'Tis the time for healing and time for members to allow the Barbados Cricket
Association (BCA) to get ahead with its mandate to develop the sport.
In recent weeks the executive of the BCA scored two notable victories.
The first, the high court judgement which found that there was nothing wrong
with the procedure in the way board members David Holford and Clinton St. Hill
were elected at the last annual general meeting.
Another, at a recent extra-ordinary general meeting where members wanted an
explanation about a $200 000 grant given to the association by the West Indies
Cricket Board (WICB).
There were also questions raised about the appointment of a chief executive
officer for the BCA and yet another about the availability and circulation of
the so-called Shorey Report which was a comprehensive study of local cricket and
recommendations on how to improve it.
From all reports, BCA president, Stephen Alleyne, handled the issues raised like
an inform Test batsman, effortlessly dispatching verbal deliveries. He showed
why he's the man at the helm.
It is hoped that with these matters out of the way the executive will be able to
focus on the big picture and the will of the members will be carried out.
After all, it seems that the association has quite a lot on its plate for the
coming year and wouldn't want to be distracted or burdened by controversy.
Continual bickering is not good for the BCA's public image and there are some
key programmes to be implemented which would need all the support they can get
to stand a chance of succeeding.
First and foremost among them will be the readjustment of the hours for first
division cricket and the covering of pitches, both measures seen as vital in the
revival of cricket, especially at the senior level.
This is not to say that members don't have the right or shouldn't ask for
transparency or indeed explanations about matters they don't clearly understand.
In fact, I think that kind of vigilance is needed to keep administrators on
their toes so that at all times or wherever possible, the interests of the sport
and members will be best served.
In too many organisations there is a closed shop mentality, which involves only
a few in the decision-making process and this in turn undermines the level of
success that is possible if a majority of the stakeholders are allowed to make
an input.
Therefore, any organisation worth its salt and one as broad-based as the BCA,
should allow for dissent and criticism with substance.
The most meaningful consensus that can be reached out of these deliberations is
that all hands are needed on deck to make a significant revival in the fortunes
of our national sport.
Now is the best time to start.