England news March 3, 2014

Flower to groom cricket's leaders


Andy Flower will remain part of England's coaching set-up after being appointed as technical director of elite coaching by the ECB with an accent on developing leadership skills and exploring technical innovation in coaching.

Flower stood down as England's team director after the whitewash in the Ashes series after discussions with the ECB's new MD of England cricket, Paul Downton, admitting that he did not feel the system of dual coaches for the Test and one-day formats was working.

From the outset, the ECB emphased that it was keen to retain his influence at a high level and negotiations over the scope of his new role have now been satisfactorily concluded. He will be based at the National Cricket Performance Centre at Loughborough.

The role is slightly more expansive than had initially been floated, if unofficially, with Flower mentoring England's leading coaches as well as creating a "leadership programme" designed to educate young England players about the qualities they need to undertake such a role.

There is a belief within the ECB, and also strongly held by Flower, that UK society does not automatically equip talented young people with necessary leadership skills. Flower is adamant that success at international level is dependent not just on ability but character and that England would benefit by both these aspects being consistently developed in young professionals throughout the county system.

Flower expressed delight at what he termed "a great opportunity". He said: "I am particularly excited about the chance to build and mould a leadership course which is not simply about captaincy but much more. This role offers me a chance to make a real contribution to the ability and character of England players and coaches in the years to come."

Downton also confirmed that Flower's responsibilities would also extend into researching best practice and innovation in coaching practice and technology throughout the ECB coaching set-up, an aspect of his role as team director in which he was particularly interested. If he comes into contact with county coaches and encourages consistent and ambitious standards of excellence across the 18 first-class counties, the ECB will judge the investment in his new role worthwhile.

"The role will also involve researching the World's Best Practice in Coaching and Performance, driving and implementing innovation in Coaching Practice and Technology, with and through the Fellowship of Elite Coaches and the National Cricket Performance Centre as well as recommending developments within ECB Coach Education and CPD Programmes," Downton said.

That presumably would leave the new England team director more time to remain at the coal face, committing his energies to specific tours, player relationships and assessments, motivation, and tactical planning. That has already been signalled by the ECB's decision to advertise for a head coach rather than a team director.

Downton said: "The ECB is delighted that we are able to retain a man of Andy Flower's experience and quality. His record over the last five years speaks for itself and the ECB and Andy are excited about the future.

"Not only will Andy work with both players and coaches but he will also look to enhance the relationship between the county coaches and the England set up. He will also work with Level 3 and 4 coaches in the ECB coaching structures.

"Andy will also build on the highly successful ECB Coach and Talent Development Programmes which have seen players such as Joe Root, Ben Stokes and Jos Buttler, to name a few, graduate to England senior teams as well as work with a number of coaches from first-class counties who have been involved with the England Lions.

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • ESPN on March 4, 2014, 23:59 GMT

    A great selection. He's the best coach England have ever had, good to keep contributing to our future success.

  • Cricinfouser on March 4, 2014, 23:26 GMT

    This man destroyed our cricket team and sacked our best player. You only have to look at the team in the WI's to see damage his coaching has done, especially to our younger players. It will take years to repair. Now they give him another position of influence and power - another ridiculous and crazy decision by the ECB.

  • stuart on March 4, 2014, 21:44 GMT

    Randy oz.the silence is broken. How come you only post or make noise when aid do well. Flower led England to a long period of success. Bear in mind most of aid success is due to over 30s. Then what happens

  • Steve on March 4, 2014, 20:21 GMT

    Insightful2013; at least cricinfo published you! I have fallen foul of the editor several times for flippancy in making an otherwise Imo valid point. For example on this blog I commented that I was afraid the power being given to Flower would remove individuality in players and coaches, citing examples such as McGrath's momentum losing arc into the stumps, Marshall's height and Warne's lifestyle. In the latter example I used a word obviously deemed unacceptable in referring to his 'body fat ratio ' , which I presume is why i was not published! Does feel ultra conservative, the moderating on cricinfo, putting me off commenting in future. Which is maybe a good thing for you readers!

  • Clifford on March 4, 2014, 18:01 GMT

    Cricinfo why do you frequently edit my posts. This is a public forum and I carefully consider my inclusions to incite response and to illuminate. With all due respect, my profession is far more severely regulated and scrutinized, therefore I have become accustomed to carefully consider every thing I write. I think that you underestimate yours readers and they should judge posts as they see fit.

  • Clifford on March 4, 2014, 17:37 GMT

    Well said RandyOZ. Too right 5wombats. So true Mr. Kumar. Solnan is also scarily right. People like KP, I know there'll be disagreements with this, are so bloody easy to manage. Massive ego with emotions at the surface. It just doesn't get easier. It just goes to show how incompetent the previous managers were. You include him in decisions, incorporate some of his suggestions but establish a democratic process through votes, so his ego doesn't get bruised. Stroke the ego and you would have had a world beater every time. He so badly wanted to do well!

  • ian on March 4, 2014, 15:15 GMT

    There seems to me to be a great deal of management-speak or jargon to cut through here. To me, jargon is a way of dressing up language so that only the initiated really understand what it means (but do they?); it's not designed to communicate to those outside the inner sanctum - their role (that's our role, of course) is to accept that it means something very clever (and implicitly, far too clever for us) to those that dreamed it up and allow them to get on with executing their subtly-worded articulations. So, what does 'mould a leadership course' mean, exactly? A mould has a specific meaning. Everything that is put into a mould should come out the same - otherwise it isn't a mould. Is that what we want from our captains - all moulded in the the Flower shape - instantly replacable one with the next - so that we can't spot the difference? God forbid! I could pick at other bits in this windy statement-of-intent. Excited? Me? No, just confused - and more than a little sceptical.

  • Robert on March 4, 2014, 13:39 GMT

    Flowers success as a coach was underpinned by the brilliance of KP. Without KP standing up to the opposition time and time again, turning around lost causes, he would have been sacked years ago.

  • Jason on March 4, 2014, 8:44 GMT

    @dreamliner, the problem is that players who have flair often cannot coach as they find it difficult to explain what they do. As for KP he shouldnt be anywhere near the england team ever again the guy is a complete liability, and has been for 4 years.

  • Martin on March 4, 2014, 5:09 GMT

    Is anyone else uneasy? Flower was effective for a while - but then we all saw what happened - stored stress. Over years his methods and those of the people around him "got into the heads" of the players - with ruinous consequences. It's hard to imagine that Flower will be able to let go of the the techniques that he feels work for him - even though the evidence now clearly is that these methods don't work, or at least don't work over a length of time. I can't help thinking that all that will happen is that Flower will get into the heads of the next generation of our leaders and instill that same defensive afraid to fail mentality. England's best ever leaders were risk takers who were not afraid to fail: Brearley, Illingworth, Jardine. You might say that they had the resources and would have won anyway. Debatable. Good captaincy/leadership is about understanding and managing the strengths and weaknesses of the opposition and getting into their heads. I sense Flower doesn't know this.

  • No featured comments at the moment.