Wanted: a genuine all rounder
A casual glance at the composition of the Indian Test team shows that there is a conspicuous absence of an all rounder
Sankhya Krishnan
19-Nov-1999
A casual glance at the composition of the Indian Test team shows that
there is a conspicuous absence of an all rounder. Ever since Kapil Dev
and Ravi Shastri quit the game, India has been unable to unveil an all
rounder at Test level. While there are several all rounders or
aspiring all rounder wannabes in the ODI side like Robin Singh, Vijay
Bharadwaj, Sunil Joshi, Nikhil Chopra and Ajit Agarkar, none of them
fit the bill at Test level.In the one day context, a batsman who can
wheel his arm over and keep things tight or a bowler who can hit a
quick 20 or 30 qualifies to be an all rounder. Or a bits and pieces
player who can do both. But at Test level he must be both a strike
bowler and a batsman who can be as dangerous as someone in the top
order if not as consistent.
There is no all rounder's slot as such in a team - only batting and
bowling slots. The standard composition of a side in the game today is
6 batsmen and 4 bowlers. An all rounder in the side has taken one of
the batting or bowling slots. Most all rounders break into the side as
a batsman or bowler and then proceed to expand their range of
abilities. The presence of a quality all rounder is not integral to a
winning side but it most certainly is a value addition. The dominant
West Indian side of the 80's did not have an all rounder. Nor does the
current Australian side. Both relied on four man attacks which were
sufficiently strong to dismiss the opposition twice. On the other hand
the current South African side is almost exclusively powered by class
all rounders like Jacques Kallis, Shaun Pollock and Lance Klusener who
serve to shore up a fragile top order.
The Indian team has no choice but to go into a match with six batsmen
and four bowlers since there is no one who can combine both functions
effectively. An all rounder in place of a specialist bat would give a
fifth bowling option, so important to a side which has only three
tested bowlers in Srinath, Prasad and Kumble. Indeed in the Ahmedabad
Test against New Zealand India could not enforce the follow on since
they had only four bowlers who were too fatigued to take the workload.
Quality all rounders are not unearthed everyday. The number of all
rounders in India's Test history can be counted on the fingers of both
hands. In the early days there were men like C.K. Nayudu and Amar
Singh. In the 40s and 50s we had Lala Amarnath and Vinoo Mankad. In
the 60's Chandu Borde (until his shoulder injury in 1964), Bapu
Nadkarni, Rusi Surti and Salim Durrani. In the 70s and 80s there were
a host of figures, the most notable of whom were Kapil Dev and Ravi
Shastri. Others included Karsan Ghavri, Madan Lal, Roger Binny (the
latter two being better known for their ODI heroics) and towards the
end of the 80s Manoj Prabhakar.
The situation today is rather grim. These versatile customers have
become an endangered species. India's resurgence as an all wicket
cricketing power is closely linked to the discovery of at least one
genuine all rounder.