England v Bangladesh March 16, 2010

Both teams emerge with honour intact

England were the clear winners of the first Test, but Bangladesh showed grit and character even in defeat
14

Blushes were spared and honour was preserved on all fronts on the final day at Chittagong. The favourites emerged victorious by a sufficiently hefty margin (181 runs) to ensure against an inquisition, but the underdogs showed enough pride and fight to keep the contest bubbling well into the post-lunch session. Given the hideous one-sidedness of the opening two days of the contest, the subsequent cut-and-thrust augured well for Saturday's series decider in Dhaka.

"It's a really good win, and to get 20 wickets on that pitch was a fantastic effort," said England's captain, Alastair Cook, whose first Test in charge finished on an upbeat note. "It was a long, hard five days but to win like that was excellent. Everyone has contributed well, and I couldn't ask for any more than that. Test cricket is supposed to be hard, and it was hard graft at the end to get those last 10 wickets."

After a flying start to the contest on days one and two, in which England racked up a hefty first-innings 599 for 6 declared before reducing their opponents to 51 for 3 in reply, the fight and spirit that Bangladesh showed in adversity was hugely encouraging for their captain, Shakib Al Hasan. He defended his decision to bowl first on winning the toss, especially having witnessed Graeme Swann churn through 49 overs in the final innings.

"After what we saw today I am not disappointed with the decision," he said. "If I'd seen the ball being unplayable on the fifth day, maybe I would have been frustrated, but except for our first-innings bowling, everything happened as we thought it would. In the first innings we couldn't bowl in the right areas to create pressure, but we managed to improve that in the second innings."

The stars of the final stages of the contest were Bangladesh's sixth-wicket pairing of Junaid Siddique and Mushfiqur Rahim, who batted without being separated for two entire sessions and two balls shy of 70 overs all told, before the Man of the Match Swann nailed both in quick succession in the first half-hour after lunch.

For Shakib, however, the identity of Bangladesh's successes in this contest was less important than the quantity, and having watched Mushfiqur, Mahmudullah and Tamim Iqbal play with poise in the first innings as well, he was happy to be able to say that his team's consistency had gone up another notch.

"We fought hard in the second innings, as well as the first," said Shakib. "Previously we'd see only one batsman was performing. Now we get more than one batsman scoring runs, which is a positive thing for us. On the first morning, Jamie [Siddons, the coach] told us in a meeting that our batsman should each concentrate on making a hundred, because we now believe we can do it.

"I also believed that if we could survive for the first hour of the day, something good was possible," said Shakib. "When they batted very well up to lunch I was telling Mushfiq he [and Junaid] needed to work for another 40 minutes to get through their next period. They could not do it, but they still batted very well, and it shows how we have improved our character."

Of course, Bangladesh's struggles might have been a little more acute had England decided to go into the match with five bowlers. But Cook's instinct was to beat his opponents through scoreboard pressure as much as on-field pressure, and as he admitted afterwards, his only real dilemma on the eve of the game was whether to go in with three seamers or two spinners. Despite a few alarms along the way, he felt his chosen strategy was the right one.

"It was a very tough call before the game," he said. "That call gave me a sleepless night and a proper insight into the captaincy. Five bowlers is always a luxury, and when a partnership is building, your mind does wander, but Swanny got ten and the other bowlers bowled well, so it was the right decision. We've won a game comfortably after a lot of hard work."

Cook had less qualms about his other big decision of the match, however, the non-enforcement of the follow-on, despite securing a first-innings lead of 303. "Those conditions on the third day were hot and humid and we'd bowled 90 overs, so our lads needed a rest," he said.

"It's amazing what two sessions off does for a bowler, and even if we hadn't won the game, I'd have still backed my decision. You do talk to the bowlers a little bit, and if they are 100% 'you've got to enforce the follow-on' then you listen. But I'm not a massive fan of it. I was pretty set in my ways that we weren't going to enforce."

For Cook, of course, it was an all-important first victory as England captain, and as things panned out it proved to be a sound test of character. "I was quite pleased how calm I kept in that heat," he said. "Last night was probably the worst time for me, towards the end of that session when we'd been in the field all day. But we kept calm because we knew they couldn't keep doing what they were doing. We just had to keep believing it would happen and thankfully it did."

"They came back strongly and showed their character," said Shakib. "They are really professional and they kept bowling in the good areas that create the pressure. But I think after our first-innings bowling we have showed better character. We bowled in the right areas and our batsmen tried to leave the ball when it was in the danger zone. We are still improving, but we are a much more disciplined side than we were."

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo. Go to http://twitter.com/miller_cricket to follow him on Twitter through the England tour of Bangladesh.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on March 18, 2010, 18:44 GMT

    Tamim, Shakib, Mushfik, Aftab, Mahmudullah, Junayed, Imrul, Naeem, plz wake up... u all can make 1000 runs ...............in an innings together..........

    England is a good and strong team... We have to do something special to beat them........... We want wins, nothing else, nothing can satisfy us except winning....

  • Bengali-Tiger007 on March 17, 2010, 0:10 GMT

    Yeh its all big talk for Cook, still congrats to them. They lost all my respect after behaving like that towards Siddique and Rahim, so I couldnt care less about their victory. I would like to see England play like that with the same selection against India or Srilanka and then do the big talk. Its not going to be that long now for BD to be world class. I recon another 5 more years and BD won't be the last rank test team in the ICC test table.

  • Woody111 on March 16, 2010, 23:15 GMT

    Well done Bangladesh! True grit is required in test cricket and they have demonstrated they have this a-plenty. I can't agree with sending Eng in - irrespective of the pitch - as runs on the board are paramount, but pushing into the fifth day was impressive. Take that nay-sayers!

  • FlashAsh on March 16, 2010, 20:59 GMT

    Many will say it's only Bangladesh, but there are few teams who have given more restistance to Swanns bowling especially on day 5. Great Eng win and congrats to Banga boys for making a game of it! A little drizzle would have made Cook a little more twitchy!!

    Looking forward to the weekend.

  • fifth-umpire on March 16, 2010, 19:02 GMT

    The title of this story is misleading. If a team loses by 181 runs, it needs to improve drastically. Read a post about Bangla performance in last 2 years before current series. http://fifth-umpire.blogspot.com/2010/01/ordinary-bangladesh.html

  • Rahulbose on March 16, 2010, 18:40 GMT

    Bangladesh score cards from the India and Eng games have the same format. Why do they continue to deny Musfiqur a place in the top order?

  • malmanca on March 16, 2010, 15:47 GMT

    Swann's display of emotions after getting Junaid out was quite shameful

  • on March 16, 2010, 12:41 GMT

    Aah.......Another defeat of bangladesh....I think sehwag was right to point out that bangladesh side is an ordinary team...nobody else was not daring to say this openly...I think ICC should take away their test status given their performance in this format. They might do well in the shorter format but they are not worthy of being a test side.

    Many of the bangladeshis then said that bangladesh team will prove sehwag wrong but they were defeated 2-0. Now I don't see them wining any test matches unless they played with zim or now pakis.. as PAK without Younis and Yousuf will be same as Bangladesh now.. So many years in world cricket and BAN have won only two series In which both Zim and WI were weakened sides(WI did not played their first team in that series). Since 2000 i have been reading these sorts of articles that after defeat also BAN side emerge with honours intact. Now when will they win???

  • ScriptWriter on March 16, 2010, 12:40 GMT

    England seem to think they have beaten a team in the top three they way they are describing the match. From where I see it, the result shows England won. But Bangladesh ran them close. And for this effort, Bangladesh deserve more than a pat on their backs. It was a moral victory, even though morals do not have much meaning in today's world. Making England slog till way past lunch on the final day when England were expected to wrap it up by the fourth day at the most definitely shows that Bangladesh has made strides in Test cricket. What the Bangladesh team need is consistency, and that will make them start winning matches.

  • on March 16, 2010, 12:22 GMT

    great display and it hard to see why 5 days cricket is dying

  • on March 18, 2010, 18:44 GMT

    Tamim, Shakib, Mushfik, Aftab, Mahmudullah, Junayed, Imrul, Naeem, plz wake up... u all can make 1000 runs ...............in an innings together..........

    England is a good and strong team... We have to do something special to beat them........... We want wins, nothing else, nothing can satisfy us except winning....

  • Bengali-Tiger007 on March 17, 2010, 0:10 GMT

    Yeh its all big talk for Cook, still congrats to them. They lost all my respect after behaving like that towards Siddique and Rahim, so I couldnt care less about their victory. I would like to see England play like that with the same selection against India or Srilanka and then do the big talk. Its not going to be that long now for BD to be world class. I recon another 5 more years and BD won't be the last rank test team in the ICC test table.

  • Woody111 on March 16, 2010, 23:15 GMT

    Well done Bangladesh! True grit is required in test cricket and they have demonstrated they have this a-plenty. I can't agree with sending Eng in - irrespective of the pitch - as runs on the board are paramount, but pushing into the fifth day was impressive. Take that nay-sayers!

  • FlashAsh on March 16, 2010, 20:59 GMT

    Many will say it's only Bangladesh, but there are few teams who have given more restistance to Swanns bowling especially on day 5. Great Eng win and congrats to Banga boys for making a game of it! A little drizzle would have made Cook a little more twitchy!!

    Looking forward to the weekend.

  • fifth-umpire on March 16, 2010, 19:02 GMT

    The title of this story is misleading. If a team loses by 181 runs, it needs to improve drastically. Read a post about Bangla performance in last 2 years before current series. http://fifth-umpire.blogspot.com/2010/01/ordinary-bangladesh.html

  • Rahulbose on March 16, 2010, 18:40 GMT

    Bangladesh score cards from the India and Eng games have the same format. Why do they continue to deny Musfiqur a place in the top order?

  • malmanca on March 16, 2010, 15:47 GMT

    Swann's display of emotions after getting Junaid out was quite shameful

  • on March 16, 2010, 12:41 GMT

    Aah.......Another defeat of bangladesh....I think sehwag was right to point out that bangladesh side is an ordinary team...nobody else was not daring to say this openly...I think ICC should take away their test status given their performance in this format. They might do well in the shorter format but they are not worthy of being a test side.

    Many of the bangladeshis then said that bangladesh team will prove sehwag wrong but they were defeated 2-0. Now I don't see them wining any test matches unless they played with zim or now pakis.. as PAK without Younis and Yousuf will be same as Bangladesh now.. So many years in world cricket and BAN have won only two series In which both Zim and WI were weakened sides(WI did not played their first team in that series). Since 2000 i have been reading these sorts of articles that after defeat also BAN side emerge with honours intact. Now when will they win???

  • ScriptWriter on March 16, 2010, 12:40 GMT

    England seem to think they have beaten a team in the top three they way they are describing the match. From where I see it, the result shows England won. But Bangladesh ran them close. And for this effort, Bangladesh deserve more than a pat on their backs. It was a moral victory, even though morals do not have much meaning in today's world. Making England slog till way past lunch on the final day when England were expected to wrap it up by the fourth day at the most definitely shows that Bangladesh has made strides in Test cricket. What the Bangladesh team need is consistency, and that will make them start winning matches.

  • on March 16, 2010, 12:22 GMT

    great display and it hard to see why 5 days cricket is dying

  • Masud on March 16, 2010, 12:15 GMT

    Stupid, Shakib we don't need to analyse us what we are than what we were. This is International Cricket mate - unlike suburban tennis ball cricket. We are not even close to win this game at any time and please accept this fact without any explanation for better future of our game. Be analytical, Results oritented, technically strong, maturity and work with your team player without fighting with ego - this vision might help us instead playing with the words after losing all games. Its time wake up for Bangladesh cricket internationally.

    Congrates to England team, its pity that we are known as Tigar, but we are the tail of a tiger not the head. Anyone knows actually when we are going be the Head of the Tiger??? Leaving for the fate ...

    Masud from Sydney - regular cricinfo reader and a Bangladesh Cricket Fan.

  • realredbaron on March 16, 2010, 12:08 GMT

    Good, positive character shown by the young Bangladeshi team. Before anyone criticizes Bangladesh's yet another defeat in test cricket, I would like to remind them the average age of this Bangladesh squad is 22.7! This team is literally qualified for any U23 tournament, if there were any. Give them 3-5 more years and they will produce some quality cricket, with a team effort of course! The three batsman who performed in this test were Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiq, Junaid, whose ages are, respectively, 21, 20, 23 years. I know people are fed up hearing the promise that Bangladeshi cricketers bring with and then miserably fail to convert it into reality. However these players are different. They constantly performed in U19 level and few years back when they were in U19, they had beaten Pakistan U19, Australia U19, New Zealand U19, Sri Lanaka U19, England U19 in regular basis. These are the 2nd generation of cricketers after Bangladesh received test status. So there is some real hope.

  • SimonSpliff on March 16, 2010, 11:48 GMT

    Well played to Siddique and Rahim, they showed the rest that if you get your head down and play sensibly that on the flattest track I've seen since that West Indies series Bangladesh can hold off England. I expected certain technical and mental weaknesses in Bangladesh, that's to be expected, but I think I'm the most disappointed with England, and epsecially Cook. Most people criticise Strauss for being fairly negative but Cook seems to me to be worse.5 bowlers are not a luxury, bowlers win test matches, image a football team saying 2 strikers are a luxury and playing 6 defenders. You can only get away with four bowlers if one or two of them are of geniune brilliance. Picking 7 batsman against Bangladesh is especially cowardly. I almost hoped the test would be a draw to teach England a lesson and shake this negative attitude away. Also why no second spinner! Have three ODI's and a practive match not shown you the importance of that. Man up England, the Aussie's certainly will.

  • CricketMaan on March 16, 2010, 11:21 GMT

    Well done Bangla..you are improving every test match. There is something with these low profile Bangla coaches, Dav first and now Jamie, they seem to get the best out of this outfit. Hope to see you guys make more 100s in Aus, SA etc.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • CricketMaan on March 16, 2010, 11:21 GMT

    Well done Bangla..you are improving every test match. There is something with these low profile Bangla coaches, Dav first and now Jamie, they seem to get the best out of this outfit. Hope to see you guys make more 100s in Aus, SA etc.

  • SimonSpliff on March 16, 2010, 11:48 GMT

    Well played to Siddique and Rahim, they showed the rest that if you get your head down and play sensibly that on the flattest track I've seen since that West Indies series Bangladesh can hold off England. I expected certain technical and mental weaknesses in Bangladesh, that's to be expected, but I think I'm the most disappointed with England, and epsecially Cook. Most people criticise Strauss for being fairly negative but Cook seems to me to be worse.5 bowlers are not a luxury, bowlers win test matches, image a football team saying 2 strikers are a luxury and playing 6 defenders. You can only get away with four bowlers if one or two of them are of geniune brilliance. Picking 7 batsman against Bangladesh is especially cowardly. I almost hoped the test would be a draw to teach England a lesson and shake this negative attitude away. Also why no second spinner! Have three ODI's and a practive match not shown you the importance of that. Man up England, the Aussie's certainly will.

  • realredbaron on March 16, 2010, 12:08 GMT

    Good, positive character shown by the young Bangladeshi team. Before anyone criticizes Bangladesh's yet another defeat in test cricket, I would like to remind them the average age of this Bangladesh squad is 22.7! This team is literally qualified for any U23 tournament, if there were any. Give them 3-5 more years and they will produce some quality cricket, with a team effort of course! The three batsman who performed in this test were Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiq, Junaid, whose ages are, respectively, 21, 20, 23 years. I know people are fed up hearing the promise that Bangladeshi cricketers bring with and then miserably fail to convert it into reality. However these players are different. They constantly performed in U19 level and few years back when they were in U19, they had beaten Pakistan U19, Australia U19, New Zealand U19, Sri Lanaka U19, England U19 in regular basis. These are the 2nd generation of cricketers after Bangladesh received test status. So there is some real hope.

  • Masud on March 16, 2010, 12:15 GMT

    Stupid, Shakib we don't need to analyse us what we are than what we were. This is International Cricket mate - unlike suburban tennis ball cricket. We are not even close to win this game at any time and please accept this fact without any explanation for better future of our game. Be analytical, Results oritented, technically strong, maturity and work with your team player without fighting with ego - this vision might help us instead playing with the words after losing all games. Its time wake up for Bangladesh cricket internationally.

    Congrates to England team, its pity that we are known as Tigar, but we are the tail of a tiger not the head. Anyone knows actually when we are going be the Head of the Tiger??? Leaving for the fate ...

    Masud from Sydney - regular cricinfo reader and a Bangladesh Cricket Fan.

  • on March 16, 2010, 12:22 GMT

    great display and it hard to see why 5 days cricket is dying

  • ScriptWriter on March 16, 2010, 12:40 GMT

    England seem to think they have beaten a team in the top three they way they are describing the match. From where I see it, the result shows England won. But Bangladesh ran them close. And for this effort, Bangladesh deserve more than a pat on their backs. It was a moral victory, even though morals do not have much meaning in today's world. Making England slog till way past lunch on the final day when England were expected to wrap it up by the fourth day at the most definitely shows that Bangladesh has made strides in Test cricket. What the Bangladesh team need is consistency, and that will make them start winning matches.

  • on March 16, 2010, 12:41 GMT

    Aah.......Another defeat of bangladesh....I think sehwag was right to point out that bangladesh side is an ordinary team...nobody else was not daring to say this openly...I think ICC should take away their test status given their performance in this format. They might do well in the shorter format but they are not worthy of being a test side.

    Many of the bangladeshis then said that bangladesh team will prove sehwag wrong but they were defeated 2-0. Now I don't see them wining any test matches unless they played with zim or now pakis.. as PAK without Younis and Yousuf will be same as Bangladesh now.. So many years in world cricket and BAN have won only two series In which both Zim and WI were weakened sides(WI did not played their first team in that series). Since 2000 i have been reading these sorts of articles that after defeat also BAN side emerge with honours intact. Now when will they win???

  • malmanca on March 16, 2010, 15:47 GMT

    Swann's display of emotions after getting Junaid out was quite shameful

  • Rahulbose on March 16, 2010, 18:40 GMT

    Bangladesh score cards from the India and Eng games have the same format. Why do they continue to deny Musfiqur a place in the top order?

  • fifth-umpire on March 16, 2010, 19:02 GMT

    The title of this story is misleading. If a team loses by 181 runs, it needs to improve drastically. Read a post about Bangla performance in last 2 years before current series. http://fifth-umpire.blogspot.com/2010/01/ordinary-bangladesh.html