Bowling Most Runs Conceded Innings

Lancashire Women vs other countries Minor T20s Bowling Records - Most Runs Conceded in an Innings

Most runs conceded in an innings

Player	Overs	Mdns	Runs conceded	Wickets taken	Econ	Innings in match	Team	Opposition	Ground	Result	Match Date	Scorecard
GA Elwiss	4.0	-	27	1	6.75	1	Sussex Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	lost	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
MT Pope	2.0	-	24	-	12.00	1	Middx Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	lost	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
RJ Raval	3.0	-	23	-	7.66	1	Middx Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	lost	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
N Allen	4.0	-	22	3	5.50	1	Notts Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	won	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
FMK Morris	4.0	1	21	3	5.25	2	Berks Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	won	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
MS Belt	4.0	-	21	2	5.25	1	Kent Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	lost	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
FR Davies	4.0	-	21	-	5.25	1	Sussex Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	lost	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
RC Penford	4.0	-	20	-	5.00	1	Notts Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	won	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
KL Gordon	4.0	1	20	2	5.00	1	Notts Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	won	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
CVE Pape	4.0	-	18	-	4.50	1	Kent Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	lost	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
SW Bates	4.0	-	18	1	4.50	1	Kent Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	lost	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
GM Hennessy	2.0	-	18	-	9.00	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
NE Farrant	4.0	-	17	2	4.25	1	Kent Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	lost	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
SIR Dunkley	4.0	-	17	-	4.25	1	Middx Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	lost	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
HR Huddleston	4.0	-	17	1	4.25	1	Middx Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	lost	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
RL Grundy	2.0	-	17	1	8.50	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
HEM Phelps	4.0	-	17	2	4.25	1	Sussex Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	lost	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
JL Gunn	4.0	-	17	2	4.25	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
ML Gibson	4.0	1	16	-	4.00	1	Notts Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	won	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
IMG Westbury	3.0	-	16	2	5.33	1	Middx Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	lost	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
GK Davis	4.0	1	16	1	4.00	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
J Jackson	4.0	-	15	2	3.75	1	Kent Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	lost	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
EL Burt	4.0	-	15	1	3.75	1	Sussex Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	lost	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
SB Odedra	4.0	-	14	1	3.50	1	Notts Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	won	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
EA Russell	2.0	-	14	-	7.00	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
M Kelly	3.0	-	14	1	4.66	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
K Thompson	4.0	1	13	1	3.25	2	Yorks Women	v LAN Women	Leigh	won	24 Jul 2016	Other T20
A Potgieter	4.0	-	11	1	2.75	2	Berks Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	won	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
AA Patel	1.0	-	11	-	11.00	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
D Hazell	3.0	-	11	-	3.66	2	Yorks Women	v LAN Women	Leigh	won	24 Jul 2016	Other T20
LJ Crofts	1.0	-	10	1	10.00	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
IBP Noakes	2.0	-	10	1	5.00	1	Sussex Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	lost	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
LCN Smith	4.0	-	9	-	2.25	2	Berks Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	won	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
AJ Macleod	2.1	-	9	2	4.15	2	Berks Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	won	26 Jun 2016	Other T20
ND Dattani	4.0	1	9	2	2.25	1	Middx Women	v LAN Women	Beaconsfield	lost	3 Jul 2016	Other T20
TG Norris	2.0	-	8	-	4.00	1	Sussex Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	lost	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
K Sciver-Brunt	2.0	-	7	1	3.50	2	Yorks Women	v LAN Women	Leigh	won	24 Jul 2016	Other T20
K Green	1.0	-	5	-	5.00	2	WAR Women	v LAN Women	Birmingham	won	17 Jul 2016	Other T20
KA Levick	2.0	-	4	1	2.00	2	Yorks Women	v LAN Women	Leigh	won	24 Jul 2016	Other T20
R Hardy	2.0	1	3	3	1.50	2	Berks Women	v LAN Women	Wokingham	won	26 Jun 2016	Other T20

Adjust:Most recentPast weekPast MonthPast year4 years10 years25 years

Performances in matches that overlap decades are credited to the year in which they occurred - this results in some unknown data, especially in regard to bowling figures
Performances in matches that overlap years are credited to the year in which they occurred - this results in some unknown data, especially in regard to bowling figures