Comment: Christoper Martin-Jenkins (27 April 1999)
IT IS an unfortunate irony that the welcome renaissance in West Indian cricket on the field should have led to a reprise of the crowd disturbances which were once a not uncommon feature of cricket in the Caribbean
27-Apr-1999
27 April 1999
Comment: Christoper Martin-Jenkins
The Electronic Telegraph
IT IS an unfortunate irony that the welcome renaissance in West
Indian cricket on the field should have led to a reprise of the crowd
disturbances which were once a not uncommon feature of cricket in the
Caribbean. The crowd invasion which created an artificial tied match
in Guyana last week and the bottle-throwing which interrupted the
final game of Australia's tour on Sunday have left the West Indies
Cricket Board and the International Cricket Council with an
unexpected problem.
It is tempting to say that the passion which lay behind the unruly
behaviour was preferable to the apathy which threatened to hasten the
apparent decline of the one activity which has ever united the West
Indian islands. Brian Lara's personal return to form and the
remarkable West Indian recovery against Australia have been wonderful
for those already working to regenerate cricket in the Caribbean but
the security of players will have to be much better organised.
Steve Waugh's dramatic comment after the invasion in Georgetown that
he had feared for his life was brought into sharp focus by the bottle
which was thrown dangerously close to his head on Sunday after
Sherwin Campbell had been impeded in going for a run by Brendon
Julian. The situation would have been defused at once if the umpires
had called dead ball, as they could have done under law 42, or if the
Australians had shown the same sportsmanship as their former
wicketkeeper, Wally Grout, when he refused to run out Fred Titmus in
a Test match in the 1960s in not dissimilar circumstances. Chivalry,
sadly, no longer comes naturally to professional cricketers.
The only proper ICC reaction now is to refuse the staging of
international matches at any ground which cannot satisfy the referee
in advance that its security arrangements are reliable.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)