ICC Board meet gives free hand to anti-corruption unit
If it was cricket in between match-fixing allegations before, it's the other way around this week
AC Ganesh
17-Oct-2000
If it was cricket in between match-fixing allegations before, it's the
other way around this week. After witnessing some good cricket in the
ICC KnockOut Trophy at Nairobi, the International Cricket Council's
(ICC) board members sat for a two-day meeting at the Kenyan capital
from Monday.
An important decision on match-fixing was made during the course of
the meeting with the ICC's anti-corruption wing being given a free
hand to go ahead with the inquiries on the scandal and bribery. Sir
Paul Condon, head of the ICC anti-corruption unit said on Monday that
"The newly-established ICC anti-coruption unit will not interfere with
the match-fixing and bribery inquiries set up by its affiliates
against cricket players and officials." He added "We will be
supporting the criminal and judicial inquiries and also conduct our
inquiries."
A former police commissioner, Condon said he had accepted to lead the
fight against corruption in cricket after the board gave its total
support to the unit, which will receive four million dollars in
funding, over the next year. He also said that the unit had assisted
in the King Commission inquiry in South Africa and cooperated with the
Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) inquiry which was looking into the
allegations of match fixing in the 1999 World Cup matches.
Accepting that match-fixing was deep rooted in the game, Condon said
"We will start our work, looking back at what has been happening and
we will look forward. There have been huge opportunities to make
money, not only in fixing matches but especially when there was no
regulatory machine like we now have in place." The unit, which is
operating from London, has three former British police officers in its
five-member committee and will monitor activities in all the Test
playing nations.
Meanwhile, former Pakistan captain Wasim Akram has come out in support
of Hansie Cronje and felt that the former South African captain has
been treated unfairly. Akram said ``Cronje is a brave man as he at
least admitted that he did something wrong." Queried on the life ban
imposed on Cronje, in comparison to the punishment meted out to
Australia's Shane Warne and Mark Waugh, Akram said, ``If you see it as
a comparison, then definitely it is unfair." Both Warne and Waugh were
fined in 1995 for accepting money in reciprocation of providing pitch
and weather information.
Dismissing the charge that frequent batting order changes constituted
attempts at match fixing, Akram said "people should not read sudden
changes in the batting order as attempts at match-fixing. We do that
(change the order) very often in Pakistan and India."
Finally, with the interim report to be handed over to the Sports
Ministry by the CBI this week, things are hotting up in the Indian
scenario. The excellent performance by the side in the recently
concluded tournament has certainly diverted the attention from matchfixing. Though things are progressing for the better, the game may not
be the same if the report contains some names of players and
officials. It may even affect the morale of the side for the
forthcoming Sharjah tournament to start this week.