USA February 9, 2010

Carl Wright leads USA to victory

USA 121 for 4 (Wright 62, Cush 41) beat Scotland 120 for 7 (Hamilton 41, Darlington 2-19, Dhaniram 1-12) by six wickets Scorecard

USA 121 for 4 (Wright 62, Cush 41) beat Scotland 120 for 7 (Hamilton 41, Darlington 2-19, Dhaniram 1-12) by six wickets
Scorecard

A 97-run partnership between Carl Wright and Lennox Cush helped USA to an unexpected six-wicket victory over Scotland in the opening game of the World Twenty20 Qualifiers at Abu Dhabi.

Coming together after the early loss of Sushil Nadkarni, the pair compiled their runs at better than a run-a-ball to guide USA to within striking distance of victory. Wright struck eight fours on the way to a 57-ball 62, and Cush was no less enterprising, with three fours and a six in his 41.

Wright's dismissal, trapped lbw by Jan Stander with victory in sight, sparked a mini collapse as three wickets fell for no runs. Cush picked out Richie Berrington off Ryan Watson's medium pace, and Timroy Allen - the hero of USA's thrilling one-wicket win over UAE in the warm-ups - fell without scoring as USA slipped to 114 for 4. But Sudesh Dhaniram and captain Steve Massiah played a calm hand to ensure no further blips, sealing the win off the first ball of the 20th over.

Though Wright thoroughly deserved the Man-of-the-Match award for his match-winning half-century, the victory was set up by a solid team effort from USA's bowlers, who took the pressure off their batsmen by pegging Scotland back.

Usman Shuja began in superb fashion, getting rid of the dangerous Kyle Coetzer with his second ball. Orlando Baker then bowled Navdeep Poonia before he could get going, and Rashard Marshall and Wright combined to run out Fraser Watts and reduce Scotland to 42 for 3 in the ninth over.

Dhaniram kept the reins on the middle order with an extremely frugal spell, conceding just 12 runs in his four overs and picking up the vital wicket of Gavin Hamilton for 41. Stander's bright cameo lifted Scotland's score in the closing overs, but a target of 121 was never going to be a stern test, even for USA's brittle top order.

Sahil Dutta is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • AssociateAffiliate on February 21, 2010, 13:00 GMT

    Agreed with Pat and Anil. I compile most of the squad lists on Associate/Affiliate nations on Wikipedia and only a few days ago I updated the current USA squad and it was mostly a Guyana Rejects XI. Canada was mostly an Asian XI (which annoys me considering they get the same funding as Ireland, Netherlands, Afghanistan who make an effort to spread the game). UAE was mostly a Pakistani XI. There was some coverage of the issue when the UAE with the squad that won the 2009 ACC Twenty20 would not be able to take part in the Asian Games because their squad contained only 2 players from the UAE itself.

    As Anil said in an earlier post, anyone can put together a "first-class" team with a phone call to some failed first-class player from Guyana, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka Jamaica ect.

    ICC needs to reward nations that put an effort into spreading the game outside of expat roots and those who don't... well tough, give them less funding.

  • Anil Koshy on February 9, 2010, 16:08 GMT

    I fully agree Pat, don't know why ICC is wasting money on coutries like USA,Canada & UAE who are over dependent on expatriates.

  • Pat on February 9, 2010, 12:00 GMT

    I had a look at the American lineup and not one of their players was born in the US. I'm all for Associate cricket, but what's the point if there are no homegrown players? Is the development other countries being hindered by the ICC's obsession with breaking through in America? It ain't gonna happen.

  • AssociateAffiliate on February 21, 2010, 13:00 GMT

    Agreed with Pat and Anil. I compile most of the squad lists on Associate/Affiliate nations on Wikipedia and only a few days ago I updated the current USA squad and it was mostly a Guyana Rejects XI. Canada was mostly an Asian XI (which annoys me considering they get the same funding as Ireland, Netherlands, Afghanistan who make an effort to spread the game). UAE was mostly a Pakistani XI. There was some coverage of the issue when the UAE with the squad that won the 2009 ACC Twenty20 would not be able to take part in the Asian Games because their squad contained only 2 players from the UAE itself.

    As Anil said in an earlier post, anyone can put together a "first-class" team with a phone call to some failed first-class player from Guyana, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka Jamaica ect.

    ICC needs to reward nations that put an effort into spreading the game outside of expat roots and those who don't... well tough, give them less funding.

  • Anil Koshy on February 9, 2010, 16:08 GMT

    I fully agree Pat, don't know why ICC is wasting money on coutries like USA,Canada & UAE who are over dependent on expatriates.

  • Pat on February 9, 2010, 12:00 GMT

    I had a look at the American lineup and not one of their players was born in the US. I'm all for Associate cricket, but what's the point if there are no homegrown players? Is the development other countries being hindered by the ICC's obsession with breaking through in America? It ain't gonna happen.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Pat on February 9, 2010, 12:00 GMT

    I had a look at the American lineup and not one of their players was born in the US. I'm all for Associate cricket, but what's the point if there are no homegrown players? Is the development other countries being hindered by the ICC's obsession with breaking through in America? It ain't gonna happen.

  • Anil Koshy on February 9, 2010, 16:08 GMT

    I fully agree Pat, don't know why ICC is wasting money on coutries like USA,Canada & UAE who are over dependent on expatriates.

  • AssociateAffiliate on February 21, 2010, 13:00 GMT

    Agreed with Pat and Anil. I compile most of the squad lists on Associate/Affiliate nations on Wikipedia and only a few days ago I updated the current USA squad and it was mostly a Guyana Rejects XI. Canada was mostly an Asian XI (which annoys me considering they get the same funding as Ireland, Netherlands, Afghanistan who make an effort to spread the game). UAE was mostly a Pakistani XI. There was some coverage of the issue when the UAE with the squad that won the 2009 ACC Twenty20 would not be able to take part in the Asian Games because their squad contained only 2 players from the UAE itself.

    As Anil said in an earlier post, anyone can put together a "first-class" team with a phone call to some failed first-class player from Guyana, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka Jamaica ect.

    ICC needs to reward nations that put an effort into spreading the game outside of expat roots and those who don't... well tough, give them less funding.