England's familiar achilles heel
Mike Selvey writes in the Observer that England's old failings against spin has already put their top ranking in jeopardy

Abdur Rehman took 6 for 25 as England were rolled over for 72 • Getty Images
Andrew Strauss, who for much of his innings stayed on the back foot and scored in his habitual areas square. Others, such as Kevin Pietersen, strive to use their height and get forward, knowing that the pace at which Abdur Rehman and Saeed Ajmal can bowl can catch batsmen all too readily on the back foot. Essentially, though, where pad play was once an integral part of technique against spin, the ball has to be played with the bat.
These are perfectly sensible explanations but I prefer one that draws from Sufism (and this may sound overblown at first and probably is even on reflection but we will stick with it). In these moments, they enter a state of Haal, a kind of temporary state of a different consciousness to the state normally inhabited.
They walk and act differently, with greater urgency and settle upon some central figures around whom they all whir in unison towards one central purpose.
The over-riding feeling was one of shock. Shock that we'd allowed a winning position to slip away so easily and shock that we'd allowed a pressure situation to get the better of us.
The best players of spin have the ability to score 360 degrees of the ground.
At the moment England have too many players who can only hit through 90 degrees. It makes it easier for Pakistan to defend the boundary leaving England with not enough options to take the pressure off.
England need to look at the way Misbah-ul-Haq plays the spinners. He plants his front foot down and either plays through extra cover or hits over the top. Unless you are a brilliant sweeper, that is the way to play.