April 10, 2012

England

The England puzzle, and the case for/against Sammy

Andy Zaltzman
Darren Sammy celebrates Ed Cowan's wicket, West Indies v Australia, 1st Test, Barbados, 3rd day, April 9, 2012
Darren Sammy: he's a Star Trek character, he's not  © Getty Images
Enlarge

RELATED LINKS

The dust is settling on England's fascinating, and, until Colombo's belated redemption, spectacularly unsuccessful Test winter. And that dust is confused. Very confused. Is it covering a landmark underachievement, or an unfortunate blip? Has 2011-12 shown how vulnerable this supposedly world-leading England side is, and how the weaknesses in it had been camouflaged by an unprecedented collective burst of form and some fractured, sub-standard opposition; or has it strangely proved, as suggested by my World Cricket Podcast compadre Daniel Norcross, quite how good they are?

They were, after all, not far from winning four Tests out of five despite having batted for most of the winter like a long-forgotten salad in an abandoned fridge, and they bowled persistently superbly (statistically far better than in 2000-01, when they returned from Asia with two series victories). As soon as the batsmen for the first time applied themselves correctly, they waltzed to a resounding victory. Albeit that the sound that resounded was the echo of the words, "Where the hell was that in the Gulf in January?" rebounding back from outer space.

So many questions remain to be answered. Which was the batting blip - the first four Tests or the last one? Will the Pakistan whitewash remain a scar on this excellent England team's record, or will it prove to be an open wound in which the maggots of doubt have laid out their towels for an interesting year's sunbathing ahead?

Your witness, history. Get back to us in nine months' time with some supporting evidence from (a) this summer's series against an increasingly-determined-but-almost-entirely-unacquainted-with-early-season-English-conditions West Indies, and a probably-should-be-No. 1-side-in-the-Test-world-if-only-they-didn't -keep-tanking-one-nil-series-leads South Africa, and (b) the four Tests in India at the end of the year.

Personally, my expectation is that England will beat West Indies comfortably, draw 1-1 with South Africa, and win narrowly in India, guided by their freshly printed multi-volume Encyclopaedia Of Lessons Learned, which they are no doubt busy scribbling down from their failures this winter.

However, my expectation was that they would win in the UAE against Pakistan, and they managed to avoid doing that in some style, in much the same way that the Titanic managed to avoid overshooting America on its maiden voyage.

And, just as they had not faced high-class spin for a lengthy period before subsiding to Ajmal and Rehman, so they will not have faced the calibre of swing bowling they can expect from Steyn and Philander since Amir and Asif brilliantly hooped them to distraction two years ago before. Just as facing Xavier Doherty in Brisbane, or Mishra and Raina at The Oval, was not ideal preparation for encountering Pakistan's crafty tweakmen in the Gulf, so seeing off Lakmal and Prasad in Colombo, statistically one of cricket history's least penetrating new-ball attacks (their career figures suggesting they offered the incision of an ice scalpel in a sub-Saharan operating theatre), will not have honed England ideally for the South African pace and swing barrage. As preparation for that task, it was about as appropriate as Neil Armstrong training for his rocket trip to the moon by hanging a cantaloupe melon from his bedroom ceiling, saying "5-4-3-2-1-blast-off" and throwing a dart at it.

Luckily, Strauss and his men have time and the West Indies series in which to reactivate their facing-swing-bowling heads. And hope that they work better than they did in 2010. And that England's bowlers continue to provide the grip and penetration of a Viagra-addled boa constrictor, as they have done consistently for the last two years.

Then, in November, England's batsmen will have to switch heads back to the spin-oriented ones that only started showing signs of neural activity briefly in Galle, and only uttered coherent sentences in Colombo. India will enter that series with scores to settle, both with England and, more specifically, with themselves.

They will be hoping by then that they still have a left-arm spinner who can remember how to bowl anything other than four overs of balls speared in at leg stump. Not only has this been England's worst ever winter or summer season against spin (they lost 77 wickets to spin in the five Tests, at a little under 19 runs apiece), but Abdur Rehman and Rangana Herath both returned series hauls of 19 wickets against them. That is more than any left-arm spinner in a series against England since India's Dilip Doshi took 22 in a six-Test rubber 30 winters ago, and more than any non-Indian left-arm spinner since Alf Valentine twirled England to post-war befuddlement in 1950. England are likely to face legspinners Devendra Bishoo and Imran Tahir this summer. I never thought I would write this, but Pragyan Ojha could hold the entire future health of Indian Test cricket in his fingers.

EXTRAS ● Excuse me for largely skipping over the first half of England's Test summer, despite West Indies' impressively cussed all-round performance in the first three days against Australia in Barbados. The Caribbean team's last two early-season tours to England have been pointlessly one-sided and deeply depressing. Darren Sammy's team seems unlikely to cave in as readily as Chris Gayle's did in the two-Test-total-waste-of-time in 2009, but West Indies have lost 12 out of 14 matches in England since they last won a Test here 12 years ago. Excluding tours of Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, West Indies have played 65 away Tests since 1997. They have won two of them. And lost 50. I just hope for something resembling cricket to occur.

● Is there a more underrated bowler in world cricket than Sammy? As I write (in between days three and four of the Barbados Test), the West Indian skipper's Test bowling average stands at 29.60. This means that, of all West Indian bowlers to have taken more than 20 Test wickets, Sammy has the best average of anyone who has made their debut since Ian Bishop in 1989 (albeit only by a very slim margin over Jermaine Lawson, which a single boundary at the start of play today would wipe out).

Sammy currently has a better career average than Jimmy Anderson, Morne Morkel, Brett Lee, Zaheer Khan, Umar Gul and Andrew Flintoff. That does not mean he is a better bowler than them, but Sammy's statistics suggest that he is a far better bowler than his action and speed-gun readings suggest he is.

● How much longer can West Indies continue to carry their captain, Sammy? His continued presence in the team, and the fact that he is not a good enough batsman to bat above No. 8, means that only two of a decent crop of Caribbean pacemen can play alongside Sammy and a spinner. Do not be fooled by his Test average of 29.60. It has been boosted by some cheap wickets against Bangladesh, and, excluding a home series against a weak Pakistan batting line-up, and a debut haul of 7 for 66 in England five years ago, in series against major opposition Sammy has not averaged under 34 runs per wicket, and has taken a wicket on average once every 14.2 overs. He might be forging a more dogged and disciplined West Indies team, for which all cricket fans should be wiping their brows in relief, but his limitations as a bowler are negating what could be their strongest attacking suit - an improving and increasingly potent pace attack.

● Stats are confusing.

Andy Zaltzman is a stand-up comedian, a regular on the BBC Radio 4, and a writer

RSS Feeds: Andy Zaltzman

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by tongue on (May 25, 2012, 13:52 GMT)

Sammy is the baggage on the WI team

Posted by Stephen Jepson on (April 16, 2012, 11:25 GMT)

The winter has exposed the fact that this England side has no 'great' batsmen and consequently will fall short of becoming a 'great' team. What they do have is, KP apart, a set of bloody minded grafters who, when they are in form, or against lesser bowling will fill their boots. Ally this to a great work ethic and a deep, balanced and talented bowling attack and you have a team that is deservedly number one but also there for the taking.

Posted by david on (April 15, 2012, 15:38 GMT)

Thank you Sigismund. (Btw, there should have been a "that" between "is" and "The Glory...") One thing though: I must be out of the loop, as I believe you young people say, but who is this "Ronald" of whom you speak? Irani? No, surely not. Is it a nickname? A clownish figure, after the gruesome promoter of gut-rot our children are encouraged to treat as a kind of twisted Earth Mother? Graeme Swann? If you have a mo, let me know, as I am intrigued. All the best, and here's to at least three decades of English cricketing hegemony.

Posted by John the Just on (April 12, 2012, 0:05 GMT)

Everyone seems to forget that England very comprehensively won all the one-dayers vs Pakistan immediately following the tests. And lambasted the same spinners too.

Posted by Sigismund on (April 10, 2012, 22:30 GMT)

Andy, while the simile is certainly your forte, the simile of the salad is verily a touch of genius. Thank you.

David: quite so, and well said, like a true Englishman; and Ronald surely shall be to the fore in the humiliation of those baggy-green b*stards.

Posted by djinn on (April 10, 2012, 17:55 GMT)

Actually, 87.3% of all stats are statistically correct. Andy will back me up on that

Posted by david on (April 10, 2012, 16:00 GMT)

Lovely writing, Andy. My tuppeneth: The four defeats are absolutely nothing to worry about. Dominance in anything- a sport, a career, a relationship- becomes boring and needs a taste of mess-up to renew the desire to suceed, to wit: an unsucessful new venture by an entrepreneur will generally be followed by incresed success in his core business; discord in the home is usually followed by furious and joyful love-making. So it is The Glory Of Our Nation (Strauss and his merry men) will now surge victoriously through the next three series with a renewed vigour and wish to vanquish, and will so arrive at Summer 2013 utterly unstoppable, remorseless, resulting in a ritual dispatching of Australia.

Posted by Rahulbose on (April 10, 2012, 15:58 GMT)

England's Asian tour has infact shown why they will a be a top side for some time. They have a strong bowling unit with plenty reserves, and that is much more important than the batting. As for the Indian tour, I expect them to win by some margin. India don't have any quality spinners, they will be playing after 6 months break from tests and in winter there is plenty swing in India.

Posted by Ed Parsons on (April 10, 2012, 12:37 GMT)

Nice bit of Glenda Slagg at the end there Andy...geddit?????????!?!!?!

Posted by alex on (April 10, 2012, 11:06 GMT)

Really love your writings Andy but as a West Indies fan i am kindly asking for a 'hands-off' of Darren Sammy please. We know he's not the best bowler, batsman or fielder but somehow he's getting our guys to play with some pride, spirit and backbone. This is something that other captains more worthy of their places (Lara, Gayle, Chanderpaul, Walsh) in the team, either didnt, wouldnt or simply couldnt do.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Andy Zaltzman
Andy Zaltzman was born in obscurity in 1974. He has been a sporadically-acclaimed stand-up comedian since 1999, and has appeared regularly on BBC Radio 4. He is currently one half of TimesOnline's hit satirical podcast The Bugle, alongside John Oliver. Zaltzman's love of cricket outshone his aptitude for the game by a humiliating margin. He once scored 6 in 75 minutes in an Under-15 match, and failed to hit a six between the ages of 9 and 23. He would have been ideally suited to Tests, had not a congenital defect left him unable to play the game to anything above genuine village standard. He writes the Confectionery Stall blog on Cricinfo.

All articles by this writer