
|

Don Shepherd (right) took 2218 first-class wickets in 668 games but didn't play a single Test, along with Glamorgan team-mate Alan Jones (centre), the highest run-scorer who never played in a Test. Pictured with them is Tony Lewis, who captained England in eight of his nine appearances
© Playfair Cricket Monthly
|
|
Shane Warne has 1185 first-class wickets,
Muttiah Muralitharan 1134,
Glenn McGrath 814, and they are the top three wicket-takers in Test cricket. Now consider these numbers, 4204 wickets for
Wilfred Rhodes (127 in Tests), 3776 to
Alfred Freeman (just 66 in Tests) and 3278 for
Charlie Parker (only two Test wickets). Well, at least they won Test caps.
Last week's column was about prolific first-class batsmen who never made it in Test cricket, this week it's the bowlers' turn.
Glamorgan have achieved a unique double; in
Alan Jones they have the highest first-class runscorer never to play a Test, and in
Don Shepherd, they have the highest uncapped wicket-taker. Shepherd, a medium-pacer who later bowled fast offcutters, toured Ceylon with the MCC in 1969-70 and was even one of Wisden's Cricketers of the Year in 1970.
Gloucestershire's
George Dennett, the second on the list, had several highlights during his 2151-wicket career but none worthier than his 8 for 9 that helped
rout Northamptonshire for 12, the lowest total in first-class cricket. He finished with match-figures of 15 for 21, all taken in a single day.

|

Vince van der Bijl
© The Cricketer
|
|
Nineteenth-century Englishmen dominate the list of bowlers with the lowest averages to not play a Test with
John Wisden , who finished 186 matches with an average of 6.66, on top. The three players on the list from outside England are Otago's
Alexander Downes, South Africa's
Vince van der Bijl, who also played for Middlesex, and most intriguingly,
Bart King from the United States of America. King, who is USA's premier cricketer by some distance, took 415 wickets in 65 matches and also toured England with the Philadelphians in
1897,
1903 and
1908.
However, if we exclude players before World War I, the result is a mix of players from the subcontinent and England, with van der Bijl right leading the way. van der Bijl, a medium-fast bowler of 6ft 7½ inches, was considered by some to be one of the leading bowlers of his time. He was included in the South African squad for the tour of Australia in 1971-72 that was subsequently cancelled.
If you look at Test wickets as a proportion of first-class wickets, most of the bowlers with the highest percentages, with the exception of
Ashantha De Mel and
Kapil Dev , played in the 21st century. It was a similar case with the batsmen, all of whom made their debuts after 1990, a result of central contracts and packed international schedules that allow national cricketers only the rare domestic appearance.
In fact,
Courtney Walsh, ranked 49th with 1807 wickets, is the only bowler from the 1990s among the top 50 bowlers with the most first-class wickets.