England prepare to play their new signature tune (2 May 1999)
A major cornerstone of the revolution of English cricket will be approved on May 13 when the country's leading players will be told they are to become full-time England cricketers
02-May-1999
2 May 1999
England prepare to play their new signature tune
The Electronic Telegraph
Paul Newman on why the country's leading players are to sign
for different employers
A major cornerstone of the revolution of English cricket will be
approved on May 13 when the country's leading players will be told
they are to become full-time England cricketers. But they will still
have to serve two masters.
The long-awaited Trangmar Report, which seeks to follow the
Australian and South African example in giving total control of Test
players to the England management, was circulated to the counties
last week and was met with almost unanimous approval.
The document, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal, will be passed at the
spring meeting of the First-Class Forum in 11 days' time. It means 15
or 16 England Test players will be contracted to the England and
Wales Cricket Board for a six-month period, to be reviewed each March
and September, from the spring of 2000 and will be joined by seven or
eight one-day specialists for limited overs internationals only.
Those players, however, will remain contracted to their counties
throughout each summer and will be paid by them while they are with
England, protecting their right to a benefit and maintaining their
links with their counties.
In return, the counties will receive compensation and a guarantee
that Test players will be allowed to play in all NatWest Trophy and
Super Cup matches. They will not, significantly, play in county
championship matches unless England want them to, but there is a grey
area allowing 'consultation' between England management and counties
over key matches. Pressure, no doubt, will remain on England from the
counties when titles or relegation are at stake.
Currently, England players are paid £3,150 for each Test and £1,050
for each one-day international. In addition, a team bonus of £19,500
is paid by the Board for each Test win and £200,000 for a series
victory. For winter tours, they are paid a basic fee of £5,000 plus a
series fee, which this year was £25,000 for the Ashes and £12,500 for
the following one-day series.
The Trangmar Report concludes that there has been little or no
assessment of the true value of an England player and that a better
salary structure needs to be introduced. That will be brought in to
coincide with the increase in international cricket next year to
seven Tests and 10 one-day internationals per season.
Critics of the new scheme will point out that the players will not
receive much more money than they do now and they may even be worse
off in bonuses if their county wins the championship. They also
appear to be playing just as much cricket as they do now, overlooking
the need for 'quality' rest, and still face the prospect of long
journeys to play cup matches immediately after finishing a Test.
Yet those who feel the door to the England team will be closed each
year to those outside the squad should be appeased by the clause
which will allow others to be brought in at any time during the
summer on a match-fee basis.
The fact that even the most traditional counties have welcomed the
news indicates that they will maintain a hold over their players.
Essex secretary Peter Edwards, a trenchant voice against change in
the domestic game, spoke for the majority when he said: "Basically
I'm in favour of this as long as counties are properly recompensed.
It's the way things have to go. My only slight concern is what
happens to the players from the 15 or 16-man squad who are out of
form and not playing Test cricket? Will they face a long spell on the
sidelines or will counties be told they must play for them even if
their replacement is doing well?"
Yorkshire have expressed reservations about losing the likes of
Darren Gough full-time for England in the past but they, too, are
happy. "The report was put together in a consultative manner so there
shouldn't be any problems," said Chris Hassell, their chief
executive. "In Darren's case, he wants to remain a Yorkshire player
and we want him to remain a Yorkshire player so we are pleased that
will continue to be the case."
The financial details of the new deal have yet to be finalised as the
report feels "it would be unwise to produce a detailed contract until
current and future changes in employment law as applicable to cricket
and other leisure activities become clearer later in the summer". For
the good of the England team, however, the news must be a step
forward.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)