Australian cricket June 4, 2013

Mark Cosgrove and the stigma of obesity

Russell Jackson
What is worse for the image of Australian cricket - cricketers overweight of body, or cricketers underweight of runs?

Cosgrove's recent form has not warranted Australian selection, but there have been times in the past when it has © Getty Images

Heading into this year-long festival of Ashes, I'm willing to finally concede that I can no longer take comfort in thoughts like, "Will Glenn McGrath predict a 5-0 whitewash again?" or "Will every Aussie in the top six make a ton at Lord's?" like I did in days gone by. Those have been replaced by less palatable alternatives like, "Will any Aussie batsman make a hundred at Lord's?" and "Is the darkness creeping slowly and inevitably closer by the day?" It's just the way things are now for Australians.

But I've also been thinking about the players that made the Ashes squad and those who didn't. John Inverarity probably did as well as he might have, given the options at his disposal. He also finally picked Chris Rogers, and everyone knows that picking ginger blokes with glasses who are really, really good at batting is a good thing to do when you are a national cricket selector.

In a weird way, after the initial rush of relief at Rogers' elevation, I just started to worry about the rest of Australia's batsmen even more than I would if he wasn't there. His sturdy batsmanship and measured demeanour took flight in my imagination and immediately rendered some of his colleagues an assortment of hapless, skittish liabilities. I pictured Phillip Hughes crouched down at the crease with his head swiveling about like a drunk driver trying to slowly navigate his way home through the back streets. I imagined Constable Anderson chuckling away at the sight for a few minutes before collaring him; drunk drivers are a liability after all, even if they are sometimes entertaining to watch.

But we had no one else, right? The Sheffield Shield is merely a crèche service to give the staff at the Centre of Excellence some time off, isn't it? Well, not quite.

This is the point at which I try to convince you that even though he had no real right to be selected in this or the 2009 Ashes squad to tour England, Mark Cosgrove has been hard done by in his career. I'll admit it, he hasn't done me many favours here, what with averaging in the 30s for the last two consecutive Australian summers and all, but I'll give it a try because this isn't an argument about statistics or numbers, it is an argument about society's last apparently acceptable stigma: obesity.

Cosgrove is what any doctor would term overweight and though history is brim full of well-upholstered characters who have risen to the top of their professions, dominated their sports, and led the free world, it is wrong that Cosgrove has barely been afforded the opportunity to prosper as a result of his weight issues. Very wrong. In return for his mortal sin he has spent his entire professional career being pointed and laughed at, bullied even. Some journalists have even seized upon Cosgrove's battles as an opportunity to break the world record for shoehorning as many fat jokes into one column as possible.

Yes, there have been many times when Cosgrove's form has not warranted Australian selection, but equally there have been times when it has; times in which Australia have not exactly been spoiled for options, either. What I ask is this: if Mark Cosgrove were to average over 50 in domestic first-class cricket during the next Australian summer, would the National Selection Panel even consider him? Have his papers been marked yet and is this due purely to his weight issues?

Cosgrove is something of a physical anomaly in his sport though not in his country, where close to 64% of adults are overweight or obese

Cosgrove's body shape has been looked on by more than a few pundits as being emblematic of a kind of cultural poison that he'd bring to the national team set-up, as though his weight problems were somehow contagious. Yet it was Tasmania, Australian cricket's current cultural cradle, which opened its arms when Cosgrove was cut loose by South Australia. Tasmanian cricket is arguably a much more serviceable piece of machinery than the national set-up at present and Cosgrove is a valuable cog within it, making that point moot. Personally I hope Cosgrove makes a truckload of runs next year and turns this into more than a hypothetical. What is worse for the image of Australian cricket: cricketers overweight of body, or cricketers underweight of runs?

In a measured, insightful discussion of "fat discrimination", University of New South Wales Research Fellow Deborah Lupton spoke of overweight people and the "moral failure that their bodies represent". She also told of the diminished respect and career opportunities suffered as a result of obesity. Nowhere is the perception of this "failure" element more present than in professional sports. It is anathema to everything elite sport and its ever-expanding circle of sports scientists and high-performance managers stand for.

Phrases like "failed to meet the expectations of professionalism placed upon him" abound now in a combination of medical, management, and marketing-speak that is somehow meant to soften the personal blows that come as a corollary to the double stigmas of failure and weight gain. It is also why AFL football clubs have even taken the step of publicly chastising players for ballooning skin-fold results. Cosgrove is something of a physical anomaly in his sport though not in his country, where close to 64% of adults are overweight or obese.

We've all heard it before: "he's let himself go", "he's not professional enough" or even worse, "he doesn't want it bad enough". I don't know Cosgrove but every time I've watched him bat he seems to be taking a great amount of pleasure in scoring runs. In first-class cricket he has 8386 of them at an average of 43.22. Those aren't Bradmanesque numbers but we are all adjusting our expectations of Australian cricketers these days, anyway. I'd find it hard to ever view Cosgrove as a failure though. With the odds stacked so increasingly against him with each passing season, he just hangs in there, ready and waiting for that next loose one. I'll think about him during the Ashes too. I know it.

There's every chance that Cosgrove won't allow me to indulge this minor obsession much more, I guess. He might not follow the advice of every person who has even passed public comment on his career and lose some weight. He also might not score enough runs next season to even be mentioned as a possible international. Many of us will then indulge in that awful reflection of what could have been and whether we're all connected in this problem of his, this problem of everyone's.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Richard on June 5, 2013, 20:11 GMT

    I remember the first ashes series I watched in 1993. There was a fair bit of extra timber being carried around by a few players, and Cosgrove wouldn't have been in bad company at all. Mike Gatting, David Boon, Shane Warne, Mark Taylor, Merv Hughes, Allan Border. Different times I suppose. As much as it is good to say that Cosgrove should be given as much chance as anyone else should score the runs, you'd have to imagine he'd be a bit of a liability in the field should he find himself chasing down a ball and he would get no end of stick from the Barmy Army. If he dropped a catch or made a clanger in the field it just wouldn't be fair on the lad.

  • Dummy4 on June 5, 2013, 14:31 GMT

    There are definitely both sides of an issue here. As said in the article he has performed below par for two seasons now, but his FC average is still 43-odd which is exceptionally good in the current dark times of Aussie batting. I disagree that excess weight can be a liability in the field: "Cossie, you're at second slip." will do the trick. The other side is that attitudes have changed regarding this and its no longer acceptable to be an overweight sportsman at the top level, in the same kind of way as not being seen smoking or contract clauses regarding alcohol use. If it were up to me I would give him a few innings to see what he can do, but under current conditions there is no way he is helping his case by carrying so much excess weight. Fingers crossed for him to shed 20kg and be a serious contender for a Test berth.

  • Nicholas on June 5, 2013, 10:16 GMT

    I wonder would the public rather pay to watch: Mark Cosgrove, Samit Patel and Jesse Ryder...or Cooke, Compton and Trott!! Also, I don't think I.T. Botham was a great pie-avoider...and no-one in history hit the ball harder than Colin Milburn!

  • michael on June 5, 2013, 1:46 GMT

    At the end of the day it's not hard to lose weight. Flintoff did it and a few others. The days of Gatting and Boon are long gone. You cannot have guys lumbering around the outfield in this day and age. Cricket is a sport after all, it's not a game of Darts.

  • Chris on June 4, 2013, 22:32 GMT

    Lehman, Inzamam, De Silva, Ranatunga, Warne... they have all at times carried a bit of extra kilos and would any rational person have ignored them from their respective sides knowing how great they would become? I doubt it. If they're getting results, that's all that matters. D.Hussey, Cosgrove, O'Keefe and Burns all have reason to feel hard done by and neither D.Hussey, O'Keefe or Burns are overweight so I think it's more just selector incompetence rather than an actual weight issue.

  • Richard on June 4, 2013, 13:59 GMT

    Cosgrove's rather slender compared to Colin Milburn, but I guess cricket was different then.

  • Dummy4 on June 4, 2013, 13:42 GMT

    @Tom Langridge, I think you've nailed it. What would the difference be in runs saved or made between he and Dave Warner in a match, supposing their batting was of equal quality? Could be up to 50 runs, particularly when you take into account runs lost running between the wickets if the both played a long innings. Thats a lot of runs to make up with the bat. Even at best you'd have to say warner is going to be 10-20 runs ahead on fielding alone over a test match. When you are only averaging low forties thats a big difference.

  • Noor on June 4, 2013, 11:25 GMT

    As a decently overweight person myself (though not as overweight as Cosgrove), I've read plenty about how incredibly difficult it is to lose weight and keep it off. There are endless physiological reasons for it. One is that skinny people feel more full than fat people after a meal and thus are less likely to endulge in extra snacks. And then there are those who have hormonal difficulties. In this light, not selecting Cosgrove due to his weight is almost akin to discrimination of the disabled.

  • Dummy4 on June 4, 2013, 10:00 GMT

    An interesting piece, although I find it quite hard to agree with some of the sentiment.

    In an era of increasingly professional, competitive cricket where players are all expected to throw themselves around in the field and run hard between the wickets, players who are so out of shape look ever more out of place. With the professionalisation of sport, margins between failure and success become finer. Players have short careers, and are very well rewarded financially in that time. I'm of the view that, as a professional sportsman, you have a duty to ensure you perform as well as you can whenever you take the field, especially in the international arena, and that includes diet, fitness, lifestyle, and preparation. The runs lost from being a plodder between the wickets, or a sluggish outfielder could be crucial. If Cosgrove's stats were exceptional, it might be that he could be accommodated, but he is merely a good player, not extraordinary, so it's hard to justify his selection.