.28 438 1.82
Zimbabwe 138 0.38 84 0.38 102 0.39 375 0.36
Bangladesh 37 0.08 24 0.00 120 0.69 221 0.33
A few numbers that stand out:
  • India's win-loss ratio has gradually improved over the years, and they've won far more than they've lost in the last five years. Their year-wise stats show that 2008 was an exceptional year, when they won 19 games and lost only eight. Also, the period between 2000 and 2002 was when they caught up with Australia; in the last five years, both teams have played almost the same number of matches.
  • Pakistan's lack of matches in the last five years is one of the aspects that stands out starkly. Till the end of 2004, they had played 25 more ODIs than their nearest rival, India (603 to 578). Since 2005, though, Pakistan have played a mere 112 matches, which is less than all teams except Zimbabwe. During the same period India have played a whopping 165 ODIs, 53 more than Pakistan's tally.
  • West Indies' win percentage has dropped alarmingly over the last five years. Till the end of 1999, they had an outstanding ratio of 1.66 wins per loss. That halved between 2000 and 2002, and since 2005 it's fallen to 0.61. Despite this, their overall ratio remains a respectable 1.22, which is joint third in the all-time list.
  • South Africa have played surprisingly few ODIs since 2005. In the three-year period between 2000 and 2002 they played 100, the most by any team (along with Pakistan); in five-and-a-half years since the beginning of 2005, they've only played 120, which is two fewer than England.
  • Zimbabwe have maintained a surprisingly consistent win-loss ratio across all three periods.
  • Windies in a rut
    "Losing is becoming a habit and it's a bit difficult to get out of." These were Chris Gayle's words after yet another West Indies defeat in the home ODI series against South Africa. West Indies' decline over the last 15 years has manifested itself in various ways, but none has been more depressing than how their home record has fallen away. There used to be a time when a tour to the West Indies used to be the toughest assignment, but that was long ago. Over the last 10 years, West Indies' ODI numbers have dropped dramatically: even in the 1990s, their win-loss ratio at home against the top teams was an impressive 1.82, with 31 wins and 17 losses; since 2000, though, they've won only 25 and lost almost twice as many. And since the beginning of 2007, there have been only six wins to 19 losses.
    West Indies in home ODIs over the years (against top 7 teams only)
    Period Played Won Lost Ratio
    1980s 28 25 3 8.33
    1990s 52 31 17 1.82
    since 2000 75 25 46 0.54
    since 2007 27 6 19 0.31
    The table below shows that both the batting and the bowling have slipped significantly since their heyday. In the 1980s West Indies were almost unbeatable at home, and their batting average was almost twice their bowling average. In the 28 matches they played in that decade, they scored 10 centuries; in 27 matches they've played since 2007, they've managed only one, which is a damning indictment of their batting line-up.
    Similarly, their bowling has slipped considerably, with the average going up to almost 40 runs per wicket since 2007.
    West Indies batting and bowling in home ODIs (against top 7 teams only)
    Period Bat average Run rate 100s/ 50s Bowl average Econ rate
    1980s 48.21 4.60 10/ 34 23.90 3.85
    1990s 31.05 4.48 13/ 58 32.55 4.49
    since 2000s 26.02 4.47 10/ 72 36.73 4.90
    since 2007 25.07 4.82 1/ 31 39.76 5.31
    A look at the stats of their top batsmen shows none of them have been at the top of their games. Gayle's strike rate is impressive, but he averages less than 35, which isn't what you'd expect from a top-class opener. Ramnaresh Sarwan's average is only slightly higher, while both he and Shivnarine Chanderpaul - the only batsman averaging more than 40 - have a strike rate of less than 75.
    West Indies batsmen at home since 2000 (Qual: 750 runs, against top 7 teams only)
    Batsman ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
    Chris Gayle 74 2467 34.26 82.95 3/ 14
    Ramnaresh Sarwan 60 1836 36.72 74.12 2/ 11
    Shivnarine Chanderpaul 53 1737 43.42 72.83 2/ 12
    Brian Lara 45 1397 36.76 70.62 1/ 9
    Dwayne Bravo 45 841 26.28 83.10 0/ 4
    It's a similar story for their bowlers, with most of the regulars averaging around 35 or more, at more than five runs per over. Going by recent evidence, it doesn't seem as if West Indies will get out of this rut anytime soon.
    (Windies stats only include the first four ODIs of their series against South Africa.)

    S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo