May 16, 2014

Cricketers on TV when they're not playing? We'll pass

We see enough of our heroes on the field. Learn when to say no

Reverse-integrated synergy being monetised. Or something
Reverse-integrated synergy being monetised. Or something © Getty Images

Should cricketers only be allowed to appear on our screens when they are actually out in the middle playing cricket? This admittedly rather censorious suggestion nipped into my head this week after watching one bland IPL post-match interview too many and then coming across a glossy new TV advert featuring a couple of England players. Our heroes, so sublime and graceful on the field, seem to often transform into bewildered or bewildering automatons off it whenever a camera comes near them, though in some cases this isn't really their fault.

Take the post-match interview, for instance, in which the number of genuinely illuminating answers given by players per season could be written on the back of a business card. This is hardly surprising, of course, when Ravi Shastri's startling interrogation technique involves asking questions while thrusting the microphone towards his interviewee's face as if he's stabbing a pumpkin with a knitting needle. Similarly, Danny Morrison's tactic of shouting his queries in a voice loud enough to take off his unfortunate victim's skin generally induces awkward fear rather than responses of any actual interest. Even in-play interviews with the batting bench - a relatively innovative phenomenon - rarely offer us much aside from how the "lads are working hard" and, occasionally, news on dew levels. Dale Steyn took the ennui of the in-play chat a step further the other week when he was asked what he made of his team's current batting performance. He replied he hadn't been watching because he was playing on his iPod.

It's in the commercial sphere, however, that cricketers can really excel at proving they are cricketers rather than screen idols. There has been the odd triumph in cricket-themed adverts, such as Kevin Pietersen batting blindfolded to advertise a popular hair cream. Can you see the link between the premise and the product there? No, me neither, but at least it was quite compelling viewing.

In general, however, it has been a mixed bag. Chris Gayle has long presumably made a tidy profit out of flogging fizzy drinks by merrily goofing about as young Indian starlets swoon at his impressive physique and disco moves, which are, to be fair, undeniably more stylish than England's sprinkler dance.

The same company also commissioned a campaign starring members of the Pakistan team in which Mohammad Irfan at one point had to pretend to be a hotel water feature. Perhaps it was lost in translation, given my lack of Urdu, but you got the impression even fans in Lahore may have been left feeling a bit confused by it all. At least when Ian "Beefy" Botham and Allan "Lamby" Lamb advertised - and this may shock you - beef and lamb, there was a certain logic to things.

So to the latest addition to the canon of slightly kitsch cricket commercials. The ECB last week unveiled an advert for their new corporate sponsor, an upmarket supermarket chain. The slot features Stuart Broad and James Anderson gallivanting about the aisles like a pair of well-groomed teens bunking off school, and finishes with ex-England coach David Lloyd sitting in a van outside the supermarket, listening to a piece of commentary remarking on "what a great catch that was by Paul Downton".

Now, given the ECB managing director last played professional cricket in 1991, there are two possible explanations for this. 1) Lloyd has a vast collection of archive audio footage of Middlesex matches from the 1980s, which he loves listening to in supermarket car parks, or 2) someone commissioned a piece of commentary specifically for this advert, which inadvertently or otherwise shows Downton to be a man not short of self-regard. It would be folly to speculate which is the more likely and, to be fair, it's far from the most incongruous thing in the whole affair.

This is all, though, possibly being rather smug and curmudgeonly about our beloved cricketers' off-pitch on-screen efforts. Saeed Ajmal's post-match interviews remain a surreal tornado of words and giggles, whilst there are few mothers in Britain who have forgotten the quick-stepped performances of ex-England Test batsman Mark Ramprakash on Strictly Come Dancing. Steyn himself is to appear in an Adam Sandler romantic comedy. The mind boggles, but it's plausible Steyn could go on to become South Africa's answer to Mohsin Khan, the Pakistan opener who dabbled in Bollywood.

At least cricketers have the good grace to stick to their own sport when they get committed to celluloid. Lionel Messi last year appeared in an advert trying his hand at cricket with results that were both beguiling and ugly as he revealed a bowling action so angular even Marlon Samuels may have raised an eyebrow.

So, perhaps, as the football World Cup eats into the English cricketing summer, with all the mind-blunting razor commercials and brain-numbing post-match interviews that it will entail, we shouldn't be too harsh on cricketers' efforts when they get caught in the corporate or commentary box camera's gaze.

James Marsh writes Pavilion Opinions. He is also a Tefl teacher whose students learn superlatives by being shown Graham Thorpe videos

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • jackiethepen on May 16, 2014, 8:02 GMT

    You're right about the questions. They are not only bland but hopeless at finding out what cricketers think or feel. Would that be because they are usually delivered by ex-cricketers themselves? On field interviews are also the worst kind. The cricketer is exhausted. The interviewer feeds the questions like, "Are you upset you've not been putting the ball in the right areas?" "Or you must be pleased you are now back in form and contributing to the side." The best interviews are the ones away from the games where the cricketer has time to reflect. But still the questions have to be good ones. Off the wall questions seem to get better results. The Polite Enquiries videos by Dobell and Kimber are not only funny but allow the cricketer to relax. I thought the two Ian Bell ones showed a completely different side to his character. Droll, engaging.

  • on May 18, 2014, 7:41 GMT

    K XI Punjab wins this 2014 IPL cup - George Bailey & Co will celebrate with champagne on June 1st 2014

  • dunger.bob on May 16, 2014, 23:34 GMT

    Our (Aust) BBL commentators are all retired cricketers and it really annoys me when they so transparently talk up the game in progress. At the slightest pause in the on-field action one or more will break in and gush about how exciting the game is. It seems too be a contractual requirement and I think it sounds so phoney most of the time it's almost insulting. I feel as though I'm being conned by them in a very cynical, by the book way. .. Disappointing to say the least.

    This is where I reckon people like Dave Warner are an absolute god-send. He doesn't seem to care much for the boringly consistent language of sports-speak. Dave has the shocking but entertaining habit of actually telling the truth about what he thinks about a situation or opponent and while it usually ends in tears at least it's honest. .. Journo's must love interviewing him. He's sure to offend someone at some point.

  • on May 16, 2014, 20:28 GMT

    Who could forget this gem from David Willey?: "You hit a lot of sixes of Jade Dernbach, did you feel bad for him?" - "No, I can't stand the bloke, actually."

  • on May 16, 2014, 8:40 GMT

    Yes, polite enquiries is excellent. Think some ex-players offer insightful post-match questions such as Nasser and Atherton, but it's too often just by numbers blandness.

  • jackiethepen on May 16, 2014, 8:02 GMT

    You're right about the questions. They are not only bland but hopeless at finding out what cricketers think or feel. Would that be because they are usually delivered by ex-cricketers themselves? On field interviews are also the worst kind. The cricketer is exhausted. The interviewer feeds the questions like, "Are you upset you've not been putting the ball in the right areas?" "Or you must be pleased you are now back in form and contributing to the side." The best interviews are the ones away from the games where the cricketer has time to reflect. But still the questions have to be good ones. Off the wall questions seem to get better results. The Polite Enquiries videos by Dobell and Kimber are not only funny but allow the cricketer to relax. I thought the two Ian Bell ones showed a completely different side to his character. Droll, engaging.

  • on May 18, 2014, 7:41 GMT

    K XI Punjab wins this 2014 IPL cup - George Bailey & Co will celebrate with champagne on June 1st 2014

  • dunger.bob on May 16, 2014, 23:34 GMT

    Our (Aust) BBL commentators are all retired cricketers and it really annoys me when they so transparently talk up the game in progress. At the slightest pause in the on-field action one or more will break in and gush about how exciting the game is. It seems too be a contractual requirement and I think it sounds so phoney most of the time it's almost insulting. I feel as though I'm being conned by them in a very cynical, by the book way. .. Disappointing to say the least.

    This is where I reckon people like Dave Warner are an absolute god-send. He doesn't seem to care much for the boringly consistent language of sports-speak. Dave has the shocking but entertaining habit of actually telling the truth about what he thinks about a situation or opponent and while it usually ends in tears at least it's honest. .. Journo's must love interviewing him. He's sure to offend someone at some point.

  • on May 16, 2014, 20:28 GMT

    Who could forget this gem from David Willey?: "You hit a lot of sixes of Jade Dernbach, did you feel bad for him?" - "No, I can't stand the bloke, actually."

  • on May 16, 2014, 8:40 GMT

    Yes, polite enquiries is excellent. Think some ex-players offer insightful post-match questions such as Nasser and Atherton, but it's too often just by numbers blandness.

  • on May 16, 2014, 8:40 GMT

    Yes, polite enquiries is excellent. Think some ex-players offer insightful post-match questions such as Nasser and Atherton, but it's too often just by numbers blandness.

  • on May 16, 2014, 20:28 GMT

    Who could forget this gem from David Willey?: "You hit a lot of sixes of Jade Dernbach, did you feel bad for him?" - "No, I can't stand the bloke, actually."

  • dunger.bob on May 16, 2014, 23:34 GMT

    Our (Aust) BBL commentators are all retired cricketers and it really annoys me when they so transparently talk up the game in progress. At the slightest pause in the on-field action one or more will break in and gush about how exciting the game is. It seems too be a contractual requirement and I think it sounds so phoney most of the time it's almost insulting. I feel as though I'm being conned by them in a very cynical, by the book way. .. Disappointing to say the least.

    This is where I reckon people like Dave Warner are an absolute god-send. He doesn't seem to care much for the boringly consistent language of sports-speak. Dave has the shocking but entertaining habit of actually telling the truth about what he thinks about a situation or opponent and while it usually ends in tears at least it's honest. .. Journo's must love interviewing him. He's sure to offend someone at some point.

  • on May 18, 2014, 7:41 GMT

    K XI Punjab wins this 2014 IPL cup - George Bailey & Co will celebrate with champagne on June 1st 2014

  • jackiethepen on May 16, 2014, 8:02 GMT

    You're right about the questions. They are not only bland but hopeless at finding out what cricketers think or feel. Would that be because they are usually delivered by ex-cricketers themselves? On field interviews are also the worst kind. The cricketer is exhausted. The interviewer feeds the questions like, "Are you upset you've not been putting the ball in the right areas?" "Or you must be pleased you are now back in form and contributing to the side." The best interviews are the ones away from the games where the cricketer has time to reflect. But still the questions have to be good ones. Off the wall questions seem to get better results. The Polite Enquiries videos by Dobell and Kimber are not only funny but allow the cricketer to relax. I thought the two Ian Bell ones showed a completely different side to his character. Droll, engaging.