Gough the lonely Braveheart (29 December 1998)
THERE is a generous view among the great and the good of Australian cricketing opinion that England have bowled particularly well during this so far one-sided series
29-Dec-1998
29 December 1998
Gough the lonely Braveheart
By Mark Nicholas
THERE is a generous view among the great and the good of
Australian cricketing opinion that England have bowled
particularly well during this so far one-sided series. This is
not right, rather they have bowled quite well, have been let down
by careless catching, and overall have chosen a tidy approach to
their art rather than a threatening one.
There is an exception, writ large. Darren Gough has bowled for
England rather as William Wallace fought for Scotland, with
immense pride and courage but with flair, too. And, best of all,
with unconditional commitment.
I cannot remember a man so obviously bursting himself for his
team in the way that Gough did on Sunday evening - not even Allan
Donald during that memorable evening against Michael Atherton
last summer.
Gough's cavalry charges to the crease, the good and strong action
in delivery, the hurling of the body into the follow-through,
earned him the wickets of Michael Slater and Mark Taylor, which
seemed so little gained for so much given. Poor Gough, a
magnificent warrior in an attack made up by mediums.
He had more to show for his campaign yesterday, even though
another catch went down, but the final figures do not do him
justice. He did not have the support he required or deserved.
Alan Mullally has something up his sleeve but appears distracted,
has lost the nip he had in Brisbane and does not make his
opponent play the ball enough. Angus Fraser is a yard slow these
days for a good, hard and even-paced Aussie pitch. Dean Headley
has some zip but he is slipping into lacklustre patches too
often.
These cricketers were exposed by the Stuart MacGill innings, the
knife in the back for England, the one which gave Australia the
advantage and allowed Steve Waugh his supreme hundred.
This is nothing to do with effort, there is plenty of that from
the bowlers, it is to do with excellence which is missing from
English cricket in general. Bowlers don't bowl straight enough,
batsmen don't stay in long enough.
To get the most from the bowling that is available to the England
selectors, a better balance of style and speed must be
identified. Fraser and Mullally are doing the same stock job,
Headley is not a spearhead.
One or both of Alex Tudor and Andrew Caddick must be included
next summer - extra height means extra bounce, which means extra
wickets - along with at least one bowler who can bat a bit in
support of the top order and a spinner when the pitch demands it.
We must not give up in the quest for quality of performance, or
give up on people who have talent but are tricky to handle. We
cannot leave Gough alone and worn out.
If anyone is in doubt about how to bowl with a new ball, watch
Glenn McGrath and Damien Fleming. Watch how they commit the
batsmen to play, how time after time the seam is upright and
homing in on its target. Watch replay after replay of the beauty
from Fleming which clipped the top of Atherton's off stump last
evening.
This was bowling as an art, not a job. It is the difference
between the two attacks. Save for Gough, of course, who is still,
as he was four years ago, England's breath of fresh air - their
Braveheart.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)