THE CORDON HOME

BLOGS ARCHIVES
SELECT BLOG
December 11, 2013

Close, Chappell and acts of courage

Jon Hotten
Brian Close: always seemed to be in the firing line against West Indies in 1976  © PA Photos
Enlarge

Before the Adelaide Test began, I tweeted a link to this video of Brian Close facing Michael Holding at Old Trafford in 1976, with a line saying that England's batsmen should watch it before they walked back out into the Australian guns. I got a reply saying that, as Close had only made 20 and England lost by 425 runs, there were probably some more inspiring videos about.

As a statistical point it was inarguable, and it made me wonder why some small acts in the game's vast history endure, when others, which dwarf them by numbers, fade from view. The six innings that Close played in the scorching summer of '76, three Tests in which he made 166 runs at 33.20, not only confirmed his legend within the game but took him out into the wider public in a way that sustains him in the imagination. He even became the subject of a famous joke by Morecambe and Wise - "I always know it's summer when I hear the sound of leather on Brian Close."

That 20 at Old Trafford was Close's final Test innings, bookending a career that began at 18 and ended at 45. Only Wilfred Rhodes has had more time between his first Test and his last.

The brutality that Close confronted at Old Trafford is only hinted at on film and in the sonorous declamation from the Almanack: "The period before the close of the third day brought disquieting cricket as Close and Edrich (his opening partner) defended themselves against fast bowling which was frequently too wild and hostile to be acceptable."

On a decaying wicket it was both awesome and terrible in its ferocity, and the batsmen displayed sporting courage of the highest kind. Close survived 108 balls and almost three hours, at one point facing Holding for more than 40 minutes without a change of ends. He refused to be broken by the onslaught, or by the hopeless situation of the match - England had been bowled out for 71 in their first innings, with Woolmer and Hayes dismissed by balls that Wisden records as "unplayable" and Greig and Underwood having "narrow escapes from what could have been serious injury". They were 552 behind when Close and Edrich went in for a second time. It was heroic in its way, defiant and brave and doomed, and it's hard not to be moved by the sight of it.

Mike Selvey sensed that Cook's England were facing pace that echoed a previous era, in a brilliant piece for the Guardian about Greg Chappell's method during the Packer years.

In West Indies for the WSC's only tour, Chappell took 620 runs from an attack that read: Holding, Roberts, Croft, Garner and Daniel. Chappell's maths was an insight into the task: 12 overs an hour, 72 deliveries, of which roughly 48 - four per over - would be short-pitched, leaving 24 that landed in the batsman's half. Chappell and his partner might receive 12 each. Of those, he'd probably have to defend six, leaving another six for which he could potentially come forward and score. You need a certain mindset to accept those odds and turn them to your advantage.

Selvey made his debut in Close's Old Trafford Test, taking the wickets of Roy Fredericks, Viv Richards and Alvin Kallicharran in his first 20 deliveries. Here's how he remembered the onslaught: "From the Old Trafford dressing room, side on to play, it was almost impossible to follow the flight of the ball from hand to the gloves of Deryck Murray."

When his turn came to face Holding: "He reached the crease, and the ball flew from his hand. A split second later, the ball exploded from the middle of my bat and ricocheted (there is no other word for it) back past the bowler, and we scampered two runs. It even drew some applause. The thing was, here was a bowler of such purity that you never lost sight of the ball, yet who could propel it at such velocity that although in vision all the time, it was too fast for the reaction of someone of my capabilities."

Close, even at 45, was good enough to face it for three hours on a dangerous pitch. He only made 20 runs, but they have a value beyond statistics. They are about the meaning of competition; they uphold the purity of sport. I still think England should watch it: at least they would walk out next time knowing that they are not alone.

Jon Hotten blogs here and tweets here

RSS Feeds: Jon Hotten

Keywords: Nostalgia

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by CricketChat on (December 12, 2013, 17:09 GMT)

Shame that Close didn't get to play after this WI tour. He might have retired with batter batting stats for all his troubles against WI. Still, I can only admire his guts facing the might of WI fast bowling with very basic protective gear.

Posted by Beertjie on (December 12, 2013, 11:35 GMT)

Lovely post @Nutcutlet on (December 11, 2013, 19:05 GMT). Agree entirely, @Gerry_the_Merry on (December 11, 2013, 8:53 GMT). Methinks the lads (sic!) doth protest too much!

Posted by Markdal on (December 12, 2013, 9:23 GMT)

Even Graeme Swann said that they wear so much protective gear now that it doesn't really hurt when you are hit. I felt for Brian Close and John Edrich here, because Close was brought back into the side, based obviously on how he withstood Wes Hall 13 years previous, and Edrich was just one gutsy player. Their reward for copping this? They were both dropped for the next Test, never to play again for England!

Posted by highveldhillbilly on (December 12, 2013, 8:04 GMT)

I hardly think Siddle, Harris, Watson and Johnson can even be compare to playing Holding, Roberts, Croft, Garner with no helmets. Only Johnson really looks like causing bodily harm. Harris and Siddle generally bowl pretty full. Think the English need to harden up.

Posted by Nutcutlet on (December 11, 2013, 19:05 GMT)

Just like England's second knock at Adelaide. Gutsing it out, going down with pride. Oh my Close & Edrich (& Steele & Cowdrey) of long ago! And that, folks, is why I believe that the modern cricketer is not fit to lace the boots of any of those players who wore one, wore a dozen (without helmets) for the cause. How is it that cricket as we know it today, was played for more than 100 years without modern protective gear? Were they mad? That's an awful ot of insane cricketers! There are only two ways in which you can be hit on the head (1) by taking your eye off the ball (2) from a top edge into the head/face. Bob Barber told me this in 1976. I guess he knew what he was talking about. PS I am not arguing against modern protective gear, but I am, I hope, putting in context the modern batsman facing extreme pace. Now, as I was saying, about Adelaide...

Posted by Whispering_Holding on (December 11, 2013, 18:38 GMT)

Why is fast bowling always great when England are dishing it out? I heard no complaints when Harmison routed Windies for 40 odd in Kingston. Yet it is a problem when England are on the receiving end. This current lot has Broad and Finn who love using the short ball too. What's the problem?

Posted by jw76 on (December 11, 2013, 16:41 GMT)

Like sledging, bouncer warfare is an evil that was never meant to be part of the game. Today's batsmen need nothing like the courage that batsmen showed in the past, without helmets, but the game was never meant to be that had batsmen in frequent danger of extremely serious injury. It is a mercy nobody was killed outright, but there were some who were permanently impaired in one way or another, and claims that the effects shortened the lives of some. Even after Ewen Chatfield's brush with death, the authorities never had the guts to do anything about it.

Posted by Gerry_the_Merry on (December 11, 2013, 8:53 GMT)

On a percentage basis, England are lucky since they ran into the only bowler in the world who can rattle cages like this, and unfortunately for them he is in form. Else there is no similar challenge elsewhere. Earlier in the time of the West Indies, there was. Imagine needing to play Lillee and Thommo in one season and within 2 years, play Holding and Roberts. I think batsmen like Close, Greig and Knott were very brave indeed. But there is no need for the modern batsman to be brave, really.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jon Hotten
Jon Hotten is the author of Muscle and The Years Of The Locust, neither of which is about cricket, and writes the blog The Old Batsman, which is. @theoldbatsman

All articles by this writer