Report of Disciplinary Board of Inquiry into comments made by Alistair Campbell
The Board of Directors of the Zimbabwe Cricket Union has agreed that for transparency the findings by the Disciplinary Board of Inquiry be made public and accordingly the full report on the above matter is now attached
ZCU
15-Nov-2001
The Board of Directors of the Zimbabwe Cricket Union has agreed
that for transparency the findings by the Disciplinary Board of
Inquiry be made public and accordingly the full report on the
above matter is now attached.
DISCIPLINARY BOARD INQUIRY - ALISTAIR CAMPBELL : COMMENTS IN THE LONDON DAILY TELEGRAPH CONCERNING RACISM IN CRICKET
The future of Zimbabwean Cricket depends on the integration of
black players into the National Team. Apart from achieving the
obvious benefit of having the cricket team properly reflecting
the racial diversity of Zimbabwe, the simple truth is that the
pool of white players is far too small to sustain an
internationally competitive side. The selling of the game to
black Zimbabweans and creating and nurturing an increasing flow
of black players through all levels into the National team, has
to be achieved if the game we love is not to wither and die in
Zimbabwe. The process of racial integration of the game of
cricket should have achieved much more given the 21 years of
Zimbabwe's life - it needs to be accelerated if the game is to
survive.
A balance, however, needs to be drawn. Success of the National
team on the field is essential to spreading and selling the game
and providing the financial base to sustain and increase
development and coaching programmes. If players are pushed onto
the field because they are black and not because they merit
selection the process will be self-defeating. How then is the
balance to be achieved of increasing black representation in the
National cricket team while maintaining and improving performance
on the field? The answer is as with any human endeavour - by the
exercise of commonsense, co-operation, understanding and looking
for answers instead of problems.
The ZCU's implementation task force seeks the answer by setting
goals for racial integration and not quotas. Cynics always seem
to look for problems instead of answers and are quick to say
goals really means quotas. That is by no means necessarily so. An
objective look at the selection of the Zimbabwean team over the
past 6 months shows that goals means goals and not quotas. The
number of black players selected for the last 10 or so 1-day
internationals, for example, has consistently been below the goal
set - a situation which would not pertain if goals were quotas. A
goal which we would recommend achieving is to provide a quota of
one player representative to sit on the implementation task force
committee - that should help enhance communication and
understanding between players and officials.
Senior players in the National side need to understand and
realise the aims and goals of integration. They need to lend
their experience, maturity and ability to making the programme
work. The creation of harmony, team spirit and a necessary
positive attitude are vital components of success. That can only
be achieved, and maintained, by the senior players. Negativity by
even a single senior player can destroy in days what has taken
years to build. Senior players need to realise that while they
may have made Zimbabwe cricket what it is, Zimbabwe cricket has
also made them what they are. Very few of them would have had the
opportunity to play test cricket for any other Nation and they
should see it as their duty to actively help create an
integrated, growing and developing National cricket team - as
their legacy to Zimbabwe cricket when their careers come to an
end.
Those who misinterpret goals and quotas also, to our minds, tend
to misunderstand merit. The truth of the matter, we believe, and
we have followed cricket in Zimbabwe and across the world for
close on 40 years, is that only two Zimbabwean players currently
can claim to be selected truly on merit - with merit meaning a
consistency of performance meeting the minimum standard expected
for a test class of cricketer. Those players, to our minds, are
Andy Flower - who is in a class of his own -and Heath Streak. A
third player, though just at the start of his career, has made a
beginning which shows the potential to scale the same heights as
Andy Flower. That is Hamilton Masakadza. But the three tests this
18 year old has played, is far too soon to make a proper judgment
on merit.
Other current Zimbabwean cricketers have reached the plateau of
consistent performance at a level to merit automatic selection -
but have sadly fallen away. Here we think of Grant Flower and Guy
Whittal. Hopefully they will regain that plateau by pushing their
test batting averages above the unacceptable minimum of 30 around
which they now hover. The erratic and injury prone Paul Strang
also falls into the category of a player who has in the past
merited automatic selection. Henry Olonga is another such player.
Stuart Carlisle is, in our view, approaching the plateau of
automatically warranting selection on merit - but he is not yet
there and needs to make more scores of substance. With all the
other players there is real potential, occasional performance at
the level required, but a frustrating lack of anything
approaching the consistency necessary for automatic selection on
merit.
Players whose claim to merit selection is that although they are
performing badly and without consistency they are the best
available - should not be surprised if selectors give other up
and coming players the chance to test their mettle at the highest
level. If those up and coming young players include as many black
as white players, that is only commonsense given a diminishing
pool of white players, an increasing pool of black players and
the needs of the future. But once again there needs to be a
balance. Young players, be they black or white, need to be
nurtured and not thrown into the unforgiving cauldron of
international cricket too soon - as that can result in a career
of promise being stillborn.
What then of Alistair Campbell in this mix? He is an enigma. He
has the natural talent to be a batsman of world class. At his
best he stirs memories of David Gower, and at his very best there
are even echoes of Graeme Pollock. But he lacks the necessary
discipline and concentration. His test batting average of 26,93
after 50 tests would see him long since dropped from almost every
other team in the world. We emphasise that by stating that an
average of 40 is regarded as the bench mark for a frontline test
batsman of world class. An average of 35 is regarded as just
acceptable. But once that average slips below 33 to 30 it becomes
unacceptably low. Alistair Campbell's average of 26.93 is way
below the acceptable minimum for a frontline test batsman. He
cannot seriously regard that performance level as warranting
automatic selection on merit. It saddens us to say that because
Alistair Campbell is one of the few batsman in Zimbabwe with the
natural talent to be a world class test batsman. He needs to add
application, discipline and concentration to that talent and to
eliminate rashness to reach his potential. We, like every
Zimbabwean cricket lover, hope that he will achieve that in the
latter part of his career. And it has been encouraging to note
that in the last year his performances at test level have
improved. We should, perhaps, add that as a one-day batsman,
Campbell's record is much better. But his average of 31.14 for a
top order batsman in one-day cricket can only be regarded as
acceptable as opposed to world class.
Regrettably the rashness and lack of discipline which punctuates
Campbell's batting seems also to affect his comments to the
press.
To blame Zimbabwe's poor recent performances on a perceived quota
system for black players is, in our view, not correct. Zimbabwe
has done amazingly well given its very small pool of players to
be playing test cricket at all - let alone often being
competitive against nations with massively greater playing
resources. A sense of reality needs to accompany assessments of
Zimbabwe's performance on the international cricketing stage.
There will always be peaks and troughs, but in general, until the
playing base is broadened, Zimbabwe will always struggle to
compete. To an outsider the major difficulty in recent times has
been the failure of senior players (and here we include Olonga)
apart from Andy Flower and Heath Streak to perform consistently
at an acceptable level - and indeed to have retrogressed in terms
of level of performance. Hopefully that will change.
It is the duty of the senior players to mould team spirit and
pull the team together, not to become a divisive force. They may
not always like selectors decisions but that is a factor common
to all players, all teams and all spectators across the world.
They need to understand the aims and objectives of the selectors
and the need to maintain the best possible team on merit, while
also enhancing and ensuring the survival of Zimbabwe cricket by
racial integration. Selectors and officials for their part must
make sure that they properly understand the players and their
concerns and keep open lines of communication. We don't pretend
that the necessary balance is an easy one to draw -but it can be
achieved by reasonable men working together.
We now turn to the specific comments made to the London Daily
Telegraph by Alistair Campbell. Comments like those referring to
"the race thing having spilt onto the field" and "the team being
torn apart", are completely unhelpful and counter-productive.
They create disharmony and conflict where sensible, rational
discussion, understanding and agreement are necessary. They put
into the glare of media publicity, matters which can and should
be resolved by discussion in private between players and
officials.
In fairness to Alistair Campbell he realises that. In a letter to
Mr Chingoka, the President of the ZCU, on 17 October, he
apologises "unreservedly for having spoken to the Press about
these issues and affording them the opportunity of publishing the
articles in question." He adds that it was exceptionally naive to
do so, "knowing the subject at hand is so sensitive". He adds
that "I must emphasise that I did not make any comments about the
performance of black players, nor did I say that the inclusion of
players of colour was adversely affecting team performance". He
concludes by again expressing his sincere apologies for any harm
caused to the ZCU and the game of cricket in Zimbabwe. Alistair
Campbell has also assured the President of the ZCU and ourselves
that he is not racist and believes in the racial integration of
Zimbabwean cricket. We accept his assurances.
We hope that these proceedings have focused Alistair Campbell's
mind. We hope that he realises his shortcomings and works
diligently to correct them. We hope that he uses the opportunity
we propose to give him to become a cohesive force in Zimbabwe
cricket. We would like nothing better than for Alistair Campbell
to achieve his potential and reach the level of a world class
batsman which his natural talent allows. But to do that he will
need to show a maturity which he has not yet shown, to replace
rashness with discipline and carelessness with concentration. In
view of the damage his loose words have caused, he will need to
work tirelessly to help rebuild and nurture team spirit. That
will take humility, maturity, strength of character and an
understanding of others. We propose to give Alistair Campbell the
chance to achieve this and hope that he will. But he must realise
that no team or responsible cricket union can allow division and
disunity to be paraded across newspaper pages as opposed to
sensibly resolved by rational internal discussion. We hope the
observations we have made will help enhance that process. But any
repeat of similar ill chosen and ill considered words to the
Press by Alistair Campbell could, in our view, only be regarded
in a serious light.
Balancing all the factors we have tried to rationally analyse, we
find Alistair Campbell in breach of Clause 4.1.12.1 and 4.1.12.2
of the his contract with the ZCU and in breach of Clause C8(a)
and (b) of the ICC Code of Conduct (November 2000).
The penalty imposed is a suspension of Alistair Campbell for two
test matches and two one-day internationals, which suspension is
suspended for 12 months on condition Alistair Campbell does not
in that period breach Clauses 4.1.12.1 and 4.1.12.2 of his
contract with the ZCU or the equivalent clause of any new
contract and on condition that he does not in that period breach
Clause C8(a) or (b) of the ICC Code of Conduct (November 2000).
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S MUCHECHETERE - CHAIRMAN
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D G BARTLETT - MEMBER
This the 31st day
of October, 2001